1 |
♠8
♥QT95
♦A75
♣QJT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KT97
♥8763
♦984
♣K7
|
♠Q652
♥KJ42
♦J
♣A943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 6.50 0.50 6♣ E 7 11-Strickland-Singer vs 11-Read-Bursey
460 6.50 0.50 5♣ E 7 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
420 5.00 2.00 3N E 5 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
150 4.00 3.00 5♣ E 7 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
130 2.50 4.50 3N E 5 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
130 2.50 4.50 5♣ E 7 10-Long-Long vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
110 0.50 6.50 3N E 6 6-Urben-Heeter vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
110 0.50 6.50 5♣ E 7 8-Harris-Brock vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
|
2 |
♠KQ84
♥K73
♦KT875
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠96
♥Q642
♦AQ6
♣Q754
|
♠AJ7
♥AJ98
♦94
♣KJ92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2/3NT ♦6 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
100 5.50 1.50 2♠ S 4 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
100 5.50 1.50 2♠ S 2 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
140 2.50 4.50 1N N -1 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
140 2.50 4.50 3♠ S 3 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
140 2.50 4.50 2♠ S 4 6-Urben-Heeter vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
140 2.50 4.50 2♠ S 3 10-Long-Long vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
200 0.00 7.00 2♠ S 4 11-Strickland-Singer vs 11-Read-Bursey
|
3 |
♠AJ6
♥AQ4
♦Q982
♣A43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠-
♥J97632
♦T4
♣Q8652
|
♠T543
♥8
♦AK7653
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1000 7.00 0.00 6♥ W 7 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
480 6.00 1.00 6♥ W 6 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
450 3.00 4.00 6♥ W 6 6-Urben-Heeter vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
450 3.00 4.00 6♥ W 6 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
450 3.00 4.00 6♥ W 6 11-Strickland-Singer vs 11-Read-Bursey
450 3.00 4.00 4♥ W 7 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
450 3.00 4.00 10-Long-Long vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
420 0.00 7.00 6♥ W -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
|
4 |
♠A75
♥AQJT8
♦QT4
♣Q3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT986
♥K3
♦K87
♣J74
|
♠K42
♥7652
♦A2
♣A985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 7.00 0.00 3♦ N -1 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
110 5.50 1.50 3♦ N 3 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
110 5.50 1.50 10-Long-Long vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
100 4.00 3.00 3♦ N -1 11-Strickland-Singer vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
90 3.00 4.00 3♣ E 6 6-Urben-Heeter vs 11-Read-Bursey
140 1.50 5.50 4♠ W 5 12-Urben-Comstock vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
140 1.50 5.50 3♦ N 3 8-Harris-Brock vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
200 0.00 7.00 4♦ N -2 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
|
5 |
♠AJT
♥8543
♦K753
♣T8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠865
♥AJ7
♦96
♣AQJ63
|
♠Q9743
♥K62
♦QT42
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♦ 2/1♠ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 7.00 0.00 2♣ S 2 11-Strickland-Singer vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
90 6.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
50 5.00 2.00 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
100 3.00 4.00 3N S -2 6-Urben-Heeter vs 11-Read-Bursey
100 3.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
100 3.00 4.00 2♣ S -2 12-Urben-Comstock vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
110 1.00 6.00 2♠ N -2 10-Long-Long vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
200 0.00 7.00 2♠ N -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
|
6 |
♠AQ43
♥86
♦T74
♣T542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J975
♥752
♦J853
♣87
|
♠62
♥AKQT43
♦Q962
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 6.50 0.50 2♠ E -2 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
400 6.50 0.50 3♥ N 4 8-Harris-Brock vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
150 3.00 4.00 3♥ S -3 12-Urben-Comstock vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
150 3.00 4.00 3♥ N 4 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
150 3.00 4.00 4♦ W 4 10-Long-Long vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
150 3.00 4.00 4♣ N 5 11-Strickland-Singer vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
150 3.00 4.00 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
130 0.00 7.00 2♣ N 4 6-Urben-Heeter vs 11-Read-Bursey
|
7 |
♠KT64
♥T8642
♦T94
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠8
♥KQ9
♦Q8632
♣AQT2
|
♠972
♥73
♦J75
♣K8654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 7.00 0.00 3♦ E 3 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
620 5.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
620 5.50 1.50 3♦ E 3 11-Strickland-Singer vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
200 3.50 3.50 2♠ N 2 8-Harris-Brock vs 2-Anderson-Converse
200 3.50 3.50 3♦ E 4 12-Urben-Comstock vs 11-Read-Bursey
170 1.50 5.50 3♦ E 4 1-Price-Price vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
170 1.50 5.50 3♦ E 5 6-Urben-Heeter vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
140 0.00 7.00 2♦ E 4 10-Long-Long vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
|
8 |
♠Q43
♥QJ753
♦84
♣AK6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠A862
♥-
♦QT753
♣9753
|
♠KJ97
♥AK6
♦A962
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 7.00 0.00 2♥ E 2 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
140 6.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 6-Urben-Heeter vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
