1 |
♠62
♥T53
♦KT75
♣AQ84
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QJT8
♥QJ9
♦Q6
♣9765
|
♠9543
♥A8742
♦J
♣KJT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 1.50 1N N 3 ♥4 4-Favors-Robertson vs 1-Mann-Reiser
150 2.50 1.50 4♦ S 5 ♥Q 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
150 2.50 1.50 4♦ S 5 ♥Q 10-Little-Allen vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
150 2.50 1.50 2♦ S 5 ♠Q 9-Randall-Randall vs 2-Spengler-Gose
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ S 4 ♠Q 7-Peters-Francis vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
|
2 |
♠T
♥73
♦QT98654
♣K64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AKJ5
♥QJ96
♦K72
♣T7
|
♠Q632
♥AKT52
♦A
♣J53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 ♣A 10-Little-Allen vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 ♦J 4-Favors-Robertson vs 1-Mann-Reiser
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 ♦J 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 ♦J 7-Peters-Francis vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 5 ♦J 9-Randall-Randall vs 2-Spengler-Gose
|
3 |
♠KT7642
♥AJ74
♦8
♣J6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J5
♥KT62
♦KJT6432
♣-
|
♠-
♥Q9853
♦A95
♣AKQ72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 1/-♣ 6/5♦ 6♥ ♣7/6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 5♦ W 5 ♥A 7-Peters-Francis vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
620 3.00 1.00 5♦ W 6 ♠6 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♠A 10-Little-Allen vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
680 1.00 3.00 5♥ W 6 ♠2 9-Randall-Randall vs 2-Spengler-Gose
950 0.00 4.00 5♦* W 6 ♥A 4-Favors-Robertson vs 1-Mann-Reiser
|
4 |
♠K62
♥QJ2
♦KJ75
♣AT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ843
♥-
♦Q3
♣KQJ542
|
♠JT9
♥T853
♦A984
♣97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠3 |
EW: 3/4♣ 4♠ ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♥Q 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 4-Favors-Robertson
200 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♥Q 10-Little-Allen vs 9-Randall-Randall
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 4 ♥Q 7-Peters-Francis vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 ♥Q 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 2-Spengler-Gose
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 5 ♥Q 1-Mann-Reiser vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
|
5 |
♠95
♥AJ942
♦KQ653
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK843
♥KT
♦8
♣T7643
|
♠QT7
♥Q53
♦J42
♣KQ82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 ♠7 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 2-Spengler-Gose
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 5 ♣K 10-Little-Allen vs 9-Randall-Randall
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣K 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 4-Favors-Robertson
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 5 ♣A 1-Mann-Reiser vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
300 0.00 4.00 5♦ S -3 ♠A 7-Peters-Francis vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
|
6 |
♠74
♥AQJ
♦J863
♣J853
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q6
♥654
♦KT942
♣642
|
♠AK983
♥KT8
♦AQ7
♣KQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT5/3 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣7 7-Peters-Francis vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
170 3.00 1.00 1♠ E 4 ♦5 1-Mann-Reiser vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♦5 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 4-Favors-Robertson
630 0.50 3.50 3N E 4 ♦5 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 2-Spengler-Gose
630 0.50 3.50 3N E 4 ♣7 10-Little-Allen vs 9-Randall-Randall
|
7 |
♠65
♥KJT87653
♦J2
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ87
♥942
♦T965
♣QJ
|
♠JT2
♥-
♦AKQ
♣AKT9852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 7♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ N -2 ♦A 10-Little-Allen vs 1-Mann-Reiser
500 3.00 1.00 4♥* N -2 ♦A 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 7-Peters-Francis
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ E 7 ♥A 2-Spengler-Gose vs 4-Favors-Robertson
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ E 7 ♥A 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ E 7 ♥A 9-Randall-Randall vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
|
8 |
♠954
♥KQT7
♦65
♣KQ32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T82
♥9632
♦KJT97
♣7
|
♠AQ63
♥54
♦AQ82
♣AT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N E 1 ♣5 2-Spengler-Gose vs 4-Favors-Robertson
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 ♥K 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 ♣K 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 7-Peters-Francis
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ E 3 ♣J 9-Randall-Randall vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
120 0.00 4.00 1N E 2 ♥8 10-Little-Allen vs 1-Mann-Reiser
|
9 |
♠JT865
♥-
♦Q982
♣QT76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQ97
♥K5
♦753
♣KJ93
|
♠4
♥AQJ94
♦AT64
♣852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♠ ♣6/7 ♦5 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 ♣8 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 7-Peters-Francis
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♥6 9-Randall-Randall vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
100 2.50 1.50 3♣ W -1 ♠J 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -2 ♠K 10-Little-Allen vs 1-Mann-Reiser
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -2 ♦7 2-Spengler-Gose vs 4-Favors-Robertson
