1 |
♠A42
♥KT765
♦JT43
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ98
♥94
♦Q2
♣QT973
|
♠T7
♥AJ83
♦AK985
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.92 0.08 3N E -1 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
400 4.17 1.83 3N W 3 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 7-Neumann-Handly
400 4.17 1.83 3N E 3 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 1-Brown-White
430 2.42 3.58 3N E 4 4-Lealos-Black vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
460 0.67 5.33 3N W 5 3-Esch-Georges vs 4-Osborn-Flores
460 0.67 5.33 3N W 5 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
|
2 |
♠AQJ
♥K63
♦QT92
♣T82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K6
♥AT872
♦7654
♣Q4
|
♠T432
♥Q9
♦K83
♣AJ63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.92 0.08 2♠ S 4 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
140 4.75 1.25 1♠ S 3 3-Esch-Georges vs 4-Osborn-Flores
120 3.00 3.00 1N S 2 4-Lealos-Black vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
120 3.00 3.00 1N N 2 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 1-Brown-White
110 1.25 4.75 1♠ S 2 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 7-Neumann-Handly
90 0.08 5.92 1N N 1 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
|
3 |
♠AK87653
♥76
♦96
♣A9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q42
♥K5
♦KT73
♣8432
|
♠T9
♥AQJT3
♦AQ52
♣K7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: -/1♣ 4♦ 3♥ -/4NT ♣6/7 ♠5/6 NT5/10 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.33 0.67 2♠ N 2 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 1-Brown-White
110 5.33 0.67 2♠ N 2 3-Esch-Georges vs 4-Osborn-Flores
100 3.00 3.00 4♥ E -1 4-Lealos-Black vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
100 3.00 3.00 4♥ E -1 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
50 1.25 4.75 3♠ N -1 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
300 0.08 5.92 4♠* N -2 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 7-Neumann-Handly
|
4 |
♠K86
♥43
♦K943
♣AQT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT
♥AQT95
♦JT75
♣72
|
♠A9752
♥K8
♦AQ
♣K843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.92 0.08 3N W -2 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
90 4.75 1.25 1N W 1 3-Esch-Georges vs 4-Osborn-Flores
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ W 3 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ W 3 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 7-Neumann-Handly
170 1.25 4.75 2♠ E 4 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 1-Brown-White
630 0.08 5.92 3N E 4 4-Lealos-Black vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
|
5 |
♠T5
♥A3
♦AK843
♣K853
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J96
♥K74
♦J7652
♣T4
|
♠K3
♥JT9652
♦T
♣QJ92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 4/5♦ -/1♥ 6♠ 3/6NT ♥6/7 |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 5.80 0.20 4♠ S 6 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
650 3.70 2.30 4♠ S 5 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
650 3.70 2.30 4♠ S 5 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
100 0.90 5.10 3N N -1 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 4-Osborn-Flores
100 0.90 5.10 4♠ S -1 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 1-Brown-White
|
6 |
♠3
♥A8432
♦AK73
♣982
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠9842
♥JT65
♦942
♣KT
|
♠QJ76
♥Q97
♦T86
♣Q76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 5.80 0.20 3N S 6 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 1-Brown-White
460 4.40 1.60 3N S 5 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
430 3.00 3.00 3N N 4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
400 0.90 5.10 3N S 3 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
400 0.90 5.10 3N S 3 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 4-Osborn-Flores
|
7 |
♠T852
♥QJT32
♦97
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠J
♥AK96
♦KQJ84
♣T72
|
♠A97643
♥8
♦52
♣AKQ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.80 0.20 4♠ E -1 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
140 3.70 2.30 3♠ E 3 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
140 3.70 2.30 2♠ E 3 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 4-Osborn-Flores
170 1.60 4.40 2♠ E 4 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 1-Brown-White
620 0.20 5.80 4♠ E 4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
|
8 |
♠7543
♥983
♦87
♣AKQT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠QJT6
♥AQ
♦AKJ52
♣76
|
♠K98
♥7
♦T9643
♣J542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.80 0.20 3♥ S 3 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
50 4.40 1.60 4♥ S -1 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 4-Osborn-Flores
130 2.30 3.70 4♦ W 4 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
130 2.30 3.70 4♦ W 4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
300 0.20 5.80 5♥* S -2 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 1-Brown-White
|
9 |
♠763
♥KJ2
♦Q74
♣QJ97
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT54
♥7
♦AT82
♣AKT6
|
♠K982
♥A843
♦J63
♣83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.80 0.20 1N W 3 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 7-Neumann-Handly
