1 |
♠74
♥J87
♦T743
♣AK74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 2-Cowan-Ash vs 4-Farnham-Jones
150 1.00 1.00 2♠ S -3 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
210 0.00 2.00 2N W 5 6-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
2 |
♠Q3
♥T9762
♦KQT974
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♠ 4NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 1♠ E 4 2-Cowan-Ash vs 4-Farnham-Jones
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 6-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
480 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 6 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
|
3 |
♠JT62
♥J5
♦7652
♣J52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ E 3 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ E 4 6-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 2-Cowan-Ash vs 4-Farnham-Jones
|
4 |
♠987
♥T
♦AQ862
♣T743
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4/3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 2-Cowan-Ash vs 4-Farnham-Jones
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
650 0.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 6-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
5 |
♠653
♥A75
♦KJ
♣AT972
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 6/5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 2.00 0.00 3N N 5 2-Cowan-Ash vs 4-Farnham-Jones
200 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 5 6-Shreves-Back vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
|
6 |
♠K92
♥AQJ87
♦87
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 4-Farnham-Jones
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 6-Shreves-Back vs 2-Cowan-Ash
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ N 5 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
7 |
♠KJ82
♥AK4
♦A2
♣A642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 1♠ N 4 6-Shreves-Back vs 2-Cowan-Ash
150 1.00 1.00 1N S 3 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
100 0.00 2.00 2N N -1 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 4-Farnham-Jones
|
8 |
♠JT9
♥AJ7
♦JT95
♣J87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ W 2 6-Shreves-Back vs 2-Cowan-Ash
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 4-Farnham-Jones
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ W 3 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
9 |
♠Q87
♥T63
♦2
♣JT8732
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦0 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 6-Shreves-Back vs 2-Cowan-Ash
200 1.50 0.50 5♦* E -1 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ E 4 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 4-Farnham-Jones
|
10 |
♠92
♥KT3
♦KT8752
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -3 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
200 1.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 6-Shreves-Back vs 2-Cowan-Ash
100 0.00 2.00 1N N -1 3-Baumann-Hodes vs 4-Farnham-Jones
|
11 |
♠T4
♥Q94
♦J964
♣KQ87
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ 4NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 6-Shreves-Back vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
400 1.00 1.00 3N E 3 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Cowan-Ash
430 0.00 2.00 3N E 4 4-Farnham-Jones vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
|
12 |
♠A873
♥A52
♦AK75
♣53
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ 1♠ ♦7/6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 1N N 1 6-Shreves-Back vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
100 0.50 1.50 1N S -1 4-Farnham-Jones vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
100 0.50 1.50 2♦ N -1 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Cowan-Ash
|
13 |
♠Q2
♥Q643
♦AQT62
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 6 6-Shreves-Back vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
690 1.00 1.00 3N E 6 4-Farnham-Jones vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
1470 0.00 2.00 6N E 7 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Cowan-Ash
|
14 |
♠84
♥T952
♦T875
♣752
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6/5♦ 4♥ 6/5♠ 6/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.50 0.50 3N S 3 4-Farnham-Jones vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
400 1.50 0.50 3N N 3 6-Shreves-Back vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
120 0.00 2.00 2N N 2 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Cowan-Ash
|
15 |
♠J42
♥KJ6
♦AQJ9
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ W 3 6-Shreves-Back vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
130 0.50 1.50 3♣ E 4 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 2-Cowan-Ash
130 0.50 1.50 2♣ W 4 4-Farnham-Jones vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
|
16 |
♠T9853
♥J
♦KQ92
♣J96
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2/3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ S 4 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 2-Cowan-Ash
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 4 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 4 6-Shreves-Back vs 4-Farnham-Jones
|
17 |
♠5
♥7
♦J843
♣AKQT732
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 5♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 6-Shreves-Back vs 4-Farnham-Jones
100 1.00 1.00 5♣ N -2 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 2-Cowan-Ash
150 0.00 2.00 5♣ N -3 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
|
18 |
♠43
♥A984
♦K52
♣Q543
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 1.50 0.50 Pass Out 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 2-Cowan-Ash
PASS 1.50 0.50 Pass Out 6-Shreves-Back vs 4-Farnham-Jones
150 0.00 2.00 1N W 3 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
|
19 |
♠A9
♥KT82
♦KT74
♣653
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 2-Cowan-Ash
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ S -1 6-Shreves-Back vs 4-Farnham-Jones
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -4 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
|
20 |
♠A7
♥T
♦Q732
♣AT9854
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♥ E 3 6-Shreves-Back vs 4-Farnham-Jones
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 4 1-Hargest-Cosgrove vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
650 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 5-O'Connell-Crawford vs 2-Cowan-Ash
|
21 |
♠A9
♥AKQJT3
♦AT76
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 2.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 2-Cowan-Ash vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 4-Farnham-Jones vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ W -2 6-Shreves-Back vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
|
22 |
♠Q97
♥QJ43
♦AJ3
♣Q83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ N 3 6-Shreves-Back vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Farnham-Jones vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
50 0.00 2.00 2♣ N -1 2-Cowan-Ash vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
|
23 |
♠AJ5
♥AKQ97
♦74
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 4 2-Cowan-Ash vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ N 4 4-Farnham-Jones vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
150 0.00 2.00 1N N 3 6-Shreves-Back vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
|
24 |
♠KT83
♥73
♦K743
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 3NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 1♥ E 4 6-Shreves-Back vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
200 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 5 2-Cowan-Ash vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 4-Farnham-Jones vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
|
25 |
♠AKQ5
♥K982
♦96
♣T73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 2.00 0.00 4♠* N 5 2-Cowan-Ash vs 3-Baumann-Hodes
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ S -2 4-Farnham-Jones vs 1-Hargest-Cosgrove
130 0.00 2.00 4♣ W 4 6-Shreves-Back vs 5-O'Connell-Crawford
|