|
10 |
♠AQ64
♥AQJ
♦K8
♣J964
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠J85
♥8742
♦J765
♣53
|
♠KT97
♥KT53
♦A3
♣Q82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 4/3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 1.00 3N N 3 ♠7 1-Mann-Reiser vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
600 3.00 1.00 3N N 3 ♠7 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
600 3.00 1.00 3N N 3 ♠7 7-Peters-Francis vs 4-Favors-Robertson
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ N 2 ♥3 9-Randall-Randall vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
100 0.00 4.00 1♦ W -1 ♣J 10-Little-Allen vs 2-Spengler-Gose
|
11 |
♠A97632
♥-
♦AK952
♣T4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠K8
♥KQJ85
♦J76
♣982
|
♠Q
♥A97
♦Q8
♣AKQJ653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣1 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 3/4♣ 4♥ 4NT ♦3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦A 1-Mann-Reiser vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
50 3.00 1.00 5♣ E -1 ♠J 7-Peters-Francis vs 4-Favors-Robertson
50 3.00 1.00 5♣ E -1 ♠J 9-Randall-Randall vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
170 1.00 3.00 4♣ E 6 ♠J 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 4 ♦A 10-Little-Allen vs 2-Spengler-Gose
|
12 |
♠432
♥KJ2
♦6432
♣A52
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQT876
♥T75
♦5
♣963
|
♠K95
♥964
♦Q8
♣KQJ84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 5♦ S 5 ♠A 10-Little-Allen vs 2-Spengler-Gose
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ S 5 ♠A 7-Peters-Francis vs 4-Favors-Robertson
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ S 5 ♣9 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ S 5 ♣6 1-Mann-Reiser vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 ♠2 9-Randall-Randall vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
13 |
♠962
♥KQ8
♦QJ53
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠8753
♥76
♦974
♣K965
|
♠KJ
♥AT52
♦AKT
♣AT43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N N 1 ♥2 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
90 3.50 0.50 1N N 1 ♥2 10-Little-Allen vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
90 2.00 2.00 1N E 1 ♠4 2-Spengler-Gose vs 7-Peters-Francis
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♣5 4-Favors-Robertson vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
110 0.00 4.00 1♣ E 3 ♠A 1-Mann-Reiser vs 9-Randall-Randall
|
14 |
♠AQ3
♥976543
♦Q83
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠JT985
♥A
♦75
♣A7654
|
♠72
♥QJ2
♦KJ92
♣KT82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ N 3 ♣K 1-Mann-Reiser vs 9-Randall-Randall
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 ♣A 2-Spengler-Gose vs 7-Peters-Francis
50 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♣5 4-Favors-Robertson vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠7 10-Little-Allen vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♠7 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
|
15 |
♠AQT93
♥KJ7
♦QJ9
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠72
♥54
♦K854
♣Q9653
|
♠J854
♥T86
♦AT3
♣AKJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N S 4 ♠2 2-Spengler-Gose vs 7-Peters-Francis
170 3.00 1.00 2♥ N 4 ♣A 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ S 3 ♦4 1-Mann-Reiser vs 9-Randall-Randall
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ S 3 ♣5 4-Favors-Robertson vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠7 10-Little-Allen vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
|
16 |
♠95
♥J93
♦T876
♣KJ87
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ8
♥875
♦J54
♣A432
|
♠642
♥QT62
♦AK93
♣T9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2/1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 2 ♥7 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
90 3.00 1.00 1N S 1 ♥8 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 7-Peters-Francis
80 2.00 2.00 1♠ S 1 ♦4 10-Little-Allen vs 4-Favors-Robertson
50 0.50 3.50 1♠ S -1 ♥7 9-Randall-Randall vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
50 0.50 3.50 1♠ S -1 ♦4 2-Spengler-Gose vs 1-Mann-Reiser
|
17 |
♠QT6
♥KQT932
♦T7
♣98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠5
♥84
♦QJ32
♣KT7532
|
♠AJ982
♥65
♦K954
♣A6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S 4 ♠5 2-Spengler-Gose vs 1-Mann-Reiser
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 ♣A 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 ♠5 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 7-Peters-Francis
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♣A 9-Randall-Randall vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
200 0.00 4.00 2♦ N -4 ♣A 10-Little-Allen vs 4-Favors-Robertson
|
18 |
♠963
♥AQ743
♦8
♣A962
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT8752
♥K82
♦A
♣Q54
|
♠KQJ4
♥JT9
♦JT542
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S 5 ♣5 2-Spengler-Gose vs 1-Mann-Reiser
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ N 5 ♣6 9-Randall-Randall vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
300 2.00 2.00 5♣* E -2 ♦A 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
200 1.00 3.00 3♦ E -4 ♣A 10-Little-Allen vs 4-Favors-Robertson
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ S 4 ♦Q 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 7-Peters-Francis
|
19 |
♠KT92
♥8532
♦764
♣73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠76543
♥964
♦Q8
♣QT5
|
♠A
♥K
♦JT532
♣KJ8642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♦8 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 2-Spengler-Gose
