1 |
♠K98
♥J9432
♦J2
♣K64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
210 5.00 0.00 2N S 5 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
180 4.00 1.00 1N S 4 3-Jones-Farnham vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
150 2.50 2.50 1N S 3 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
150 2.50 2.50 3♣ S 5 1-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
50 0.50 4.50 2N S -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 7-Cowan-Ash
50 0.50 4.50 2♥ N -1 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Parker-Robbins
|
2 |
♠Q73
♥KT6
♦QT542
♣T2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 1.00 3♣ E 6 3-Jones-Farnham vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
170 4.00 1.00 3♣ E 6 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Parker-Robbins
170 4.00 1.00 2♣ E 6 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
400 2.00 3.00 5♣ E 5 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
420 1.00 4.00 5♣ E 6 4-Graves-Graves vs 7-Cowan-Ash
460 0.00 5.00 3N E 5 1-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
|
3 |
♠KT764
♥A853
♦32
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Parker-Robbins
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 3-Jones-Farnham vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ E 3 4-Graves-Graves vs 7-Cowan-Ash
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ E 3 1-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
170 1.00 4.00 3♥ W 4 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
630 0.00 5.00 3N W 4 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
|
4 |
♠J96
♥A63
♦983
♣Q984
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 3-Jones-Farnham vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
170 4.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Parker-Robbins
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ S 3 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -1 1-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
100 0.50 4.50 3♠ S -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 7-Cowan-Ash
|
5 |
♠QJ843
♥Q9854
♦K3
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 5.00 0.00 4♠ S 6 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
650 2.00 3.00 5♠ S 5 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ S 5 1-Devault-Queen vs 7-Cowan-Ash
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ S 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Parker-Robbins
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ S 5 4-Graves-Graves vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ S 5 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
|
6 |
♠Q75
♥AKQ3
♦AKT
♣A52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5/4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 5.00 0.00 3N N 5 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
450 4.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 4-Graves-Graves vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
430 2.50 2.50 3N N 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Parker-Robbins
430 2.50 2.50 3N N 4 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
50 1.00 4.00 6♥ N -1 1-Devault-Queen vs 7-Cowan-Ash
300 0.00 5.00 6N* N -2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
7 |
♠KT42
♥KT
♦A94
♣QJ96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
100 4.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Parker-Robbins
90 3.00 2.00 1N S 1 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
80 2.00 3.00 1♠ W 1 1-Devault-Queen vs 7-Cowan-Ash
100 1.00 4.00 1N S -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
300 0.00 5.00 3♣ N -3 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
|
8 |
♠KT2
♥32
♦K632
♣J964
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 2/1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 2♦ S 3 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
100 4.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
50 3.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
50 1.50 3.50 3♦ S -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
50 1.50 3.50 2♦ S -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 2-Parker-Robbins
80 0.00 5.00 1♥ W 1 1-Devault-Queen vs 7-Cowan-Ash
|
9 |
♠K5
♥42
♦KQ952
♣A532
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ W 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Lusby-Back
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ W 4 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Parker-Robbins
170 3.50 1.50 2♠ W 4 1-Devault-Queen vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
170 3.50 1.50 2♠ W 4 3-Jones-Farnham vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
600 1.00 4.00 3N W 3 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
620 0.00 5.00 4♥ E 4 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 7-Cowan-Ash
|
10 |
♠A73
♥975
♦KQT
♣9874
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 1N N 3 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 7-Cowan-Ash
90 4.00 1.00 1N N 1 3-Jones-Farnham vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
PASS 2.50 2.50 Pass Out 1-Devault-Queen vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
PASS 2.50 2.50 Pass Out 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
100 0.50 4.50 1N N -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Lusby-Back
100 0.50 4.50 2♣ S -1 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Parker-Robbins
|
11 |
♠KQJ87
♥K
♦T864
♣742
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.50 0.50 1♣ E -1 3-Jones-Farnham vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
50 4.50 0.50 1♣ E -1 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
90 2.50 2.50 1N E 1 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 7-Cowan-Ash
90 2.50 2.50 1♣ E 2 1-Devault-Queen vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
100 1.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Lusby-Back
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ W 2 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Parker-Robbins
|
12 |
♠QT982
♥T64
♦7
♣KQ84
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 1-Devault-Queen vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
230 4.00 1.00 2♥ W 6 3-Jones-Farnham vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
240 3.00 2.00 2N W 6 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 7-Cowan-Ash
420 2.00 3.00 5♦ W 6 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 2-Parker-Robbins
480 0.50 4.50 4♥ E 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 1-Lusby-Back
480 0.50 4.50 4♥ E 6 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
|
13 |
♠AT94
♥964
♦KJ75
♣T4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Lusby-Back
140 4.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 4-Graves-Graves vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ N 2 1-Devault-Queen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ N 2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
100 0.50 4.50 3♠ N -1 3-Jones-Farnham vs 2-Parker-Robbins
100 0.50 4.50 2♠ N -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 7-Cowan-Ash
|
14 |
♠4
♥A63
♦T972
♣AQJ76
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ -/1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♠6/7 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.00 0.00 3♦ S 3 4-Graves-Graves vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
90 4.00 1.00 2♣ N 2 1-Devault-Queen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
PASS 3.00 2.00 Pass Out 3-Jones-Farnham vs 2-Parker-Robbins
50 2.00 3.00 2♣ N -1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 7-Cowan-Ash
