1 |
♠AK93
♥JT8
♦AQ9
♣A84
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T74
♥AK76
♦KT64
♣63
|
♠Q62
♥Q94
♦J753
♣QT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 7.94 0.06 3N N 3 ♦2 3-Smith-Boyd vs 4-Condon-Poulton
210 6.81 1.19 1N N 5 ♦3 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 7-Newman-Davis
180 5.69 2.31 1N N 4 ♦3 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 1-Utter-Utter
150 4.56 3.44 2N N 3 ♥4 8-Yee-Yee vs 5-Markham-Markham
130 3.44 4.56 4♣ N 4 ♠2 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
110 1.75 6.25 2♠ N 2 ♥4 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 3-Frink-Larson
110 1.75 6.25 3♣ N 3 ♦3 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 9-Hofer-Larson
100 0.06 7.94 3♦ E -2 ♣K 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 10-Tam-Liddle
|
2 |
♠762
♥943
♦843
♣KT93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT54
♥J7
♦AKJT5
♣A6
|
♠KQ8
♥QT62
♦976
♣Q87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 7.94 0.06 1N E 4 ♠J 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 10-Tam-Liddle
210 6.81 1.19 2N E 5 ♣2 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 7-Newman-Davis
430 5.69 2.31 3N W 4 ♣3 3-Smith-Boyd vs 4-Condon-Poulton
460 2.88 5.13 3N W 5 ♣3 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
460 2.88 5.13 3N W 5 ♣2 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 9-Hofer-Larson
460 2.88 5.13 3N E 5 ♣2 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 3-Frink-Larson
460 2.88 5.13 3N E 5 ♣2 8-Yee-Yee vs 5-Markham-Markham
490 0.06 7.94 3N W 6 ♥2 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 1-Utter-Utter
|
3 |
♠K872
♥K98532
♦T
♣97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q5
♥A7
♦Q95
♣KQT864
|
♠J9
♥JT4
♦A8632
♣J53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 7.94 0.06 4♠ S 5 ♣K 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 10-Tam-Liddle
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♥A 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 3-Frink-Larson
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♣K 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 1-Utter-Utter
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♣K 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 7-Newman-Davis
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♣K 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 9-Hofer-Larson
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♣Q 8-Yee-Yee vs 5-Markham-Markham
170 0.63 7.38 2♠ S 4 ♣K 3-Smith-Boyd vs 4-Condon-Poulton
170 0.63 7.38 2♥ N 4 ♣J 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
|
4 |
♠874
♥AK764
♦Q6
♣T62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠T52
♥JT53
♦J9852
♣5
|
♠QJ3
♥Q2
♦743
♣AJ987
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 7.38 0.63 3N S 4 ♠5 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 1-Utter-Utter
630 7.38 0.63 3N S 4 ♦5 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 5-Markham-Markham
620 5.69 2.31 4♥ N 4 ♦7 8-Yee-Yee vs 4-Condon-Poulton
600 2.88 5.13 3N S 3 ♦8 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 10-Tam-Liddle
600 2.88 5.13 3N S 3 ♦5 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 2-Evans-Evans
600 2.88 5.13 3N S 3 ♦5 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 7-Newman-Davis
600 2.88 5.13 3N S 3 ♦5 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
100 0.06 7.94 4♥ N -1 ♠Q 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 9-Hofer-Larson
|
5 |
♠AT973
♥J75
♦A
♣JT42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J85
♥Q642
♦JT76
♣87
|
♠K6
♥T98
♦Q98532
♣A3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.25 1.75 4♠ S 5 ♦J 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 2-Evans-Evans
650 6.25 1.75 4♠ S 5 ♣8 8-Yee-Yee vs 4-Condon-Poulton
