|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♥6 4-Miller-Hummel vs 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♦K 5-Player-Player vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ S 4 ♦6 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N E 3 ♦4 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♠T 5-Player-Player vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♦T 4-Miller-Hummel vs 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣3 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 ♣K 5-Player-Player vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 ♥J 4-Miller-Hummel vs 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ E 2 ♦2 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
120 0.50 1.50 2N W 2 ♦5 4-Miller-Hummel vs 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle
120 0.50 1.50 2N W 2 ♦5 5-Player-Player vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 1♠ S -2 ♥8 4-Miller-Hummel vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
590 1.00 1.00 4♠* W 4 ♣T 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle
1400 0.00 2.00 2♠* S -5 ♦T 1-Russo-Mendenhall vs 5-Player-Player
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♣ E -2 ♦8 1-Russo-Mendenhall vs 5-Player-Player
100 1.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♦8 4-Miller-Hummel vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ W 3 ♠Q 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 2.00 0.00 1♥ E 1 ♥8 4-Miller-Hummel vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
90 0.50 1.50 1N E 1 ♦8 1-Russo-Mendenhall vs 5-Player-Player
90 0.50 1.50 1N E 1 ♦3 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N W 4 ♥9 4-Miller-Hummel vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 ♥8 1-Russo-Mendenhall vs 5-Player-Player
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ E 5 ♣5 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♦Q 5-Player-Player vs 4-Miller-Hummel
630 1.50 0.50 3N E 4 ♦3 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
690 0.00 2.00 3N E 6 ♠6 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♦J 5-Player-Player vs 4-Miller-Hummel
600 1.00 1.00 5♣ N 5 ♦6 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
210 0.00 2.00 2N S 5 ♥A 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♥4 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
150 1.00 1.00 2N S 3 ♥8 5-Player-Player vs 4-Miller-Hummel
50 0.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♣3 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ N 3 ♠7 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 3-Marr-Dantzscher
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ N 2 ♠7 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
100 0.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♠3 5-Player-Player vs 4-Miller-Hummel
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ W 3 ♥4 3-Marr-Dantzscher vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 4 ♥8 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 4-Miller-Hummel
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 5 ♦5 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle vs 5-Player-Player
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♣6 3-Marr-Dantzscher vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
100 1.50 0.50 4♦ E -2 ♠2 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 4-Miller-Hummel
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ W 4 ♥8 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle vs 5-Player-Player
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♣A 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle vs 5-Player-Player
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ W 2 ♦T 3-Marr-Dantzscher vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
170 0.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 ♣A 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 4-Miller-Hummel
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ W 6 ♣A 6-Gammel-Hayden vs 4-Miller-Hummel
1050 1.00 1.00 5♠* W 6 ♥Q 3-Marr-Dantzscher vs 1-Russo-Mendenhall
1660 0.00 2.00 6♠* W 6 ♣A 2-DeWilkins-Tuttle vs 5-Player-Player
|