1 |
♠T986
♥AJT2
♦A964
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠-
♥Q98
♦JT72
♣AT9852
|
♠K742
♥K654
♦K3
♣763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5/4 ♥5/6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 7.38 0.63 4♠ S 4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 5-Larson-Blackman
420 7.38 0.63 4♠ S 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 7-Poel-Petersen
170 5.69 2.31 3♠ S 4 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
50 3.44 4.56 4♠ S -1 4-Metheny-Williams vs 6-Allen-Michelson
50 3.44 4.56 4♠ S -1 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 9-Hackler-Edington
50 3.44 4.56 3♠ S -1 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
100 0.63 7.38 4♠ S -2 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
100 0.63 7.38 4♠ S -2 7-Rooney-Henson vs 3-Lee-Thomason
|
2 |
♠KT72
♥874
♦A942
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A83
♥AK96
♦K5
♣9742
|
♠54
♥QJT
♦876
♣KQJ63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.94 0.06 3♥ W -1 7-Rooney-Henson vs 3-Lee-Thomason
110 5.69 2.31 3♣ W 3 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
110 5.69 2.31 3♣ W 3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 6-Allen-Michelson
110 5.69 2.31 2♣ W 3 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
130 2.88 5.13 3♣ W 4 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
130 2.88 5.13 2♣ W 4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 5-Larson-Blackman
150 0.63 7.38 3♣ W 5 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 7-Poel-Petersen
150 0.63 7.38 3♣ W 5 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 9-Hackler-Edington
|
3 |
♠T6
♥KQ43
♦K742
♣965
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ98
♥65
♦T86
♣K842
|
♠Q743
♥J
♦AQJ93
♣Q73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 5.69 2.31 4♥ S 4 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
420 5.69 2.31 4♥ S 4 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
420 5.69 2.31 4♥ S 4 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
420 5.69 2.31 4♥ S 4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 5-Larson-Blackman
420 5.69 2.31 4♥ S 4 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 9-Hackler-Edington
170 1.75 6.25 3♥ S 4 7-Rooney-Henson vs 3-Lee-Thomason
170 1.75 6.25 2♥ S 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 7-Poel-Petersen
50 0.06 7.94 4♥ S -1 4-Metheny-Williams vs 6-Allen-Michelson
|
4 |
♠Q876
♥AJT9
♦KQ2
♣J3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J9
♥K53
♦T75
♣AQ642
|
♠T432
♥Q872
♦84
♣T97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 7.94 0.06 3N N 6 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 6-Allen-Michelson
660 5.69 2.31 3N S 5 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 2-Forrester-Denton
660 5.69 2.31 3N S 5 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
660 5.69 2.31 3N S 5 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
630 3.44 4.56 3N S 4 4-Metheny-Williams vs 5-Larson-Blackman
130 2.31 5.69 3♦ N 4 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 7-Poel-Petersen
200 0.63 7.38 6♦ N -2 6-Randall-Randall vs 9-Hackler-Edington
200 0.63 7.38 6♦ N -2 7-Rooney-Henson vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
|
5 |
♠AQT96
♥732
♦J972
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K532
♥5
♦T63
♣AQJT7
|
♠84
♥KQ98
♦AK4
♣9862
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.94 0.06 2N E -1 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 6-Allen-Michelson
110 4.56 3.44 3♣ W 3 7-Rooney-Henson vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
110 4.56 3.44 3♣ E 3 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 2-Forrester-Denton
110 4.56 3.44 3♣ E 3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 5-Larson-Blackman
110 4.56 3.44 3♣ E 3 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 7-Poel-Petersen
110 4.56 3.44 3♣ E 3 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
200 1.19 6.81 3♥* S -1 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
400 0.06 7.94 3N W 3 6-Randall-Randall vs 9-Hackler-Edington
|
6 |
♠AT76
♥A9
♦JT87
♣Q84
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠98
♥T52
♦Q6543
♣AJ6
|
♠K53
♥KQ63
♦92
♣9732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♦ 2/1♥ 4/3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.94 0.06 2N N 3 7-Rooney-Henson vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