650 6.25 1.75 4♠ S 5 ♣6 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 7-Newman-Davis
650 6.25 1.75 4♠ N 5 ♦5 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 9-Hofer-Larson
620 2.88 5.13 4♠ S 4 ♦J 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
620 2.88 5.13 4♠ S 4 ♦T 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 5-Markham-Markham
600 1.19 6.81 3N S 3 ♦6 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 1-Utter-Utter
150 0.06 7.94 2N S 3 ♦7 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 10-Tam-Liddle
|
6 |
♠T85
♥AQ93
♦2
♣AJ932
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠74
♥854
♦QJ95
♣KQ86
|
♠QJ2
♥KJ62
♦KT3
♣T74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2/3♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 7.94 0.06 3N N 4 ♥2 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 10-Tam-Liddle
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♥4 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 7-Newman-Davis
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♦Q 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 2-Evans-Evans
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♦Q 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♣K 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 9-Hofer-Larson
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ S 4 ♣Q 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 5-Markham-Markham
50 0.63 7.38 3N N -1 ♠2 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 1-Utter-Utter
50 0.63 7.38 4♠ S -1 ♣K 8-Yee-Yee vs 4-Condon-Poulton
|
7 |
♠-
♥J832
♦J96
♣KT9852
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT65
♥KT64
♦AQ84
♣A
|
♠KJ94
♥97
♦KT53
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3/4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.94 0.06 4♠ E -2 ♣3 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 9-Hofer-Larson
100 5.69 2.31 4♠ W -1 ♣T 3-Smith-Boyd vs 3-Frink-Larson
100 5.69 2.31 4♠ W -1 ♣T 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 5-Markham-Markham
100 5.69 2.31 4♠ E -1 ♠2 8-Yee-Yee vs 2-Evans-Evans
130 3.44 4.56 3♦ W 4 ♣T 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 7-Newman-Davis
140 2.31 5.69 3♠ E 3 ♣3 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 10-Tam-Liddle
150 1.19 6.81 2N W 3 ♣9 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 1-Utter-Utter
620 0.06 7.94 4♠ E 4 ♠2 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
|
8 |
♠QT643
♥-
♦KT43
♣AQ52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠A
♥KQ642
♦AQ9876
♣4
|
♠972
♥AJ98753
♦J
♣T8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥0 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 6♥ 1NT ♣2 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 7.94 0.06 6♥* W -1 ♣A 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 9-Hofer-Larson
300 5.69 2.31 6♠* S -2 ♦A 3-Smith-Boyd vs 3-Frink-Larson
300 5.69 2.31 6♠* N -2 ♦J 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
300 5.69 2.31 6♠* N -2 ♦J 8-Yee-Yee vs 2-Evans-Evans
480 3.44 4.56 4♥ W 6 ♠6 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 7-Newman-Davis
980 2.31 5.69 6♥ W 6 ♣A 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 10-Tam-Liddle
1310 0.63 7.38 6♥* E 7 ♠K 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 1-Utter-Utter
1310 0.63 7.38 6♥* E 7 ♠5 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 5-Markham-Markham
|
9 |
♠KT962
♥J7
♦T54
♣A53
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A
♥AQT832
♦AJ86
♣T4
|
♠Q73
♥K94
♦KQ93
♣K97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 7.86 0.14 5♦ E 6 ♣Q 8-Yee-Yee vs 2-Evans-Evans
680 4.00 4.00 5♥ W 6 ♠9 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 9-Hofer-Larson
680 4.00 4.00 4♥ W 6 ♠6 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
680 4.00 4.00 4♥ W 6 ♠2 3-Smith-Boyd vs 3-Frink-Larson
