1 |
♠6
♥A642
♦Q4
♣JT9763
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠JT82
♥973
♦KJ8
♣854
|
♠KQ54
♥KQT
♦AT65
♣A2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 8.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♣9 1-Thier-Johnson vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
50 6.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♠3 3-Homan-Daling vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
50 6.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♣J 10-Vales-Warner vs 9-Condon-Poulton
70 5.00 3.00 1♦ E 1 ♣K 7-Nance-Baker vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
90 4.00 4.00 1♦ E 2 ♣K 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 10-Markham-Markham
110 3.00 5.00 1♦ W 3 ♣5 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 6-Utter-Utter
170 2.00 6.00 3♠ W 4 ♣7 8-Belton-Poole vs 5-Smith-Smith
180 1.00 7.00 1N E 4 ♦2 5-Katz-Katz vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
420 0.00 8.00 4♠ W 4 ♣3 9-Bader-Potter vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
|
2 |
♠A92
♥KJ5
♦A73
♣KT52
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K86543
♥Q84
♦KQ86
♣-
|
♠QJT
♥A963
♦92
♣QJ87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 7.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♣2 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 10-Markham-Markham
50 7.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 ♠2 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 6-Utter-Utter
110 5.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 ♠2 1-Thier-Johnson vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
110 5.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 ♣5 5-Katz-Katz vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
110 5.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 ♣2 3-Homan-Daling vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
140 2.00 6.00 3♠ W 3 ♣2 10-Vales-Warner vs 9-Condon-Poulton
140 2.00 6.00 2♠ W 3 ♣5 8-Belton-Poole vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 2.00 6.00 2♠ E 3 ♦J 7-Nance-Baker vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
170 0.00 8.00 2♠ W 4 ♠2 9-Bader-Potter vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
|
3 |
♠743
♥KJT92
♦Q75
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A
♥Q7653
♦3
♣K97542
|
♠QT962
♥4
♦AJT4
♣A86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 7.00 1.00 1N N -2 ♠9 1-Thier-Johnson vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
100 7.00 1.00 2♥ N -2 ♣A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 10-Markham-Markham
100 7.00 1.00 2♦ S -2 ♠A 8-Belton-Poole vs 5-Smith-Smith
110 4.00 4.00 3♣ W 3 ♦5 5-Katz-Katz vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
110 4.00 4.00 3♣ W 3 ♦5 10-Vales-Warner vs 9-Condon-Poulton
110 4.00 4.00 2♣ W 3 ♦5 3-Homan-Daling vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
130 1.50 6.50 3♣ W 4 ♦Q 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 6-Utter-Utter
130 1.50 6.50 3♣ E 4 ♦6 7-Nance-Baker vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
150 0.00 8.00 2♦ S -3 ♠A 9-Bader-Potter vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
|
4 |
♠K87
♥J9842
♦763
♣85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠6
♥AQ65
♦AQ2
♣AJT93
|
♠AT32
♥KT
♦T85
♣KQ74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 8.00 0.00 6N E -2 ♠Q 8-Belton-Poole vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
660 6.00 2.00 3N W 5 ♥4 9-Bader-Potter vs 6-Utter-Utter
660 6.00 2.00 3N E 5 ♠5 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
660 6.00 2.00 3N E 5 ♦4 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 9-Condon-Poulton
690 3.50 4.50 3N W 6 ♥4 1-Thier-Johnson vs 10-Markham-Markham
690 3.50 4.50 3N W 6 ♥4 7-Nance-Baker vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
720 2.00 6.00 3N W 7 ♥4 10-Vales-Warner vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
1390 0.50 7.50 6♣ W 7 ♦7 5-Katz-Katz vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
1390 0.50 7.50 6♣ W 7 ♣5 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
5 |
♠A62
♥KJ
♦T32
♣98652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQT8
♥95
♦AJ6
♣KT43
|
♠J75
♥AT63
♦K94
