1 |
♠QJ84
♥KT7
♦J96
♣T65
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AT62
♥A932
♦KQ72
♣9
|
♠K95
♥QJ8
♦843
♣8743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 7.94 0.06 2♣ S 3 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
100 6.81 1.19 2N E -2 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 7-Randall-Randall
90 5.13 2.88 2♣ S 2 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
90 5.13 2.88 2♣ S 2 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 3-Schatz-Mann
50 3.44 4.56 2♦ W -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 9-Edington-Liner
50 2.31 5.69 2♣ S -1 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
110 0.63 7.38 2♥ W 2 9-Little-Metheny vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
110 0.63 7.38 2♥ E 2 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
|
2 |
♠JT987
♥QJ2
♦82
♣852
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AKQ62
♥K8
♦AQ
♣Q643
|
♠54
♥65
♦9765
♣AKJT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣1 ♦4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 4♠ 5NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 7.94 0.06 4♣ W 6 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 3-Schatz-Mann
210 6.81 1.19 2N W 5 11-Allen-Gordon vs 9-Edington-Liner
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ W 4 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ W 4 9-Little-Metheny vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
420 4.56 3.44 4♠ W 4 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
430 1.75 6.25 3N W 4 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 7-Randall-Randall
430 1.75 6.25 3N E 4 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
800 0.06 7.94 5♥* S -3 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
|
3 |
♠9
♥53
♦A8732
♣AKT97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ6
♥AKQJ84
♦5
♣654
|
♠K83
♥9
♦KQT64
♣QJ32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.94 0.06 4♥ W -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 9-Edington-Liner
100 6.81 1.19 4♦ S -2 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
150 5.69 2.31 3♦ S -3 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 3-Schatz-Mann
600 4.56 3.44 3N E 3 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 7-Randall-Randall
620 2.88 5.13 4♥ W 4 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
620 2.88 5.13 4♥ W 4 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
630 1.19 6.81 3N E 4 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
650 0.06 7.94 4♥ W 5 9-Little-Metheny vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
4 |
♠K5
♥KJT942
♦7
♣7643
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠A943
♥A87
♦64
♣QJ82
|
♠862
♥63
♦AKJ93
♣A95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
870 7.94 0.06 2♥* N 3 2-Stein-Binning vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
300 6.81 1.19 3♦ E -3 7-Gose-Liner vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
200 5.69 2.31 3N W -2 11-Allen-Gordon vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ N 3 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 9-Edington-Liner
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ N 3 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
110 2.31 5.69 2♥ N 2 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
100 1.19 6.81 3N W -1 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
110 0.06 7.94 2♠ W 2 9-Little-Metheny vs 4-Hackler-Colson
|
5 |
♠QJ72
♥KQ74
♦T
♣A763
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K84
♥AT985
♦Q643
♣K
|
♠A95
♥J2
♦9875
♣QJT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♥ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6/7 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ -/1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.94 0.06 3♥ W -3 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
90 6.81 1.19 1N S 1 7-Gose-Liner vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
50 5.69 2.31 2♥ W -1 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 9-Edington-Liner
100 3.44 4.56 2N N -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
100 3.44 4.56 1N N -1 2-Stein-Binning vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
100 3.44 4.56 1N N -1 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
200 1.19 6.81 3♣ N -2 9-Little-Metheny vs 4-Hackler-Colson
300 0.06 7.94 2♦ S -3 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
|
6 |
♠T873
♥J8642
♦9
♣T72
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK6
♥93
♦AKJ65
♣J64
|
♠J542
♥Q5
♦32
♣KQ985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 7.38 0.63 3♥ N 3 9-Little-Metheny vs 4-Hackler-Colson
140 7.38 0.63 2♥ S 3 7-Gose-Liner vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
50 5.69 2.31 3♥ N -1 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 9-Edington-Liner
90 4.56 3.44 1N W 1 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
100 2.31 5.69 3N N -2 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
100 2.31 5.69 1♦ S -2 2-Stein-Binning vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