680 4.00 4.00 4♥ W 6 ♦T 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 5-Markham-Markham
680 4.00 4.00 4♥ W 6 ♦5 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 7-Newman-Davis
1430 0.14 7.86 6♥ W 6 ♣A 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 10-Tam-Liddle
|
10 |
♠J82
♥QJ865
♦K43
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q73
♥973
♦J9876
♣Q6
|
♠T9654
♥KT42
♦A2
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 1/-♥ 2♠ ♣4/3 ♦7/6 ♥7/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 7.94 0.06 3♣ S 4 ♠3 8-Yee-Yee vs 1-Utter-Utter
110 6.81 1.19 3♣ S 3 ♠3 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 7-Newman-Davis
100 5.69 2.31 3♠ E -1 ♣T 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 9-Hofer-Larson
80 4.56 3.44 1♠ E 1 ♣T 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 3-Frink-Larson
100 2.88 5.13 2N S -1 ♠3 3-Smith-Boyd vs 2-Evans-Evans
100 2.88 5.13 4♣ S -1 ♠Q 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 10-Tam-Liddle
110 0.63 7.38 2♠ E 2 ♥A 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
110 0.63 7.38 2♠ E 2 ♣T 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 4-Condon-Poulton
|
11 |
♠K9
♥J72
♦A532
♣T743
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠8542
♥AKQ983
♦7
♣98
|
♠QJT6
♥T5
♦J86
♣AQ52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 7.38 0.63 4♦ S 4 ♥A 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 7-Newman-Davis
130 7.38 0.63 3♦ S 4 ♥A 3-Smith-Boyd vs 2-Evans-Evans
50 5.13 2.88 3♠ W -1 ♦A 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 3-Frink-Larson
50 5.13 2.88 3♥ W -1 ♠K 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 10-Tam-Liddle
PASS 2.88 5.13 Pass Out 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
PASS 2.88 5.13 Pass Out 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 9-Hofer-Larson
140 0.63 7.38 3♥ W 3 ♦A 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 4-Condon-Poulton
140 0.63 7.38 3♥ W 3 ♦A 8-Yee-Yee vs 1-Utter-Utter
|
12 |
♠AK97
♥KQ4
♦AT52
♣74
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT42
♥73
♦QJ873
♣86
|
♠86
♥AJ9652
♦K4
♣AK3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 7.38 0.63 3♣ N 4 ♠8 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 7-Newman-Davis
130 7.38 0.63 3♣ N 4 ♠8 8-Yee-Yee vs 1-Utter-Utter
50 5.13 2.88 3♥ E -1 ♣Q 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 10-Tam-Liddle
50 5.13 2.88 3♥ E -1 ♣Q 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 3-Frink-Larson
100 3.44 4.56 4♣ S -1 ♥7 3-Smith-Boyd vs 2-Evans-Evans
110 1.75 6.25 2♥ E 2 ♣Q 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 4-Condon-Poulton
110 1.75 6.25 2♥ E 2 ♣Q 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 9-Hofer-Larson
300 0.06 7.94 3N N -3 ♥6 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
|
13 |
♠93
♥63
♦KJ742
♣9865
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ542
♥AQ9
♦A5
♣AQ3
|
♠86
♥JT84
♦T63
♣JT42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣5/4 ♦7/6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6/5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♦2 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 2-Evans-Evans
200 7.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♦8 3-Smith-Boyd vs 1-Utter-Utter
100 6.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♥6 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 7-Newman-Davis
80 5.00 3.00 1♠ W 1 ♦4 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 5-Markham-Markham
100 4.00 4.00 3♦ S -1 ♦A 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 3-Frink-Larson
110 3.00 5.00 2♠ W 2 ♥8 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 9-Hofer-Larson
150 1.50 6.50 2N W 3 ♣9 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
150 1.50 6.50 2N W 3 ♣9 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 4-Condon-Poulton