140 6.81 1.19 2♠ N 3 6-Randall-Randall vs 9-Hackler-Edington
50 3.44 4.56 3N N -1 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
50 3.44 4.56 4♠ N -1 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 2-Forrester-Denton
50 3.44 4.56 4♠ N -1 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 7-Poel-Petersen
50 3.44 4.56 4♠ N -1 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
50 3.44 4.56 4♠ N -1 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 6-Allen-Michelson
150 0.06 7.94 6♠ N -3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 5-Larson-Blackman
|
7 |
♠A86
♥A4
♦Q943
♣Q862
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠52
♥KQJT93
♦KJT72
♣-
|
♠KQJ7
♥87
♦A86
♣9754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥2 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.94 0.06 4♥ W -1 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 5-Larson-Blackman
110 6.25 1.75 2♥ W 2 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 6-Allen-Michelson
110 6.25 1.75 3♦ W 3 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 9-Hackler-Edington
170 4.56 3.44 3♥ W 4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 2-Forrester-Denton
200 3.44 4.56 2♥ W 5 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 3-Lee-Thomason
620 1.75 6.25 4♥ W 4 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
620 1.75 6.25 4♥ W 4 6-Randall-Randall vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
650 0.06 7.94 4♥ W 5 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 7-Poel-Petersen
|
8 |
♠K62
♥AK984
♦2
♣Q854
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠JT84
♥T7
♦AJ83
♣K96
|
♠73
♥QJ52
♦76
♣AJT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 7.94 0.06 3N S 3 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 3-Lee-Thomason
120 6.81 1.19 2N S 2 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 2-Forrester-Denton
50 5.69 2.31 3N S -1 6-Randall-Randall vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
100 2.88 5.13 3N N -2 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 5-Larson-Blackman
100 2.88 5.13 2N N -2 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 7-Poel-Petersen
100 2.88 5.13 4♠ S -2 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
100 2.88 5.13 4♠ N -2 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 9-Hackler-Edington
150 0.06 7.94 3N N -3 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 6-Allen-Michelson
|
9 |
♠AQ9
♥AT4
♦KT763
♣85
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K72
♥K963
♦J9
♣J732
|
♠J643
♥5
♦852
♣AQT94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 7.94 0.06 3N N 5 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 9-Hackler-Edington
450 5.13 2.88 4♥ S 5 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
450 5.13 2.88 4♥ S 5 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 3-Lee-Thomason
450 5.13 2.88 4♥ S 5 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 2-Forrester-Denton
450 5.13 2.88 4♥ S 5 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 5-Larson-Blackman
430 2.31 5.69 3N S 4 6-Randall-Randall vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
420 1.19 6.81 4♥ S 4 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 7-Poel-Petersen
170 0.06 7.94 2♥ S 4 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 6-Allen-Michelson
|
10 |
♠A5
♥AK76
♦AJ7
♣KT54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠7642
♥QT82
♦843
♣A2
|
♠QJ9
♥543
♦QT2
♣J986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4/3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 7.38 0.63 3N N 5 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 3-Lee-Thomason
660 7.38 0.63 3N N 5 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 6-Allen-Michelson
630 5.69 2.31 3N N 4 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
600 2.88 5.13 3N N 3 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 2-Forrester-Denton
600 2.88 5.13 3N N 3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
600 2.88 5.13 3N N 3 7-Rooney-Henson vs 9-Hackler-Edington
600 2.88 5.13 3N N 3 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
200 0.06 7.94 3N N -2 6-Randall-Randall vs 7-Poel-Petersen
|
11 |
♠AQJT
♥KJ85
♦983
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠652
♥2
♦AKT76
♣T953
|
♠K87
♥AQT73
♦J5