170 4.40 1.60 3♠ E 4 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
200 3.00 3.00 2♠ W 5 3-Esch-Georges vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
620 1.60 4.40 4♠ E 4 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 1-Brown-White
650 0.20 5.80 4♠ W 5 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
|
10 |
♠96
♥KJ53
♦KJ754
♣J7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠J743
♥Q876
♦QT
♣KQ9
|
♠AQ85
♥A
♦9863
♣AT54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.80 0.20 4♠ E -2 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
120 4.40 1.60 2N E 2 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 1-Brown-White
170 2.30 3.70 2♠ E 4 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 7-Neumann-Handly
170 2.30 3.70 2♠ E 4 3-Esch-Georges vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
620 0.20 5.80 4♠ E 4 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
|
11 |
♠J6
♥QT753
♦T43
♣952
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ9543
♥62
♦87
♣843
|
♠T8
♥AJ
♦AKQ652
♣AK7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 5.80 0.20 2N E 4 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
420 3.70 2.30 4♠ W 4 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 1-Brown-White
420 3.70 2.30 5♦ E 6 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
450 1.60 4.40 4♠ W 5 3-Esch-Georges vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
480 0.20 5.80 4♠ W 6 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 7-Neumann-Handly
|
12 |
♠QJT9
♥K53
♦64
♣KJ96
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠76542
♥AQ94
♦AQJ
♣7
|
♠-
♥876
♦T8532
♣T5432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 3♠ 3/4NT ♣7/6 ♦4 ♥6/5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 5.10 0.90 3N S 4 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 7-Neumann-Handly
630 5.10 0.90 3N S 4 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
600 3.00 3.00 3N S 3 3-Esch-Georges vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
180 0.90 5.10 1N S 4 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 1-Brown-White
180 0.90 5.10 1N N 4 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
|
13 |
♠QJ6
♥53
♦86543
♣AK5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠A3
♥AKQ876
♦QJT
♣63
|
♠KT74
♥T94
♦A97
♣J82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.50 0.50 2♠ W 4 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 7-Neumann-Handly
170 5.50 0.50 3♥ W 4 3-Esch-Georges vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
620 2.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
620 2.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
620 2.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 1-Brown-White
620 2.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
620 2.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 4-Lealos-Black vs 4-Osborn-Flores
|
14 |
♠AT986
♥A8754
♦-
♣654
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠752
♥KQJT
♦K83
♣KT8
|
♠Q3
♥3
♦JT2
♣AQJ9732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠2/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.00 0.00 5♣ E -4 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
150 4.00 2.00 5♣ E -3 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 7-Neumann-Handly
150 4.00 2.00 4♣ E -3 4-Lealos-Black vs 4-Osborn-Flores
150 4.00 2.00 4♣ E -3 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 1-Brown-White
140 2.00 4.00 3♠ N 3 3-Esch-Georges vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
100 0.50 5.50 4♣ E -2 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
100 0.50 5.50 4♣ E -2 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
|
15 |
♠AK4
♥T7
♦954
♣KJT98
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠92
♥A63
♦KQ8763
♣A7
|
♠QJ85
♥QJ94
♦T2
♣642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT4/8 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 6.00 0.00 3♦ W -3 3-Esch-Georges vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
50 3.50 2.50 3♥ E -1 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
50 3.50 2.50 3♦ W -1 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
50 3.50 2.50 3♦ W -1 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 7-Neumann-Handly
50 3.50 2.50 3♦ W -1 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 1-Brown-White
90 0.50 5.50 2♦ W 2 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
90 0.50 5.50 2♦ W 2 4-Lealos-Black vs 4-Osborn-Flores
|
16 |
♠Q43
♥A72
♦JT9
♣KT84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠98
♥QJ53
♦AQ6
♣A965
|
♠T2
♥T964
♦8753
♣Q73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 6.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 1-Brown-White
170 5.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
140 3.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
140 3.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 3-Esch-Georges vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 4-Lealos-Black vs 4-Osborn-Flores
50 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 7-Neumann-Handly
|
17 |
♠K9
♥87
♦763
♣AKT975
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QT7
♥AKQ965
♦AQ9
♣4
|
♠A432
♥J43
♦KT42
♣32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.17 1.83 4♥ W 5 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 4-Osborn-Flores
