1 |
♠Q76
♥JT963
♦KQ8
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AKJT853
♥A
♦T6
♣Q97
|
♠4
♥Q85
♦AJ974
♣A842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 4/5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -4 ♥4 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Robertson-Poel
50 3.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥7 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 2-Stein-Michelson
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 ♥J 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 ♥J 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Randall-Randall
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 ♥J 7-Francis-Peters vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
|
2 |
♠KJT7
♥54
♦AQ92
♣943
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A984
♥AKT87
♦-
♣AQ52
|
♠Q653
♥9
♦J7654
♣876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5/6 ♠2/3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.00 0.00 1♥ W 1 ♣9 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
110 2.50 1.50 1♥ W 2 ♠J 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 2-Stein-Michelson
110 2.50 1.50 1♥ W 2 ♦9 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Robertson-Poel
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 ♥Q 7-Francis-Peters vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
800 0.00 4.00 3♦* S -3 ♥A 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Randall-Randall
|
3 |
♠AK73
♥A862
♦JT2
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠JT92
♥74
♦A74
♣AKJ7
|
♠Q54
♥QJ
♦9853
♣QT63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 2♥ S 4 ♣A 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Randall-Randall
170 3.50 0.50 2♥ S 4 ♣A 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ S 3 ♣A 7-Francis-Peters vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ S 3 ♣A 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Robertson-Poel
100 0.00 4.00 1N E -1 ♥3 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 2-Stein-Michelson
|
4 |
♠Q852
♥A4
♦J973
♣AK4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT76
♥KJ6
♦T6
♣QT96
|
♠K94
♥QT9873
♦Q2
♣J7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♦A 8-Robertson-Poel vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
130 3.00 1.00 4♦ N 4 ♥3 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 2-Stein-Michelson
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♦A 7-Francis-Peters vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
100 0.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♥3 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
100 0.50 3.50 4♦ N -1 ♥3 1-Randall-Randall vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
|
5 |
♠T542
♥QT6
♦KQJ4
♣J9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠976
♥K93
♦AT85
♣K52
|
♠J83
♥84
♦973
♣AT743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♠7 8-Robertson-Poel vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ S 4 ♦5 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♣2 1-Randall-Randall vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠9 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 2-Stein-Michelson
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠9 7-Francis-Peters vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
|
6 |
♠J87
♥AQ83
♦T972
♣A2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠642
♥T2
♦QJ5
♣K8763
|
♠K53
♥KJ976
♦AK43
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♦3 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♣Q 7-Francis-Peters vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 ♣Q 1-Randall-Randall vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 ♣Q 8-Robertson-Poel vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 2 ♣5 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 2-Stein-Michelson
|
7 |
♠T9632
♥J62
♦4
♣J642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K8
♥KT753
♦AQ93
♣Q7
|
♠QJ54
♥AQ984
♦8
♣985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 5♦* S -2 ♥5 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♦4 2-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 ♦4 8-Robertson-Poel vs 7-Francis-Peters
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 ♠A 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
790 0.00 4.00 4♥* W 4 ♦4 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Randall-Randall
|
8 |
♠KJ7
♥T754
♦KQ73
♣43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T862
♥K3
♦JT
♣QJT72
|
♠AQ943
♥986
♦A95
♣96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ 3/2♥ 1/-NT ♣5 ♠4 NT7/5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♣9 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♣A 8-Robertson-Poel vs 7-Francis-Peters
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♣Q 2-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 ♣A 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Randall-Randall
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 ♣5 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
|
9 |
♠T92
♥KQT8
♦KJ76
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K4
♥A52
♦AQ953
♣QJ2
|
♠AJ3
♥J9
♦T842
♣A653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♦ W -2 ♠T 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥8 8-Robertson-Poel vs 7-Francis-Peters
150 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -3 ♣Q 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Randall-Randall
600 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 ♣T 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
630 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♣4 2-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
10 |
♠AT3
♥9
♦976543
♣A42
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K6
♥7542
♦AK8
♣KQJ7
|
♠94