100 2.31 5.69 1♦ S -2 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
690 0.06 7.94 3N W 6 11-Allen-Gordon vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
|
7 |
♠K2
♥J752
♦KJT4
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A983
♥AQ
♦A8762
♣72
|
♠QJ65
♥KT98
♦53
♣K63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3/4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 6.81 1.19 4♠ W -1 2-Stein-Binning vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
100 6.81 1.19 4♠ W -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 7-Randall-Randall
100 6.81 1.19 3♠ W -1 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 9-Edington-Liner
100 4.56 3.44 3♣ N -1 3-Henson-Soules vs 3-Schatz-Mann
110 3.44 4.56 1♠ W 2 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
140 1.75 6.25 3♠ W 3 9-Little-Metheny vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
140 1.75 6.25 2♠ W 3 7-Gose-Liner vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
170 0.06 7.94 2♠ W 4 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
8 |
♠AK764
♥5
♦KQT6
♣Q83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠JT5
♥A96
♦9853
♣654
|
♠Q
♥J73
♦J742
♣AJT92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3/2 ♠2 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 6.81 1.19 5♠ N 5 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
450 6.81 1.19 4♠ N 5 3-Henson-Soules vs 3-Schatz-Mann
450 6.81 1.19 4♠ N 5 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 9-Edington-Liner
420 2.88 5.13 4♠ N 4 2-Stein-Binning vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
420 2.88 5.13 4♠ N 4 7-Gose-Liner vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
420 2.88 5.13 4♠ N 4 9-Little-Metheny vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
420 2.88 5.13 4♠ N 4 11-Allen-Gordon vs 7-Randall-Randall
100 0.06 7.94 6♠ N -2 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
9 |
♠KQ6
♥KQJ2
♦A
♣AT983
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A842
♥A8654
♦QT
♣62
|
♠T7
♥T97
♦K9865
♣KJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 7.94 0.06 3N N 4 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
200 6.25 1.75 2♥ W -2 9-Little-Metheny vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
200 6.25 1.75 2♥* W -1 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 9-Edington-Liner
140 4.56 3.44 1♥ N 3 3-Henson-Soules vs 3-Schatz-Mann
130 2.88 5.13 3♣ N 4 11-Allen-Gordon vs 7-Randall-Randall
130 2.88 5.13 1♣ N 4 2-Stein-Binning vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
50 1.19 6.81 4♠ S -1 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
100 0.06 7.94 4♠ S -2 7-Gose-Liner vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
|
10 |
♠QT9
♥53
♦Q83
♣J8765
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK73
♥Q972
♦6
♣Q932
|
♠J854
♥T6
♦AK954
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.94 0.06 2N W -2 3-Henson-Soules vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
100 4.56 3.44 3N W -1 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 4-Hackler-Colson
100 4.56 3.44 2N W -1 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
100 4.56 3.44 4♠ W -1 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 3-Schatz-Mann
100 4.56 3.44 2♦ E -1 9-Little-Metheny vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
100 4.56 3.44 2♦ E -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
110 1.19 6.81 2♦ E 3 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
170 0.06 7.94 3♠ E 4 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
|
11 |
♠QT93
♥Q93
♦4
♣A9865
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ8765
♥J62
♦KJ5
♣K
|
♠K4
♥KT4
♦QT876
♣JT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.94 0.06 4♠ W -2 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 4-Hackler-Colson
50 5.13 2.88 3♠ W -1 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
50 5.13 2.88 3♠ W -1 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
50 5.13 2.88 2♠ W -1 9-Little-Metheny vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
50 5.13 2.88 2♠ W -1 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 3-Schatz-Mann
110 1.75 6.25 2♠ W 2 11-Allen-Gordon vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
110 1.75 6.25 2♠ W 2 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
140 0.06 7.94 3♠ W 3 3-Henson-Soules vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
|
12 |
♠A5
♥KT9
♦KQ92
♣A543
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q2
♥Q762
♦T864
♣QJ9
|
♠JT63
♥AJ85
♦-
♣K8762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 7.94 0.06 3N N 5 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
630 6.81 1.19 3N N 4 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
620 5.69 2.31 4♠ N 4 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 3-Schatz-Mann
600 4.00 4.00 3N N 3 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 4-Hackler-Colson
600 4.00 4.00 3N N 3 11-Allen-Gordon vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
170 2.31 5.69 2♠ N 4 3-Henson-Soules vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