♣AQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥7 8-Belton-Poole vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
430 6.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥4 7-Nance-Baker vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
430 6.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥4 9-Bader-Potter vs 6-Utter-Utter
430 6.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥4 10-Vales-Warner vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
460 2.00 6.00 3N W 5 ♣5 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
460 2.00 6.00 3N E 5 ♥4 1-Thier-Johnson vs 10-Markham-Markham
460 2.00 6.00 3N E 5 ♥4 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 5-Smith-Smith
460 2.00 6.00 3N E 5 ♥4 5-Katz-Katz vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
460 2.00 6.00 3N E 5 ♥4 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 9-Condon-Poulton
|
6 |
♠JT
♥K86432
♦KJ
♣J82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A963
♥A
♦T974
♣KQ63
|
♠KQ4
♥J75
♦A2
♣AT975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 7♣ 3♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 8.00 0.00 3♣ E 6 ♦5 10-Vales-Warner vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
300 7.00 1.00 4♥* N -2 ♦A 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
600 6.00 2.00 5♣ E 5 ♦8 8-Belton-Poole vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
650 5.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 ♣2 5-Katz-Katz vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
660 2.50 5.50 3N W 5 ♥4 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 9-Condon-Poulton
660 2.50 5.50 3N E 5 ♦5 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 5-Smith-Smith
660 2.50 5.50 3N E 5 ♦5 7-Nance-Baker vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
660 2.50 5.50 3N E 5 ♦5 9-Bader-Potter vs 6-Utter-Utter
690 0.00 8.00 3N W 6 ♠J 1-Thier-Johnson vs 10-Markham-Markham
|
7 |
♠K53
♥T6
♦T85
♣AK753
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ8
♥Q43
♦A9
♣98642
|
♠T9764
♥KJ2
♦7432
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 7.50 0.50 2♣ W -3 ♥T 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
300 7.50 0.50 2♣ W -3 ♥T 8-Belton-Poole vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
140 6.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♣8 7-Nance-Baker vs 10-Markham-Markham
120 4.00 4.00 2N N 2 ♠9 10-Vales-Warner vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
120 4.00 4.00 2N N 2 ♠6 3-Homan-Daling vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
120 4.00 4.00 2N N 2 ♠6 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
110 2.00 6.00 2♥ S 2 ♣9 5-Katz-Katz vs 6-Utter-Utter
90 1.00 7.00 2♦ S 2 ♣9 1-Thier-Johnson vs 9-Condon-Poulton
100 0.00 8.00 2N S -1 ♣4 9-Bader-Potter vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
8 |
♠KT732
♥K7
♦J8763
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q9
♥A986
♦5
♣AT8654
|
♠854
♥Q52
♦T2
♣KQJ32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♣K 1-Thier-Johnson vs 9-Condon-Poulton
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♣K 5-Katz-Katz vs 6-Utter-Utter
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♣K 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
450 6.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 ♣K 10-Vales-Warner vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
420 4.00 4.00 4♠ N 4 ♣K 7-Nance-Baker vs 10-Markham-Markham
150 2.50 5.50 3♦ S 5 ♣A 3-Homan-Daling vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
150 2.50 5.50 3♦ S 5 ♣A 8-Belton-Poole vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
50 1.00 7.00 5♠ N -1 ♣K 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
110 0.00 8.00 3♣ E 3 ♦A 9-Bader-Potter vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
9 |
♠T43
♥A3
♦QT9862
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K862
♥KJ72
♦3
♣9876
|
♠975
♥QT65
♦KJ54
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 7.50 0.50 1N S 2 ♥2 10-Vales-Warner vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
120 7.50 0.50 1N S 2 ♣9 3-Homan-Daling vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
50 4.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♠2 5-Katz-Katz vs 6-Utter-Utter