110 5.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 1-Price-Price vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
50 4.00 3.00 4♥ W -3 11-Strickland-Singer vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
100 3.00 4.00 2♥ E -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 2-Anderson-Converse
110 2.00 5.00 2N E -1 12-Urben-Comstock vs 11-Read-Bursey
300 1.00 6.00 2♠ E 3 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
420 0.00 7.00 2N E 2 10-Long-Long vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
|
9 |
♠83
♥KJ52
♦J83
♣QT43
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K9542
♥T84
♦Q54
♣75
|
♠QT76
♥Q7
♦KT97
♣AK6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 7.00 0.00 4♠ S -1 11-Strickland-Singer vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
50 6.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
100 4.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 1-Price-Price vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
100 4.50 2.50 6-Urben-Heeter vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
140 1.50 5.50 4♠ S -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 2-Anderson-Converse
140 1.50 5.50 3♠ S 4 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
140 1.50 5.50 2♠ S 3 10-Long-Long vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
140 1.50 5.50 12-Urben-Comstock vs 11-Read-Bursey
|
10 |
♠J973
♥64
♦A76
♣AJT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠-
♥AQJ93
♦K5432
♣652
|
♠K8542
♥KT75
♦QT
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.00 0.00 2♠ E 2 11-Strickland-Singer vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
100 6.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 11-Read-Bursey
170 4.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 2-Anderson-Converse
170 4.00 3.00 3♣ N -1 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
170 4.00 3.00 12-Urben-Comstock vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
620 1.00 6.00 2♠ E 2 1-Price-Price vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
620 1.00 6.00 2♠ E -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
620 1.00 6.00 2♠ E 2 10-Long-Long vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
|
11 |
♠KQJ32
♥AJ2
♦KJ
♣Q64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠6
♥QT9763
♦652
♣J93
|
♠A7
♥854
♦QT743
♣852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 6.50 0.50 3N E 5 1-Price-Price vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
980 6.50 0.50 2♥ E 2 12-Urben-Comstock vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
480 2.50 4.50 3N E 3 10-Long-Long vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
480 2.50 4.50 6♦ W -2 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 2-Anderson-Converse
480 2.50 4.50 5♦ W -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
480 2.50 4.50 3♦ W 4 11-Strickland-Singer vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
480 2.50 4.50 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 11-Read-Bursey
480 2.50 4.50 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
|
12 |
♠Q73
♥853
♦K95
♣AQ53
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T8642
♥KQJ
♦JT
♣J76
|
♠-
♥642
♦Q7632
♣KT942
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 7.00 0.00 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
170 6.00 1.00 3N N -2 12-Urben-Comstock vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
110 5.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 2-Anderson-Converse
100 2.50 4.50 3♠ E -1 1-Price-Price vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
100 2.50 4.50 5♣ N -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
100 2.50 4.50 4♣ N 4 10-Long-Long vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
100 2.50 4.50 3♣ N 5 11-Strickland-Singer vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
500 0.00 7.00 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 11-Read-Bursey
|
13 |
♠A73
♥AJT5
♦Q9
♣9653
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠8
♥2
♦KJ8532
♣AJT42
|
♠QJ952
♥K983
♦7
♣K87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1/2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.00 1.00 3♥ E 5 1-Price-Price vs 11-Read-Bursey
200 6.00 1.00 5♦ E 5 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 2-Anderson-Converse
200 6.00 1.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
100 3.50 3.50 5♥ E -2 11-Strickland-Singer vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
100 3.50 3.50 4♦ E 4 10-Long-Long vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
PASS 2.00 5.00 3♦ E 6 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
110 1.00 6.00 3♦ E 6 12-Urben-Comstock vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
200 0.00 7.00 3♦ E 3 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
|
14 |
♠843
♥T86
♦K32
♣QJT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠72
♥975
♦QJT64
♣A52
|
♠AKQJ
♥AQJ43
♦A85
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1/0 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.50 0.50 1N W -1 11-Strickland-Singer vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
50 6.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 12-Urben-Comstock vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
450 4.00 3.00 2N W 2 1-Price-Price vs 11-Read-Bursey
450 4.00 3.00 1♠ W -1 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
450 4.00 3.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
480 2.00 5.00 2N E -2 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 2-Anderson-Converse
980 0.50 6.50 2N W -2 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
980 0.50 6.50 2N W -1 10-Long-Long vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
|
15 |
♠J976
♥A2
♦75
♣KJ654
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT53
♥T83
♦J32
♣872
|
♠842
♥Q9754
♦K
♣AQT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♠ 3/2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 7.00 0.00 4♥ W 5 1-Price-Price vs 11-Read-Bursey