90 1.19 6.81 2♦ S 2 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
100 0.06 7.94 3N N -1 9-Little-Metheny vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
|
13 |
♠AQJT6
♥T9
♦J87
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠K
♥A854
♦T954
♣K642
|
♠8754
♥KQJ762
♦K2
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 7.38 0.63 3♠ N 5 2-Stein-Binning vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
200 7.38 0.63 3♠ N 5 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
100 5.69 2.31 4♥ E -1 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 3-Schatz-Mann
140 4.00 4.00 3♥ E 3 3-Henson-Soules vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ E 3 11-Allen-Gordon vs 4-Hackler-Colson
170 2.31 5.69 3♥ E 4 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
620 1.19 6.81 4♥ E 4 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 9-Edington-Liner
650 0.06 7.94 4♥ E 5 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 7-Randall-Randall
|
14 |
♠74
♥T92
♦QT5
♣T8743
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AKT83
♥A653
♦K4
♣K2
|
♠Q5
♥QJ74
♦A832
♣AQ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.81 1.19 6N E -1 3-Henson-Soules vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
50 6.81 1.19 6N E -1 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
50 6.81 1.19 6♠ E -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 4-Hackler-Colson
200 4.56 3.44 2♠ W 5 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 3-Schatz-Mann
460 3.44 4.56 3N W 5 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
980 1.19 6.81 6♥ E 6 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 9-Edington-Liner
980 1.19 6.81 6♥ E 6 2-Stein-Binning vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
980 1.19 6.81 6♥ E 6 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 7-Randall-Randall
|
15 |
♠AKT54
♥KT4
♦5
♣QT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠7
♥AQ95
♦AJT9743
♣J
|
♠QJ98
♥J8
♦KQ8
♣K854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.81 1.19 5♦ W -1 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
50 6.81 1.19 5♦ W -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 4-Hackler-Colson
50 6.81 1.19 5♦ W -1 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 7-Randall-Randall
400 2.88 5.13 3N E 3 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 9-Edington-Liner
400 2.88 5.13 3N E 3 3-Henson-Soules vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
400 2.88 5.13 3N E 3 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 3-Schatz-Mann
400 2.88 5.13 3N E 3 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
430 0.06 7.94 3N E 4 2-Stein-Binning vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
|
16 |
♠832
♥K9
♦K6
♣K98542
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ65
♥AJ3
♦543
♣AQ7
|
♠KJ94
♥QT642
♦QT7
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ -/1NT ♣4 ♦5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 7.94 0.06 4♠ W -1 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
120 6.81 1.19 2N W 2 11-Allen-Gordon vs 3-Schatz-Mann
620 4.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 2-Stein-Binning vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
620 4.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
620 4.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
620 4.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
650 0.63 7.38 4♠ W 5 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
650 0.63 7.38 4♠ W 5 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 4-Hackler-Colson
|
17 |
♠J
♥962
♦Q98762
♣AQ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A42
♥4
♦AT54
♣JT876
|
♠876
♥AKJT
♦J3
♣9532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 7.94 0.06 3♠ S 3 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
110 6.25 1.75 2♠ S 2 2-Stein-Binning vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
110 6.25 1.75 2♠ S 2 11-Allen-Gordon vs 3-Schatz-Mann
50 4.56 3.44 4♣ W -1 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
50 2.88 5.13 3♠ S -1 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
50 2.88 5.13 2♠ S -1 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 4-Hackler-Colson
100 0.63 7.38 3N N -2 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
100 0.63 7.38 3♥ S -2 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
|
18 |
♠KJT
♥963
♦3
♣AJ9832
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A8752
♥A5
♦A72
♣KQ7
|
♠93
♥KT742
♦JT64
♣T5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.94 0.06 2♥ W -3 11-Allen-Gordon vs 3-Schatz-Mann
100 6.81 1.19 2N W -2 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
50 5.69 2.31 1N W -1 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
80 4.56 3.44 1♠ W 1 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
90 3.44 4.56 1N W 1 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 4-Hackler-Colson
200 1.19 6.81 2♦ S -2 2-Stein-Binning vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
200 1.19 6.81 3♣ N -2 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
200 1.19 6.81 3♣ N -2 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