50 4.50 3.50 2N N -1 ♥5 9-Bader-Potter vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 4.50 3.50 3♦ N -1 ♣A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
50 4.50 3.50 3♦ N -1 ♣A 7-Nance-Baker vs 10-Markham-Markham
100 1.50 6.50 3N N -2 ♥7 8-Belton-Poole vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
100 1.50 6.50 4♣ S -2 ♦3 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
500 0.00 8.00 5♦* N -3 ♥5 1-Thier-Johnson vs 9-Condon-Poulton
|
10 |
♠93
♥AJ42
♦752
♣A963
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K6
♥T
♦AKQT93
♣JT82
|
♠QT875
♥KQ73
♦6
♣Q75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 7.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥8 10-Vales-Warner vs 6-Utter-Utter
100 7.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 ♣6 8-Belton-Poole vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
110 5.50 2.50 3♦ W 3 ♣A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
110 5.50 2.50 2♦ W 3 ♠9 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
130 3.50 4.50 2♦ W 4 ♠9 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 10-Markham-Markham
130 3.50 4.50 2♦ W 4 ♠9 9-Bader-Potter vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
150 1.50 6.50 2N W 3 ♣3 3-Homan-Daling vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
150 1.50 6.50 2N W 3 ♣3 7-Nance-Baker vs 9-Condon-Poulton
600 0.00 8.00 3N W 3 ♣3 1-Thier-Johnson vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
|
11 |
♠Q95
♥T62
♦T
♣AKJ762
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KJT843
♥97
♦AK95
♣9
|
♠A7
♥KJ5
♦QJ862
♣T43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦1 ♠3/2 NT2 |
EW: 4♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 8.00 0.00 4♦ E -2 ♣5 10-Vales-Warner vs 6-Utter-Utter
50 7.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 ♣Q 8-Belton-Poole vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
100 6.00 2.00 5♣ N -2 ♠A 1-Thier-Johnson vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
110 5.00 3.00 3♦ E 3 ♣5 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
140 4.00 4.00 3♠ W 3 ♣A 7-Nance-Baker vs 9-Condon-Poulton
150 3.00 5.00 3♦ W 5 ♣K 9-Bader-Potter vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
420 2.00 6.00 4♠ W 4 ♣A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
450 1.00 7.00 4♠ W 5 ♣A 3-Homan-Daling vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
500 0.00 8.00 5♣* N -3 ♣4 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 10-Markham-Markham
|
12 |
♠QT76
♥Q95
♦-
♣KQ9875
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠43
♥JT73
♦KT63
♣T43
|
♠5
♥864
♦AQ98754
♣A2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♥ 6♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.50 2.50 5♠ S 6 ♦K 7-Nance-Baker vs 9-Condon-Poulton
680 5.50 2.50 5♠ S 6 ♦T 3-Homan-Daling vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
680 5.50 2.50 5♠ S 6 ♦3 8-Belton-Poole vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
680 5.50 2.50 5♠ S 6 ♦3 10-Vales-Warner vs 6-Utter-Utter
680 5.50 2.50 4♠ S 6 ♦K 1-Thier-Johnson vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
680 5.50 2.50 4♠ S 6 ♦K 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
500 2.00 6.00 6♦* E -3 ♥A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
100 0.50 7.50 5♦ E -2 ♥A 9-Bader-Potter vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
100 0.50 7.50 4♦* E -1 ♥A 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 10-Markham-Markham
|
13 |
♠KJ8
♥AK52
♦KQJ
♣K52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠2
♥T43
♦T985
♣A9863
|
♠AQT963
♥Q976
♦A4
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 8.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♠T 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 9-Condon-Poulton
150 6.00 2.00 2N N 3 ♠A 9-Bader-Potter vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
150 6.00 2.00 2N N 3 ♠9 3-Homan-Daling vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
150 6.00 2.00 1N S 3 ♠9 10-Vales-Warner vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
120 4.00 4.00 2N N 2 ♠T 5-Katz-Katz vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 2.50 5.50 2♠ E -1 ♣Q 7-Nance-Baker vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
100 2.50 5.50 3♥ E -1 ♣Q 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
