1 |
♠J953
♥83
♦AQ4
♣Q974
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AKT
♥Q654
♦7
♣AKJ86
|
♠Q6
♥97
♦KT98653
♣T5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♦ E -2 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ N -2 5-Wicker-Flores vs 3-Lama-White
430 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 2-Neumann-Flores
|
2 |
♠984
♥J95
♦62
♣Q9532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J65
♥AK7
♦AQJ87
♣K6
|
♠AT
♥Q82
♦T9543
♣A74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 5/3♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♦ W 6 5-Wicker-Flores vs 3-Lama-White
420 1.00 1.00 5♦ W 6 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
490 0.00 2.00 3N E 6 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 2-Neumann-Flores
|
3 |
♠K942
♥KQT8
♦AJ862
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠83
♥J94
♦Q73
♣AQJ87
|
♠765
♥7652
♦T94
♣K65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 7♦ 4♥ 7♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 7 5-Wicker-Flores vs 3-Lama-White
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 2-Neumann-Flores
230 0.00 2.00 3♠ S 6 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
|
4 |
♠974
♥J4
♦KQ9654
♣J3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT85
♥AQT3
♦872
♣92
|
♠K6
♥85
♦T3
♣AKQ8754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 2♥ 2/1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 5♣ E -1 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 2-Neumann-Flores
100 1.50 0.50 5♣ E -1 5-Wicker-Flores vs 3-Lama-White
130 0.00 2.00 4♣ E 4 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
|
5 |
♠K9862
♥A32
♦K32
♣86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q
♥J984
♦AT96
♣K975
|
♠AJ754
♥KQT65
♦7
♣J4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠6/5 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥* E -1 5-Wicker-Flores vs 3-Lama-White
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E 3 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 2-Neumann-Flores
|
6 |
♠98654
♥KT5
♦J7
♣JT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A7
♥A8632
♦Q93
♣872
|
♠T32
♥QJ7
♦8642
♣AK6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 2-Neumann-Flores
100 0.50 1.50 2N S -2 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 3-Lama-White
100 0.50 1.50 1♦ S -2 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 5-Wicker-Flores
|
7 |
♠AQ83
♥A96
♦87
♣J872
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K7642
♥T74
♦94
♣KQ9
|
♠95
♥QJ8532
♦AKQT5
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 5♥ E -3 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 5-Wicker-Flores
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 2-Neumann-Flores
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E 3 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 3-Lama-White
|
8 |
♠AKJT3
♥9
♦AJT92
♣J5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q62
♥AQ863
♦Q4
♣K84
|
♠98754
♥JT75
♦7
♣762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 2/3♠ 2/3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠4/3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 5♦ N 6 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 3-Lama-White
150 0.50 1.50 3♦ N 5 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 5-Wicker-Flores
150 0.50 1.50 3♦ N 5 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 2-Neumann-Flores
|
9 |
♠AQ743
♥KT642
♦J
♣A5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT98652
♥QJ9
♦5
♣KJ
|
♠-
♥3
♦AK9764
♣T76432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ 4/3♥ 3/2NT ♣6 ♦6/7 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1100 2.00 0.00 6♣* E -4 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 2-Neumann-Flores
300 1.00 1.00 4♠ W -3 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 5-Wicker-Flores
200 0.00 2.00 3♦ E -2 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 3-Lama-White
|
10 |
♠KT82
♥54
♦653
♣AT64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q9
♥JT976
♦82
♣K732
|
♠J7543
♥AKQ
♦KQT
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 3N W -3 4-Curlin-Chanoux vs 3-Lama-White
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ E 1 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 2-Neumann-Flores
200 0.00 2.00 2♦ S -2 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 5-Wicker-Flores
|
11 |
♠KQT7
♥J75
♦QJ7543
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J83
♥AT92
♦6
♣96532
|
♠642
♥Q3
♦KT92
♣AKJT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 2N S 2 5-Wicker-Flores vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
110 0.50 1.50 2♦ N 3 2-Neumann-Flores vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
110 0.50 1.50 2♦ N 3 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 3-Lama-White
|
12 |
♠A73
♥9
♦AJ2
♣QJ7632
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9854
♥AQ32
♦KQ4
♣54
|
♠QJT
♥JT87
♦T853
♣T8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♠ 3/4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 3-Lama-White
110 1.00 1.00 2♣ N 3 2-Neumann-Flores vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
100 0.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 5-Wicker-Flores vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
|
13 |
♠J43