450 4.17 1.83 4♥ W 5 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 7-Neumann-Handly
450 4.17 1.83 4♥ W 5 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
450 4.17 1.83 4♥ W 5 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
500 0.67 5.33 5♣* N -3 3-Esch-Georges vs 1-Brown-White
500 0.67 5.33 5♣* N -3 4-Lealos-Black vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
|
18 |
♠763
♥Q9
♦K95
♣AQ854
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠2
♥AKT864
♦A42
♣763
|
♠QJT5
♥J532
♦Q86
♣K9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2/1♠ ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.92 0.08 3♥ W 4 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 7-Neumann-Handly
300 4.75 1.25 3♠ S -3 3-Esch-Georges vs 1-Brown-White
420 3.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
420 3.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
450 1.25 4.75 4♥ W 5 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 4-Osborn-Flores
500 0.08 5.92 3♠* S -2 4-Lealos-Black vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
|
19 |
♠J94
♥T86
♦76532
♣87
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT73
♥932
♦T94
♣Q53
|
♠K62
♥AK74
♦K8
♣AKT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 3/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.92 0.08 2♠ W -1 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
50 4.17 1.83 1N S -1 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 4-Osborn-Flores
50 4.17 1.83 1N S -1 4-Lealos-Black vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
150 1.83 4.17 2N E 3 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
150 1.83 4.17 1N S -3 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 7-Neumann-Handly
180 0.08 5.92 1N E 4 3-Esch-Georges vs 1-Brown-White
|
20 |
♠K6
♥JT6
♦8652
♣AQJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q4
♥K972
♦KJ97
♣853
|
♠AJ532
♥43
♦AQ43
♣T2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.92 0.08 2♠ E -1 4-Lealos-Black vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
PASS 4.75 1.25 Pass Out 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
90 3.00 3.00 1N W 1 3-Esch-Georges vs 1-Brown-White
90 3.00 3.00 1N W 1 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
110 0.67 5.33 3♦ W 3 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 7-Neumann-Handly
110 0.67 5.33 2♦ E 3 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 4-Osborn-Flores
|
21 |
♠QJT83
♥96
♦432
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠2
♥QJ32
♦76
♣AT9753
|
♠K9754
♥AT8
♦T5
♣Q84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2/1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 5.92 0.08 5♦ S 5 3-Esch-Georges vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
170 4.75 1.25 2♦ S 6 4-Lealos-Black vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
150 3.00 3.00 3♦ S 5 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 4-Osborn-Flores
150 3.00 3.00 3♦ S 5 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
130 0.67 5.33 3♦ S 4 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
130 0.67 5.33 3♦ S 4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 1-Brown-White
|
22 |
♠QJ54
♥Q
♦KJ72
♣AK32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠73
♥87642
♦AQ54
♣94
|
♠K9862
♥J53
♦3
♣JT65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 4♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 5.33 0.67 3N S 6 3-Esch-Georges vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
490 5.33 0.67 3N S 6 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
460 3.00 3.00 3N S 5 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
460 3.00 3.00 3N S 5 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 4-Osborn-Flores
430 1.25 4.75 3N S 4 4-Lealos-Black vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
180 0.08 5.92 1N S 4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 1-Brown-White
|
23 |
♠92
♥T65
♦QJ6532
♣82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠J865
♥AJ4
♦8
♣QT973
|
♠A743
♥K732
♦4
♣AK65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.92 0.08 3♦ N 4 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
90 4.75 1.25 1N S 1 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 4-Osborn-Flores
100 3.58 2.42 3♦ N -1 4-Lealos-Black vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
130 2.42 3.58 3♣ W 4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 1-Brown-White
400 1.25 4.75 3N S -4 3-Esch-Georges vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
500 0.08 5.92 5♦* N -2 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
|
24 |
♠J2
♥AT85
♦AK954
♣A3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠3
♥J964
♦7632
♣J987
|
♠KQT964
♥KQ
♦J
♣KT42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 5.33 0.67 2N S 2 4-Lealos-Black vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
120 5.33 0.67 2N S 2 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 4-Osborn-Flores
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ N 3 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ N 3 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 1-Brown-White
100 1.25 4.75 2♠* E -1 3-Esch-Georges vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
80 0.08 5.92 1♠ E 1 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
|
25 |
♠AQJT
♥K86