130 5.00 2.00 1♥ W 4 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
130 5.00 2.00 1♥ W 4 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
130 5.00 2.00 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 2-Anderson-Converse
100 2.00 5.00 2♥ W 5 10-Long-Long vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
100 2.00 5.00 2♥ W 4 11-Strickland-Singer vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
100 2.00 5.00 1♦ S 1 12-Urben-Comstock vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
200 0.00 7.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
|
16 |
♠63
♥J3
♦A654
♣T9752
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJ952
♥85
♦QT98
♣84
|
♠AKT87
♥AKQT9
♦2
♣63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.00 0.00 1N N -5 10-Long-Long vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
620 4.00 3.00 3N S -1 1-Price-Price vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
620 4.00 3.00 3N S -1 11-Strickland-Singer vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
620 4.00 3.00 3N S -2 12-Urben-Comstock vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
620 4.00 3.00 2N N 3 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
620 4.00 3.00 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
650 0.50 6.50 3N S -1 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
650 0.50 6.50 3N N 4 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 2-Anderson-Converse
|
17 |
♠AQJ9763
♥62
♦763
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K
♥98753
♦AQ952
♣Q2
|
♠52
♥AQJT4
♦84
♣A963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥1 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 6.50 0.50 10-Long-Long vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
140 6.50 0.50 11-Strickland-Singer vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
50 4.00 3.00 2N S 2 1-Price-Price vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
50 4.00 3.00 2N S -1 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
50 4.00 3.00 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
100 2.00 5.00 1N N 3 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 2-Anderson-Converse
420 0.50 6.50 2N S 2 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
420 0.50 6.50 2N S -1 12-Urben-Comstock vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
|
18 |
♠AJ4
♥QJ42
♦KQJ5
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ853
♥86
♦82
♣AKQJ
|
♠-
♥AT95
♦974
♣T97643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 7.00 0.00 11-Strickland-Singer vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
110 5.50 1.50 2N N -1 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
110 5.50 1.50 2♥ E -2 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 2-Anderson-Converse
100 3.00 4.00 2N N -2 12-Urben-Comstock vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
100 3.00 4.00 1♠ N 2 1-Price-Price vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
100 3.00 4.00 10-Long-Long vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
90 1.00 6.00 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
130 0.00 7.00 3♣ N -2 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
|
19 |
♠AJT63
♥A5
♦Q72
♣965
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K98
♥KQ76
♦-
♣KQJ832
|
♠Q752
♥92
♦T86543
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4/5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.00 0.00 4♥ W 4 1-Price-Price vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
140 6.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
50 4.50 2.50 3♠ S 3 12-Urben-Comstock vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
50 4.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
150 2.00 5.00 4♥ W -1 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 11-Read-Bursey
150 2.00 5.00 10-Long-Long vs 2-Anderson-Converse
150 2.00 5.00 11-Strickland-Singer vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
200 0.00 7.00 4♠ S -1 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
|
20 |
♠AJT85
♥62
♦A932
♣94
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K943
♥A3
♦K874
♣K75
|
♠2
♥KJ954
♦J5
♣AJT83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1/2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 6.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
300 6.00 1.00 3♣ W 4 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
300 6.00 1.00 11-Strickland-Singer vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
200 3.00 4.00 3N W 4 12-Urben-Comstock vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
200 3.00 4.00 2♣ W 4 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 11-Read-Bursey
200 3.00 4.00 2♣ W 5 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
100 1.00 6.00 2♣ W 4 1-Price-Price vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
210 0.00 7.00 10-Long-Long vs 2-Anderson-Converse
|
21 |
♠K52
♥9632
♦K84
♣763
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT4
♥KT874
♦JT
♣J92
|
♠A63
♥AQ
♦763
♣AKQ85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 7.00 0.00 2♥ E 3 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
120 6.00 1.00 2♦ W 3 1-Price-Price vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
130 4.00 3.00 3N E -2 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 11-Read-Bursey
130 4.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
130 4.00 3.00 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
150 1.50 5.50 4♥ E -4 10-Long-Long vs 2-Anderson-Converse
150 1.50 5.50 11-Strickland-Singer vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
520 0.00 7.00 12-Urben-Comstock vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
|
22 |
♠K762
♥K63
♦985
♣986
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJ98
♥Q984
♦AKT2
♣3
|
♠5
♥T72
♦J763
♣AT754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♣7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 6.50 0.50 2♦ W 3 1-Price-Price vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
