1 |
♠QT43
♥AK9
♦52
♣AJ85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5/6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♥8 3-Devault-Queen vs 2-Buri-Crawford
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♦6 1-Farnham-Ash vs 1-Lusby-Back
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♣4 2-Nudo-Parker vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ S 5 ♣3 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
2 |
♠T96432
♥KQ
♦QT86
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 ♦K 2-Nudo-Parker vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ E 4 ♠A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 1-Lusby-Back
130 1.50 1.50 2♣ E 4 ♦7 3-Devault-Queen vs 2-Buri-Crawford
150 0.00 3.00 4♣ E 5 ♥6 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
3 |
♠QT64
♥86
♦7654
♣K83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ S 3 ♣5 2-Nudo-Parker vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ E 3 ♣T 3-Devault-Queen vs 2-Buri-Crawford
300 1.00 2.00 5♦* S -2 ♠A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 1-Lusby-Back
850 0.00 3.00 5♥* E 5 ♥6 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
4 |
♠J98632
♥J84
♦3
♣QT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥6/5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2/3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ E 4 ♠A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
130 2.00 1.00 2♦ E 4 ♥A 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ W 4 ♦3 3-Devault-Queen vs 2-Buri-Crawford
150 0.00 3.00 2♦ E 5 ♥A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 1-Lusby-Back
|
5 |
♠QT872
♥-
♦J87
♣J8743
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ W 4 ♦J 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
200 2.00 1.00 4♠ N -2 ♥K 2-Nudo-Parker vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 ♦J 3-Devault-Queen vs 2-Buri-Crawford
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 ♦7 1-Farnham-Ash vs 1-Lusby-Back
|
6 |
♠AK98
♥K
♦KJ865
♣T42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♠7 1-Farnham-Ash vs 1-Lusby-Back
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 ♣7 2-Nudo-Parker vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
130 1.00 2.00 4♦ N 4 ♣5 3-Devault-Queen vs 2-Buri-Crawford
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♣A 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
7 |
♠K963
♥KQT973
♦QJ3
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 ♦T 3-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
620 2.50 0.50 4♥ N 4 ♦9 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 ♦T 1-Farnham-Ash vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ N 2 ♦T 2-Nudo-Parker vs 2-Buri-Crawford
|
8 |
♠Q876
♥KJ3
♦T654
♣85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♠A 3-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
150 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -3 ♦A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 2-Buri-Crawford
150 1.50 1.50 3♣ S 5 ♥6 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ E -2 ♣A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
9 |
♠AK652
♥AT4
♦J3
♣Q84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.50 0.50 3N N 6 ♥5 3-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
490 2.50 0.50 3N N 6 ♥5 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
460 1.00 2.00 3N N 5 ♥7 1-Farnham-Ash vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
150 0.00 3.00 2♦ S 5 ♥3 2-Nudo-Parker vs 2-Buri-Crawford
|
10 |
♠AKJ6
♥954
♦KJ9
♣K86
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 4/3♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♥3 3-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
600 2.00 1.00 3N S 3 ♦3 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
100 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♦3 2-Nudo-Parker vs 2-Buri-Crawford
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♥6 1-Farnham-Ash vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
11 |
♠93
♥T8764
♦T973
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 3/2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 6N E -1 ♠A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
400 2.00 1.00 3N W 3 ♦5 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
440 1.00 2.00 5♣ W 7 ♥4 3-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
460 0.00 3.00 3N E 5 ♠A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 2-Buri-Crawford
|
12 |
♠9
♥K8753
♦AKQ74
♣94
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 2-Buri-Crawford
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦A 3-Devault-Queen vs 1-Lusby-Back
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦A 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
|
13 |
♠96
♥T653
♦8643
♣T92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N E 2 ♣8 1-Farnham-Ash vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
660 2.00 1.00 3N E 5 ♣A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 1-Lusby-Back
690 1.00 2.00 3N E 6 ♣8 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Buri-Crawford
720 0.00 3.00 3N E 7 ♣8 3-Devault-Queen vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
14 |
♠K8632
♥Q973
♦A5
♣Q6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 1N* W -3 ♣Q 1-Farnham-Ash vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 ♦A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 1-Lusby-Back
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 ♦A 3-Devault-Queen vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
50 0.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 ♥A 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Buri-Crawford
|
15 |
♠AQ43
♥KJ
♦KJ98
♣K43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 2♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♥T 2-Nudo-Parker vs 1-Lusby-Back
660 2.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♥9 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Buri-Crawford
630 1.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♣2 1-Farnham-Ash vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
100 0.00 3.00 6N N -1 ♥T 3-Devault-Queen vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
16 |
♠AQ843
♥4
♦7543
♣953
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥0 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ W 5 ♠A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 1-Lusby-Back
680 1.50 1.50 5♥ W 6 ♦5 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Buri-Crawford
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ W 6 ♦3 3-Devault-Queen vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
710 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 7 ♥4 1-Farnham-Ash vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
|
17 |
♠T87
♥76
♦AKJ52
♣AK8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♦7 2-Nudo-Parker vs 1-Lusby-Back
50 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♦5 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Buri-Crawford
50 1.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♥A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
140 0.00 3.00 1♠ E 3 ♦7 3-Devault-Queen vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
18 |
♠K4
♥AJ976
♦AK
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 ♦4 1-Farnham-Ash vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 ♠A 3-Devault-Queen vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 ♣T 2-Nudo-Parker vs 1-Lusby-Back
600 0.00 3.00 3N N 3 ♠A 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 2-Buri-Crawford
|
19 |
♠AJ96
♥KQT3
♦J9
♣A94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 1♠ N 2 ♥5 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
50 1.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♦A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 2-Buri-Crawford
50 1.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♦6 3-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
50 1.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♣5 2-Nudo-Parker vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
20 |
♠KQT
♥A54
♦T432
♣Q75
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.50 0.50 2N N 4 ♣9 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
180 2.50 0.50 1N N 4 ♣A 1-Farnham-Ash vs 2-Buri-Crawford
120 1.00 2.00 1N N 2 ♦7 3-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ E 3 ♦A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
21 |
♠K74
♥9765
♦Q7
♣Q752
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ S 4 ♥6 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♣T 1-Farnham-Ash vs 2-Buri-Crawford
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♣T 3-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
300 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -3 ♦A 2-Nudo-Parker vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
22 |
♠JT9764
♥QT9
♦3
♣Q74
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.50 0.50 3N E 3 ♦5 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
600 2.50 0.50 3N E 3 ♦4 3-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
630 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♦4 1-Farnham-Ash vs 2-Buri-Crawford
630 0.50 2.50 3N E 4 ♦4 2-Nudo-Parker vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|
23 |
♠AT765
♥T6
♦52
♣9874
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4/3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4/3 |
EW: 2/1♣ 3♦ 3/2♥ 1/-♠ 3/2NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1♦ W 2 ♥9 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ W 2 ♣9 1-Farnham-Ash vs 2-Buri-Crawford
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ W 4 ♣9 2-Nudo-Parker vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ W 3 ♠A 3-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
|
24 |
♠4
♥KJT2
♦QJ83
♣AK95
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ N 4 ♠7 4-Burchfield-Burchfield vs 1-Lusby-Back
130 2.50 0.50 2♣ N 4 ♦A 3-Devault-Queen vs 3-Greenberg-Nadell
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ N 2 ♠7 1-Farnham-Ash vs 2-Buri-Crawford
110 0.00 3.00 1♠ W 2 ♣K 2-Nudo-Parker vs 4-Fordon-Scanlin
|