1 |
♠AQ9
♥K984
♦Q9764
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KJT5
♥AJT32
♦K8
♣85
|
♠432
♥Q6
♦T532
♣AQ94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: -/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2N S -1 ♠5 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ N -2 ♥Q 4-Boardman-Jungemann vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♣K 7-Beardsley-Nagler vs 3-Trout-Church
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♣K 9-Higgins-Andersen vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W 4 ♦4 6-McCoy-Pekarek vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
|
2 |
♠J985
♥A7
♦QJ842
♣A2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q72
♥K8643
♦A9
♣J97
|
♠AKT64
♥T52
♦63
♣QT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 ♦5 4-Boardman-Jungemann vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
150 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -3 ♦K 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ W -1 ♣A 6-McCoy-Pekarek vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 ♦4 9-Higgins-Andersen vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
100 0.00 4.00 4♦ N -1 ♠A 7-Beardsley-Nagler vs 3-Trout-Church
|
3 |
♠A98765
♥K86
♦A73
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K42
♥J5
♦K85
♣AQ963
|
♠QJ3
♥T74
♦Q964
♣KT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 5 ♦8 1-Dunn-de Groen vs 3-Trout-Church
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♦4 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 3 ♦K 5-Schweinler-Urban vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
100 1.00 3.00 2♣ W -1 ♥6 7-Beardsley-Nagler vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♦5 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
|
4 |
♠A7
♥832
♦AKQ973
♣J9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q62
♥T54
♦J42
♣K872
|
♠K93
♥AKQ97
♦T65
♣54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♦8 7-Beardsley-Nagler vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 ♦8 5-Schweinler-Urban vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ N 4 ♥A 1-Dunn-de Groen vs 3-Trout-Church
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ N 3 ♥A 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
100 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♥A 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
|
5 |
♠764
♥T943
♦T62
♣AT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T82
♥5
♦KQ9
♣KQ8654
|
♠KQJ3
♥KQJ86
♦AJ4
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5N W -2 ♦2 9-Higgins-Andersen vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
400 2.50 1.50 3N W 3 ♥T 6-McCoy-Pekarek vs 3-Trout-Church
400 2.50 1.50 3N E 3 ♠5 2-Cornell-Quimby vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
430 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 ♥9 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
430 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 ♦2 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
|
6 |
♠A973
♥J75
♦JT83
♣J4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT8
♥A84
♦K965
♣AT5
|
♠J652
♥KT
♦Q4
♣Q8632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT5/6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♥5 9-Higgins-Andersen vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
200 3.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♥3 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ E -1 ♠Q 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♠K 6-McCoy-Pekarek vs 3-Trout-Church
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ E 2 ♥3 2-Cornell-Quimby vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
|
7 |
♠T4
♥T962
♦AT
♣AK854
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠62
♥K875
♦KJ543
♣96
|
♠J73
♥AQJ3
♦Q98
♣QJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 ♠4 9-Higgins-Andersen vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
200 3.00 1.00 3♥* E -1 ♠A 3-Trout-Church vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ S 3 ♦4 1-Dunn-de Groen vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ N 3 ♥A 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 3 ♦A 7-Beardsley-Nagler vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
|
8 |
♠AQJ62
♥Q
♦9
♣AJ8762
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T95
♥T9854
♦743
♣T5
|
♠7
♥K632
♦AKQJ2
♣KQ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♠7 1-Dunn-de Groen vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
150 3.00 1.00 5♦ E -3 ♠K 7-Beardsley-Nagler vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 ♦A 9-Higgins-Andersen vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♦K 3-Trout-Church vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
500 0.00 4.00 6♠* S -3 ♦7 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
|
9 |
♠J32
♥AQ98
♦KQT
♣952
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K954
♥643
♦A5
♣AKJ8
|
♠76
♥KT
♦J7643
♣QT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ -/1♠ 1NT ♥5 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -1 ♦K 4-Boardman-Jungemann vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♣A 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 3-Trout-Church
90 2.00 2.00 1N W 1 ♥8 1-Dunn-de Groen vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -2 ♦A 2-Cornell-Quimby vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
110 0.00 4.00 2♣ W 3 ♠2 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
|
10 |
♠84
♥Q83
♦AT976
♣986