19 |
♠Q873
♥842
♦JT843
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT92
♥J3
♦K75
♣Q987
|
♠A5
♥QT975
♦A2
♣AK62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 8.00 0.00 3N W -1 2-Stein-Binning vs 9-Edington-Liner
170 7.00 1.00 2♥ E 4 3-Henson-Soules vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
210 6.00 2.00 1N E 5 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
600 4.00 4.00 3N W 3 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
600 4.00 4.00 3N W 3 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 3-Schatz-Mann
600 4.00 4.00 3N W 3 7-Gose-Liner vs 7-Randall-Randall
630 2.00 6.00 3N W 4 11-Allen-Gordon vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
660 1.00 7.00 3N E 5 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
690 0.00 8.00 3N E 6 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 4-Hackler-Colson
|
20 |
♠T964
♥Q654
♦K732
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K
♥J97
♦QJ986
♣AK85
|
♠J87
♥KT3
♦5
♣T97632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦5/6 |
EW: 4♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 8.00 0.00 5♣* W -1 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
170 7.00 1.00 3♠ S 4 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
140 6.00 2.00 2♠ S 3 2-Stein-Binning vs 9-Edington-Liner
110 4.50 3.50 2♠ S 2 3-Henson-Soules vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
110 4.50 3.50 2♠ S 2 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 3-Schatz-Mann
100 3.00 5.00 4♣ W -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
150 1.50 6.50 4♣ W 5 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
150 1.50 6.50 2♣ W 5 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 4-Hackler-Colson
200 0.00 8.00 4♠ S -2 7-Gose-Liner vs 7-Randall-Randall
|
21 |
♠Q5
♥A974
♦AK2
♣AQ52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠872
♥KJ86
♦Q9
♣T964
|
♠AJ643
♥Q53
♦J873
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 7.86 0.14 3N N 5 3-Henson-Soules vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
600 4.64 3.36 3N S 3 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
600 4.64 3.36 3N S 3 2-Stein-Binning vs 9-Edington-Liner
600 4.64 3.36 3N S 3 11-Allen-Gordon vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
600 4.64 3.36 5♣ N 5 7-Gose-Liner vs 7-Randall-Randall
130 1.43 6.57 2♣ N 4 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 3-Schatz-Mann
100 0.14 7.86 3♦ S -1 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
|
22 |
♠J3
♥A754
♦T76
♣AKT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A97652
♥J62
♦J
♣J43
|
♠T84
♥K83
♦AQ953
♣62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.81 1.19 4♣ S -1 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
50 6.81 1.19 3♣ S -1 3-Henson-Soules vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
50 6.81 1.19 3♣ N -1 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
100 3.44 4.56 3N S -2 7-Gose-Liner vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
100 3.44 4.56 2N S -2 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
100 3.44 4.56 2N S -2 2-Stein-Binning vs 7-Randall-Randall
150 1.19 6.81 3N S -3 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 4-Hackler-Colson
360 0.06 7.94 1♠* W 2 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 3-Schatz-Mann
|
23 |
♠AJ754
♥J9
♦765
♣982
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q9
♥2
♦QT9
♣AQT7654
|
♠T862
♥QT7654
♦J8
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ -/3NT ♣5/6 NT6/9 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5/4 ♠4/3 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 7.94 0.06 3♣ W -3 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
130 6.81 1.19 3♦ S 4 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
100 4.56 3.44 3N S -1 2-Stein-Binning vs 7-Randall-Randall
100 4.56 3.44 3N S -1 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 4-Hackler-Colson
100 4.56 3.44 3♦ S -1 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 3-Schatz-Mann
200 2.31 5.69 4♠ N -2 3-Henson-Soules vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
300 1.19 6.81 3N S -3 7-Gose-Liner vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
500 0.06 7.94 6N S -5 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
|
24 |
♠AT864
♥J3
♦J54
♣AT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q7
♥AT876
♦KT632
♣3
|
♠K2
♥Q954
♦AQ
♣KQJ94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 4.00 4♠ E 4 3-Henson-Soules vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 2-Stein-Binning vs 7-Randall-Randall
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 7-Gose-Liner vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 12-Kornegay-Kornegay vs 3-Schatz-Mann
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 4-Hackler-Colson
420 4.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
|
25 |
♠AKQ8
♥A3
♦95
♣96542
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠JT762
♥QJ74
♦Q3
♣JT
|
♠953
♥T92
♦J862
♣Q73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 4♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 7.50 0.50 3N S 6 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 3-Schatz-Mann