♥J96
♦865
♣KJ65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠-
♥KT7532
♦T94
♣9874
|
♠AK9872
♥A8
♦A72
♣A3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 1♠ E 2 2-Neumann-Flores vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
140 0.50 1.50 1♠ E 3 5-Wicker-Flores vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
140 0.50 1.50 1♠ E 3 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 3-Lama-White
|
14 |
♠87652
♥8
♦K84
♣KQ82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ94
♥Q5
♦JT975
♣75
|
♠AK3
♥AT642
♦A6
♣J94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 5-Wicker-Flores vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
100 1.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 3-Lama-White
110 0.00 2.00 1♥ E 2 2-Neumann-Flores vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
|
15 |
♠A86
♥Q
♦AJT9
♣98753
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJT4
♥A743
♦Q76
♣KT
|
♠9753
♥K85
♦K532
♣62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ -/1♦ 1♥ ♦6/7 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 1♦ W -2 5-Wicker-Flores vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 2-Neumann-Flores vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
50 0.50 1.50 1♥ W -1 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 3-Lama-White
|
16 |
♠A9
♥AJ74
♦JT532
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠76
♥Q9852
♦K974
♣T4
|
♠T842
♥T63
♦Q6
♣AQ63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 2.00 0.00 3N N 5 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
400 0.50 1.50 3N N 3 2-Neumann-Flores vs 5-Wicker-Flores
400 0.50 1.50 3N N 3 3-Lama-White vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
|
17 |
♠AKT65
♥QJ8
♦9854
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠832
♥A5
♦AQ63
♣Q732
|
♠Q74
♥K64
♦J2
♣AK654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ E 3 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
130 1.00 1.00 4♣ E 4 2-Neumann-Flores vs 5-Wicker-Flores
400 0.00 2.00 5♣ E 5 3-Lama-White vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
|
18 |
♠AKQJ7
♥KJ
♦KT7
♣KT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠96432
♥96
♦Q2
♣8763
|
♠T85
♥QT2
♦AJ983
♣Q4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/4♣ 3♦ 5/3♥ 5/4♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
710 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 7 3-Lama-White vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
680 1.00 1.00 4♥ N 6 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
630 0.00 2.00 3N N 4 2-Neumann-Flores vs 5-Wicker-Flores
|
19 |
♠J652
♥AJ2
♦J4
♣J964
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠7
♥QT98
♦AT2
♣KT532
|
♠AK3
♥K75
♦KQ7653
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 2♦ E 6 2-Neumann-Flores vs 5-Wicker-Flores
600 1.00 1.00 5♦ E 5 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
620 0.00 2.00 5♦ E 6 3-Lama-White vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
|
20 |
♠53
♥Q875
♦Q6
♣AKJ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K942
♥JT92
♦K43
♣63
|
♠AJT76
♥A
♦AJ7
♣Q942
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ E 4 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 2-Neumann-Flores vs 5-Wicker-Flores
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 3-Lama-White vs 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip
|
21 |
♠Q5
♥T973
♦AKT7
♣J85
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KT7
♥K
♦9542
♣QT974
|
♠A843
♥Q652
♦3
♣A632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2/1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 2♦ S 2 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 5-Wicker-Flores
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 3-Lama-White vs 2-Neumann-Flores
|
22 |
♠A943
♥862
♦K7
♣T853
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT875
♥53
♦A85
♣K74
|
♠J62
♥AT94
♦QT643
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 2.00 0.00 2♣ S 4 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 5-Wicker-Flores
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 2 3-Lama-White vs 2-Neumann-Flores
50 0.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
|
23 |
♠AJ4
♥J3
♦AJ62
♣A875
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q95
♥985
♦K74
♣QT32
|
♠T72
♥KQT6
♦T93
♣K96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.00 0.00 3N N 4 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 5-Wicker-Flores
600 1.00 1.00 3N N 3 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
120 0.00 2.00 1N N 2 3-Lama-White vs 2-Neumann-Flores
|
24 |
♠8753
♥95
♦T92
♣Q852
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KT6
♥T86
♦AJ8
♣K974
|
♠AJ94
♥Q2
♦Q43
♣JT63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
140 1.50 0.50 1♥ S 3 3-Lama-White vs 2-Neumann-Flores
110 0.00 2.00 1♥ S 2 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 5-Wicker-Flores
|
25 |
♠8
♥AT9653
♦Q
♣QJ875
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJT9
♥K7
♦876
♣AT93
|
♠642
♥Q84
♦J9532
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ N 4 6-Woods Jr-Ayer vs 5-Wicker-Flores
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 3-Lama-White vs 2-Neumann-Flores
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 1-Vandertulip-Vandertulip vs 4-Curlin-Chanoux
|