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.94 0.06 1N W -2 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 2-Forrester-Denton
50 6.25 1.75 1♥ E -1 6-Randall-Randall vs 7-Poel-Petersen
50 6.25 1.75 2♣ E -1 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
50 4.56 3.44 1N N -1 4-Metheny-Williams vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
100 3.44 4.56 2♠ N -2 7-Rooney-Henson vs 9-Hackler-Edington
120 1.75 6.25 2N E 2 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 3-Lee-Thomason
120 1.75 6.25 1N W 2 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 6-Allen-Michelson
250 0.06 7.94 3N N -5 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
12 |
♠KJT952
♥8
♦QT7
♣Q32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠86
♥975
♦J84
♣J7654
|
♠7
♥AQT63
♦K963
♣K98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 6.81 1.19 4♠ N 5 7-Rooney-Henson vs 9-Hackler-Edington
650 6.81 1.19 4♠ N 5 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
650 6.81 1.19 4♠ N 5 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 3-Lee-Thomason
630 4.56 3.44 3N S 4 6-Randall-Randall vs 7-Poel-Petersen
620 1.75 6.25 4♠ N 4 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
620 1.75 6.25 4♠ N 4 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 2-Forrester-Denton
620 1.75 6.25 4♠ N 4 4-Metheny-Williams vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
620 1.75 6.25 4♠ N 4 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 6-Allen-Michelson
|
13 |
♠AK862
♥T
♦T98
♣J832
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT97
♥K93
♦AK65
♣54
|
♠5
♥J52
♦QJ742
♣KQT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 7.94 0.06 2♠ N 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 2-Forrester-Denton
110 6.25 1.75 2♠ N 2 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 7-Poel-Petersen
110 6.25 1.75 2♥ S 2 7-Rooney-Henson vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
100 4.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
100 4.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 5-Larson-Blackman
110 2.31 5.69 3♦ E 3 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 9-Hackler-Edington
200 1.19 6.81 2♥ S -2 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
300 0.06 7.94 3♠ N -3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 3-Lee-Thomason
|
14 |
♠K954
♥J7
♦A42
♣JT82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠T83
♥AQ96
♦KQ53
♣63
|
♠A76
♥T85432
♦7
♣954
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 7.94 0.06 3N S 3 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 9-Hackler-Edington
130 6.81 1.19 3♣ S 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 2-Forrester-Denton
110 4.56 3.44 2♦ S 3 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
110 4.56 3.44 2♣ S 3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 3-Lee-Thomason
110 4.56 3.44 2♣ S 3 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 5-Larson-Blackman
50 2.31 5.69 4♠ N -1 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
140 1.19 6.81 3♥ E 3 7-Rooney-Henson vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
150 0.06 7.94 4♠ N -3 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 7-Poel-Petersen
|
15 |
♠Q63
♥T95
♦T4
♣97653
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK
♥AJ832
♦K8632
♣Q
|
♠T
♥Q
♦AJ975
♣AKJ842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦0 ♥1 ♠6 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 7♦ 6♥ 7NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
440 6.81 1.19 5♦ W 7 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 7-Poel-Petersen
440 6.81 1.19 5♦ W 7 4-Metheny-Williams vs 3-Lee-Thomason
440 6.81 1.19 5♦ W 7 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 2-Forrester-Denton
520 4.56 3.44 3N W 7 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 9-Hackler-Edington
940 2.31 5.69 6♦ W 7 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
940 2.31 5.69 6♦ W 7 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 5-Larson-Blackman
940 2.31 5.69 6♦ W 7 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
1440 0.06 7.94 7♦ E 7 7-Rooney-Henson vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
16 |
♠K5
♥QJ6
♦KJT7
♣QT92
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T
♥AK874
♦Q43
♣J543
|
♠AQJ8732
♥T3
♦A96