100 1.00 7.00 3N N -1 ♠A 1-Thier-Johnson vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
200 0.00 8.00 2N N -2 ♠9 8-Belton-Poole vs 10-Markham-Markham
|
14 |
♠AKQ865
♥KJT93
♦-
♣QJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠J9432
♥6
♦QJ73
♣T87
|
♠-
♥AQ72
♦T8642
♣A642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1/2NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1/2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 ♦T 9-Bader-Potter vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
50 6.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 ♦8 3-Homan-Daling vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
50 6.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♦8 8-Belton-Poole vs 10-Markham-Markham
50 6.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♣A 10-Vales-Warner vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
100 2.00 6.00 5♠ N -2 ♣A 7-Nance-Baker vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
100 2.00 6.00 4♠ N -2 ♦2 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
100 2.00 6.00 4♥ N -2 ♦8 1-Thier-Johnson vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
100 2.00 6.00 4♥ N -2 ♦8 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 9-Condon-Poulton
100 2.00 6.00 3♥ N -2 ♦4 5-Katz-Katz vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
15 |
♠JT9743
♥97
♦QJ94
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK
♥AJ865
♦A865
♣T3
|
♠Q
♥K32
♦K32
♣986542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 8.00 0.00 3♠* N 3 ♣9 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 9-Condon-Poulton
100 6.50 1.50 4♥ W -2 ♠J 3-Homan-Daling vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
100 6.50 1.50 4♥ W -2 ♠J 10-Vales-Warner vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
50 4.50 3.50 4♥ W -1 ♠J 9-Bader-Potter vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
50 4.50 3.50 4♥ W -1 ♣K 1-Thier-Johnson vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
110 2.50 5.50 2♥ W 2 ♠J 7-Nance-Baker vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
110 2.50 5.50 2♥ W 2 ♠7 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
300 1.00 7.00 4♠ N -3 ♥2 8-Belton-Poole vs 10-Markham-Markham
420 0.00 8.00 4♥ W 4 ♠J 5-Katz-Katz vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
16 |
♠J7
♥T95
♦KJ83
♣AT96
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ3
♥AJ62
♦96
♣K843
|
♠T98652
♥KQ7
♦2
♣Q75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 5♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 8.00 0.00 3♦ S -1 ♠A 5-Katz-Katz vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
170 7.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 ♦A 8-Belton-Poole vs 9-Condon-Poulton
200 4.50 3.50 3♠ W 5 ♥9 10-Vales-Warner vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
200 4.50 3.50 3♠ E 5 ♦A 1-Thier-Johnson vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 4.50 3.50 3♠ E 5 ♦A 3-Homan-Daling vs 10-Markham-Markham
200 4.50 3.50 3♠ E 5 ♦A 9-Bader-Potter vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
230 2.00 6.00 3♠ E 6 ♣J 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 6-Utter-Utter
650 0.50 7.50 4♠ E 5 ♦A 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
650 0.50 7.50 4♠ E 5 ♦A 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
|
17 |
♠A3
♥7
♦AJ9732
♣Q732
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QT42
♥A9865
♦Q6
♣86
|
♠J976
♥K3
♦KT8
♣KT54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 8.00 0.00 1N N 3 ♣4 5-Katz-Katz vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
130 7.00 1.00 2♦ N 4 ♣4 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
110 5.50 2.50 2♥ S 2 ♠6 8-Belton-Poole vs 9-Condon-Poulton
110 5.50 2.50 2♦ N 3 ♠6 1-Thier-Johnson vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 3.50 4.50 3♠* W -1 ♥7 3-Homan-Daling vs 10-Markham-Markham
100 3.50 4.50 2♠ E -2 ♦5 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 6-Utter-Utter
100 1.50 6.50 2N S -2 ♠2 9-Bader-Potter vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
100 1.50 6.50 2N S -2 ♠2 10-Vales-Warner vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
150 0.00 8.00 2N S -3 ♠4 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
|