♥AKQT3
♦T
♣T9653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 2♥ -/2NT ♦3/4 ♠4 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♣ E 5 ♥J 1-Randall-Randall vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 4 ♦3 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
200 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♥7 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 8-Robertson-Poel
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 ♦9 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Stein-Michelson
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 5 ♦Q 7-Francis-Peters vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
11 |
♠AKQT72
♥9
♦T985
♣J2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J
♥AKJ8642
♦74
♣743
|
♠86
♥Q753
♦Q2
♣AKT85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠A 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 8-Robertson-Poel
50 2.00 2.00 5♠ N -1 ♣A 1-Randall-Randall vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
50 2.00 2.00 5♠ N -1 ♣A 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
50 2.00 2.00 5♠ N -1 ♣A 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Stein-Michelson
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W 3 ♠A 7-Francis-Peters vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
12 |
♠97
♥T
♦AT85
♣AQJ752
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQJ63
♥KQJ4
♦6
♣K93
|
♠A852
♥87532
♦Q2
♣84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣0 ♦0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
750 4.00 0.00 5♦* N 5 ♠K 1-Randall-Randall vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
190 3.00 1.00 4♦ S 7 ♦6 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Stein-Michelson
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦A 7-Francis-Peters vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 ♥T 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W 4 ♣A 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 8-Robertson-Poel
|
13 |
♠AK86
♥K7
♦KT6
♣JT87
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠T32
♥J92
♦Q952
♣AK3
|
♠J975
♥A65
♦J74
♣Q96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N N 2 ♠5 2-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Francis-Peters
110 3.00 1.00 1♠ N 2 ♣6 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
90 2.00 2.00 1N S 1 ♦2 8-Robertson-Poel vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 1-Randall-Randall vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -1 ♣6 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
|
14 |
♠QJ963
♥A9
♦T9864
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K82
♥Q4
♦J75
♣QT874
|
♠A7
♥KJ3
♦Q32
♣J9532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 5 ♣4 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
140 2.00 2.00 1♠ N 3 ♦2 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S 3 ♣7 8-Robertson-Poel vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 3 ♣7 1-Randall-Randall vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
50 0.00 4.00 3♣ E -1 ♠T 2-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Francis-Peters
|
15 |
♠JT75
♥J74
♦T6
♣KJT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K642
♥KT6
♦952
♣974
|
♠Q93
♥Q853
♦AQ74
♣Q6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 2♦ 2/1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 1N S 3 ♠2 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
150 3.50 0.50 1N S 3 ♥6 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
120 2.00 2.00 1N S 2 ♠2 2-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Francis-Peters
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Randall-Randall vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
90 0.00 4.00 1N S 1 ♠2 8-Robertson-Poel vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
|
16 |
♠3
♥AQT
♦A32
♣KQ8765
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T92
♥K86
♦QJ4
♣9432
|
♠AQJ8
♥J9752
♦K976
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1/-♠ 3NT ♥5 ♠7/6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N N 3 ♦6 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 8-Robertson-Poel
130 3.00 1.00 2♣ N 4 ♥5 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ N 2 ♦6 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 7-Francis-Peters
50 1.00 3.00 5♣ N -1 ♥J 2-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Randall-Randall
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 2 ♣T 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
|
17 |
♠AK4
♥8754
♦K9
♣8542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠8763
♥A92
♦52
♣QJ73
|
♠QJ2
♥KQ6
♦QJ84
♣AK6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 1N E 3 ♦6 2-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Randall-Randall
150 3.50 0.50 1N E 3 ♦6 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 8-Robertson-Poel
400 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 ♠5 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
400 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 ♦6 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 7-Francis-Peters
400 1.00 3.00 3N E 3 ♦3 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
18 |
♠9
♥T972
♦J72
♣AJT62
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJT
♥AQJ85
♦AKT5
♣7
|
♠87
♥K4
♦Q983
♣Q9543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 1.00 3N W 4 ♠9 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 8-Robertson-Poel
430 3.00 1.00 3N W 4 ♠9 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
430 3.00 1.00 3N E 4 ♠6 9-Allen-Lawrence vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 ♠9 2-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Randall-Randall
500 0.00 4.00 3♠* S -2 ♣7 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 7-Francis-Peters
|