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1/2♦ 2/3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 7.94 0.06 3♠ E 3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 2-Forrester-Denton
170 6.25 1.75 2♠ E 4 6-Randall-Randall vs 6-Allen-Michelson
170 6.25 1.75 2♠ E 4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 9-Hackler-Edington
620 3.44 4.56 4♠ E 4 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
620 3.44 4.56 4♠ E 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
620 3.44 4.56 4♠ E 4 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 3-Lee-Thomason
650 0.63 7.38 4♠ E 5 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 5-Larson-Blackman
650 0.63 7.38 4♠ E 5 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
17 |
♠654
♥A95
♦A9542
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J87
♥JT73
♦KT6
♣KT6
|
♠AK2
♥K4
♦QJ3
♣QJ954
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 3/2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 7.38 0.63 2N E 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
180 7.38 0.63 1N E 4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 9-Hackler-Edington
400 4.56 3.44 3N E 3 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 5-Larson-Blackman
400 4.56 3.44 3N E 3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 2-Forrester-Denton
400 4.56 3.44 3N E 3 6-Randall-Randall vs 6-Allen-Michelson
430 1.19 6.81 3N E 4 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
430 1.19 6.81 3N E 4 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
430 1.19 6.81 3N E 4 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 3-Lee-Thomason
|
18 |
♠985
♥A6
♦AQT75
♣JT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K7642
♥J53
♦K83
♣KQ
|
♠AQ
♥K974
♦J62
♣9874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ -/1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 6.25 1.75 3N W -2 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
100 6.25 1.75 3♠ W -2 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 3-Lee-Thomason
100 6.25 1.75 2♥ W -2 6-Randall-Randall vs 6-Allen-Michelson
100 6.25 1.75 2♥ E -2 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 9-Hackler-Edington
50 2.88 5.13 2♠ W -1 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
50 2.88 5.13 2♥ E -1 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
120 1.19 6.81 2N W 2 4-Metheny-Williams vs 2-Forrester-Denton
140 0.06 7.94 2♠ W 3 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 5-Larson-Blackman
|
19 |
♠AT54
♥K873
♦95
♣843
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQ8732
♥-
♦8763
♣QT6
|
♠J6
♥AJT52
♦K4
♣K952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 7.94 0.06 4♠ W -3 6-Randall-Randall vs 5-Larson-Blackman
200 6.25 1.75 3♠ W -2 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 6-Allen-Michelson
200 6.25 1.75 5♣ E -2 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 3-Lee-Thomason
140 4.56 3.44 3♥ N 3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
110 3.44 4.56 2♥ N 2 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
100 2.31 5.69 4♠ W -1 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 9-Hackler-Edington
50 1.19 6.81 3♦ S -1 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Forrester-Denton
100 0.06 7.94 3♥* S -1 7-Rooney-Henson vs 7-Poel-Petersen
|
20 |
♠97
♥KT953
♦A96
♣864
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKQ42
♥AQJ2
♦Q8
♣AT
|
♠J65
♥64
♦7543
♣J532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.81 1.19 5♠ W -2 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 9-Hackler-Edington
200 6.81 1.19 4♠ W -2 4-Metheny-Williams vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
200 6.81 1.19 4♠ W -2 6-Randall-Randall vs 5-Larson-Blackman
100 3.44 4.56 3N W -1 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Forrester-Denton
100 3.44 4.56 4♠ W -1 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 6-Allen-Michelson
100 3.44 4.56 4♠ W -1 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 3-Lee-Thomason
110 1.19 6.81 2♠ W 2 7-Rooney-Henson vs 7-Poel-Petersen
140 0.06 7.94 2♠ W 3 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
|
21 |
♠KT86
♥JT52
♦KQT9
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A92
♥7
♦J65
♣AJ9532
|
♠7
♥98643
♦3
♣KQ8764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 6♠ ♣2 NT6 |
EW: 5♣ ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 7.94 0.06 4♠ N 5 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Forrester-Denton
