1 |
♠AK986
♥Q
♦AJT7
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T54
♥A652
♦Q42
♣AK2
|
♠J7
♥KJT43
♦65
♣T643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 9-Poel-Allen vs 2-Denton-Binning
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 4-Randall-Randall vs 1-Woods-Anderson
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 8-Edington-Williams
|
2 |
♠T7
♥J873
♦J54
♣T974
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ6
♥T964
♦Q32
♣862
|
♠A832
♥AK5
♦A986
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 3N W -2 9-Poel-Allen vs 2-Denton-Binning
100 2.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
110 1.00 2.00 1♠ E 2 4-Randall-Randall vs 1-Woods-Anderson
120 0.00 3.00 2N E 2 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 8-Edington-Williams
|
3 |
♠AKQT5
♥K75
♦62
♣JT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠93
♥J3
♦QT973
♣9532
|
♠76
♥Q864
♦J85
♣AKQ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ S 4 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 4-Randall-Randall vs 1-Woods-Anderson
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 9-Poel-Allen vs 2-Denton-Binning
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 8-Edington-Williams
|
4 |
♠9852
♥Q763
♦A852
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ76
♥J
♦J73
♣AQT94
|
♠AKT3
♥A85
♦QT6
♣J63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 1-Woods-Anderson vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 8-Edington-Williams vs 4-Randall-Randall
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ W 4 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 9-Poel-Allen
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 2-Denton-Binning
|
5 |
♠KQ762
♥Q8
♦AT954
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT8
♥AT9753
♦Q72
♣Q
|
♠94
♥KJ2
♦863
♣T7642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦2 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 2-Denton-Binning
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 8-Edington-Williams vs 4-Randall-Randall
140 0.50 2.50 3♠ N 3 1-Woods-Anderson vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ N 3 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 9-Poel-Allen
|
6 |
♠752
♥KT32
♦AK
♣AK98
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q6
♥J76
♦J875
♣JT76
|
♠AKJ943
♥AQ4
♦4
♣Q42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ E 3 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 2-Denton-Binning
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ S -3 1-Woods-Anderson vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ E 4 8-Edington-Williams vs 4-Randall-Randall
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ E 4 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 9-Poel-Allen
|
7 |
♠QJ62
♥Q98632
♦2
♣K5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A9
♥A5
♦AKT5
♣QJ943
|
♠T53
♥KJT4
♦J963
♣A8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦0 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 7♦ 3♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 1-Woods-Anderson
630 1.50 1.50 3N W 4 2-Denton-Binning vs 4-Randall-Randall
630 1.50 1.50 3N E 4 8-Edington-Williams vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
800 0.00 3.00 2♥* N -3 9-Poel-Allen vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
|
8 |
♠AQ542
♥AK92
♦AQJ4
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠JT93
♥J73
♦K7
♣Q943
|
♠K76
♥QT4
♦83
♣AJT86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 7♦ 6/5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥1 ♠3/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 3.00 0.00 3♣* E -3 8-Edington-Williams vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
170 2.00 1.00 1♠ N 4 9-Poel-Allen vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
150 1.00 2.00 3♦ S 5 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 1-Woods-Anderson
50 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 2-Denton-Binning vs 4-Randall-Randall
|
9 |
♠Q94
♥AT7
♦KJT762
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠8
♥Q9865
♦A95
♣7654
|
♠AKJ6
♥K42
♦Q43
♣Q83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2/-♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♥8/6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 2-Denton-Binning vs 4-Randall-Randall
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 8-Edington-Williams vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 3 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 1-Woods-Anderson
500 0.00 3.00 4♠* S -3 9-Poel-Allen vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
|
10 |
♠876
♥J8
♦K8742
♣A96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠2
♥962
♦QT95
♣QJ853
|
♠JT94
♥A5
♦AJ63
♣K72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3/2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.50 0.50 2♠ S 4 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 4-Randall-Randall
170 2.50 0.50 2♠ S 4 9-Poel-Allen vs 8-Edington-Williams
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 2-Denton-Binning
|
11 |
♠AK98
♥T
♦KJ95
♣T976
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T7
♥Q7654
♦Q3
♣J543
|
♠J62
♥A83
♦AT842
♣Q2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 4-Randall-Randall
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 4 9-Poel-Allen vs 8-Edington-Williams
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ N 4 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 2-Denton-Binning
|
12 |
♠J
♥K74
♦9876
♣JT432
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q95
♥AQJ63
♦K43
♣95
|
♠8732
♥T2
♦AQJ2
♣AK7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ W 3 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 4-Randall-Randall
400 2.00 1.00 3N W 3 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 2-Denton-Binning
430 0.50 2.50 3N W 4 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
430 0.50 2.50 3N W 4 9-Poel-Allen vs 8-Edington-Williams
|
13 |
♠A32
♥K642
♦64
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQJ975
♥T
♦A32
♣J73
|
♠4
♥Q875
♦JT95
♣T865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ S -1 1-Woods-Anderson vs 9-Poel-Allen
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ S -1 2-Denton-Binning vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
200 1.00 2.00 4♥ S -2 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
300 0.00 3.00 3N N -3 8-Edington-Williams vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
|
14 |
♠32
♥J62
♦QT9654
♣K3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠KQJ9
♥AQT4
♦8
♣T862
|
♠T64
♥K985
♦2
♣AQJ97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥1 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 2-Denton-Binning vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
50 2.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 1-Woods-Anderson vs 9-Poel-Allen
