|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.88 0.13 3N N 6 ♣5 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
430 2.63 1.38 3N S 4 ♠T 4-Davis-Garrett vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
400 0.75 3.25 3N N 3 ♠2 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 1-Gulka-Berry
400 0.75 3.25 3N N 3 ♣K 3-Miller-Swenson vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.88 0.13 3N N 5 ♣8 4-Davis-Garrett vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
600 2.63 1.38 3N N 3 ♥3 3-Miller-Swenson vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
130 1.38 2.63 3♦ N 4 ♣4 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 1-Gulka-Berry
400 0.13 3.88 6N N -4 ♣4 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2N E -1 ♣5 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
110 2.63 1.38 3♣ W 3 ♥K 4-Davis-Garrett vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
130 1.38 2.63 3♣ W 4 ♥A 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 1-Gulka-Berry
150 0.13 3.88 1N E 3 ♥3 3-Miller-Swenson vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♠ W -1 ♦A 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
70 2.63 1.38 1♦ N 1 ♣T 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 3-Skinner-Poole
110 1.38 2.63 1♠ E 2 ♦8 4-Davis-Garrett vs 1-Gulka-Berry
300 0.13 3.88 4♦ N -3 ♠Q 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3N W -4 ♣2 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
100 2.63 1.38 3N W -2 ♦4 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
50 1.38 2.63 4♠ E -1 ♥J 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 3-Skinner-Poole
400 0.13 3.88 3N W 3 ♦4 4-Davis-Garrett vs 1-Gulka-Berry
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.63 1.38 3♥ W -1 ♦J 4-Davis-Garrett vs 1-Gulka-Berry
100 2.63 1.38 2♥ W -1 ♠2 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
100 2.63 1.38 1♦ E -1 ♣2 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 3-Skinner-Poole
50 0.13 3.88 2♥ S -1 ♦2 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ N 3 ♥3 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 1-Gulka-Berry
100 3.00 1.00 5♣ W -1 ♠A 3-Miller-Swenson vs 3-Skinner-Poole
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 ♣3 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ W 4 ♠A 4-Davis-Garrett vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 4 ♣6 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 6N W -3 ♥Q 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
430 3.00 1.00 3N W 4 ♠5 3-Miller-Swenson vs 3-Skinner-Poole
520 2.00 2.00 3N W 7 ♠5 4-Davis-Garrett vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
990 1.00 3.00 6N W 6 ♥J 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
1020 0.00 4.00 6N W 7 ♥2 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 1-Gulka-Berry
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 2N W -2 ♠2 4-Davis-Garrett vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
100 2.63 1.38 2♦ W -1 ♦5 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
100 1.38 2.63 1N N -2 ♥K 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 1-Gulka-Berry
150 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -3 ♥K 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N E -4 ♥6 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
100 2.63 1.38 3N W -1 ♠2 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 1-Gulka-Berry
110 1.38 2.63 2♣ E 3 ♠3 3-Miller-Swenson vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
150 0.13 3.88 2N W 3 ♣T 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 2♠ E 5 ♥2 3-Miller-Swenson vs 2-Von Barandy-Von Barandy
230 2.63 1.38 3♠ E 6 ♥6 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 1-Gulka-Berry
450 1.38 2.63 4♠ E 5 ♣A 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
480 0.13 3.88 4♠ E 6 ♦T 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 6♣ W -2 ♠8 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 6 ♣A 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 1-Gulka-Berry
980 0.33 3.67 6♠ W 6 ♣A 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.25 0.75 2♠ W 4 ♦9 3-Miller-Swenson vs 1-Gulka-Berry
170 3.25 0.75 2♠ E 4 ♣8 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 3-Skinner-Poole
600 1.38 2.63 3N W 3 ♦2 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
660 0.13 3.88 3N W 5 ♥3 4-Davis-Garrett vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 2♥ N 4 ♣8 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 3-Skinner-Poole
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ N 3 ♦2 4-Davis-Garrett vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ N 3 ♠4 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
90 0.13 3.88 1♣ W 2 ♦Q 3-Miller-Swenson vs 1-Gulka-Berry
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N E -2 ♥J 1-Gammel-Patterson vs 3-Skinner-Poole
110 2.63 1.38 3♦ W 3 ♠2 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
430 1.38 2.63 3N W 4 ♥Q 3-Miller-Swenson vs 1-Gulka-Berry
460 0.13 3.88 3N W 5 ♥7 4-Davis-Garrett vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.88 0.13 3N S 5 ♥5 4-Davis-Garrett vs 3-Skinner-Poole
420 2.63 1.38 4♠ S 4 ♣6 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
400 1.38 2.63 5♦ S 5 ♥Q 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
100 0.13 3.88 3♥ E -1 ♦K 3-Miller-Swenson vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♥ S 3 ♠9 4-Davis-Garrett vs 3-Skinner-Poole
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ S 2 ♣9 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
100 1.38 2.63 2♠ W -2 ♦K 3-Miller-Swenson vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
100 0.13 3.88 1N N -2 ♣3 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 ♣T 2-DeWilkins-Arora vs 4-Marr-Dantzscher
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 ♣2 3-Miller-Swenson vs 6-Kessel-Thoma
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♥7 4-Davis-Garrett vs 3-Skinner-Poole
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 4 ♣9 5-Tomlinson-Bundy vs 5-Hannon-Gibson
|