1 |
♠A8
♥985
♦A953
♣KQ32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KQT7
♥43
♦J7
♣JT987
|
♠9632
♥J62
♦KT
♣A654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♠2 8-Randall-Randall vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
450 3.00 1.00 9-Woods-Crews vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ N 4 ♠K 12-Favors-Robertson vs 1-Mann-Reiser
420 1.50 2.50 5♦ N 6 ♣4 5-Poel-Allen vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ N 5 ♠6 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
|
2 |
♠QT63
♥K5
♦983
♣KQ63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠7
♥A8632
♦A764
♣J54
|
♠A8
♥J974
♦KQT52
♣T8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 ♣J 5-Poel-Allen vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 5 ♣4 12-Favors-Robertson vs 1-Mann-Reiser
50 2.00 2.00 5♦ E -1 ♠K 8-Randall-Randall vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
PASS 1.00 3.00 Pass Out 9-Woods-Crews vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
200 0.00 4.00 5♠* S -1 ♥A 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
|
3 |
♠J54
♥Q954
♦KT5
♣T62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQT82
♥T2
♦6432
♣AQ
|
♠A763
♥AKJ87
♦A
♣753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 4.00 0.00 3♦ N -5 ♥A 12-Favors-Robertson vs 1-Mann-Reiser
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 ♦5 5-Poel-Allen vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
680 1.50 2.50 5♠ W 6 ♠4 8-Randall-Randall vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
680 1.50 2.50 4♠ W 6 ♣T 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
800 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -4 ♥A 9-Woods-Crews vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
|
4 |
♠8
♥J653
♦AK84
♣AKQ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT76532
♥K8
♦QT52
♣-
|
♠KQ4
♥T942
♦73
♣JT98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 ♠6 9-Woods-Crews vs 5-Poel-Allen
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S 4 ♠J 12-Favors-Robertson vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S 5 ♠J 1-Mann-Reiser vs 8-Randall-Randall
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S 5 ♠J 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
100 0.00 4.00 5♣ N -1 ♠K 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
|
5 |
♠AT865
♥J54
♦KJ32
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K32
♥K862
♦AT85
♣K4
|
♠Q74
♥A93
♦Q9
♣Q9532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♥ 1/2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦2 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
80 3.00 1.00 1♠ N 1 ♦9 12-Favors-Robertson vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♣A 1-Mann-Reiser vs 8-Randall-Randall
120 1.00 3.00 1N W 2 ♠6 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♣2 9-Woods-Crews vs 5-Poel-Allen
|
6 |
♠Q3
♥K854
♦AT964
♣76
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A85
♥J9762
♦QJ8
♣Q8
|
♠T64
♥AQT3
♦K72
♣K43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/-♦ 4/3♠ ♦7/6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠Q 9-Woods-Crews vs 5-Poel-Allen
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ W 3 ♠Q 1-Mann-Reiser vs 8-Randall-Randall
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ W 3 ♠Q 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -4 ♥6 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
250 0.00 4.00 3N N -5 ♥3 12-Favors-Robertson vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
|
7 |
♠Q86
♥Q86
♦K64
♣Q642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ532
♥J4
♦9753
♣K9
|
♠4
♥K9752
♦AT82
♣JT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 3/2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S 3 ♠3 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 5-Poel-Allen
180 3.00 1.00 1N N 4 ♥5 1-Mann-Reiser vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
150 2.00 2.00 2N S 3 ♠3 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 8-Randall-Randall
120 1.00 3.00 2N S 2 ♠3 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
200 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♠4 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 9-Woods-Crews
|
8 |
♠AK863
♥J82
♦-
♣T8763
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠74
♥K
♦QJT98543
♣Q9
|
♠QJT952
♥765
♦K2
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♥ 2♠ 5NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ S 5 ♦Q 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ S 5 ♦Q 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 8-Randall-Randall
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ S 5 ♦Q 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 5-Poel-Allen
150 1.00 3.00 5♦ W -3 ♠A 1-Mann-Reiser vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
50 0.00 4.00 5♦ W -1 ♠A 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 9-Woods-Crews
|
9 |
♠K94
♥A87
♦KT5
♣KQT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q
♥T6532
♦QJ92
♣J84
|
♠AT8763
♥K9
♦763
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♠7 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 8-Randall-Randall
430 2.00 2.00 3N N 4 ♠7 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 9-Woods-Crews
430 2.00 2.00 3N N 4 ♠7 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
430 2.00 2.00 3N N 4 ♠7 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 5-Poel-Allen
400 0.00 4.00 3N N 3 ♠7 1-Mann-Reiser vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
|
10 |
♠A73
♥9853