200 1.00 2.00 2♥ E 5 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
500 0.00 3.00 5♦* S -3 8-Edington-Williams vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
|
15 |
♠AK7
♥AK
♦KT95
♣Q862
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ532
♥96
♦J6432
♣9
|
♠86
♥QJ5432
♦Q7
♣J73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2/3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1100 3.00 0.00 4♥* E -5 2-Denton-Binning vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
720 2.00 1.00 3N N 7 1-Woods-Anderson vs 9-Poel-Allen
690 0.50 2.50 3N N 6 8-Edington-Williams vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
690 0.50 2.50 3N N 6 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
|
16 |
♠42
♥AKT432
♦K5
♣A84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ7653
♥85
♦Q972
♣9
|
♠JT9
♥96
♦AJT86
♣K72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦1 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 3♥ N -1 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ N -2 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 8-Edington-Williams
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ N -2 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 4-Randall-Randall
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 2-Denton-Binning vs 1-Woods-Anderson
|
17 |
♠T986542
♥T2
♦9
♣KT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K3
♥9
♦AT65
♣A87543
|
♠QJ7
♥KQJ73
♦83
♣QJ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ N -2 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 8-Edington-Williams
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ W 4 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 4-Randall-Randall
150 1.00 2.00 2N W 3 2-Denton-Binning vs 1-Woods-Anderson
300 0.00 3.00 5♦* S -2 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
18 |
♠A92
♥AKJ
♦Q5
♣AQ863
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ764
♥Q98
♦KT93
♣2
|
♠T85
♥T643
♦J874
♣K7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: -/1♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6/7 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 4-Randall-Randall
150 2.00 1.00 2♣ N 5 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 8-Edington-Williams
130 0.50 2.50 3♣ N 4 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
130 0.50 2.50 2♣ S 4 2-Denton-Binning vs 1-Woods-Anderson
|
19 |
♠J85
♥KQ8765
♦T96
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T2
♥T9
♦QJ8543
♣962
|
♠A643
♥J432
♦K2
♣AT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.50 0.50 3N S 4 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 2-Denton-Binning
430 2.50 0.50 3N S 4 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 4-Randall-Randall vs 9-Poel-Allen
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ S 3 1-Woods-Anderson vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
20 |
♠A3
♥75
♦976432
♣J53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ8
♥J9862
♦AQ8
♣Q6
|
♠JT7
♥K3
♦KJ
♣AKT984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.50 0.50 3N W 4 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 2-Denton-Binning
630 2.50 0.50 3N W 4 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
660 0.50 2.50 3N W 5 1-Woods-Anderson vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
660 0.50 2.50 3N W 5 4-Randall-Randall vs 9-Poel-Allen
|
21 |
♠J8
♥K9876
♦KJ2
♣T73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT95
♥J432
♦875
♣52
|
♠76432
♥A
♦AQ6
♣AKQ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 6♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 1♠ E 5 4-Randall-Randall vs 9-Poel-Allen
230 2.00 1.00 3♠ E 6 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 2-Denton-Binning
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 1-Woods-Anderson vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
480 0.50 2.50 4♠ E 6 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 5-Spengler-McMillin
|
22 |
♠K72
♥AK2
♦AJ542
♣K5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQT6
♥QT
♦97
♣Q7643
|
♠985
♥873
♦KQ8
♣JT82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ N 4 4-Randall-Randall vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ N 4 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Poel-Allen
130 1.00 2.00 2♦ N 4 2-Denton-Binning vs 8-Edington-Williams
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 1-Woods-Anderson
|
23 |
♠T5
♥A73
♦KJT82
♣T93
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠9
♥K842
♦A754
♣Q874
|
♠K8642
♥T965
♦63
♣K5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4/3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 3.00 0.00 3N N 5 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Poel-Allen
630 2.00 1.00 3N N 4 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 1-Woods-Anderson
180 1.00 2.00 2N N 4 2-Denton-Binning vs 8-Edington-Williams
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ S 4 4-Randall-Randall vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
|
24 |
♠K32
♥QJT3
♦AKT8
♣87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J
♥8542
♦Q7652
♣AQ2
|
♠97654
♥K7
♦J
♣KJT54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2♦ W -3 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 1-Woods-Anderson
120 2.00 1.00 1N N 2 2-Denton-Binning vs 8-Edington-Williams
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Poel-Allen
50 0.50 2.50 3♦ N -1 4-Randall-Randall vs 3-Wiborg-Blackman
|
25 |
♠87
♥KJ83
♦AQT8
♣764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQT96
♥AT52
♦62
♣98
|
♠4
♥974
♦KJ94
♣AKQ53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 3N W -1 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
100 2.50 0.50 2N W -1 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 4-Randall-Randall
120 1.00 2.00 2N W 2 8-Edington-Williams vs 1-Woods-Anderson
600 0.00 3.00 3N E 3 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 9-Poel-Allen
|
26 |
♠A853
♥2
♦9432
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T9
♥AJ964
♦A8
♣A763
|
♠QJ72
♥KT73
♦J76
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 4-Randall-Randall
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ W 2 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 9-Poel-Allen
110 0.50 2.50 2♥ W 2 8-Edington-Williams vs 1-Woods-Anderson
|
27 |
♠AK9
♥J
♦J765
♣Q8432
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠Q8752
♥K8
♦Q82
♣K76
|
♠T6
♥6542
♦T94
♣AT95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.00 0.00 3N N 4 3-Wiborg-Blackman vs 9-Poel-Allen
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ S 4 8-Edington-Williams vs 1-Woods-Anderson
400 1.00 2.00 3N N 3 5-Spengler-McMillin vs 4-Randall-Randall
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 10-Reiser-McCoy vs 7-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|