1 |
♠JT
♥Q972
♦Q942
♣962
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A643
♥KJ64
♦K
♣AKQJ
|
♠Q852
♥T5
♦AJT83
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥3 4-Reiser-Mann vs 1-Robertson-Favors
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦2 7-Randall-Randall vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♣7 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 8-Falck-Schneider
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 ♣4 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 5-Stein-Michelson
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 5 ♦7 9-Oates-Saekow vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
|
2 |
♠52
♥AKT74
♦5
♣Q9752
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT84
♥8632
♦-
♣AKT63
|
♠KQ96
♥QJ9
♦JT64
♣J4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 5♦ S 5 ♣A 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 5-Stein-Michelson
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S 5 ♣A 4-Reiser-Mann vs 1-Robertson-Favors
100 1.50 2.50 6♦ S -1 ♣A 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 8-Falck-Schneider
100 1.50 2.50 5♦ S -1 ♣A 9-Oates-Saekow vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
1700 0.00 4.00 6N* N -6 ♣A 7-Randall-Randall vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
|
3 |
♠AT65
♥K93
♦864
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K843
♥T84
♦KQT9
♣Q5
|
♠J97
♥J752
♦AJ52
♣87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N S 3 ♦K 9-Oates-Saekow vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
400 3.50 0.50 3N N 3 ♦2 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 5-Stein-Michelson
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ S 4 ♥4 7-Randall-Randall vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
130 1.00 3.00 2♣ S 4 ♥4 4-Reiser-Mann vs 1-Robertson-Favors
130 1.00 3.00 2♣ S 4 ♦K 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 8-Falck-Schneider
|
4 |
♠94
♥KJT854
♦Q
♣A763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ6
♥9763
♦542
♣T92
|
♠8753
♥AQ
♦T9873
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N 5 ♠K 8-Falck-Schneider vs 4-Reiser-Mann
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 ♦T 1-Robertson-Favors vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
630 1.50 2.50 3N S 4 ♦2 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 9-Oates-Saekow
630 1.50 2.50 3N S 4 ♣T 7-Randall-Randall vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♣J 5-Stein-Michelson vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
|
5 |
♠K873
♥85
♦972
♣KJ86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠92
♥QT43
♦QT843
♣A4
|
♠J654
♥76
♦AJ6
♣T932
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S 4 ♠9 7-Randall-Randall vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S 3 ♠9 1-Robertson-Favors vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦4 5-Stein-Michelson vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦4 8-Falck-Schneider vs 4-Reiser-Mann
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦4 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 9-Oates-Saekow
|
6 |
♠JT74
♥T
♦98765
♣J75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q5
♥AJ873
♦KJ4
♣KT2
|
♠A9862
♥Q965
♦Q
♣A83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2/3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ W 5 ♦9 1-Robertson-Favors vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♦9 8-Falck-Schneider vs 4-Reiser-Mann
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♦9 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 9-Oates-Saekow
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 ♠J 5-Stein-Michelson vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ W 5 ♦5 7-Randall-Randall vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
|
7 |
♠AQ96
♥Q95
♦AK2
♣AT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠J542
♥J6
♦T975
♣983
|
♠-
♥K72
♦J8643
♣KQ762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 6/5♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 4.00 0.00 6♠ S 7 ♥J 8-Falck-Schneider vs 7-Randall-Randall
1430 3.00 1.00 6♠ N 6 ♣K 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 4-Reiser-Mann
710 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 7 ♥J 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 1-Robertson-Favors
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ S 6 ♣K 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
200 0.00 4.00 6♥ W -2 ♣K 9-Oates-Saekow vs 5-Stein-Michelson
|
8 |
♠KQJT2
♥J542
♦QJ5
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠9543
♥AT76
♦AT6
♣93
|
♠A7
♥K
♦K9843
♣QJT65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 4.00 0.00 Pass Out 8-Falck-Schneider vs 7-Randall-Randall
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 ♠8 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 4-Reiser-Mann
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ E 4 ♣K 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 1-Robertson-Favors
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ E 4 ♠8 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ E 4 ♣A 9-Oates-Saekow vs 5-Stein-Michelson
|
9 |
♠AQ865
♥Q6
♦87
♣KT98
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT7
♥JT42
♦6
♣AQ543
|
♠94
♥873
♦QJT932
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 ♦6 9-Oates-Saekow vs 5-Stein-Michelson