18 |
♠AT765
♥K87
♦7
♣AQJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K82
♥A964
♦KJ2
♣T64
|
♠9
♥Q32
♦AQT86
♣K982
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1/2♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ -/2NT ♠4 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 8.00 0.00 4♦* E -2 ♠Q 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
140 6.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 ♦A 5-Katz-Katz vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
140 6.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 ♦A 9-Bader-Potter vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
140 6.00 2.00 2♠ N 3 ♠9 3-Homan-Daling vs 10-Markham-Markham
50 3.00 5.00 3N W -1 ♠6 1-Thier-Johnson vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 3.00 5.00 3N W -1 ♣J 8-Belton-Poole vs 9-Condon-Poulton
50 3.00 5.00 3♦ E -1 ♠Q 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
110 1.00 7.00 3♦ W 3 ♠A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 6-Utter-Utter
150 0.00 8.00 2N W 3 ♣5 10-Vales-Warner vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
|
19 |
♠A654
♥KJ
♦AKQ2
♣T98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQJT8
♥T974
♦J6
♣63
|
♠72
♥Q83
♦T543
♣AQ52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 7.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♦T 10-Vales-Warner vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
430 7.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♦5 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 6-Utter-Utter
430 7.00 1.00 3N N 4 ♦3 5-Katz-Katz vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
400 4.50 3.50 3N N 3 ♣2 1-Thier-Johnson vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
400 4.50 3.50 3N N 3 ♣2 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
150 2.50 5.50 1N N 3 ♣2 3-Homan-Daling vs 9-Condon-Poulton
150 2.50 5.50 1N N 3 ♣2 7-Nance-Baker vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
50 1.00 7.00 3♥ N -1 ♠K 9-Bader-Potter vs 10-Markham-Markham
100 0.00 8.00 3♥ S -2 ♠K 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
20 |
♠KT93
♥QJ9
♦QJ4
♣Q92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠8765
♥A753
♦A86
♣AJ
|
♠AQJ
♥K6
♦K9752
♣873
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♣5 7-Nance-Baker vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
200 7.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♣5 10-Vales-Warner vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
100 4.50 3.50 3N E -1 ♣5 3-Homan-Daling vs 9-Condon-Poulton
100 4.50 3.50 3N E -1 ♣5 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
100 4.50 3.50 3N E -1 ♣5 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 4.50 3.50 3N E -1 ♣5 9-Bader-Potter vs 10-Markham-Markham
130 2.00 6.00 2♦ W 4 ♥Q 1-Thier-Johnson vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
600 1.00 7.00 3N E 3 ♣5 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 6-Utter-Utter
630 0.00 8.00 3N E 4 ♥2 5-Katz-Katz vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
|
21 |
♠KT974
♥Q864
♦54
♣A5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ632
♥AJ2
♦76
♣T43
|
♠A
♥K975
♦T982
♣KJ96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 1/-♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠7/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 8.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 ♦5 7-Nance-Baker vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
120 5.50 2.50 2N S 2 ♠2 1-Thier-Johnson vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
120 5.50 2.50 2N N 2 ♠A 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 6-Utter-Utter
120 5.50 2.50 2N N 2 ♠A 10-Vales-Warner vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
120 5.50 2.50 1N N 2 ♦T 3-Homan-Daling vs 9-Condon-Poulton
110 3.00 5.00 2♦ S 3 ♠Q 5-Katz-Katz vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
90 2.00 6.00 2♦ S 2 ♠J 9-Bader-Potter vs 10-Markham-Markham
100 0.50 7.50 2♦ S -1 ♠3 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.50 7.50 2♦ S -1 ♥A 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
|
22 |
♠AJ85
♥KQ8
♦KQ82
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K4
♥A3
♦AJ973
♣QT84
|
♠QT9632
♥J7
♦64
