| 1 |
♠T3
♥KQ8643
♦A
♣KT75
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ W 3 3-Jones-Hughs vs 3-Young-Young
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ E 3 2-Hein-Klump vs 2-Conner-Hatch
150 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -3 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 1-Nagel-Devine
|
| 2 |
♠KJ652
♥AQT85
♦84
♣A
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
| EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 3-Jones-Hughs vs 3-Young-Young
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 2 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 1-Nagel-Devine
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 2-Hein-Klump vs 2-Conner-Hatch
|
| 3 |
♠Q53
♥QT94
♦52
♣AQ54
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 2-Hein-Klump vs 2-Conner-Hatch
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 3-Jones-Hughs vs 3-Young-Young
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 1-Nagel-Devine
|
| 4 |
♠9653
♥J6543
♦AK
♣J5
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♠ 3/2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 3 2-Hein-Klump vs 2-Conner-Hatch
170 1.00 1.00 1♠ E 4 3-Jones-Hughs vs 3-Young-Young
180 0.00 2.00 2N W 4 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 1-Nagel-Devine
|
| 5 |
♠AKJ87
♥653
♦T2
♣942
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2N W 3 3-Jones-Hughs vs 2-Conner-Hatch
170 1.00 1.00 1♥ E 4 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 3-Young-Young
180 0.00 2.00 1N E 4 2-Hein-Klump vs 1-Nagel-Devine
|
| 6 |
♠3
♥JT2
♦AKQ4
♣KJ972
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♦
♦6/7 ♥4 ♠5 NT4/5 |
| EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 1N N 2 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 3-Young-Young
110 1.00 1.00 2♣ N 3 3-Jones-Hughs vs 2-Conner-Hatch
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 3 2-Hein-Klump vs 1-Nagel-Devine
|
| 7 |
♠KT52
♥972
♦9
♣AQJ65
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5/4♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2/3NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
80 2.00 0.00 1♠ N 1 2-Hein-Klump vs 1-Nagel-Devine
100 0.50 1.50 3N S -1 3-Jones-Hughs vs 2-Conner-Hatch
100 0.50 1.50 2♦ S -1 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 3-Young-Young
|
| 8 |
♠J974
♥KQ3
♦A9872
♣J
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠6/5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 3-Young-Young
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ W 2 3-Jones-Hughs vs 2-Conner-Hatch
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ W 3 2-Hein-Klump vs 1-Nagel-Devine
|
| 9 |
♠-
♥QT8532
♦AQ52
♣AK2
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 1♥ N 3 2-Hein-Klump vs 3-Young-Young
100 1.00 1.00 1♠ W -1 3-Jones-Hughs vs 1-Nagel-Devine
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 2-Conner-Hatch
|
| 10 |
♠AT4
♥K7
♦AK98
♣AQJ5
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2/1♥ 2/1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♣ E -2 2-Hein-Klump vs 3-Young-Young
120 1.00 1.00 2N N 2 3-Jones-Hughs vs 1-Nagel-Devine
100 0.00 2.00 2N N -1 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 2-Conner-Hatch
|
| 11 |
♠K53
♥87
♦AQ6
♣AQJT8
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2/1♦ 2/3NT ♥5 ♠6/5 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ N 3 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 2-Conner-Hatch
90 1.00 1.00 1N N 1 2-Hein-Klump vs 3-Young-Young
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ W 2 3-Jones-Hughs vs 1-Nagel-Devine
|
| 12 |
♠AJT
♥J9542
♦KQT7
♣Q
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 3-Jones-Hughs vs 1-Nagel-Devine
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ W -1 2-Hein-Klump vs 3-Young-Young
100 0.00 2.00 3♣ S -1 1-O'Brien-Levinsky vs 2-Conner-Hatch
|