200 0.00 8.00 3♦ S -2 ♠5 8-Yee-Yee vs 10-Tam-Liddle
|
14 |
♠A83
♥Q54
♦Q7
♣KJ632
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠72
♥T82
♦KJ953
♣T54
|
♠J654
♥AJ3
♦A6
♣AQ87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 8.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♠K 8-Yee-Yee vs 10-Tam-Liddle
110 7.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 ♦A 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 9-Hofer-Larson
100 5.50 2.50 1N E -2 ♠K 3-Smith-Boyd vs 1-Utter-Utter
100 5.50 2.50 1N E -2 ♠K 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
50 4.00 4.00 1N E -1 ♦8 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 7-Newman-Davis
90 2.50 5.50 1N E 1 ♠K 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 3-Frink-Larson
90 2.50 5.50 1N E 1 ♠9 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 5-Markham-Markham
100 1.00 7.00 2♠ S -2 ♦5 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 2-Evans-Evans
150 0.00 8.00 1N W 3 ♠9 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 4-Condon-Poulton
|
15 |
♠AT
♥KQ53
♦J4
♣AJ865
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠432
♥J98
♦7652
♣973
|
♠K87
♥A72
♦AQ83
♣Q42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 8.00 0.00 1N* E -3 ♠Q 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 9-Hofer-Larson
180 6.50 1.50 2N N 4 ♥2 3-Smith-Boyd vs 1-Utter-Utter
180 6.50 1.50 2N N 4 ♣2 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 5-Markham-Markham
150 5.00 3.00 1N E -3 ♠Q 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 3-Frink-Larson
140 4.00 4.00 3♠ N 3 ♣2 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
120 3.00 5.00 2N N 2 ♦3 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 4-Condon-Poulton
110 2.00 6.00 2♥ N 2 ♦A 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 2-Evans-Evans
100 0.50 7.50 3N N -1 ♦3 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 7-Newman-Davis
100 0.50 7.50 2N N -1 ♦3 8-Yee-Yee vs 10-Tam-Liddle
|
16 |
♠Q6
♥T9543
♦73
♣AK42
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠974
♥AKJ86
♦8
♣QJ76
|
♠A
♥Q72
♦AKQ94
♣9853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 5/4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 7.38 0.63 4♠* S 4 ♥A 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
590 7.38 0.63 4♠* S 4 ♥A 8-Yee-Yee vs 9-Hofer-Larson
500 5.69 2.31 5♥* W -2 ♣A 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 3-Frink-Larson
100 4.00 4.00 5♥ W -1 ♠Q 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 5-Markham-Markham
100 4.00 4.00 5♥ W -1 ♣A 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 1-Utter-Utter
620 1.75 6.25 4♥ W 4 ♠Q 3-Smith-Boyd vs 10-Tam-Liddle
620 1.75 6.25 4♥ W 4 ♠Q 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 4-Condon-Poulton
990 0.06 7.94 4♥* W 5 ♠Q 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 2-Evans-Evans
|
17 |
♠7
♥KJ9864
♦K9865
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AKQ
♥T3
♦AJ4
♣K9865
|
♠T62
♥5
♦QT72
♣QJT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦6 |
EW: 3/4♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 7.94 0.06 4♥* N 5 ♣Q 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 4-Condon-Poulton
450 5.13 2.88 4♥ N 5 ♥5 3-Smith-Boyd vs 10-Tam-Liddle
450 5.13 2.88 4♥ N 5 ♣Q 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
450 5.13 2.88 4♥ N 5 ♣Q 8-Yee-Yee vs 9-Hofer-Larson
450 5.13 2.88 4♥ N 5 ♣Q 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 3-Frink-Larson
200 1.75 6.25 3♥ N 5 ♣Q 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 2-Evans-Evans
200 1.75 6.25 2♥ N 5 ♣Q 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 1-Utter-Utter
50 0.06 7.94 5♥ N -1 ♣J 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 5-Markham-Markham
|
18 |
♠Q98
♥KQ6
♦KQT
♣T642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK642
♥A873
♦654
♣A
|
♠J73