620 6.25 1.75 4♠ S 4 7-Rooney-Henson vs 7-Poel-Petersen
620 6.25 1.75 5♦ S 6 6-Randall-Randall vs 5-Larson-Blackman
200 4.56 3.44 3♠ N 5 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 3-Lee-Thomason
150 3.44 4.56 2♦ S 5 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 9-Hackler-Edington
100 2.31 5.69 5♠ S -1 4-Metheny-Williams vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
400 1.19 6.81 4♥ S -4 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 6-Allen-Michelson
550 0.06 7.94 5♣* E 5 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
|
22 |
♠965432
♥A973
♦T
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT8
♥KT64
♦J53
♣973
|
♠AKJ7
♥85
♦A874
♣QT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ NT6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4/3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 6.81 1.19 3♣ S 4 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 5-Larson-Blackman
130 6.81 1.19 2♣ S 4 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 2-Forrester-Denton
130 6.81 1.19 2♣ S 4 6-Randall-Randall vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
110 4.56 3.44 2♣ S 3 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 7-Poel-Petersen
100 3.44 4.56 1♠ E -1 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 3-Lee-Thomason
50 2.31 5.69 4♥ N -1 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
100 1.19 6.81 2N S -2 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
150 0.06 7.94 3N S -3 7-Rooney-Henson vs 6-Allen-Michelson
|
23 |
♠5
♥QJT764
♦QT82
♣A5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKJT3
♥93
♦K93
♣KJ3
|
♠7
♥A85
♦AJ4
♣T98642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3/5 ♥6 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 7.94 0.06 2♠ W 4 7-Rooney-Henson vs 6-Allen-Michelson
200 6.25 1.75 3♠ W 5 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 3-Lee-Thomason
200 6.25 1.75 3♠ W 5 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 5-Larson-Blackman
230 4.56 3.44 2♠ W 6 6-Randall-Randall vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
650 2.31 5.69 4♠ W 5 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 2-Forrester-Denton
650 2.31 5.69 4♠ W 5 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
650 2.31 5.69 4♠ W 5 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
2440 0.06 7.94 2♠** W 6 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 7-Poel-Petersen
|
24 |
♠T62
♥AT84
♦QT8
♣K63
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K87
♥32
♦KJ763
♣JT8
|
♠AQJ4
♥Q97
♦954
♣952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1/2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 7.94 0.06 2♥ S 4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
140 4.56 3.44 2♥ N 3 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 3-Lee-Thomason
140 4.56 3.44 2♥ N 3 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 5-Larson-Blackman
140 4.56 3.44 2♥ N 3 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 7-Poel-Petersen
140 4.56 3.44 2♥ N 3 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 2-Forrester-Denton
140 4.56 3.44 2♥ N 3 7-Rooney-Henson vs 6-Allen-Michelson
50 1.19 6.81 2♦ W -1 10-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
50 0.06 7.94 3♥ N -1 6-Randall-Randall vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
|
25 |
♠K
♥AJT9853
♦A85
♣Q5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠8764
♥2
♦QT943
♣T87
|
♠AQJ92
♥764
♦6
♣A963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 8.00 0.00 4♥ N 6 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 2-Forrester-Denton
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N 5 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N 5 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 6-Allen-Michelson
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N 5 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N 5 6-Randall-Randall vs 3-Lee-Thomason
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N 5 7-Rooney-Henson vs 5-Larson-Blackman
420 1.50 6.50 4♥ N 4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 7-Poel-Petersen
420 1.50 6.50 4♥ N 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 9-Hackler-Edington
140 0.00 8.00 2♠ E 3 4-Metheny-Williams vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
26 |
♠KQ643