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT
♥AT2
♦J82
♣AKJ32
|
♠632
♥J65
♦Q543
♣QT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 ♦J 4-Boardman-Jungemann vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 ♣A 2-Cornell-Quimby vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S 3 ♣A 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S 3 ♣A 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 3-Trout-Church
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♣A 1-Dunn-de Groen vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
|
11 |
♠7
♥AT752
♦Q5
♣AKJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KT962
♥K93
♦K743
♣3
|
♠AJ83
♥Q8
♦JT92
♣Q92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.00 0.00 1♥ N 1 ♦J 5-Schweinler-Urban vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♠A 2-Cornell-Quimby vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♦J 3-Trout-Church vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ W 3 ♥A 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E 3 ♥4 9-Higgins-Andersen vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
|
12 |
♠2
♥7
♦KJ98742
♣AJ96
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q9763
♥AK2
♦A63
♣T5
|
♠AT85
♥QJT93
♦5
♣K83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣9 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♦T 9-Higgins-Andersen vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 4 ♥7 3-Trout-Church vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 4 ♥7 5-Schweinler-Urban vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 ♥7 2-Cornell-Quimby vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
|
13 |
♠J9
♥AT98
♦T4
♣AJ632
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠T654
♥K7652
♦975
♣4
|
♠K73
♥J4
♦A632
♣QT75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4/3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 1.00 3N S 5 ♥5 4-Boardman-Jungemann vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
660 3.00 1.00 3N S 5 ♥5 6-McCoy-Pekarek vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
660 3.00 1.00 3N N 5 ♣5 1-Dunn-de Groen vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
630 0.50 3.50 3N S 4 ♥5 3-Trout-Church vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
630 0.50 3.50 3N S 4 ♥5 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
|
14 |
♠KQ8542
♥42
♦K8
♣AQ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AT97
♥AT8
♦QT943
♣2
|
♠6
♥K63
♦AJ7
♣KT9854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 5/4♣ 6♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♦ W -1 ♠K 4-Boardman-Jungemann vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 ♦A 1-Dunn-de Groen vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 ♦A 3-Trout-Church vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ W 3 ♠K 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 5-Schweinler-Urban
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♥7 6-McCoy-Pekarek vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
|
15 |
♠JT986
♥K73
♦-
♣QJT97
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠53
♥J9642
♦T865
♣K5
|
♠Q72
♥Q
♦KQJ743
♣A64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♦ ♣3 ♥4/5 ♠2 NT6/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 5 ♦5 7-Beardsley-Nagler vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 ♣K 4-Boardman-Jungemann vs 3-Trout-Church
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦5 2-Cornell-Quimby vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦5 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦5 5-Schweinler-Urban vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
|
16 |
♠2
♥94
♦AK652
♣QJ432
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A64
♥2
♦QT843
♣AK75
|
♠QJ973
♥A7653
♦-
♣T96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6/5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2N W -3 ♦6 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 6-McCoy-Pekarek
200 3.00 1.00 3♠* E -1 ♣8 5-Schweinler-Urban vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
100 2.00 2.00 2N W -1 ♣3 7-Beardsley-Nagler vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♣A 4-Boardman-Jungemann vs 3-Trout-Church
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -4 ♠Q 2-Cornell-Quimby vs 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn
|
17 |
♠AQJT2
♥T632
♦T3
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠643
♥854
♦AJ87
♣AK5
|
♠85
♥AK9
♦K6
♣Q98764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ E 3 ♥Q 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
130 2.50 1.50 4♣ E 4 ♠K 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
130 2.50 1.50 3♣ E 4 ♦4 3-Trout-Church vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
400 1.00 3.00 5♣ E 5 ♠K 6-McCoy-Pekarek vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 ♠A 5-Schweinler-Urban vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
|
18 |
♠65
♥J97532
♦Q8
♣983
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT43
♥K6
♦AKJ92
♣T6
|
♠972
♥AT
♦543
♣AQ752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 ♣8 6-McCoy-Pekarek vs 2-Cornell-Quimby
250 3.00 1.00 3N W -5 ♥5 8-Wenneman-Kalhorn vs 1-Dunn-de Groen
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♦9 10-Hendrix-Christianson vs 7-Beardsley-Nagler
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 ♦3 3-Trout-Church vs 9-Higgins-Andersen
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 ♦3 5-Schweinler-Urban vs 4-Boardman-Jungemann
|