♣765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 6.00 2.00 4♥ S 5 ♠K 1-Thier-Johnson vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
450 6.00 2.00 4♥ S 5 ♠K 3-Homan-Daling vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
450 6.00 2.00 4♥ S 5 ♥A 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 10-Markham-Markham
450 6.00 2.00 4♥ S 5 ♦A 10-Vales-Warner vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
450 6.00 2.00 4♥ S 5 ♣8 7-Nance-Baker vs 6-Utter-Utter
420 3.00 5.00 4♥ N 4 ♦6 8-Belton-Poole vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
200 1.50 6.50 3♥ S 5 ♠K 5-Katz-Katz vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
200 1.50 6.50 2♥ N 5 ♦6 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
180 0.00 8.00 2N N 4 ♦6 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
23 |
♠A82
♥Q8
♦AQJ862
♣K8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K73
♥KJT643
♦7
♣732
|
♠Q6
♥A5
♦K953
♣AJT95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1/-♠ ♣3 ♥3 ♠7/6 NT4/3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 8.00 0.00 2♠ N 2 ♣A 10-Vales-Warner vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
100 6.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♠A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
100 6.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♦A 3-Homan-Daling vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
100 6.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♦A 8-Belton-Poole vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
140 4.00 4.00 3♥ W 3 ♥8 1-Thier-Johnson vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
170 3.00 5.00 3♥ W 4 ♦A 5-Katz-Katz vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
200 2.00 6.00 3♦ N -2 ♥A 7-Nance-Baker vs 6-Utter-Utter
300 0.50 7.50 4♦ N -3 ♥A 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 5-Smith-Smith
300 0.50 7.50 4♦ N -3 ♥6 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 10-Markham-Markham
|
24 |
♠83
♥KQ
♦Q764
♣QJ965
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJT75
♥76
♦95
♣A842
|
♠K96
♥T82
♦KJ3
♣KT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 8.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♠A 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 5-Smith-Smith
150 7.00 1.00 4♠ W -3 ♥K 10-Vales-Warner vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
140 4.50 3.50 3♥ S 3 ♠A 8-Belton-Poole vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
140 4.50 3.50 3♥ S 3 ♥7 5-Katz-Katz vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
140 4.50 3.50 3♥ S 3 ♦9 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 10-Markham-Markham
140 4.50 3.50 2♥ S 3 ♦5 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
100 2.00 6.00 3♠ E -2 ♥A 7-Nance-Baker vs 6-Utter-Utter
50 0.50 7.50 4♥ S -1 ♠A 1-Thier-Johnson vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
50 0.50 7.50 3♦ S -1 ♠A 3-Homan-Daling vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
|
25 |
♠AT8732
♥97
♦43
♣J93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q
♥J853
♦QT6
♣KQT54
|
♠95
♥QT62
♦AJ875
♣A2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 8.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 ♥6 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
140 5.00 3.00 3♠ N 3 ♥2 8-Belton-Poole vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
140 5.00 3.00 3♠ N 3 ♣A 1-Thier-Johnson vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
140 5.00 3.00 2♠ N 3 ♥2 5-Katz-Katz vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
140 5.00 3.00 2♠ N 3 ♣A 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
140 5.00 3.00 2♠ N 3 ♣A 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
50 1.50 6.50 4♠ S -1 ♣K 9-Bader-Potter vs 9-Condon-Poulton
50 1.50 6.50 4♠ N -1 ♣A 3-Homan-Daling vs 6-Utter-Utter
140 0.00 8.00 3♥ W 3 ♠A 7-Nance-Baker vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
26 |
♠QT
♥AT987
♦T84
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠J643
♥Q
♦AKQJ76
♣85
|
♠AK8752
♥K542
♦32
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 8.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 ♣A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
650 4.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 ♣K 1-Thier-Johnson vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