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ N 5 ♦Q 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 1-Robertson-Favors
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 4 ♦Q 8-Falck-Schneider vs 7-Randall-Randall
210 1.00 3.00 2N S 5 ♣4 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 4-Reiser-Mann
170 0.00 4.00 1♠ N 4 ♦Q 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
|
10 |
♠T74
♥A93
♦KQJ2
♣A83
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q83
♥KQ865
♦43
♣Q64
|
♠AJ92
♥2
♦T876
♣T952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N 4 ♠2 9-Oates-Saekow vs 8-Falck-Schneider
600 2.00 2.00 3N S 3 ♥K 1-Robertson-Favors vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
600 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 ♠2 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Stein-Michelson
600 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 ♠2 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ N 4 ♥2 7-Randall-Randall vs 4-Reiser-Mann
|
11 |
♠4
♥AJ9732
♦QJT96
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J87
♥Q
♦A52
♣AQJ862
|
♠K65
♥KT864
♦K8
♣543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ -/1♠ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6/7 NT4/5 |
EW: 3♣ 2NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♠A 7-Randall-Randall vs 4-Reiser-Mann
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♥Q 9-Oates-Saekow vs 8-Falck-Schneider
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -2 ♣3 1-Robertson-Favors vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -2 ♣3 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Stein-Michelson
150 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -3 ♣A 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
|
12 |
♠K32
♥A65
♦AT76
♣K87
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ985
♥J97
♦52
♣QT9
|
♠T76
♥84
♦9843
♣A543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 4NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♣3 7-Randall-Randall vs 4-Reiser-Mann
660 3.50 0.50 3N N 5 ♣3 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
630 1.50 2.50 3N N 4 ♠T 9-Oates-Saekow vs 8-Falck-Schneider
630 1.50 2.50 3N N 4 ♣3 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Stein-Michelson
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ S 5 ♦5 1-Robertson-Favors vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
|
13 |
♠KJ842
♥75
♦QT
♣KJ84
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠A5
♥Q98643
♦A53
♣A6
|
♠Q96
♥AK
♦9762
♣9532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ W 3 ♠4 8-Falck-Schneider vs 5-Stein-Michelson
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ W 3 ♥5 4-Reiser-Mann vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
140 3.00 1.00 1♥ W 3 ♦Q 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 7-Randall-Randall
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 4 ♠4 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
180 0.00 4.00 1N W 4 ♠4 1-Robertson-Favors vs 9-Oates-Saekow
|
14 |
♠KT2
♥643
♦J432
♣J72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠J74
♥QJ52
♦T7
♣A965
|
♠98
♥KT
♦A985
♣KT843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S 4 ♦T 8-Falck-Schneider vs 5-Stein-Michelson
170 3.50 0.50 1♠ S 4 ♦T 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
50 2.00 2.00 3♣ E -1 ♦K 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 7-Randall-Randall
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♥2 1-Robertson-Favors vs 9-Oates-Saekow
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -1 ♦T 4-Reiser-Mann vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
|
15 |
♠Q7
♥Q97
♦QJ952
♣J96
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠953
♥J65432
♦T83
♣8
|
♠AKJ2
♥AKT8
♦A64
♣K7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ ♥3/2 ♠4/3 NT6/2 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ 1/-NT ♣3 ♦6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣J 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♣6 4-Reiser-Mann vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ W 4 ♣6 8-Falck-Schneider vs 5-Stein-Michelson
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 ♣6 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 7-Randall-Randall
500 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -2 ♥J 1-Robertson-Favors vs 9-Oates-Saekow
|
16 |
♠Q85
♥AJ8
♦Q974
♣A84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKT62
♥KT2
♦3
♣QJ92
|
♠93
♥Q9754
♦AKT52
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣6 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 1-Robertson-Favors
90 2.50 1.50 2♦ E 2 ♥6 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 8-Falck-Schneider
90 2.50 1.50 2♦ E 2 ♥6 9-Oates-Saekow vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E 3 ♣6 5-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Randall-Randall
250 0.00 4.00 3N N -5 ♠9 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 4-Reiser-Mann
|
17 |
♠63
♥QJ8
♦KT8
♣Q6543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ9874
♥K76
♦4
♣872
|
♠AJT5
♥A32
♦AJ632
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 6♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ W 5 ♠3 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 4-Reiser-Mann