♥T52
♦9832
♣K53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 7.94 0.06 3♠ W -2 ♣T 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 1-Utter-Utter
80 6.81 1.19 1♠ N 1 ♦K 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 2-Evans-Evans
50 5.13 2.88 2♠ W -1 ♥K 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 3-Frink-Larson
50 5.13 2.88 2♠ W -1 ♦K 3-Smith-Boyd vs 10-Tam-Liddle
80 3.44 4.56 1♠ W 1 ♣2 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 5-Markham-Markham
100 2.31 5.69 3♣ S -1 ♠A 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
110 1.19 6.81 1♠ W 2 ♦K 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 4-Condon-Poulton
140 0.06 7.94 1♠ W 3 ♦K 8-Yee-Yee vs 9-Hofer-Larson
|
19 |
♠A92
♥9
♦J32
♣AKJ742
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT75
♥Q3
♦A9865
♣T9
|
♠J84
♥AJ82
♦QT4
♣Q85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 7.94 0.06 2♥ S 3 ♠5 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 10-Tam-Liddle
120 6.81 1.19 2N N 2 ♦8 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 4-Condon-Poulton
110 5.69 2.31 2♥ S 2 ♣T 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 7-Newman-Davis
50 4.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♦6 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 2-Evans-Evans
50 4.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♠5 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 5-Markham-Markham
100 1.19 6.81 2N S -2 ♣T 3-Smith-Boyd vs 9-Hofer-Larson
100 1.19 6.81 2♥ S -2 ♠T 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 3-Frink-Larson
100 1.19 6.81 2♥ S -2 ♠7 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 1-Utter-Utter
|
20 |
♠93
♥T53
♦953
♣Q7432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT4
♥984
♦AKJT76
♣A
|
♠Q76
♥AK62
♦Q8
♣KJ96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 6/5♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 7.94 0.06 3N W 4 ♣3 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 4-Condon-Poulton
660 6.81 1.19 3N E 5 ♠5 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 2-Evans-Evans
690 4.00 4.00 3N W 6 ♠9 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 3-Frink-Larson
690 4.00 4.00 3N E 6 ♠5 3-Smith-Boyd vs 9-Hofer-Larson
690 4.00 4.00 3N E 6 ♠5 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 7-Newman-Davis
690 4.00 4.00 3N E 6 ♠5 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 10-Tam-Liddle
1370 1.19 6.81 6♦ W 6 ♠9 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 5-Markham-Markham
1440 0.06 7.94 6N E 6 ♠5 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 1-Utter-Utter
|
21 |
♠AK7
♥87
♦KQJ7642
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠32
♥Q96
♦A85
♣AT984
|
♠QT86
♥K3
♦T93
♣K752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.69 2.31 4♦ N 4 ♣2 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 10-Tam-Liddle
130 5.69 2.31 3♦ N 4 ♠6 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 1-Utter-Utter
130 5.69 2.31 3♦ N 4 ♠6 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 5-Markham-Markham
130 5.69 2.31 3♦ N 4 ♣8 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 4-Condon-Poulton
130 5.69 2.31 3♦ N 4 ♣2 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 3-Frink-Larson
110 2.31 5.69 3♦ N 3 ♣2 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 7-Newman-Davis
100 0.63 7.38 5♦ N -1 ♣2 3-Smith-Boyd vs 9-Hofer-Larson
100 0.63 7.38 5♦ N -1 ♣2 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 2-Evans-Evans
|
22 |
♠K4
♥KJ52
♦83
♣AKQT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJ652
♥843
♦652
♣92
|
♠QT93
♥A96
♦KT9
♣J65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 7.94 0.06 3N N 5 ♠9 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 5-Markham-Markham
400 6.81 1.19 3N N 3 ♠3 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 3-Frink-Larson
