1 |
♠AJ32
♥A52
♦64
♣J653
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QT94
♥Q64
♦A9753
♣9
|
♠86
♥JT873
♦K
♣KT874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.00 0.00 3N S 5 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Stein-Michelson
430 2.00 1.00 3N S 4 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
50 0.50 2.50 3N S -1 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
50 0.50 2.50 3♣ N -1 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 1-Randall-Randall
|
2 |
♠AT842
♥Q2
♦A
♣98542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q96
♥AT7
♦KQ64
♣AQ7
|
♠K
♥K8643
♦T9873
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ W 4 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ W 4 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Stein-Michelson
200 0.50 2.50 2♥ W 5 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 1-Randall-Randall
200 0.50 2.50 2♥ W 5 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
3 |
♠Q3
♥743
♦864
♣K8543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A
♥AJ5
♦KT93
♣AQ962
|
♠K7542
♥KT9
♦AQJ5
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦0 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 7♦ 5♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 0.00 5♦ E 6 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
660 2.00 1.00 3N E 5 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Stein-Michelson
690 0.50 2.50 3N W 6 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 1-Randall-Randall
690 0.50 2.50 3N E 6 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
4 |
♠873
♥A9765
♦AJ
♣AK5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠6
♥Q843
♦K6543
♣QJT
|
♠QJT952
♥KJT
♦QT98
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/2NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 3.00 0.00 5♦* E -3 1-Randall-Randall vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
150 2.00 1.00 3♣ S 5 8-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
130 1.00 2.00 4♣ S 4 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
100 0.00 3.00 5♣ S -1 5-Peters-Francis vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
|
5 |
♠Q
♥J965
♦AJ64
♣A532
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠852
♥74
♦9853
♣KJ96
|
♠AKJ9743
♥AQ
♦QT
♣74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 1-Randall-Randall vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 8-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 5 5-Peters-Francis vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
|
6 |
♠AJ972
♥A2
♦74
♣KT64
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT843
♥K87
♦A32
♣J3
|
♠K5
♥954
♦QT5
♣Q8752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.00 0.00 1N S 2 8-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
50 1.50 1.50 3N N -1 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 5-Peters-Francis vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 1-Randall-Randall vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
7 |
♠83
♥J74
♦AJ52
♣AJT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKJ2
♥A82
♦T76
♣762
|
♠QT96
♥KQ9
♦Q984
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ W 3 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Randall-Randall
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ E 4 8-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ E 4 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 5-Peters-Francis
|
8 |
♠83
♥K9875
♦853
♣642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠92
♥A
♦AQT97
♣QJ983
|
♠AKJT754
♥Q63
♦K
♣K7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 2♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 8-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 5-Peters-Francis
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Randall-Randall
|
9 |
♠K84
♥J92
♦K632
♣AT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q93
♥K4
♦A85
♣KQJ86
|
♠A62
♥A875
♦QJ
♣9742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 8-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
210 2.00 1.00 1N W 5 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Randall-Randall
630 0.50 2.50 3N W 4 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
630 0.50 2.50 3N W 4 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 5-Peters-Francis
|
10 |
♠KQJ2
♥4
♦AT75
♣KQJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠6
♥9753
♦J986
♣7643
|
♠AT984
♥AQJ2
♦K
♣A92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
150 2.00 1.00 2N N 3 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
90 1.00 2.00 2♣ N 2 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 8-Stein-Michelson
100 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 5-Peters-Francis
|
11 |
♠Q973
♥J843
♦K962
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠86
♥AK9762
♦AT
♣K62
|
♠KT2
♥T
♦Q853
♣AQ953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2/1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 3N E -3 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 5-Peters-Francis
100 1.50 1.50 3N E -2 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
100 1.50 1.50 3N E -2 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 8-Stein-Michelson
|
12 |
♠QT93
♥KJ8
♦T8
♣Q982
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A2
♥AT3
♦A976
♣KT53
|
♠84
♥Q954
♦J5432
♣74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
140 2.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 9-Hawkins-Smithers vs 8-Stein-Michelson
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ S 2 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 5-Peters-Francis
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ S 2 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
|
13 |
♠2
♥AQT9432
♦874
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJT854
♥K
♦Q65
♣952
|
♠A76
♥J8765
♦A2
♣K73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♠ ♣4/3 ♦3/2 ♥4/3 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 1-Randall-Randall vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
100 2.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 8-Stein-Michelson vs 5-Peters-Francis
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
400 0.00 3.00 3N S -4 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
14 |
♠T76
♥AK93
♦J92
♣874
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ54
♥JT762
♦T4
♣Q5
|
♠K983
♥85
♦Q863
♣J92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.50 0.50 2♠ W -3 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