♦T95
♣Q73
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T92
♥AQJ74
♦632
♣84
|
♠Q864
♥K2
♦KJ84
♣KT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♥3 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 9-Woods-Crews
120 2.50 1.50 1N S 2 ♠T 12-Favors-Robertson vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
120 2.50 1.50 1N S 2 ♥7 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ S 3 ♦2 8-Randall-Randall vs 5-Poel-Allen
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 ♣A 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
|
11 |
♠Q952
♥T3
♦AT7643
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠43
♥AK2
♦-
♣AKQT6432
|
♠AKJ76
♥Q8765
♦K95
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥0 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 6/7♥ 6♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 5♣ W 6 ♠2 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
920 2.00 2.00 6♣ W 6 ♦A 8-Randall-Randall vs 5-Poel-Allen
920 2.00 2.00 6♣ W 6 ♦A 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 9-Woods-Crews
920 2.00 2.00 6♣ W 6 ♦A 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
980 0.00 4.00 6♥ E 6 ♦Q 12-Favors-Robertson vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
|
12 |
♠98754
♥9
♦J2
♣KT954
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQJ6
♥J432
♦T6543
♣-
|
♠32
♥AK
♦AKQ
♣AQJ732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦0 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 7♦ 4♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 6♣ E -2 ♥8 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 9-Woods-Crews
100 3.50 0.50 4♣ E -2 ♦9 8-Randall-Randall vs 5-Poel-Allen
490 1.50 2.50 3N E 6 ♥7 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
490 1.50 2.50 3N E 6 ♥5 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
920 0.00 4.00 6♦ W 6 ♥9 12-Favors-Robertson vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
|
13 |
♠T9874
♥Q732
♦T
♣J62
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQJ63
♥8
♦KJ962
♣T9
|
♠-
♥AKT94
♦543
♣AKQ43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4/3♥ 3♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♣ E 5 ♠A 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
600 3.00 1.00 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 ♠T 12-Favors-Robertson vs 5-Poel-Allen
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 ♦T 9-Woods-Crews vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
660 0.50 3.50 3N E 5 ♦7 1-Mann-Reiser vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
|
14 |
♠AT4
♥Q753
♦J8653
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠Q763
♥A42
♦Q
♣K9765
|
♠K82
♥KJ
♦A9742
♣A32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♣4 12-Favors-Robertson vs 5-Poel-Allen
50 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♥T 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
50 2.00 2.00 2N E -1 ♥T 9-Woods-Crews vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
50 2.00 2.00 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 ♣4 1-Mann-Reiser vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
|
15 |
♠J975
♥9753
♦9632
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT62
♥KJ86
♦Q
♣K543
|
♠A43
♥Q2
♦AT875
♣Q96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♣T 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
100 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♥6 1-Mann-Reiser vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ S -1 ♥J 9-Woods-Crews vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
100 2.00 2.00 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -2 ♦Q 12-Favors-Robertson vs 5-Poel-Allen
|
16 |
♠T852
♥KQ
♦KJ765
♣AQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠97
♥8742
♦T92
♣JT76
|
♠AKQJ43
♥T96
♦-
♣9843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 5/4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 4.00 0.00 6♦ N 6 ♠A 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 9-Woods-Crews
420 3.00 1.00 5♦ N 6 ♠A 12-Favors-Robertson vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
170 1.00 3.00 3♦ N 6 ♠A 1-Mann-Reiser vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
170 1.00 3.00 3♦ N 6 ♠A 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
170 1.00 3.00 3♦ N 6 ♠A 8-Randall-Randall vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
|
17 |
♠AK75
♥Q87
♦JT86
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠J84
♥54
♦AK974
♣KT5
|
♠QT3
♥KJT3
♦2
♣AQJ96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N W 2 ♠A 1-Mann-Reiser vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
180 3.00 1.00 2N E 4 ♠K 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 9-Woods-Crews
400 1.50 2.50 3N W 3 ♦J 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
400 1.50 2.50 3N E 3 ♥2 12-Favors-Robertson vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
460 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 ♠5 8-Randall-Randall vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
|
18 |
♠AQ983
♥AJ4
♦654
♣AK
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ65
♥T62
♦KT9
♣J96
|
♠2
♥K8753
♦Q2
♣Q8754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♥5 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 9-Woods-Crews
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ N 5 ♣8 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 ♣5 8-Randall-Randall vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥5 1-Mann-Reiser vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥5 12-Favors-Robertson vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