490 7.50 0.50 3N N 6 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 4-Hackler-Colson
460 4.50 3.50 3N S 5 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
460 4.50 3.50 3N S 5 9-Little-Metheny vs 9-Edington-Liner
460 4.50 3.50 3N N 5 3-Henson-Soules vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
460 4.50 3.50 3N N 5 7-Gose-Liner vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
430 2.00 6.00 3N N 4 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 7-Randall-Randall
400 0.50 7.50 3N S 3 2-Stein-Binning vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
400 0.50 7.50 3N S 3 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
|
26 |
♠AK942
♥A6
♦AT97
♣K8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠63
♥32
♦KQ2
♣QT9654
|
♠Q85
♥KQ8754
♦6
♣J73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1/-♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 8.00 0.00 4♠ N 5 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 4-Hackler-Colson
620 5.50 2.50 4♠ N 4 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
620 5.50 2.50 4♠ N 4 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 3-Schatz-Mann
620 5.50 2.50 4♠ N 4 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 7-Randall-Randall
620 5.50 2.50 4♠ N 4 9-Little-Metheny vs 9-Edington-Liner
200 3.00 5.00 3♠ N 5 3-Henson-Soules vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
170 1.00 7.00 3♠ N 4 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
170 1.00 7.00 2♠ N 4 2-Stein-Binning vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
170 1.00 7.00 2♠ N 4 7-Gose-Liner vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
|
27 |
♠T532
♥K84
♦J92
♣832
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J864
♥A7
♦43
♣KQ974
|
♠AK97
♥QT3
♦AQ75
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5/4♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ 5/4♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 7.50 0.50 3N E -1 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 3-Schatz-Mann
50 7.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
140 6.00 2.00 3♠ E 3 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 7-Randall-Randall
420 4.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 1-Spengler-Hiss vs 4-Hackler-Colson
420 4.50 3.50 4♠ E 4 7-Gose-Liner vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
430 3.00 5.00 3N E 4 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
450 1.00 7.00 4♠ E 5 2-Stein-Binning vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
450 1.00 7.00 4♠ E 5 3-Henson-Soules vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
450 1.00 7.00 4♠ E 5 9-Little-Metheny vs 9-Edington-Liner
|
28 |
♠JT98
♥QJ753
♦Q76
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A5
♥AT9
♦A853
♣8532
|
♠K642
♥K4
♦KT94
♣K97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 7.94 0.06 1N W 1 3-Henson-Soules vs 7-Randall-Randall
110 6.81 1.19 1♠ E 2 7-Gose-Liner vs 4-Hackler-Colson
130 5.69 2.31 3♦ W 4 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
150 4.00 4.00 3♦ W 5 2-Stein-Binning vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
150 4.00 4.00 3♦ W 5 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
400 1.75 6.25 3N W 3 9-Little-Metheny vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
400 1.75 6.25 3N W 3 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
430 0.06 7.94 3N W 4 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 9-Edington-Liner
|
29 |
♠732
♥Q863
♦9632
♣42
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK4
♥K952
♦Q7
♣J986
|
♠QT6
♥JT
♦AKJ4
♣KQ53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 7.94 0.06 2♥ W 3 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 9-Edington-Liner
630 4.56 3.44 3N W 4 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
630 4.56 3.44 3N E 4 3-Henson-Soules vs 7-Randall-Randall
630 4.56 3.44 3N E 4 7-Gose-Liner vs 4-Hackler-Colson
630 4.56 3.44 3N E 4 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
630 4.56 3.44 3N E 4 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
660 0.63 7.38 3N E 5 2-Stein-Binning vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
660 0.63 7.38 3N E 5 9-Little-Metheny vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
|
30 |
♠Q9
♥Q63
♦Q6432
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠T87
♥985
♦JT8
♣J643
|
♠K543
♥AK42
♦975
♣72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 7.38 0.63 3N S 6 3-Henson-Soules vs 7-Randall-Randall
490 7.38 0.63 3N S 6 7-Gose-Liner vs 4-Hackler-Colson
460 5.13 2.88 3N S 5 2-Stein-Binning vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
460 5.13 2.88 3N S 5 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
430 1.75 6.25 3N S 4 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 9-Edington-Liner
430 1.75 6.25 3N S 4 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
430 1.75 6.25 3N S 4 9-Little-Metheny vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
430 1.75 6.25 3N S 4 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