110 6.50 0.50 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
90 5.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 2-Anderson-Converse
50 2.50 4.50 2♠ E 2 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
50 2.50 4.50 2♠ E -1 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
50 2.50 4.50 Pass Out 6-Urben-Heeter vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
50 2.50 4.50 12-Urben-Comstock vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
90 0.00 7.00 11-Strickland-Singer vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
|
23 |
♠QJ9
♥AQ63
♦QT942
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A42
♥KJ75
♦KJ3
♣Q94
|
♠KT85
♥9
♦A76
♣AKT52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 7.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 1-Price-Price vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
200 6.00 1.00 2♣ N 5 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 2-Anderson-Converse
140 5.00 2.00 3♠* E -3 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
170 3.50 3.50 3N S 3 11-Strickland-Singer vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
170 3.50 3.50 5♣ N 5 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
600 2.00 5.00 3N S 5 6-Urben-Heeter vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
620 1.00 6.00 12-Urben-Comstock vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
660 0.00 7.00 3N S 3 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
|
24 |
♠J432
♥A5
♦8732
♣984
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠6
♥QJ932
♦J96
♣A653
|
♠KT98
♥T8
♦AKQT
♣Q72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2/1♦ 2/1♥ 2/1NT ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.00 0.00 1N N 2 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
100 6.00 1.00 12-Urben-Comstock vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
80 5.00 2.00 1N E 1 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
90 4.00 3.00 Pass Out 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
100 2.50 4.50 2♠ S 2 11-Strickland-Singer vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
100 2.50 4.50 1♠ S 1 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 2-Anderson-Converse
120 1.00 6.00 2♠ S -1 6-Urben-Heeter vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
150 0.00 7.00 Pass Out 1-Price-Price vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
|
25 |
♠AQ854
♥62
♦AK
♣AT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠2
♥A987
♦QJ764
♣KQ9
|
♠K97
♥KQJ4
♦92
♣J743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.00 0.00 2♦ W 3 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 11-Read-Bursey
90 6.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 6-Urben-Heeter vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
50 4.50 2.50 2♦ W 4 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
50 4.50 2.50 2♦ W 4 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
100 3.00 4.00 3♦ W 4 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
140 1.00 6.00 3♠ N 3 12-Urben-Comstock vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
140 1.00 6.00 4♥* E 4 1-Price-Price vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
140 1.00 6.00 4♦ W -1 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
|
26 |
♠843
♥KQT3
♦KT6
♣K85
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T62
♥976
♦54
♣QJ974
|
♠AK7
♥84
♦AJ9832
♣T6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 7.00 0.00 3♠ S -3 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
170 4.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
170 4.00 3.00 4♥ W -1 6-Urben-Heeter vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
170 4.00 3.00 4♥ E -2 1-Price-Price vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
170 4.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
170 4.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 11-Read-Bursey
140 1.00 6.00 4♦ S -2 12-Urben-Comstock vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
100 0.00 7.00 2♦ S 3 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
|
27 |
♠KT9632
♥Q864
♦-
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠Q
♥T532
♦QT96
♣KT62
|
♠J7
♥J
♦AJ8732
♣Q953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 6♠ 5NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 7.00 0.00 2N N -1 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 11-Read-Bursey
480 5.00 2.00 3N N -2 6-Urben-Heeter vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
480 5.00 2.00 3N N -2 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
480 5.00 2.00 2♦ N 2 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
450 1.50 5.50 2N S 2 12-Urben-Comstock vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
450 1.50 5.50 3♦ N -1 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
450 1.50 5.50 1-Price-Price vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
450 1.50 5.50 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
|
28 |
♠Q83
♥Q65
♦KJT9
♣T83
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K4
♥KJ9
♦75432
♣Q65
|
♠92
♥AT74
♦AQ6
♣KJ94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 6.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
110 6.50 0.50 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 2-Anderson-Converse
50 5.00 2.00 3♠ W 4 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
100 4.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 6-Urben-Heeter vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
110 2.00 5.00 4♠ W 5 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
110 2.00 5.00 4♠ W -1 8-Harris-Brock vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
110 2.00 5.00 1-Price-Price vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
120 0.00 7.00 4♠ W -1 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
|
29 |
♠KQ
♥KT7
♦KT732
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠9754
♥QJ6
♦95
♣J982
|
♠JT8
♥A98432
♦Q6
