1 |
♠JT9
♥952
♦T86
♣8752
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠8763
♥-
♦AKJ72
♣AJT6
|
♠A54
♥KQJT74
♦93
♣43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1/3 ♠3 NT1/4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♣2 4-Kessel-Thoma vs 2-Mendenhall-Player
300 1.00 1.00 2N S -6 ♦K 5-Casale-Casale vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♥3 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Hughes-Marr
|
2 |
♠Q43
♥K74
♦K76
♣J972
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A52
♥3
♦J83
♣KT8643
|
♠KT6
♥AJ652
♦AT54
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1/-NT NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 2♦ E 2 ♣A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Hughes-Marr
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 ♥9 5-Casale-Casale vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
120 0.00 2.00 1N W 2 ♣2 4-Kessel-Thoma vs 2-Mendenhall-Player
|
3 |
♠QJ7654
♥2
♦K6
♣J986
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T
♥AKQT96
♦J84
♣A53
|
♠AK832
♥J3
♦52
♣QT72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♦K 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Hughes-Marr
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♠J 5-Casale-Casale vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
200 0.00 2.00 4♦ S -4 ♥A 4-Kessel-Thoma vs 2-Mendenhall-Player
|
4 |
♠K
♥QT632
♦AQ96
♣T97
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ3
♥AJ7
♦KT832
♣K5
|
♠Q875
♥K98
♦J74
♣842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♥ ♦4 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣4/5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 ♦J 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Hughes-Marr
90 1.00 1.00 1N W 1 ♥3 4-Kessel-Thoma vs 2-Mendenhall-Player
200 0.00 2.00 1N S -2 ♣9 5-Casale-Casale vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
5 |
♠Q52
♥T86
♦JT6
♣AK63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K3
♥Q9543
♦Q752
♣Q4
|
♠AJ764
♥J2
♦K43
♣J95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 1-Hughes-Marr vs 5-Casale-Casale
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Kessel-Thoma vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Mendenhall-Player
|
6 |
♠T953
♥93
♦AJT6
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J42
♥T
♦9754
♣T6532
|
♠AKQ7
♥AJ6
♦KQ3
♣974
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦6/5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 ♣6 1-Hughes-Marr vs 5-Casale-Casale
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 ♣3 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Mendenhall-Player
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ E 3 ♥7 4-Kessel-Thoma vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
7 |
♠A
♥76
♦KQ86
♣K98653
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q97
♥JT32
♦J74
♣Q42
|
♠KT54
♥KQ9
♦AT92
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ N 3 ♦A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Mendenhall-Player
100 1.00 1.00 1N E -1 ♦5 1-Hughes-Marr vs 5-Casale-Casale
90 0.00 2.00 2♣ N 2 ♥9 4-Kessel-Thoma vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
8 |
♠K
♥QJ43
♦62
♣A98753
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J76
♥AK87
♦QJ987
♣2
|
♠AQT983
♥2
♦T43
♣KQT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 3 ♦A 1-Hughes-Marr vs 5-Casale-Casale
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 ♥T 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Mendenhall-Player
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♦K 4-Kessel-Thoma vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
9 |
♠A4
♥KJ
♦K86
♣AQJ975
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T73
♥AQ842
♦93
♣642
|
♠J5
♥9653
♦AQJ7
♣T83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 4/3NT ♥6/5 |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♣ N 6 ♦A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 ♥A 2-Mendenhall-Player vs 1-Hughes-Marr
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 ♦7 5-Casale-Casale vs 4-Kessel-Thoma
|
10 |
♠J7
♥73
♦T64
♣AT9853
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT2
♥QT65
♦J9753
♣2
|
♠A865
♥A82
♦A2
♣QJ64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦Q 5-Casale-Casale vs 4-Kessel-Thoma
300 1.00 1.00 4♣ N -3 ♦A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
1100 0.00 2.00 4♣* S -4 ♣2 2-Mendenhall-Player vs 1-Hughes-Marr
|
11 |
♠JT84
♥A85
♦86543
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠3
♥KQJ942
♦KQJ
♣AKJ
|
♠AKQ7
♥63
♦AT72
♣932
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N W 4 ♦3 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
480 0.50 1.50 5♥ W 6 ♣7 2-Mendenhall-Player vs 1-Hughes-Marr
480 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 6 ♠T 5-Casale-Casale vs 4-Kessel-Thoma
|
12 |
♠KJ74
♥952
♦J84
♣K53
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T
♥KJ74
♦QT93
♣QJ86
|
♠862
♥AQ
♦A7652
♣A42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ E 3 ♠A 2-Mendenhall-Player vs 1-Hughes-Marr
120 1.00 1.00 2N E 2 ♣7 5-Casale-Casale vs 4-Kessel-Thoma
150 0.00 2.00 2♦ E 5 ♥3 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
13 |
♠AT43
♥KQJ6
♦KT7
♣T5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ82
♥A98
♦A3
♣KQ84
|
♠9765
♥752
♦J654
♣J6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 ♠5 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Kessel-Thoma
100 0.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♦Q 2-Mendenhall-Player vs 5-Casale-Casale
100 0.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♦9 3-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 1-Hughes-Marr
|
14 |
♠K972
♥AQ
♦K987
♣Q83
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ
♥K9642
♦AQ2
♣KT4
|
♠8653
♥85
♦JT3
♣AJ75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2/3♦ 2/3♥ 1/2♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦7 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Kessel-Thoma
110 1.00 1.00 2♣ E 3 ♥3 2-Mendenhall-Player vs 5-Casale-Casale
150 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -3 ♥2 3-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 1-Hughes-Marr
|
15 |
♠Q9542
♥J
♦AJ65
♣J63
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K
♥KT643
♦KQT73
♣T8
|
♠A863
♥AQ92
♦98
♣A42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥1 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 6♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ E 5 ♣7 2-Mendenhall-Player vs 5-Casale-Casale
230 1.00 1.00 2♥ W 6 ♠2 3-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 1-Hughes-Marr
480 0.00 2.00 4♥ W 6 ♠4 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Kessel-Thoma
|
16 |
♠82
♥A94
♦J5
♣AKQJ42
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT654
♥QJT6
♦32
♣76
|
♠KJ97
♥832
♦KQT94
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2NT ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.75 0.25 2♣ N 4 ♠J 2-Mendenhall-Player vs 5-Casale-Casale
110 0.25 1.75 3♣ N 3 ♦K 3-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 1-Hughes-Marr
|