1 |
♠86
♥9765
♦Q6432
♣98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 5-Nair-Carstens
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 2-Sells-Clancy
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 5 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 6 1-Shreves-Back vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
|
2 |
♠-
♥K9732
♦AJ976
♣Q32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 5-Nair-Carstens
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 2-Sells-Clancy
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E 3 1-Shreves-Back vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
|
3 |
♠AT8743
♥854
♦A52
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5/4NT ♣5/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 1-Shreves-Back vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ S 5 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 2-Sells-Clancy
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ S 4 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
4 |
♠A
♥62
♦KQ72
♣KQJ987
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥2/3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ W 4 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 2-Sells-Clancy
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 1-Shreves-Back vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
800 0.00 4.00 3♣* N -3 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
5 |
♠A9
♥AKQ
♦A863
♣A743
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.50 0.50 3N N 3 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
600 3.50 0.50 3N N 3 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 1-Shreves-Back vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 2-Sells-Clancy
200 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
6 |
♠AK7
♥K85
♦AQ96
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
430 3.00 1.00 3N N 4 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
400 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 2-Sells-Clancy
150 1.00 3.00 2N S 3 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 1-Shreves-Back vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
7 |
♠JT852
♥AKJT8
♦AT
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
500 2.00 2.00 2♥* N -2 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 2-Sells-Clancy
600 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
800 0.00 4.00 3♥* N -3 1-Shreves-Back vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
8 |
♠K9652
♥QJ
♦AKQT7
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ N 4 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 2-Sells-Clancy
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 1-Shreves-Back vs 5-Nair-Carstens
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
150 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -3 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
|
9 |
♠KT874
♥Q83
♦83
♣K86
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6/4 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 2-Sells-Clancy
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 1-Shreves-Back vs 5-Nair-Carstens
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
|
10 |
♠-
♥KJT852
♦KJ764
♣64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ 3♥ -/1NT ♣6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
EW: -/1♣ -/1♠ ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥3/4 ♠6/7 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ N 5 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 4 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 4 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ N 3 1-Shreves-Back vs 5-Nair-Carstens
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 2-Sells-Clancy
|
11 |
♠AK74
♥J9
♦K985
♣KJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 5 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
430 3.00 1.00 3N N 4 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 5-Nair-Carstens
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 1-Shreves-Back vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
400 1.00 3.00 3N N 3 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 2-Sells-Clancy
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ N 4 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
|
12 |
♠K3
♥AQ983
♦Q53
♣Q42
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 1N N 1 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 2-Sells-Clancy
100 2.50 1.50 1N N -1 1-Shreves-Back vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
100 2.50 1.50 1N N -1 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
200 1.00 3.00 1N N -2 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
300 0.00 4.00 1N N -3 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
13 |
♠K9742
♥KT95
♦Q862
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 1♠ N 4 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 2-Sells-Clancy
80 2.00 2.00 1♠ N 1 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 5-Nair-Carstens
120 1.00 3.00 1N E 2 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
150 0.00 4.00 1N E 3 1-Shreves-Back vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
|
14 |
♠Q8
♥AJT9864
♦653
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 2-Sells-Clancy
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
50 1.50 2.50 5♣ E -1 1-Shreves-Back vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
50 1.50 2.50 5♣ E -1 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 5-Nair-Carstens
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 3 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
|
15 |
♠KJ4
♥-
♦QJ832
♣AT643
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1/2NT ♣6/7 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
250 4.00 0.00 3N E -5 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 5-Nair-Carstens
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S 3 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 2-Sells-Clancy
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -2 1-Shreves-Back vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
|
16 |
♠AKQ6
♥92
♦K973
♣QT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.50 0.50 1N S 2 1-Shreves-Back vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
120 3.50 0.50 1N S 2 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
90 1.00 3.00 1N S 1 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 5-Nair-Carstens
90 1.00 3.00 1N S 1 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 2-Sells-Clancy
90 1.00 3.00 1N S 1 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
|
17 |
♠5
♥652
♦AQ632
♣JT97
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 2-Sells-Clancy
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S 3 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 1-Shreves-Back vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ W -2 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 5-Nair-Carstens
250 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -5 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
|
18 |
♠KQ5
♥-
♦AKQ9832
♣J83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 5♥ 4♠ ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 5♥ W -2 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
50 2.50 1.50 5♥ W -1 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 1-Shreves-Back vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 4 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 2-Sells-Clancy
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
19 |
♠J3
♥98765
♦7654
♣Q5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
240 4.00 0.00 2N W 6 1-Shreves-Back vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
600 3.00 1.00 3N W 3 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 2-Sells-Clancy
660 0.50 3.50 3N E 5 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
20 |
♠KQT5
♥9
♦AQ986
♣J42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♥ 4NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ W 5 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 2-Sells-Clancy
680 2.00 2.00 5♥ W 6 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 6 1-Shreves-Back vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 6 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
1430 0.00 4.00 6♥ W 6 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
21 |
♠J753
♥KJ7542
♦A
♣J8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦1 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 4.00 0.00 Pass Out 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 5-Nair-Carstens
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ E 3 1-Shreves-Back vs 2-Sells-Clancy
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ W 3 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
130 0.50 3.50 4♣ W 4 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ W 4 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
|
22 |
♠T5
♥KQ3
♦AKQT
♣K432
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 1♣ E -2 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ N 4 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ N 4 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ S 3 1-Shreves-Back vs 2-Sells-Clancy
870 0.00 4.00 2♥* W 3 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
23 |
♠JT4
♥AQ65
♦T95
♣K72
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 4/5♦ -/1♥ 1/2♠ -/1NT ♥5/7 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 3N W -2 1-Shreves-Back vs 2-Sells-Clancy
200 3.50 0.50 5♣ W -2 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ W 4 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 5-Nair-Carstens
150 1.00 3.00 3♣ W 5 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
170 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 6 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
|
24 |
♠AKQT
♥942
♦T3
♣9542
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/2♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♣4/8 ♦5/6 NT4/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ N 3 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
90 3.00 1.00 1N S 1 1-Shreves-Back vs 2-Sells-Clancy
50 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
70 1.00 3.00 1♦ E 1 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|
25 |
♠Q73
♥T7
♦KT94
♣QJ95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ W 4 1-Shreves-Back vs 2-Sells-Clancy
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ E 4 3-Pierce-Neuville vs 1-Murdoch-Pierce
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 2-Sperl-Higgins vs 4-Fordon-Kaas
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 4-Segal-Shapiro vs 3-O'Connell-Bender
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 5-Kristinsson-Osborne vs 5-Nair-Carstens
|