650 4.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♥6 7-Nance-Baker vs 5-Smith-Smith
650 4.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♥3 3-Homan-Daling vs 6-Utter-Utter
650 4.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♥3 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
650 4.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♥3 5-Katz-Katz vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
650 4.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 ♣A 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
680 0.50 7.50 5♠ E 6 ♣A 9-Bader-Potter vs 9-Condon-Poulton
680 0.50 7.50 4♠ E 6 ♣A 8-Belton-Poole vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
|
27 |
♠KQ85
♥AQ82
♦AQ743
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T
♥K76
♦86
♣AK87632
|
♠97632
♥53
♦J952
♣QJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♦ 7♥ 6♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 6.50 1.50 5♥ S 6 ♣A 5-Katz-Katz vs 1-Hoffelt-Hoffelt
480 6.50 1.50 5♥ S 6 ♣K 3-Homan-Daling vs 6-Utter-Utter
480 6.50 1.50 4♥ S 6 ♣A 1-Thier-Johnson vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
480 6.50 1.50 4♥ S 6 ♣A 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ S 4 ♣A 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
300 3.00 5.00 3♣* W -2 ♠K 8-Belton-Poole vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
260 2.00 6.00 2♥ S 7 ♣A 7-Nance-Baker vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 1.00 7.00 3♦ N 6 ♣Q 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
150 0.00 8.00 4♣ W -3 ♠K 9-Bader-Potter vs 9-Condon-Poulton
|
28 |
♠875
♥AJ652
♦K4
♣J97
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT
♥T9874
♦J2
♣AKQ8
|
♠KJ9
♥K3
♦QT976
♣T52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3/4 ♦4 ♥4/5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 7.50 0.50 2♥ W 2 ♠8 5-Katz-Katz vs 9-Condon-Poulton
110 7.50 0.50 2♥ W 2 ♠7 3-Homan-Daling vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 5.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♠8 8-Belton-Poole vs 6-Utter-Utter
140 5.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♠7 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
150 4.00 4.00 2N E 3 ♠3 9-Bader-Potter vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
170 3.00 5.00 2♥ W 4 ♦K 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
180 2.00 6.00 1N E 4 ♠3 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
400 1.00 7.00 3N E 3 ♠3 7-Nance-Baker vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
430 0.00 8.00 3N E 4 ♠3 10-Vales-Warner vs 10-Markham-Markham
|
29 |
♠762
♥KQ9
♦J3
♣AQT62
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJT98
♥754
♦AK54
♣4
|
♠Q53
♥AJ63
♦72
♣9873
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 7.00 1.00 3♣ N 3 ♠Q 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
110 7.00 1.00 3♣ N 3 ♠Q 7-Nance-Baker vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
110 7.00 1.00 3♣ N 3 ♠3 5-Katz-Katz vs 9-Condon-Poulton
90 4.50 3.50 1N S 1 ♠J 3-Homan-Daling vs 5-Smith-Smith
90 4.50 3.50 2♣ N 2 ♦7 8-Belton-Poole vs 6-Utter-Utter
140 2.00 6.00 3♠ W 3 ♦J 10-Vales-Warner vs 10-Markham-Markham
140 2.00 6.00 3♠ W 3 ♣A 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
140 2.00 6.00 2♠ W 3 ♦J 9-Bader-Potter vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
300 0.00 8.00 4♣ N -3 ♠3 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
|
30 |
♠T43
♥43
♦J962
♣Q752
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K82
♥J62
♦AT854
♣J3
|
♠QJ75
♥AKT7
♦Q3
♣T64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2/1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
280 8.00 0.00 1N* S 2 ♦5 2-Cantoni-Griffith vs 3-Mansfield-Aiken
200 7.00 1.00 1N** E -1 ♣8 6-Behr-Gerlach vs 2-Haaser-Haaser
120 5.50 2.50 1N S 2 ♦5 3-Homan-Daling vs 5-Smith-Smith
120 5.50 2.50 1N S 2 ♦4 7-Nance-Baker vs 4-Humphreys-Humphreys
50 4.00 4.00 1♦ W -1 ♥4 9-Bader-Potter vs 8-Reynolds-Sutter
50 3.00 5.00 1N S -1 ♣3 10-Vales-Warner vs 10-Markham-Markham
90 2.00 6.00 1N E 1 ♣8 8-Belton-Poole vs 6-Utter-Utter
100 1.00 7.00 1N* S -1 ♦5 4-Chambers-Maresso vs 7-Quenneville-Anfinson
150 0.00 8.00 2♥ S -3 ♣J 5-Katz-Katz vs 9-Condon-Poulton
|