1 |
♠AKQ6
♥K9742
♦75
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠9432
♥A
♦QJ
♣A86542
|
♠JT7
♥JT86
♦AKT92
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 1♥ N 3 ♦K 4-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Potter-Sheridan
80 1.00 1.00 1♥ N 1 ♦A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E 3 ♥5 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
2 |
♠8
♥AT97
♦AQ2
♣AT986
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ2
♥2
♦J985
♣KQ754
|
♠KT754
♥KQJ83
♦T7
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♣T 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
50 1.50 0.50 1♥ E -1 ♣J 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ E 2 ♥4 4-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Potter-Sheridan
|
3 |
♠54
♥AQJ98765
♦T
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J8
♥KT
♦97653
♣T854
|
♠AKQT632
♥42
♦AK
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: -/1♣ 1/2♦ 4♠ -/4NT ♣6/7 ♥4 NT5/10 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 5♠ E -1 ♥3 4-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Potter-Sheridan
100 1.50 0.50 5♠ E -1 ♥3 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
500 0.00 2.00 5♥* N -3 ♦A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
|
4 |
♠A532
♥T4
♦T987
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ74
♥J8
♦KQ
♣T8754
|
♠T98
♥973
♦A6542
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 5 ♠4 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
200 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 5 ♦Q 5-Smith-Smith vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
100 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♦K 4-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Potter-Sheridan
|
5 |
♠K653
♥965
♦AT
♣JT92
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠8
♥3
♦QJ965
♣AQ7654
|
♠JT972
♥KJ72
♦42
♣83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3/2 ♠4/3 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 4 ♠8 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ S 4 ♦Q 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Potter-Sheridan
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦9 4-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
6 |
♠Q975
♥Q9
♦AT5
♣AQT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT863
♥84
♦96
♣J652
|
♠AJ42
♥A63
♦KQ3
♣973
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2/1NT ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3/2 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♥Q 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Potter-Sheridan
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 ♦6 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall vs 5-Smith-Smith
150 0.00 2.00 3N S -3 ♣5 4-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
7 |
♠52
♥QJ5
♦AQT8
♣K965
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A4
♥AT8
♦J9654
♣Q73
|
♠KT93
♥K92
♦73
♣AJT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2/3♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 2 ♦K 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -2 ♦6 4-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
200 0.50 1.50 2♦ N -2 ♣J 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Potter-Sheridan
|
8 |
♠7
♥AQ932
♦Q63
♣Q843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K9
♥854
♦KT94
♣A652
|
♠JT8543
♥JT
♦75
♣KJT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.75 0.25 4♥ N -1 ♠J 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 2-Potter-Sheridan
170 0.25 1.75 2♠ E 4 ♣7 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
9 |
♠QJ54
♥J842
♦Q64
♣QJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKT98
♥A7
♦AJ953
♣4
|
♠7632
♥KQ
♦T2
♣AKT87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N W 3 ♠4 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 ♥2 2-Potter-Sheridan vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W 4 ♥2 5-Smith-Smith vs 4-Collier-Kliger
|
10 |
♠76
♥AJ42
♦952
♣T643
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q2
♥Q95
♦QT7
♣A9852
|
♠AKT953
♥T876
♦K84
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ E 2 ♣K 5-Smith-Smith vs 4-Collier-Kliger
200 1.00 1.00 2♦ S -2 ♠2 2-Potter-Sheridan vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
300 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -3 ♠A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
|
11 |
♠JT8762
♥A984
♦T
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A543
♥KJ2
♦6432
♣K9
|
♠KQ9
♥QT763
♦AQ85
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 4♣ S 5 ♠A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
150 1.50 0.50 3♣ S 5 ♦6 5-Smith-Smith vs 4-Collier-Kliger
130 0.00 2.00 3♣ S 4 ♠A 2-Potter-Sheridan vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
|
12 |
♠AJ82
♥Q65
♦T876
♣J6
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K75
♥KT3
♦A543
♣A73
|
♠T43
♥A987
♦QJ92
♣42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 ♦K 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 3-Lamers-Dantzscher
50 1.50 0.50 2♦ W -1 ♣J 2-Potter-Sheridan vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♦Q 5-Smith-Smith vs 4-Collier-Kliger
|
13 |
♠KQ64
♥AJ76
♦KT
♣QT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠8
♥K2
♦QJ632
♣AK764
|
♠T932
♥QT83
♦987
♣83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♥3 3-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
150 1.00 1.00 2N N 3 ♦9 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Collier-Kliger
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 3 ♣K 2-Potter-Sheridan vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
14 |
♠T43
♥JT4
♦972
♣AT87
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠9
♥KQ8652
♦K863
♣J6
|
♠8652
♥A
♦AJT5
♣9532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 1♠ S 3 ♦8 2-Potter-Sheridan vs 5-Smith-Smith
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ E 3 ♠A 3-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ W 4 ♠3 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Collier-Kliger
|
15 |
♠86
♥KJ87
♦A73
♣9762
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ3
♥AQT62
♦KQ6
♣T5
|
♠KT9752
♥4
♦J5
♣AQJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2/3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ E 4 ♦T 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Collier-Kliger
420 1.50 0.50 4♠ E 4 ♦9 3-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 ♣8 2-Potter-Sheridan vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
16 |
♠AKQJ73
♥754
♦832
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠98
♥AK98
♦T
♣QJ9843
|
♠T542
♥-
♦K64
♣AKT652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ ♦2 ♥4/3 ♠3/1 NT5/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♦T 2-Potter-Sheridan vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 ♣A 6-Ewan-Gammel vs 4-Collier-Kliger
130 0.00 2.00 4♣ E 4 ♠6 3-Lamers-Dantzscher vs 1-Wilkie-Mendenhall
|