|
31 |
♠T
♥J984
♦J832
♣AK84
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K943
♥53
♦A954
♣JT3
|
♠QJ8
♥KQ762
♦76
♣972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 8.00 0.00 3N S 5 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
630 6.50 1.50 3N N 4 7-Gose-Liner vs 3-Schatz-Mann
630 6.50 1.50 3N N 4 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 9-Edington-Liner
600 5.00 3.00 3N N 3 3-Henson-Soules vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
210 4.00 4.00 2N N 5 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
180 2.50 5.50 1N N 4 9-Little-Metheny vs 7-Randall-Randall
180 2.50 5.50 1N N 4 11-Allen-Gordon vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
150 1.00 7.00 1N N 3 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
120 0.00 8.00 1N N 2 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
|
32 |
♠T98
♥85
♦QT9
♣AT973
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ
♥KJ63
♦AJ853
♣84
|
♠Q7542
♥Q94
♦642
♣Q6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 8.00 0.00 1N W -2 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 9-Edington-Liner
130 6.50 1.50 3♣ S 4 9-Little-Metheny vs 7-Randall-Randall
130 6.50 1.50 2♣ N 4 7-Gose-Liner vs 3-Schatz-Mann
110 4.50 3.50 3♣ N 3 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
110 4.50 3.50 2♣ S 3 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
100 2.00 6.00 2♠ E -1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
100 2.00 6.00 2♦ W -1 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
100 2.00 6.00 2♦ W -1 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
50 0.00 8.00 4N S -1 3-Henson-Soules vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
|
33 |
♠AQ
♥KQ83
♦863
♣KQ82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J643
♥764
♦AQJ2
♣T6
|
♠95
♥T952
♦T5
♣A9543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 3.00 3N N 3 3-Henson-Soules vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
400 5.00 3.00 3N N 3 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
400 5.00 3.00 3N N 3 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
400 5.00 3.00 3N N 3 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 1-Benjamins-Thomason
400 5.00 3.00 3N N 3 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 5-Unglaub-Lindeman
400 5.00 3.00 3N N 3 9-Little-Metheny vs 7-Randall-Randall
400 5.00 3.00 3N N 3 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 9-Edington-Liner
50 1.00 7.00 3N N -1 7-Gose-Liner vs 3-Schatz-Mann
100 0.00 8.00 4♠ N -2 11-Allen-Gordon vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
|
34 |
♠Q7
♥8752
♦T97
♣AJ63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T84
♥QJ
♦A42
♣KQT52
|
♠J6
♥AK94
♦KQJ6
♣984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.81 1.19 5♦ E -1 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 4-Hackler-Colson
50 6.81 1.19 3♦ E -1 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 7-Randall-Randall
50 6.81 1.19 4♣ W -1 9-Little-Metheny vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
100 4.56 3.44 2♠ S -1 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 9-Edington-Liner
110 2.31 5.69 3♣ W 3 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
110 2.31 5.69 3♣ W 3 7-Gose-Liner vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
110 2.31 5.69 3♣ W 3 11-Allen-Gordon vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
400 0.06 7.94 3N W 3 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
|
35 |
♠JT752
♥32
♦8543
♣93
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ
♥K
♦AKQT6
♣T8765
|
♠98
♥QJT75
♦72
♣AKQ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 5♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 7.94 0.06 5♣ E 6 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
660 6.81 1.19 3N W 5 7-Gose-Liner vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
690 4.00 4.00 4N W 6 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 9-Edington-Liner
690 4.00 4.00 3N W 6 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 4-Hackler-Colson
690 4.00 4.00 3N W 6 9-Little-Metheny vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
690 4.00 4.00 3N W 6 11-Allen-Gordon vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
1370 1.19 6.81 6♣ E 6 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 7-Randall-Randall
1440 0.06 7.94 6N W 6 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
|
36 |
♠9
♥QJ92
♦864
♣A7642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J6432
♥865
♦KT73
♣5
|
♠5
♥AK73
♦QJ95
♣KQ98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 7.94 0.06 4♦ E -3 5-Van Doren-Holliday vs 9-Edington-Liner
90 6.81 1.19 1N N 1 11-Allen-Gordon vs 10-Denton-Shropshire
100 4.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 7-Gose-Liner vs 2-Nichols-Nichols
100 4.00 4.00 2♠ S -1 6-Peters-Wilbur vs 11-Jozefowski-Jozefowski
100 4.00 4.00 2♠ S -1 8-McQuaid-Wolin vs 4-Hackler-Colson
100 4.00 4.00 2♠ S -1 9-Little-Metheny vs 6-Ludeman-Lerdal
200 1.19 6.81 2♠ S -2 10-Mohr-Caywood vs 8-Shropshire-Kryway
300 0.06 7.94 4♠ N -3 4-Duttweiler-Wooden vs 7-Randall-Randall
|