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♦8 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
150 2.00 2.00 2N S -3 ♠7 4-Favors-Robertson vs 9-Randall-Randall
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 ♦8 1-Mann-Reiser vs 7-Peters-Francis
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 ♦8 10-Little-Allen vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
|
20 |
♠-
♥842
♦AT7654
♣AK64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT854
♥963
♦Q982
♣7
|
♠J976
♥AQ75
♦K3
♣Q95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ N 5 ♠6 10-Little-Allen vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
120 3.00 1.00 2N S 2 ♥9 1-Mann-Reiser vs 7-Peters-Francis
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 2 ♠6 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 2-Spengler-Gose
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 ♣A 4-Favors-Robertson vs 9-Randall-Randall
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 3 ♦J 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
|
21 |
♠AQ94
♥KQT62
♦62
♣Q6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠752
♥AJ53
♦A985
♣K8
|
♠KJT6
♥7
♦T3
♣AJ9432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♥6/7 ♠3 NT3/2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥K 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 2-Spengler-Gose
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ N -2 ♣A 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
200 2.50 1.50 2♥ N -2 ♣A 4-Favors-Robertson vs 9-Randall-Randall
210 0.50 3.50 2N W 5 ♥6 1-Mann-Reiser vs 7-Peters-Francis
210 0.50 3.50 2N W 5 ♦6 10-Little-Allen vs 5-Resch-Lindeman
|
22 |
♠9
♥AQ98753
♦5432
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKJ532
♥2
♦AQ
♣KT65
|
♠T764
♥KJT4
♦7
♣AQ84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 5♦* N -2 ♠A 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 1-Mann-Reiser
680 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 ♥A 2-Spengler-Gose vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
680 2.50 1.50 4♠ W 6 ♣J 10-Little-Allen vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
710 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 7 ♣J 4-Favors-Robertson vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
1430 0.00 4.00 6♠ W 6 ♣J 7-Peters-Francis vs 9-Randall-Randall
|
23 |
♠Q874
♥T2
♦43
♣QJT64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T63
♥AKQ84
♦AT92
♣K
|
♠AJ
♥965
♦KJ8765
♣72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 3.50 0.50 3♥ W 6 ♣Q 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 1-Mann-Reiser
230 3.50 0.50 2♥ W 6 ♣Q 7-Peters-Francis vs 9-Randall-Randall
680 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 ♣Q 2-Spengler-Gose vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
680 1.50 2.50 4♥ W 6 ♣Q 4-Favors-Robertson vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
710 0.00 4.00 4♥ W 7 ♣Q 10-Little-Allen vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
|
24 |
♠A93
♥6
♦J432
♣A9842
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠642
♥32
♦KQ876
♣Q63
|
♠KQJT5
♥KQ74
♦A5
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1/-NT ♣5/4 ♥5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -3 ♥A 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 1-Mann-Reiser
150 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -3 ♥A 10-Little-Allen vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
150 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -3 ♣K 7-Peters-Francis vs 9-Randall-Randall
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♠8 2-Spengler-Gose vs 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♠2 4-Favors-Robertson vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
|
25 |
♠QJT742
♥432
♦Q4
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠5
♥A9865
♦AKT6
♣T62
|
♠-
♥KQJ
♦J97532
♣K843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♥A 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Mann-Reiser
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 ♥K 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 9-Randall-Randall
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♥K 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 4-Favors-Robertson
100 1.00 3.00 5♠ N -2 ♥K 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 2-Spengler-Gose
620 0.00 4.00 5♦ E 6 ♠A 10-Little-Allen vs 7-Peters-Francis
|
26 |
♠J8
♥JT874
♦863
♣Q73
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠A74
♥K632
♦72
♣AJT6
|
♠KQ53
♥A95
♦AKQ5
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 6N E -2 ♦4 10-Little-Allen vs 7-Peters-Francis
100 2.50 1.50 6N E -1 ♦J 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 9-Randall-Randall
100 2.50 1.50 6N E -1 ♦J 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Mann-Reiser
660 1.00 3.00 3N E 5 ♦J 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 4-Favors-Robertson
1440 0.00 4.00 6N E 6 ♦J 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 2-Spengler-Gose
|
27 |
♠JT75
♥4
♦AK986
♣Q96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠8
♥985
♦J5432
♣J752
|
♠A93
♥Q763
♦T7
♣AKT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3/2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♥9 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 2-Spengler-Gose
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♦2 5-Resch-Lindeman vs 4-Favors-Robertson
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 ♣2 8-Van Ekeren-Van Ekeren vs 1-Mann-Reiser
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ N 4 ♣A 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 9-Randall-Randall
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ N 4 ♣A 10-Little-Allen vs 7-Peters-Francis
|