1 |
♠T97
♥A84
♦83
♣AK954
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6/5♦ 2/1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.50 0.50 3♦ S 6 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
170 2.50 0.50 2♦ S 6 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
150 1.00 2.00 3♠ E -3 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 1-Landau-Ahern
50 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
|
2 |
♠9742
♥T762
♦A2
♣542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 1♠ S -1 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
100 2.50 0.50 1♠ S -1 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
120 1.00 2.00 2N E 2 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 1-Landau-Ahern
500 0.00 3.00 2♥* N -2 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
|
3 |
♠T6
♥AKT52
♦93
♣8752
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 0.00 4♦ S 4 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 1-Landau-Ahern
150 2.00 1.00 5♣ S -3 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ W 4 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
790 0.00 3.00 4♠* W 4 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
|
4 |
♠AKT76
♥JT75
♦K
♣Q76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT6/5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 1-Landau-Ahern
150 1.50 1.50 4♦ E 5 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
150 1.50 1.50 3♦ E 5 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -2 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
|
5 |
♠64
♥AJ8
♦Q73
♣K9874
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2♣ W -2 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
90 2.00 1.00 1N W 1 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
100 1.00 2.00 2N N -1 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
170 0.00 3.00 1♠ E 4 5-Corbett-Hawkins vs 1-Landau-Ahern
|
6 |
♠AJ7
♥Q5
♦AJ73
♣AK52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1010 3.00 0.00 6♥ S 7 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
510 1.00 2.00 5♥ S 7 5-Corbett-Hawkins vs 1-Landau-Ahern
510 1.00 2.00 4♥ S 7 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
510 1.00 2.00 4♥ N 7 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
|
7 |
♠Q85
♥Q93
♦J6
♣KJT87
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♠ E 5 5-Corbett-Hawkins vs 1-Landau-Ahern
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ W 5 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
|
8 |
♠J6
♥KJ96
♦87654
♣64
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6/5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 3.00 0.00 6N* W -4 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 5-Corbett-Hawkins vs 1-Landau-Ahern
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
|
9 |
♠AT76
♥AKQ5
♦76
♣653
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5/6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
90 1.50 1.50 1N S 1 6-Nachman-Nachman vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
90 1.50 1.50 1N S 1 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 1-Landau-Ahern
80 0.00 3.00 1♥ N 1 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
|
10 |
♠K8732
♥Q6
♦9754
♣83
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦2/3 ♠4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.00 0.00 3N S 3 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 1-Landau-Ahern
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ S 3 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 6-Nachman-Nachman vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
|
11 |
♠63
♥72
♦Q976
♣T6542
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 6♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ W 3 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ W 4 6-Nachman-Nachman vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 1-Landau-Ahern
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
|
12 |
♠AQ7432
♥53
♦KQ6
♣Q5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ N 4 6-Nachman-Nachman vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 7-Clifton-Clifton vs 1-Landau-Ahern
|
13 |
♠AT5
♥AKT82
♦93
♣762
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
80 2.00 1.00 1♠ S 1 1-Landau-Ahern vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
100 0.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
100 0.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 5-Corbett-Hawkins vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
|
14 |
♠T987
♥A872
♦KJ8
♣K9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
150 2.00 1.00 2♦ E 5 1-Landau-Ahern vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
170 0.50 2.50 4♦ E 6 5-Corbett-Hawkins vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
170 0.50 2.50 4♦ E 6 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
|
15 |
♠Q643
♥A9
♦43
♣KQ932
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 1♠ N -1 5-Corbett-Hawkins vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 4 1-Landau-Ahern vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ W 4 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
|
16 |
♠QJT864
♥74
♦K4
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.50 0.50 2♠ N 2 1-Landau-Ahern vs 3-Corbin-Ransom
110 2.50 0.50 2♠ N 2 5-Corbett-Hawkins vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
50 0.50 2.50 2♦ S -1 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
|
17 |
♠T84
♥J943
♦J7
♣K643
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2/1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.00 0.00 3N W 4 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
460 1.50 1.50 3N W 5 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
460 1.50 1.50 3N E 5 6-Nachman-Nachman vs 1-Landau-Ahern
490 0.00 3.00 3N W 6 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
|
18 |
♠942
♥Q2
♦A95
♣QT963
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ -/1♦ 4♠ 2NT ♦6/7 ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 3.00 0.00 3N N 3 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 6-Nachman-Nachman vs 1-Landau-Ahern
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
|
19 |
♠T98643
♥AQJ
♦K4
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 5/4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
150 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -3 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
150 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -3 6-Nachman-Nachman vs 1-Landau-Ahern
150 1.00 2.00 4♣ E 5 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
|
20 |
♠KT7
♥53
♦AKQ3
♣AK83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
500 2.00 1.00 5♥* W -2 2-Anikovich-Glazer vs 4-Sweetwood-Baranski
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
400 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -4 6-Nachman-Nachman vs 1-Landau-Ahern
|
21 |
♠Q52
♥T4
♦AT92
♣QJ83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
50 2.00 1.00 3N E -1 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
400 0.50 2.50 3N W 3 1-Landau-Ahern vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
400 0.50 2.50 3N E 3 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
|
22 |
♠T974
♥K
♦AJ64
♣Q642
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ S 4 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
170 1.50 1.50 2♥ S 4 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ S 3 1-Landau-Ahern vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
|
23 |
♠7532
♥A
♦J862
♣A762
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.50 0.50 2♠ E 2 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
110 2.50 0.50 2♠ E 2 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ W 4 1-Landau-Ahern vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
|
24 |
♠K7
♥KJT3
♦AJ5
♣JT93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 3N N 3 4-Sweetwood-Baranski vs 7-Clifton-Clifton
150 1.50 1.50 2N N 3 1-Landau-Ahern vs 2-Anikovich-Glazer
150 1.50 1.50 2N N 3 8-Humphreys-Tracey vs 6-Nachman-Nachman
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ S 3 3-Corbin-Ransom vs 5-Corbett-Hawkins
|