200 5.13 2.88 1♥ N 5 ♠3 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 2-Evans-Evans
200 5.13 2.88 1♥ N 5 ♠3 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 4-Condon-Poulton
150 3.44 4.56 4♣ N 5 ♠3 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 10-Tam-Liddle
130 2.31 5.69 3♦ S 4 ♥8 8-Yee-Yee vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
120 1.19 6.81 2N N 2 ♠9 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 1-Utter-Utter
50 0.06 7.94 3N S -1 ♠5 3-Smith-Boyd vs 7-Newman-Davis
|
23 |
♠T85
♥Q9
♦974
♣J9743
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠742
♥K875
♦A8
♣QT85
|
♠Q93
♥AT32
♦KQ62
♣A6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ 3/2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.94 0.06 4♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 3-Frink-Larson
100 6.25 1.75 3N E -1 ♠K 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 5-Markham-Markham
100 6.25 1.75 4♥ W -1 ♦4 8-Yee-Yee vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
90 4.56 3.44 1N E 1 ♠K 3-Smith-Boyd vs 7-Newman-Davis
120 3.44 4.56 1N W 2 ♠5 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 1-Utter-Utter
140 1.75 6.25 3♥ W 3 ♦4 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 2-Evans-Evans
140 1.75 6.25 3♥ E 3 ♠6 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 10-Tam-Liddle
150 0.06 7.94 1N E 3 ♠K 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 4-Condon-Poulton
|
24 |
♠JT95
♥QJ4
♦T653
♣Q3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AK63
♥K2
♦AQ94
♣A54
|
♠Q87
♥AT3
♦KJ72
♣K82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 7.94 0.06 6N W -2 ♠J 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 3-Frink-Larson
50 3.44 4.56 6N W -1 ♠J 3-Smith-Boyd vs 7-Newman-Davis
50 3.44 4.56 6N W -1 ♠J 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 10-Tam-Liddle
50 3.44 4.56 6N W -1 ♠J 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 2-Evans-Evans
50 3.44 4.56 6N W -1 ♠J 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 4-Condon-Poulton
50 3.44 4.56 6N W -1 ♠J 8-Yee-Yee vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
50 3.44 4.56 6N W -1 ♠J 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 1-Utter-Utter
50 3.44 4.56 6N E -1 ♠J 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 5-Markham-Markham
|
25 |
♠AT743
♥K98
♦K82
♣T7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQ92
♥A754
♦J7
♣AJ2
|
♠J65
♥Q63
♦63
♣K8654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.38 0.63 4♣ E -2 ♥J 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 4-Condon-Poulton
200 7.38 0.63 4♣ E -2 ♦A 8-Yee-Yee vs 7-Newman-Davis
110 4.00 4.00 3♦ S 3 ♠K 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 9-Hofer-Larson
110 4.00 4.00 3♦ S 3 ♠Q 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 5-Markham-Markham
110 4.00 4.00 3♦ S 3 ♦J 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
110 4.00 4.00 3♦ S 3 ♦J 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 1-Utter-Utter
100 1.19 6.81 4♣ E -1 ♥J 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 3-Frink-Larson
50 0.06 7.94 3♦ S -1 ♦J 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 2-Evans-Evans
|
26 |
♠AK63
♥AKQJT6
♦-
♣K93
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠J98
♥732
♦954
♣QT85
|
♠Q542
♥94
♦AJT2
♣J62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 6♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦3 ♥1 ♠3 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 6.25 1.75 4♥ N 6 ♠2 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 2-Evans-Evans
680 6.25 1.75 4♥ N 6 ♠2 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 3-Frink-Larson
680 6.25 1.75 4♥ N 6 ♠2 8-Yee-Yee vs 7-Newman-Davis
680 6.25 1.75 4♥ N 6 ♥9 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
660 3.44 4.56 3N N 5 ♠2 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 5-Markham-Markham