♣T6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 2♥ 5♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
720 6.50 0.50 1-Price-Price vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
720 6.50 0.50 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
690 4.50 2.50 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
690 4.50 2.50 6-Urben-Heeter vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
660 2.00 5.00 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
660 2.00 5.00 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 2-Anderson-Converse
660 2.00 5.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
600 0.00 7.00 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
|
30 |
♠KT62
♥A875
♦96
♣632
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠97
♥JT62
♦JT74
♣T74
|
♠AJ843
♥K3
♦AKQ
♣KQJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.00 0.00 6-Urben-Heeter vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
100 6.00 1.00 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 12-Kolls-McAniff
50 4.50 2.50 1-Price-Price vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
50 4.50 2.50 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
110 2.00 5.00 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
110 2.00 5.00 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 2-Anderson-Converse
110 2.00 5.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
150 0.00 7.00 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
|
31 |
♠KQ8743
♥5
♦KQ52
♣92
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T62
♥A4
♦943
♣KQJ76
|
♠95
♥KQ3
♦AJT876
♣T4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5/4 ♠4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 6.50 0.50 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
620 6.50 0.50 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
170 5.00 2.00 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
100 4.00 3.00 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
50 3.00 4.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
100 1.50 5.50 6-Urben-Heeter vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
100 1.50 5.50 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
200 0.00 7.00 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
|
32 |
♠A6
♥852
♦Q86
♣QT963
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J9742
♥A9
♦JT95
♣54
|
♠Q3
♥KQJ74
♦K42
♣AK7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4/3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 7.00 0.00 6-Urben-Heeter vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
150 5.00 2.00 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
150 5.00 2.00 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
150 5.00 2.00 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
600 2.00 5.00 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
600 2.00 5.00 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
600 2.00 5.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
630 0.00 7.00 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
|
33 |
♠J8765
♥J43
♦AJ
♣K97
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A
♥9765
♦Q9532
♣Q32
|
♠9
♥A2
♦T864
♣AJ8654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 4♠ ♣4/3 ♦3 NT6/5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 7.00 0.00 6-Urben-Heeter vs 3-Claymon-Claymon
420 4.50 2.50 2-Jackson-Hayward vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
420 4.50 2.50 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
420 4.50 2.50 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
420 4.50 2.50 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
50 2.00 5.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
50 1.00 6.00 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 5-Harrison-Beyer
100 0.00 7.00 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 1-Lecky-Huhn
|
34 |
♠J542
♥KT5
♦K965
♣A6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT97
♥63
♦J82
♣8432
|
♠KQ
♥AJ74
♦AT74
♣T95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 7.00 0.00 6-Urben-Heeter vs 2-Anderson-Converse
100 6.00 1.00 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 11-Read-Bursey
90 5.00 2.00 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
50 3.50 3.50 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
50 3.50 3.50 10-Long-Long vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
90 1.00 6.00 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
90 1.00 6.00 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
90 1.00 6.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
|
35 |
♠AJ874
♥T94
♦96
♣654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQ63
♥KJ8
♦K432
♣Q2
|
♠9
♥653
♦AQJ87
♣AKT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 4/3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 6.00 1.00 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
150 6.00 1.00 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 11-Read-Bursey
150 6.00 1.00 6-Urben-Heeter vs 2-Anderson-Converse
600 3.50 3.50 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
600 3.50 3.50 8-Harris-Brock vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
620 2.00 5.00 10-Long-Long vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
630 0.50 6.50 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
630 0.50 6.50 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
|
36 |
♠T5
♥JT9653
♦T72
♣AK
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠8743
♥Q2
♦KQ963
♣43
|
♠AK6
♥AK74
♦J54
♣Q98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 7.00 0.00 8-Harris-Brock vs 6-Gallin-Bowie
200 6.00 1.00 5-Mandelbaum-Lucas vs 11-Read-Bursey
100 4.50 2.50 6-Urben-Heeter vs 2-Anderson-Converse
100 4.50 2.50 7-Hebda-Loomas vs 4-Hinkle-Garfield
110 3.00 4.00 3-Goble-Ness-Braden vs 7-Heinsbroek-O Connor
150 2.00 5.00 4-Chitwood-Brue vs 9-Scimeca-Scimeca
180 1.00 6.00 9-Kenney-Markowitz vs 8-Reynolds-Lindsay
600 0.00 7.00 10-Long-Long vs 10-Metosky-Metosky
|