♥4
♦T6
♣97532
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT2
♥T73
♦AKJ52
♣84
|
♠7
♥QJ865
♦Q3
♣KQJT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 8.00 0.00 3N W -3 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 9-Hackler-Edington
200 7.00 1.00 4♥* E -1 4-Metheny-Williams vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
140 6.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 7-Poel-Petersen
100 4.00 4.00 4♥ E -1 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 2-Forrester-Denton
100 4.00 4.00 4♥ E -1 6-Randall-Randall vs 3-Lee-Thomason
100 4.00 4.00 3♥ E -1 7-Rooney-Henson vs 5-Larson-Blackman
140 2.00 6.00 3♥ E 3 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 6-Allen-Michelson
600 1.00 7.00 3N E 3 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
730 0.00 8.00 3♥* E 3 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
|
27 |
♠32
♥9
♦7432
♣K86543
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠JT6
♥KQJ43
♦Q8
♣QJ7
|
♠AKQ74
♥A65
♦JT95
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 8.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 4-Metheny-Williams vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
170 7.00 1.00 3♥ W 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 9-Hackler-Edington
420 5.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 1-Houseknecht-Hiss vs 2-Forrester-Denton
420 5.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 6-Allen-Michelson
420 5.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 7-Rooney-Henson vs 5-Larson-Blackman
450 2.00 6.00 4♠ E 5 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 7-Poel-Petersen
450 2.00 6.00 4♥ W 5 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
450 2.00 6.00 4♥ W 5 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 1-Shropshire-Ludeman
460 0.00 8.00 3N W 5 6-Randall-Randall vs 3-Lee-Thomason
|
28 |
♠JT63
♥KT6
♦J32
♣T82
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q72
♥AJ9
♦KQT8
♣AQ6
|
♠AK84
♥Q432
♦A5
♣J95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.94 0.06 6N W -1 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 6-Allen-Michelson
490 5.69 2.31 3N W 6 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 3-Lee-Thomason
490 5.69 2.31 3N W 6 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 9-Hackler-Edington
490 5.69 2.31 3N W 6 6-Randall-Randall vs 2-Forrester-Denton
520 3.44 4.56 3N W 7 4-Metheny-Williams vs 7-Poel-Petersen
990 1.19 6.81 6N W 6 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 5-Larson-Blackman
990 1.19 6.81 6N W 6 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
990 1.19 6.81 6N E 6 7-Rooney-Henson vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
|
29 |
♠Q985
♥KQ92
♦J94
♣T3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT632
♥T4
♦8753
♣Q2
|
♠K74
♥AJ85
♦Q6
♣K975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3/2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 7.38 0.63 3N W -3 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 9-Hackler-Edington
300 7.38 0.63 1♣ E -3 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 5-Larson-Blackman
180 5.13 2.88 2N N 4 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
180 5.13 2.88 1N S 4 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 3-Lee-Thomason
70 3.44 4.56 1♦ S 1 7-Rooney-Henson vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
100 1.75 6.25 3N N -1 4-Metheny-Williams vs 7-Poel-Petersen
100 1.75 6.25 5♦ S -1 6-Randall-Randall vs 2-Forrester-Denton
400 0.06 7.94 4♥ N -4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 6-Allen-Michelson
|
30 |
♠QT2
♥QJ
♦873
♣KT642
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K8653
♥T954
♦4
♣983
|
♠J97
♥3
♦KQJT962
♣QJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♥ 1♠ 7NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣0 ♥0 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 7.94 0.06 5♦* E -4 8-Gose-Shropshire vs 6-Allen-Michelson
510 6.81 1.19 4♥ S 7 2-Dunkel-Binning vs 3-Lee-Thomason
450 4.56 3.44 4♥ S 5 3-McQuaid-Stein vs 5-Larson-Blackman
450 4.56 3.44 4♥ S 5 6-Randall-Randall vs 2-Forrester-Denton
450 4.56 3.44 4♥ S 5 9-Jozefowski-Jozefowski vs 8-Unglaub-Lindeman
260 2.31 5.69 3♥ S 7 4-Metheny-Williams vs 7-Poel-Petersen
170 0.63 7.38 3♥ S 4 5-Schatz-Schatz vs 9-Hackler-Edington
170 0.63 7.38 3♥ S 4 7-Rooney-Henson vs 4-Gioannini-Traver
|