650 2.31 5.69 4♥ N 5 ♠2 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 4-Condon-Poulton
630 1.19 6.81 3N N 4 ♣2 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 1-Utter-Utter
100 0.06 7.94 7♥ N -1 ♦A 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 9-Hofer-Larson
|
27 |
♠762
♥72
♦KQT942
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQJ53
♥AT5
♦7
♣AKT2
|
♠AT98
♥QJ8
♦A853
♣86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠0 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 7♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 7.38 0.63 4♠ W 5 ♦K 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 4-Condon-Poulton
450 7.38 0.63 4♠ W 5 ♦K 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 1-Utter-Utter
480 5.13 2.88 4♠ W 6 ♦K 1-Cantoni-Barnes vs 2-Evans-Evans
480 5.13 2.88 4♠ W 6 ♦K 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 5-Markham-Markham
510 3.44 4.56 4♠ W 7 ♦K 8-Yee-Yee vs 7-Newman-Davis
980 1.19 6.81 6♠ W 6 ♦K 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 3-Frink-Larson
980 1.19 6.81 6♠ W 6 ♦K 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 9-Hofer-Larson
980 1.19 6.81 6♠ W 6 ♦Q 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
|
28 |
♠T92
♥-
♦K7652
♣97543
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J8
♥KJ9632
♦4
♣AQT2
|
♠AQ7
♥8754
♦Q98
♣J86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ 1/-NT ♣6 ♥4/3 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 7.94 0.06 4♠ S 4 ♦5 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 3-Frink-Larson
200 6.81 1.19 3♠ S 5 ♦4 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 2-Evans-Evans
140 5.69 2.31 3♠ S 3 ♦4 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
50 4.56 3.44 4♥ W -1 ♠T 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 10-Tam-Liddle
100 3.44 4.56 3♠ S -1 ♥6 3-Smith-Boyd vs 5-Markham-Markham
140 2.31 5.69 3♥ W 3 ♠T 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 9-Hofer-Larson
420 1.19 6.81 4♥ W 4 ♠T 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 7-Newman-Davis
590 0.06 7.94 4♥* W 4 ♠2 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 4-Condon-Poulton
|
29 |
♠T732
♥Q3
♦A753
♣K95
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠A84
♥KJ98
♦KJ2
♣Q82
|
♠-
♥T765
♦Q9864
♣A764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥5/4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠3 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1070 7.94 0.06 2♠* S 4 ♣7 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 9-Hofer-Larson
930 6.81 1.19 3♠* S 4 ♦K 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 10-Tam-Liddle
300 5.69 2.31 4♥ E -3 ♦T 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 2-Evans-Evans
200 4.56 3.44 2♠ S 5 ♥8 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 3-Frink-Larson
170 2.88 5.13 3♠ S 4 ♦2 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 7-Newman-Davis
170 2.88 5.13 2♠ S 4 ♠A 3-Smith-Boyd vs 5-Markham-Markham
140 1.19 6.81 3♠ S 3 ♠4 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
170 0.06 7.94 3♥ E 4 ♠K 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 4-Condon-Poulton
|
30 |
♠83
♥T82
♦Q932
♣AJ74
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠J7542
♥K53
♦JT6
♣T3
|
♠AKQ96
♥964
♦AK4
♣K5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 7.38 0.63 4♠ E -1 ♠T 10-Byrnes-Anderson vs 10-Tam-Liddle
50 7.38 0.63 4♠ E -1 ♦7 6-Aspinall-Catero vs 2-Evans-Evans
420 3.44 4.56 4♠ E 4 ♦7 4-Wart-Gerlach vs 7-Newman-Davis
420 3.44 4.56 4♠ E 4 ♣6 5-Hoover-Ronquist vs 9-Hofer-Larson
420 3.44 4.56 4♠ E 4 ♣2 2-Marrott-Mowry vs 3-Frink-Larson
420 3.44 4.56 4♠ E 4 ♣2 3-Smith-Boyd vs 5-Markham-Markham
420 3.44 4.56 4♠ E 4 ♣2 9-Behr-Goldstein vs 8-Vider-Quenneville
450 0.06 7.94 4♠ E 5 ♦8 7-Castellanos-Mah vs 4-Condon-Poulton
|