1 |
♠JT9764
♥T8
♦K65
♣K6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A
♥Q95
♦AJT943
♣Q53
|
♠KQ53
♥KJ
♦Q8
♣T9742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 ♥T 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
50 1.50 0.50 3♣ E -1 ♥4 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 1-Mark-Young
50 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♦8 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
|
2 |
♠KJ62
♥K96
♦A743
♣J3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9743
♥AT85
♦KQ
♣AT9
|
♠A5
♥QJ
♦JT9652
♣Q87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ E 3 ♦8 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
130 1.00 1.00 1♦ E 4 ♥2 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
430 0.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♠2 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 1-Mark-Young
|
3 |
♠AKJ6
♥82
♦52
♣K7652
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q872
♥A754
♦A6
♣T93
|
♠954
♥J
♦KQJT974
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ -/1♠ 3NT ♣4/5 ♥3/4 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♦ E -1 ♥K 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 1-Mark-Young
130 0.00 2.00 4♦ E 4 ♥Q 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
|
4 |
♠J984
♥QJ3
♦63
♣AKJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT
♥T42
♦AKT874
♣53
|
♠6
♥9876
♦J952
♣T876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2/3♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 ♦A 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
200 0.50 1.50 2♠ N 5 ♦A 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
200 0.50 1.50 1♠ S 5 ♦A 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 1-Mark-Young
|
5 |
♠KQ653
♥64
♦K763
♣52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJT9
♥AQ82
♦QT98
♣J
|
♠2
♥KJT753
♦4
♣AT973
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥1 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 6♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥ E 5 ♣6 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 1-Mark-Young
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♣K 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ E 5 ♣Q 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
|
6 |
♠J8642
♥QT54
♦A92
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKT9
♥A972
♦J75
♣KJ
|
♠Q7
♥KJ3
♦6
♣AQT9873
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣0 ♥3 ♠3 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 4♥ 2/3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣5 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
50 1.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 ♣J 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 2-Chary-Ramier
150 0.00 2.00 4♣ E 5 ♦K 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 1-Mark-Young
|
7 |
♠8742
♥T9
♦752
♣AKQ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K53
♥854
♦AQT943
♣6
|
♠AQJT
♥QJ2
♦K
♣J7543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 ♣6 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 2-Chary-Ramier
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E 2 ♥A 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
660 0.00 2.00 3N E 5 ♥6 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 1-Mark-Young
|
8 |
♠A98
♥JT8652
♦QT
♣97
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q7
♥K9
♦A43
♣Q85432
|
♠KJT
♥Q73
♦K9872
♣J6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ S 4 ♣4 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 1-Mark-Young
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♠A 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 2-Chary-Ramier
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 ♦3 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
|
9 |
♠KJT98
♥T
♦AT
♣AJT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠765
♥82
♦98532
♣Q63
|
♠Q4
♥AK94
♦KQJ4
♣K72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3/4 ♥4/5 ♠2/3 NT3/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♦K 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 2-Chary-Ramier
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 ♦4 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♥A 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 1-Mark-Young
|
10 |
♠AKT873
♥-
♦7543
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q62
♥AJT973
♦K
♣743
|
♠95
♥KQ85
♦J86
♣9862
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 7♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1400 2.00 0.00 5♥* W -5 ♠A 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 2-Chary-Ramier
300 1.00 1.00 4♥ W -3 ♠A 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♥5 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 1-Mark-Young
|
11 |
♠AJ9542
♥J2
♦J73
♣T5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠63
♥875
♦KT9864
♣A3
|
♠K7
♥AQ96
♦A52
♣J842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2/1NT ♣6/5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 ♥6 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 1-Mark-Young
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 ♣2 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ N 2 ♣2 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 2-Chary-Ramier
|
12 |
♠Q2
♥AQJT2
♦J943
♣64
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K94
♥9873
♦AT
♣A952
|
♠AJT863
♥65
♦652
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ E 3 ♦Q 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ E 3 ♣7 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 2-Chary-Ramier
300 0.00 2.00 3♣ S -3 ♠K 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 1-Mark-Young
|
13 |
♠KQJT32
♥QJ
♦54
♣J63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠84
♥842
♦KQ8
♣98542
|
♠A765
♥AK63
♦T97
♣A7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3♣ W -3 ♠T 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♣A 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 1-Mark-Young
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♣7 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 2-Chary-Ramier
|
14 |
♠6
♥9
♦AKQ976543
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠A73
♥AT5
♦J82
♣AQ62
|
♠KQJT82
♥62
♦T
♣K753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6/5♣ 2/-♥ 5♠ 5/-NT ♦4 ♥8/6 NT11/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 5♦* N -2 ♥6 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 2-Chary-Ramier
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 5 ♥K 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 1-Mark-Young
500 0.00 2.00 6♦* N -3 ♠T 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
|
15 |
♠-
♥AQ6543
♦9832
♣JT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQJ954
♥J7
♦T6
♣532
|
♠876
♥KT2
♦AQJ7
♣K86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3/2♦ 3♥ -/1NT ♠5 NT6/7 |
EW: 2/1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 ♣J 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
100 1.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♣J 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 1-Mark-Young
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 ♥5 1-Gerstner-Smith vs 2-Chary-Ramier
|
16 |
♠AJ6
♥973
♦KJT86
♣J9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠52
♥AK542
♦Q9
♣A764
|
♠KQ9874
♥T
♦75
♣KQ32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ N 4 ♠8 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 3 ♦A 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 4 ♣T 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 2-Chary-Ramier
|
17 |
♠-
♥7542
♦KQJ543
♣975
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J8763
♥AJT3
♦A6
♣A3
|
♠A92
♥K86
♦7
♣KQJT86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥0 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6/7♥ 5♠ 6NT ♦5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N E 4 ♦J 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 2-Chary-Ramier
490 1.00 1.00 3N W 6 ♦K 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
590 0.00 2.00 4♠* W 4 ♦K 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
|
18 |
♠83
♥QT8532
♦4
♣Q984
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AKQT2
♥K6
♦T32
♣AT3
|
♠J
♥J974
♦KQJ976
♣J7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 1♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ E 3 ♥A 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 2-Chary-Ramier
400 1.00 1.00 3N W 3 ♥5 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
550 0.00 2.00 5♦* E 5 ♥A 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
|
19 |
♠QJT
♥62
♦AQJ4
♣A872
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠986532
♥A9
♦K96
♣K3
|
♠A7
♥KT5
♦T72
♣J9654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: -/1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6/7 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♠7 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
200 1.00 1.00 2♥ S 5 ♠2 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
150 0.00 2.00 4♥ S -3 ♠6 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 2-Chary-Ramier
|
20 |
♠876
♥982
♦3
♣AKJ765
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT3
♥KQT754
♦A5
♣32
|
♠AQ2
♥AJ
♦KQ962
♣T94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 5♥ 2/1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦7 3-Skinner-Ouradnik vs 2-Chary-Ramier
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ E 3 ♣A 4-Bauer-Wilson vs 4-Hayden-Wiegand
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♣A 2-Kennedy-Dukes vs 3-Hayden-Lewis
|