|
19 |
♠J
♥K632
♦KQ5
♣T9863
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT97
♥T874
♦T9
♣K54
|
♠K43
♥QJ9
♦A63
♣QJ72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♦ S 4 ♥4 12-Favors-Robertson vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
90 2.00 2.00 1N N 1 ♥Q 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 ♦T 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 9-Woods-Crews
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S 2 ♣4 5-Poel-Allen vs 1-Mann-Reiser
90 0.00 4.00 1N E 1 ♠2 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
20 |
♠AQJT8
♥J965
♦93
♣A8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠65
♥4
♦AT7642
♣QJ43
|
♠K93
♥KT832
♦5
♣T765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♦6 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
660 3.50 0.50 3N S 5 ♦6 12-Favors-Robertson vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
630 2.00 2.00 3N S 4 ♦6 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 8-Randall-Randall
210 1.00 3.00 2N S 5 ♦6 5-Poel-Allen vs 1-Mann-Reiser
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♦5 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 9-Woods-Crews
|
21 |
♠AJT
♥64
♦75
♣865432
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q64
♥K98
♦KJ86
♣KJT
|
♠K83
♥AJ32
♦QT9
♣AQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥5 5-Poel-Allen vs 1-Mann-Reiser
430 2.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥5 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
430 2.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♥5 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 9-Woods-Crews
430 2.50 1.50 3N E 4 ♦2 12-Favors-Robertson vs 7-Gioannini-Medd
460 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 ♦2 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
22 |
♠A6432
♥A943
♦KQ
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ97
♥8
♦AT9632
♣Q6
|
♠8
♥J765
♦854
♣AJ852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6/7 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 ♥5 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Poel-Allen
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 ♦4 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 ♦4 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Mann-Reiser
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ W 3 ♥A 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 ♥J 12-Favors-Robertson vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
23 |
♠AT
♥862
♦Q4
♣A98432
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ3
♥AKJ753
♦J
♣JT5
|
♠K8
♥94
♦AKT9875
♣Q7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠6 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣A 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Poel-Allen
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 4 ♠A 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
230 2.00 2.00 3♥ W 6 ♥2 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 4 ♠A 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Mann-Reiser
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 4 ♠A 12-Favors-Robertson vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
24 |
♠AJ9
♥KJ
♦A732
♣AKT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠QT6543
♥A92
♦8
♣J83
|
♠K87
♥T863
♦QJ
♣Q762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N 6 ♠7 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 2-Lawrence-Allen
460 2.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♠K 10-Lindeman-Rooney vs 4-Van Ekeren-Boley
460 2.50 1.50 3N N 5 ♣2 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Mann-Reiser
420 1.00 3.00 5♦ S 6 ♠5 7-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Poel-Allen
90 0.00 4.00 1♣ N 2 ♥T 12-Favors-Robertson vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
25 |
♠KT5
♥K84
♦86
♣QT652
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠983
♥976
♦T74
♣J843
|
♠J64
♥QT53
♦AK932
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N S 1 ♦T 8-Randall-Randall vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
90 3.50 0.50 1N S 1 ♦4 12-Favors-Robertson vs 9-Woods-Crews
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦T 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦T 5-Poel-Allen vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦7 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 1-Mann-Reiser
|
26 |
♠875
♥62
♦KJT9862
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q964
♥Q974
♦74
♣KQ8
|
♠AT32
♥J53
♦AQ5
♣AJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♣5 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 1-Mann-Reiser
200 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦3 5-Poel-Allen vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♦3 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥A 12-Favors-Robertson vs 9-Woods-Crews
200 0.00 4.00 4♦ N -2 ♥3 8-Randall-Randall vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
|
27 |
♠J83
♥AK9532
♦J7
♣T4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T7
♥64
♦AT62
♣QJ876
|
♠A62
♥J7
♦KQ8
♣AK952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ N 3 ♣A 4-Van Ekeren-Boley vs 1-Mann-Reiser
50 2.50 1.50 5♣ E -1 ♥Q 8-Randall-Randall vs 6-Cauthorne-Hawkins
50 2.50 1.50 5♣ E -1 ♥8 5-Poel-Allen vs 10-Lindeman-Rooney
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ W 4 ♥A 12-Favors-Robertson vs 9-Woods-Crews
400 0.00 4.00 5♣ E 5 ♠5 2-Lawrence-Allen vs 11-Spengler-Van Ekeren
|