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ E 2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
140 0.00 5.00 3♠ W 3 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Lusby-Back
|
15 |
♠AT2
♥AT52
♦-
♣QJ6432
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♥ ♦3/2 ♥7/5 ♠5 NT3/2 |
EW: 4♦ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 1-Devault-Queen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ W 4 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Lusby-Back
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ E 4 4-Graves-Graves vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
130 3.00 2.00 1♦ E 4 3-Jones-Farnham vs 2-Parker-Robbins
150 1.00 4.00 2♦ E 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 7-Cowan-Ash
210 0.00 5.00 2N E 5 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
|
16 |
♠9432
♥A7
♦AJ5
♣Q653
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 2N W -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
90 3.50 1.50 1N W 1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 7-Cowan-Ash
90 3.50 1.50 1N W 1 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
120 2.00 3.00 1N W 2 3-Jones-Farnham vs 2-Parker-Robbins
150 0.50 4.50 1N W 3 1-Devault-Queen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
150 0.50 4.50 1N W 3 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 1-Lusby-Back
|
17 |
♠K954
♥QT
♦Q8532
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 1.00 3♦ N 3 4-Graves-Graves vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
110 4.00 1.00 2♦ N 3 1-Devault-Queen vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
110 4.00 1.00 2♦ N 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
100 2.00 3.00 1N E -2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 2-Parker-Robbins
90 0.50 4.50 1N E 1 3-Jones-Farnham vs 1-Lusby-Back
90 0.50 4.50 1N E 1 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
18 |
♠AQ54
♥4
♦A953
♣Q864
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -4 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
100 3.50 1.50 3N W -2 4-Graves-Graves vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
100 3.50 1.50 4♦ E -2 3-Jones-Farnham vs 1-Lusby-Back
100 2.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 1-Devault-Queen vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
200 1.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 2-Parker-Robbins
400 0.00 5.00 3N N -4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
|
19 |
♠9843
♥AJ8
♦T5
♣AKQ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
80 5.00 0.00 1♠ E 1 1-Devault-Queen vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
110 4.00 1.00 1♠ E 2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 2-Parker-Robbins
140 3.00 2.00 1♠ E 3 3-Jones-Farnham vs 1-Lusby-Back
170 1.00 4.00 2♠ E 4 4-Graves-Graves vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
170 1.00 4.00 2♠ E 4 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
170 1.00 4.00 1♠ E 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
|
20 |
♠Q62
♥A32
♦JT5
♣KJ73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2/3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
90 4.00 1.00 2♣ E 2 3-Jones-Farnham vs 1-Lusby-Back
140 3.00 2.00 3♥ E 3 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 2-Parker-Robbins
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ W 4 1-Devault-Queen vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 4-Graves-Graves vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
650 0.00 5.00 4♥ E 5 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
|
21 |
♠K86
♥Q
♦A8
♣QJT8754
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.90 0.10 2♣ N 5 3-Jones-Farnham vs 7-Cowan-Ash
100 3.70 1.30 4♦ W -2 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
100 1.90 3.10 4♣ N -1 1-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
100 1.90 3.10 4♣ N -1 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
130 0.10 4.90 3♦ W 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|
22 |
♠J986
♥T
♦Q92
♣AKQT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 4.50 0.50 4♠ S 7 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
510 4.50 0.50 4♠ N 7 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
490 3.00 2.00 3N S 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
480 1.50 3.50 4♠ S 6 4-Graves-Graves vs 2-Parker-Robbins
480 1.50 3.50 4♠ N 6 1-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ N 4 3-Jones-Farnham vs 7-Cowan-Ash
|
23 |
♠K632
♥65
♦K732
♣T95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 5.00 0.00 2N S 2 3-Jones-Farnham vs 7-Cowan-Ash
110 3.50 1.50 2♠ N 2 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
110 3.50 1.50 1♠ N 2 1-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
90 1.50 3.50 1N S 1 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
90 1.50 3.50 1N S 1 4-Graves-Graves vs 2-Parker-Robbins
100 0.00 5.00 1N S -1 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
|
24 |
♠97542
♥K63
♦QJ
♣A94
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 2N E -3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
50 3.00 2.00 3N W -1 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
50 3.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 1-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
50 3.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 2-Parker-Robbins
80 1.00 4.00 1♠ W 1 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
110 0.00 5.00 1♠ W 2 3-Jones-Farnham vs 7-Cowan-Ash
|
25 |
♠AT743
♥KJT54
♦2
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N 3 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N 3 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 7-Cowan-Ash
100 3.00 2.00 1N W -1 3-Jones-Farnham vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
50 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 1-Lusby-Back
50 1.50 3.50 2♦ N -1 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
100 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -2 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
|
26 |
♠J6
♥AQJ3
♦KJ9
♣KJ76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦6/5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 5.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
200 4.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 7-Cowan-Ash
170 3.00 2.00 3♥ S 4 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
100 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 1-Lusby-Back
100 1.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
110 0.00 5.00 1♠ W 2 3-Jones-Farnham vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
|
27 |
♠KJT2
♥965
♦T3
♣KT52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 4-Graves-Graves vs 1-Lusby-Back
50 4.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
110 2.00 3.00 2♦ W 3 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
110 2.00 3.00 2♦ W 3 3-Jones-Farnham vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
110 2.00 3.00 2♦ W 3 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
150 0.00 5.00 2N W 3 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 7-Cowan-Ash
|
28 |
♠9653
♥92
♦T65
♣8643
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 5-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
110 4.00 1.00 2♥ E 2 4-Graves-Graves vs 1-Lusby-Back
140 3.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 3-Jones-Farnham vs 6-Delgado-Ladd
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 7-Murray-Saperstein vs 7-Cowan-Ash
480 0.50 4.50 4♠ W 6 2-Riggers-Riggers vs 4-Bowman-Rosendahl
480 0.50 4.50 4♠ W 6 6-Finkle-Johansen vs 5-Djavadi-Scanlin
|