♦KQT
♣AT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠987
♥QJ7
♦J54
♣J754
|
♠K3
♥AT3
♦A763
♣KQ63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 5.92 0.08 1N E 1 4-Lealos-Black vs 1-Brown-White
100 4.17 1.83 2♥ S -2 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
100 4.17 1.83 1♣ N -2 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 7-Neumann-Handly
120 1.83 4.17 1N W 2 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 4-Osborn-Flores
120 1.83 4.17 1N E 2 3-Esch-Georges vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
150 0.08 5.92 2♥ S -3 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
|
26 |
♠Q4
♥T62
♦AT975
♣853
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT
♥AK9
♦Q4
♣AKQJT6
|
♠K986532
♥8
♦K3
♣972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣0 ♦6 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♠ 6NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 5.92 0.08 3N W 3 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 4-Osborn-Flores
620 4.17 1.83 5♣ W 6 4-Lealos-Black vs 1-Brown-White
620 4.17 1.83 5♣ W 6 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 7-Neumann-Handly
690 2.42 3.58 3N W 6 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
710 0.67 5.33 5♠ E 7 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
710 0.67 5.33 4♠ E 7 3-Esch-Georges vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
|
27 |
♠AJT7
♥Q86
♦J54
♣J74
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ96532
♥KJ32
♦K
♣Q
|
♠8
♥T974
♦A87632
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 5.92 0.08 4♠* W -3 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 4-Osborn-Flores
300 4.75 1.25 4♠* W -2 3-Esch-Georges vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
50 2.42 3.58 3♠ W -1 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
50 2.42 3.58 3♠ W -1 4-Lealos-Black vs 1-Brown-White
50 2.42 3.58 3♠ W -1 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
140 0.08 5.92 3♠ W 3 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 7-Neumann-Handly
|
28 |
♠AQT76
♥A
♦A8743
♣T6
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠2
♥KQJ642
♦KT62
♣43
|
♠853
♥T853
♦QJ5
♣AJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 6♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣1 ♦5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 5.33 0.67 4♠ N 6 3-Esch-Georges vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
680 5.33 0.67 4♠ N 6 4-Lealos-Black vs 1-Brown-White
620 3.58 2.42 4♠ S 4 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 7-Neumann-Handly
230 1.83 4.17 3♠ S 6 1-Sabljak-Taylor vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
230 1.83 4.17 3♠ N 6 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
150 0.08 5.92 4♥ W -3 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 4-Osborn-Flores
|
29 |
♠96
♥AT9
♦Q92
♣AJT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠84
♥KQ4
♦A86
♣KQ432
|
♠AKJT52
♥63
♦T3
♣976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2♠ ♣7/6 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 5.92 0.08 2♦ S 3 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
100 4.75 1.25 4♠ E -1 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
110 3.58 2.42 2♠ E 2 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 4-Osborn-Flores
140 2.42 3.58 3♠ E 3 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
200 1.25 4.75 4♦* S -1 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
300 0.08 5.92 3♣ N -3 4-Lealos-Black vs 7-Neumann-Handly
|
30 |
♠JT7
♥AJ986
♦32
♣Q85
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ6
♥K42
♦AKT96
♣T3
|
♠A5432
♥5
♦Q84
♣KJ72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1/2♣ 5♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.92 0.08 3♦ W 5 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
450 4.17 1.83 4♠ W 5 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
450 4.17 1.83 4♠ W 5 4-Lealos-Black vs 7-Neumann-Handly
460 1.83 4.17 3N W 5 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 4-Osborn-Flores
460 1.83 4.17 3N W 5 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
480 0.08 5.92 4♠ W 6 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
|
31 |
♠Q74
♥742
♦K742
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠96
♥A6
♦J953
♣KJ852
|
♠AJT
♥KT98
♦A6
♣9743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.92 0.08 4♣ E -2 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
50 4.75 1.25 3♣ E -1 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 4-Osborn-Flores
110 2.42 3.58 3♣ W 3 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
110 2.42 3.58 3♣ E 3 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
110 2.42 3.58 3♣ E 3 4-Lealos-Black vs 7-Neumann-Handly
400 0.08 5.92 4♠ S -4 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
|
32 |
♠532
♥7
♦J764
♣98642
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J6
♥KT542
♦5
♣QT753
|
♠KQ874
♥63
♦KQT32
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.75 1.25 2N S -2 4-Lealos-Black vs 7-Neumann-Handly
100 4.75 1.25 2♥ S -2 2-Searcy-Anderson vs 3-Glimp-Hardie
100 4.75 1.25 2♥ S -2 6-Tompkins-Canavan vs 4-Osborn-Flores
150 1.25 4.75 3N S -3 5-Deregibus-Senkowsky vs 2-Lavis-Lavis
150 1.25 4.75 3N S -3 8-Ruth-Pepe vs 8-Saad-Smith, Jr
150 1.25 4.75 3♥ S -3 7-Friedman-Pepe vs 6-Harrid-Bunge
|