1 |
♠7542
♥K72
♦K3
♣KQT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ96
♥AJ9
♦A652
♣87
|
♠KJ8
♥Q8643
♦JT7
♣94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 ♣K 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 2-Story-Kovacs
50 3.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♣K 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 ♣3 2-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W 2 ♣K 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 ♣K 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 4-Mark-Gillis
|
2 |
♠AK9642
♥72
♦T63
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J
♥K984
♦AQ
♣AJ9732
|
♠7
♥AQJT6
♦J872
♣Q54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 ♥Q 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 ♥A 2-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 ♣4 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 2-Story-Kovacs
200 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 ♣4 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 4-Mark-Gillis
200 1.50 2.50 3♥ E 5 ♠3 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
|
3 |
♠-
♥Q873
♦AQJ763
♣T52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠2
♥AKJ654
♦T8
♣QJ87
|
♠KQJT865
♥9
♦K4
♣AK4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ E 4 ♥T 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 4-Mark-Gillis
200 3.00 1.00 5♦ N -4 ♥8 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♦2 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 2-Story-Kovacs
660 1.00 3.00 3N W 5 ♦A 2-Collier-Kliger vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
690 0.00 4.00 4N E 6 ♦2 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
|
4 |
♠85432
♥K52
♦Q8
♣K72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ6
♥AQJT4
♦A432
♣6
|
♠AJT97
♥6
♦K76
♣T943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♣K 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♦8 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
120 2.00 2.00 1N W 2 ♦8 2-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Story-Kovacs
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ W 4 ♥2 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
600 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♦J 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 4-Mark-Gillis
|
5 |
♠KJ93
♥97
♦Q53
♣8543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠642
♥QT
♦AJ876
♣AT6
|
♠AQ7
♥K5432
♦KT2
♣K2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 4♥ 4/3♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥6 2-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Story-Kovacs
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥6 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
150 2.00 2.00 1N E 3 ♥6 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
400 0.50 3.50 3N E 3 ♥6 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
400 0.50 3.50 3N E 3 ♣Q 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 4-Mark-Gillis
|
6 |
♠QT732
♥T87
♦75
♣852
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K86
♥AKQ65
♦T6
♣T93
|
♠A94
♥-
♦A9432
♣KQJ74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ E 3 ♦K 2-Collier-Kliger vs 2-Story-Kovacs
120 3.00 1.00 2N W 2 ♥7 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
600 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 ♠3 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
630 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 ♠3 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
630 0.50 3.50 3N W 4 ♥7 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 4-Mark-Gillis
|
7 |
♠932
♥Q8765
♦AQT3
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T874
♥J43
♦974
♣AK9
|
♠AQ5
♥AT2
♦KJ5
♣T854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♦7/6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♥9 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
100 2.50 1.50 1♠ W -1 ♣2 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 2-Story-Kovacs
100 2.50 1.50 2♣ E -1 ♥K 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 4-Mark-Gillis
100 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♠7 2-Collier-Kliger vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W 2 ♦3 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
|
8 |
♠QT63
♥Q3
♦QJ86
♣K42
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ5
♥J962
♦T73
♣JT5
|
♠K2
♥AK874
♦A5
♣9876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♦ S -2 ♥9 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♠4 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ W 3 ♠3 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 4-Mark-Gillis
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ E 3 ♠9 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 2-Story-Kovacs
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ E 3 ♦2 2-Collier-Kliger vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
|
9 |
♠T64
♥Q7643
♦J7
♣T85
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠9753
♥92
♦T8532
♣K7
|
♠AK2
♥T8
♦AKQ4
♣AQ32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♥A 2-Collier-Kliger vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ W 4 ♥4 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
150 1.50 2.50 2N E 3 ♥A 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 4-Mark-Gillis
150 1.50 2.50 2N E 3 ♥5 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
180 0.00 4.00 2N E 4 ♦9 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 2-Story-Kovacs
|
10 |
♠J42
♥A63
♦96
♣KJ876
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT8765
♥T8
♦KJ74
♣T
|
♠KQ
♥J5
♦AQT853
♣AQ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 4♦ E 5 ♥K 2-Collier-Kliger vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
150 3.50 0.50 4♦ E 5 ♥2 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 2-Story-Kovacs
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 5 ♥3 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
600 1.00 3.00 5♦ E 5 ♥K 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 4-Mark-Gillis
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 ♥A 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
|
11 |
♠J975
♥AJ984
♦95
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AT3
♥T63
♦A863
♣A86
|
♠86
♥Q72
♦QJ72
♣JT75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 3/4♠ 2NT ♦6/7 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 ♣8 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 2-Story-Kovacs
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 ♣A 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 4-Mark-Gillis
120 2.00 2.00 2N S 2 ♦8 2-Collier-Kliger vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ S 2 ♦6 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ S 2 ♣6 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
|
12 |
♠K84
♥42
♦A965
♣KQ42
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ653
♥8
♦KQJT3
♣65
|
♠T972
♥JT93
♦72
♣987
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 3♦ 6♥ 5NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣0 ♦4 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 4.00 0.00 6N N 6 ♠2 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 ♦J 2-Collier-Kliger vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
630 1.50 2.50 3N N 4 ♠2 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 2-Story-Kovacs
630 1.50 2.50 3N N 4 ♥3 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 4-Mark-Gillis
200 0.00 4.00 1♥ S 5 ♦3 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
|
13 |
♠J2
♥KT4
♦AQJ43
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQT5
♥J65
♦765
♣T73
|
♠A9864
♥Q82
♦KT
♣K42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♦2 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 2-Story-Kovacs
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 3 ♠K 2-Collier-Kliger vs 4-Mark-Gillis
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ N 4 ♠9 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
130 1.50 2.50 2♦ N 4 ♠4 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 ♦9 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
|
14 |
♠85432
♥AT65
♦2
♣K54
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠QT6
♥K72
♦QJ943
♣T6
|
♠KJ
♥J8
♦T65
♣QJ9872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣8 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ N 5 ♣Q 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 ♦J 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 2-Story-Kovacs
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 ♦4 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♦4 2-Collier-Kliger vs 4-Mark-Gillis
|
15 |
♠AKJ9
♥J863
♦9632
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠3
♥AT5
♦Q875
♣T9874
|
♠T7542
♥-
♦AJ4
♣AJ653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦5 |
EW: 4♣ 2/1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 4.00 0.00 4♥* S 4 ♠3 4-Kennedy-Marucchi-Soos vs 3-Kemps-Hayden
680 3.00 1.00 4♥ S 6 ♣7 3-Johnson-Schlecht vs 1-Skinner-Dhanak
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ S 4 ♣7 1-Gerstner-Edmonds vs 2-Story-Kovacs
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ S 4 ♠3 2-Collier-Kliger vs 4-Mark-Gillis
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♣7 5-Wilson-Tooley vs 5-Klooster-Cantoni
|