19 |
♠3
♥A3
♦AJ9853
♣A962
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠9842
♥K82
♦Q
♣KQ875
|
♠AJT5
♥QT74
♦T74
♣J4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♦ N 5 ♠5 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ N 5 ♣J 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 2-Stein-Michelson
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ N 4 ♣J 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ N 4 ♣J 1-Randall-Randall vs 7-Francis-Peters
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ N 4 ♣J 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 8-Robertson-Poel
|
20 |
♠Q43
♥K5
♦AJ8
♣JT976
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠A98762
♥Q8
♦75
♣852
|
♠J
♥T97643
♦KT32
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N N 6 ♦2 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
660 2.50 1.50 3N S 5 ♠9 1-Randall-Randall vs 7-Francis-Peters
660 2.50 1.50 3N S 5 ♠7 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 8-Robertson-Poel
630 1.00 3.00 3N S 4 ♠7 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 2-Stein-Michelson
180 0.00 4.00 2N N 4 ♠J 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
|
21 |
♠JT54
♥-
♦9842
♣Q9854
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A
♥Q9
♦AK7653
♣AT63
|
♠K73
♥KJ865
♦QJT
♣72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 NT1/2 |
EW: 4/5♦ 1/2♥ 5NT ♣6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♦A 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
100 3.00 1.00 5♦ W -2 ♠J 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Reiser-Hunter
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 ♠J 1-Randall-Randall vs 7-Francis-Peters
200 1.00 3.00 5♠* S -1 ♦A 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 8-Robertson-Poel
460 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 ♠6 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 2-Stein-Michelson
|
22 |
♠QT4
♥T
♦976
♣Q97632
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠962
♥K9652
♦JT52
♣A
|
♠-
♥J83
♦AQ83
♣KJT854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♠ 2/3NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 4♣* E -3 ♠A 2-Stein-Michelson vs 8-Robertson-Poel
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 ♣A 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ S 5 ♣A 7-Francis-Peters vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S 3 ♣A 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 1-Randall-Randall
300 0.00 4.00 4♠* S -2 ♣A 10-Little-Wooden vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
|
23 |
♠Q
♥J86543
♦87
♣QJ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK
♥T2
♦Q65
♣KT6543
|
♠9843
♥AQ9
♦AJ943
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠6 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♦ E -1 ♣A 7-Francis-Peters vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♥5 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 1-Randall-Randall
120 2.00 2.00 2N E 2 ♠J 10-Little-Wooden vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
300 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -3 ♥T 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
300 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -3 ♦5 2-Stein-Michelson vs 8-Robertson-Poel
|
24 |
♠Q54
♥K864
♦AQ9
♣J43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K973
♥J5
♦K53
♣T865
|
♠AT6
♥93
♦762
♣AKQ97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♣5 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 3-Denton-Wiborg
250 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -5 ♥4 2-Stein-Michelson vs 8-Robertson-Poel
200 2.00 2.00 2♥ S 5 ♠7 7-Francis-Peters vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ S 3 ♠3 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 1-Randall-Randall
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ S 3 ♠2 10-Little-Wooden vs 6-Falck-Lindeman
|
25 |
♠K
♥AKT83
♦Q86
♣J762
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJT875
♥7
♦J
♣AKT85
|
♠632
♥9652
♦K7
♣Q943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♦ 7♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦0 ♥0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 4.00 0.00 6♦ S 6 ♣A 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 2-Stein-Michelson
510 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 7 ♦7 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 ♠6 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Francis-Peters
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥A 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
50 0.00 4.00 5♥ N -1 ♠6 8-Robertson-Poel vs 1-Randall-Randall
|
26 |
♠4
♥754
♦95
♣KQJ9842
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT83
♥Q92
♦AQ843
♣3
|
♠KQ972
♥J83
♦K6
♣A75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 ♥A 8-Robertson-Poel vs 1-Randall-Randall
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 ♥A 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 ♥A 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 ♥A 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 2-Stein-Michelson
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 5 ♥A 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Francis-Peters
|
27 |
♠AT954
♥53
♦73
♣KQ72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠73
♥T
♦QJT6542
♣JT4
|
♠KQ2
♥KJ8642
♦K9
♣A9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -4 ♠6 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Francis-Peters
150 3.00 1.00 2N E -3 ♥7 3-Denton-Wiborg vs 9-Allen-Lawrence
50 2.00 2.00 4♦ W -1 ♥5 8-Robertson-Poel vs 1-Randall-Randall
110 0.50 3.50 1♥ E 2 ♠6 6-Falck-Lindeman vs 2-Stein-Michelson
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ W 3 ♣K 5-Reiser-Hunter vs 4-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|