|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 ♥6 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Jewart-Poole
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ S 4 ♣7 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
50 0.00 2.00 5N S -1 ♠4 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 2-Marr-Hughes
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ W 4 ♦A 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 2-Marr-Hughes
420 1.50 0.50 4♥ W 4 ♦A 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♠J 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Jewart-Poole
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 5♦ S 6 ♦9 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Jewart-Poole
420 1.50 0.50 5♣ S 6 ♥3 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
130 0.00 2.00 4♦ S 4 ♥J 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 2-Marr-Hughes
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♦5 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Jewart-Poole
630 1.00 1.00 3N S 4 ♣A 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ N 5 ♥9 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 2-Marr-Hughes
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 4 ♦2 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
150 1.00 1.00 4♣ E -3 ♥A 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 2-Marr-Hughes
100 0.00 2.00 4♣ E -2 ♠A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Jewart-Poole
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♥5 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
460 1.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♣3 1-Jewart-Poole vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
50 0.00 2.00 6N N -1 ♣3 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Marr-Hughes
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣Q 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Marr-Hughes
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 ♦4 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 ♦Q 1-Jewart-Poole vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♠9 1-Jewart-Poole vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
420 1.00 1.00 5♦ S 6 ♠2 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
50 0.00 2.00 5♦ N -1 ♣2 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Marr-Hughes
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 ♣A 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
100 1.00 1.00 4♦ W -1 ♠6 1-Jewart-Poole vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
600 0.00 2.00 3N E 3 ♠2 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Marr-Hughes
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.75 0.25 3♦ W -1 ♠T 1-Jewart-Poole vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
600 0.25 1.75 3N E 3 ♥4 4-Gold-Wilkie vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 2♦ N 3 ♠A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
110 1.50 0.50 Pass Out 2-Marr-Hughes vs 1-Jewart-Poole
100 0.00 2.00 3♣ E -2 ♦5 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 1♣ E -2 ♠7 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ N -1 ♣A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
100 0.50 1.50 3♣ E -4 ♠A 2-Marr-Hughes vs 1-Jewart-Poole
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 0.50 3N S 4 ♥4 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
630 1.50 0.50 2♥ E 2 ♦A 2-Marr-Hughes vs 1-Jewart-Poole
600 0.00 2.00 3N S 3 ♥4 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 1N W -1 ♠5 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ W 5 ♦8 2-Marr-Hughes vs 1-Jewart-Poole
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 5 ♦4 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 1♠ W 1 ♣A 2-Marr-Hughes vs 1-Jewart-Poole
100 1.50 0.50 4♥ S -1 ♣5 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Kessel-Thoma
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ E 3 ♥5 5-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♥6 3-Kessel-Thoma vs 1-Jewart-Poole
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 ♦2 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥7 2-Marr-Hughes vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♠Q 2-Marr-Hughes vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
50 0.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♥A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
50 0.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♣A 3-Kessel-Thoma vs 1-Jewart-Poole
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♥5 2-Marr-Hughes vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♥5 3-Kessel-Thoma vs 1-Jewart-Poole
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 ♦4 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 ♣8 2-Marr-Hughes vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
100 1.00 1.00 5♦ N -2 ♥A 3-Kessel-Thoma vs 1-Jewart-Poole
140 0.00 2.00 1♠ W 3 ♣A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N N 3 ♣2 3-Kessel-Thoma vs 1-Jewart-Poole
120 1.00 1.00 2N N 2 ♥3 2-Marr-Hughes vs 5-Lamers-Dantzscher
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥3 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Gold-Wilkie
|