|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
230 3.00 1.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
450 1.00 3.00 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 3-Garrett-Marr
450 1.00 3.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
450 1.00 3.00 5-Bauer-Player vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 4.00 0.00 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 3-Garrett-Marr
110 3.00 1.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
140 2.00 2.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
170 1.00 3.00 5-Bauer-Player vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
420 0.00 4.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.88 0.13 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 3-Garrett-Marr
100 2.63 1.38 4-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
50 1.38 2.63 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
100 0.13 3.88 3-Miller-Hummel vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
140 2.50 1.50 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
140 2.50 1.50 4-Collier-Kliger vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
100 0.50 3.50 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
100 0.50 3.50 5-Bauer-Player vs 3-Garrett-Marr
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
100 1.50 2.50 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
100 1.50 2.50 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
100 1.50 2.50 4-Collier-Kliger vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
100 1.50 2.50 5-Bauer-Player vs 3-Garrett-Marr
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 5-Bauer-Player vs 3-Garrett-Marr
170 2.50 1.50 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
170 2.50 1.50 3-Miller-Hummel vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
50 1.00 3.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
100 0.00 4.00 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 3.00 1.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
130 3.00 1.00 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
130 3.00 1.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 3-Garrett-Marr
170 0.50 3.50 4-Collier-Kliger vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
170 0.50 3.50 5-Bauer-Player vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 4.00 0.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 3-Garrett-Marr
170 3.00 1.00 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
140 2.00 2.00 5-Bauer-Player vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
80 1.00 3.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
100 0.00 4.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
50 2.50 1.50 3-Miller-Hummel vs 3-Garrett-Marr
50 2.50 1.50 5-Bauer-Player vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
620 1.00 3.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
650 0.00 4.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.50 0.50 3-Miller-Hummel vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
100 3.50 0.50 5-Bauer-Player vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
110 2.00 2.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
140 1.00 3.00 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
300 0.00 4.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 3-Garrett-Marr
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 4.00 0.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
400 2.50 1.50 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
400 2.50 1.50 5-Bauer-Player vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
150 1.00 3.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 3-Garrett-Marr
110 0.00 4.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 3.88 0.13 3-Miller-Hummel vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
120 2.00 2.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
120 2.00 2.00 5-Bauer-Player vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
100 0.13 3.88 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 3-Garrett-Marr
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.50 0.50 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
110 3.50 0.50 5-Bauer-Player vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
130 2.00 2.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Garrett-Marr
150 1.00 3.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
600 0.00 4.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 4.00 0.00 5-Bauer-Player vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
150 3.00 1.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Garrett-Marr
50 1.50 2.50 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
50 1.50 2.50 3-Miller-Hummel vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
90 0.00 4.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
|
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 3-Miller-Hummel vs 1-DeWilkins-Tuttle
80 3.00 1.00 2-Skinner-Ramier vs 4-Hargus-Hargus
100 2.00 2.00 1-Mendenhall-Gammel vs 2-Verlander-Hayden
140 1.00 3.00 4-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Garrett-Marr
420 0.00 4.00 5-Bauer-Player vs 5-Crowle-Bryant
|