150 2.50 0.50 3♣ S 5 1-Randall-Randall vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ E -2 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
50 0.00 3.00 3N N -1 8-Stein-Michelson vs 5-Peters-Francis
|
15 |
♠A87
♥8
♦A982
♣A9732
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9643
♥A2
♦Q753
♣KQ5
|
♠KJT
♥QJ63
♦KJT6
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠6/5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 1-Randall-Randall vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 8-Stein-Michelson vs 5-Peters-Francis
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ E 3 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
|
16 |
♠42
♥Q7543
♦K54
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ76
♥92
♦QJ7
♣9532
|
♠93
♥K8
♦T8632
♣T876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 2.50 0.50 6♥ N 6 5-Peters-Francis vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
980 2.50 0.50 6♥ N 6 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
490 1.00 2.00 3N N 6 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 8-Stein-Michelson
480 0.00 3.00 4♥ N 6 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 1-Randall-Randall
|
17 |
♠9
♥QT9642
♦QT9
♣Q42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ2
♥AK8
♦K73
♣JT76
|
♠KT8653
♥5
♦A82
♣K53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 8-Stein-Michelson
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 5 5-Peters-Francis vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
400 1.00 2.00 3N W 3 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 1-Randall-Randall
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
|
18 |
♠KJ
♥AT9843
♦93
♣A82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T4
♥Q75
♦AQJ76
♣KQ9
|
♠A962
♥KJ62
♦KT54
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♦ W 3 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
130 1.50 1.50 4♦ E 4 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 8-Stein-Michelson
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ W 4 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 1-Randall-Randall
470 0.00 3.00 3♦* W 3 5-Peters-Francis vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
|
19 |
♠T6542
♥J7
♦AJT4
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K3
♥K652
♦73
♣QT954
|
♠QJ97
♥A943
♦965
♣KJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ S 2 1-Randall-Randall vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
50 0.50 2.50 2N N -1 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Peters-Francis
50 0.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
|
20 |
♠97
♥J7652
♦72
♣AQ54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J432
♥T9
♦AQ
♣K7632
|
♠AQT6
♥AK3
♦JT853
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠2/3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Peters-Francis
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ W 4 1-Randall-Randall vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ W 4 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
|
21 |
♠Q54
♥AJ73
♦J92
♣743
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ
♥K8
♦AKT86
♣T952
|
♠98762
♥T6
♦54
♣AQJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.50 0.50 2♦ W 2 1-Randall-Randall vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
90 2.50 0.50 2♦ W 2 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 2-Wilbur-Wilbur
110 1.00 2.00 2♦ W 3 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
130 0.00 3.00 3♣ W 4 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Peters-Francis
|
22 |
♠K952
♥Q94
♦AK9
♣T85
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T84
♥AJ6
♦J653
♣J43
|
♠QJ7
♥K532
♦T72
♣972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.00 0.00 3N S 4 5-Peters-Francis vs 1-Randall-Randall
400 1.00 2.00 3N S 3 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 8-Stein-Michelson
400 1.00 2.00 3N S 3 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
400 1.00 2.00 3N S 3 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
|
23 |
♠JT52
♥AKT3
♦QJ74
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ9
♥J76
♦K63
♣KQ92
|
♠K8
♥92
♦AT5
♣AJT874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 0.00 3♣ W 4 5-Peters-Francis vs 1-Randall-Randall
600 2.00 1.00 3N W 3 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
660 1.00 2.00 3N W 5 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 8-Stein-Michelson
690 0.00 3.00 3N W 6 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
|
24 |
♠QT76
♥876
♦QT8
♣Q87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J43
♥AJ32
♦754
♣KJ3
|
♠A5
♥QT4
♦AJ932
♣A52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 7-Van Doren-Robertson vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
120 2.00 1.00 1N E 2 5-Peters-Francis vs 1-Randall-Randall
150 1.00 2.00 2N E 3 4-Duttweiler-Denton vs 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
400 0.00 3.00 3N E 3 2-Wilbur-Wilbur vs 8-Stein-Michelson
|
25 |
♠J62
♥2
♦873
♣KQT987
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q9
♥QJ94
♦J9654
♣J2
|
♠A8754
♥AK876
♦Q
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠3/4 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 5♥ E -4 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ E 3 8-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Randall-Randall
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 5-Peters-Francis vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
|
26 |
♠K93
♥K84
♦T9862
♣73
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠6
♥AQ97
♦Q74
♣AK652
|
♠AQT742
♥JT
♦AJ
♣JT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3/2♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 6N E -1 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
100 2.50 0.50 6♣ W -1 8-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Randall-Randall
150 1.00 2.00 4♣ W 5 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
690 0.00 3.00 3N W 6 5-Peters-Francis vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
|
27 |
♠AT9
♥KT5
♦632
♣KQJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J3
♥A762
♦985
♣T853
|
♠K8542
♥984
♦AKQJ
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥6/5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.50 0.50 1N S 1 5-Peters-Francis vs 4-Duttweiler-Denton
90 2.50 0.50 2♣ N 2 8-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Randall-Randall
50 1.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 3-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Hawkins-Smithers
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Van Doren-Robertson
|