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ W 5 ♣4 9-Oates-Saekow vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 6 ♠6 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 8-Falck-Schneider
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 6 ♥Q 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 1-Robertson-Favors
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 6 ♥Q 5-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Randall-Randall
|
18 |
♠T83
♥A9852
♦J8
♣K75
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A65
♥KJ
♦QT65
♣9832
|
♠KQ42
♥QT7
♦9432
♣T4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 ♠A 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 1-Robertson-Favors
120 3.00 1.00 2N S 2 ♦5 5-Stein-Michelson vs 7-Randall-Randall
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♠6 9-Oates-Saekow vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♦5 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 4-Reiser-Mann
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♦5 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 8-Falck-Schneider
|
19 |
♠43
♥5
♦JT8432
♣KQ85
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A85
♥K9642
♦Q5
♣J94
|
♠J9
♥AJT8
♦AK97
♣T32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 ♣4 1-Robertson-Favors vs 7-Randall-Randall
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♠4 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♠4 4-Reiser-Mann vs 9-Oates-Saekow
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♠4 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 5-Stein-Michelson
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥2 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 8-Falck-Schneider
|
20 |
♠Q32
♥QT853
♦Q74
♣63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠654
♥J976
♦962
♣T92
|
♠AJ97
♥A42
♦KJT5
♣J8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3/2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♣ S 5 ♦2 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
130 3.00 1.00 2♣ S 4 ♦9 1-Robertson-Favors vs 7-Randall-Randall
120 2.00 2.00 1N S 2 ♦9 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 5-Stein-Michelson
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ N 3 ♦9 4-Reiser-Mann vs 9-Oates-Saekow
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♠A 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 8-Falck-Schneider
|
21 |
♠AT4
♥K943
♦AJ86
♣A8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K932
♥Q
♦Q932
♣K642
|
♠875
♥875
♦K54
♣QJT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3/4 ♥2 ♠4/5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 5 ♣Q 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 ♣Q 4-Reiser-Mann vs 9-Oates-Saekow
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 ♣Q 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 8-Falck-Schneider
200 1.00 3.00 2♥ N 5 ♣Q 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 5-Stein-Michelson
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ S 4 ♠2 1-Robertson-Favors vs 7-Randall-Randall
|
22 |
♠AT7
♥AK8
♦AQJT85
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQ
♥542
♦73
♣AQJT42
|
♠9543
♥QJT6
♦94
♣985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♦ N 5 ♣8 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ N 4 ♣9 5-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Robertson-Favors
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 4 ♥Q 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 8-Falck-Schneider
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ N 4 ♣9 4-Reiser-Mann vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
50 0.00 4.00 5♦ N -1 ♥Q 7-Randall-Randall vs 9-Oates-Saekow
|
23 |
♠5
♥AKQ7
♦K93
♣A9642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A83
♥8542
♦864
♣KT3
|
♠KJT76
♥T6
♦QJ7
♣QJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 2♠* E -1 ♦A 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 8-Falck-Schneider
200 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -2 ♣8 4-Reiser-Mann vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
120 2.00 2.00 1N N 2 ♠7 5-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Robertson-Favors
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♠J 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
100 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -1 ♠A 7-Randall-Randall vs 9-Oates-Saekow
|
24 |
♠J76432
♥JT6
♦5
♣532
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠5
♥KQ74
♦KJ3
♣KQJT4
|
♠AK8
♥82
♦Q7642
♣986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5/6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ N -2 ♥8 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 6-Rooney-Lindeman
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ E 3 ♣A 4-Reiser-Mann vs 3-Gioannini-Medd
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ W 3 ♦5 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins vs 8-Falck-Schneider
120 1.00 3.00 1N W 2 ♠4 5-Stein-Michelson vs 1-Robertson-Favors
430 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 ♦8 7-Randall-Randall vs 9-Oates-Saekow
|
25 |
♠T
♥9
♦AKJT93
♣QT532
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ986
♥QT73
♦652
♣A
|
♠J72
♥K842
♦4
♣KJ864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♣5/7 ♥2 ♠3 |
EW: 5♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.00 0.00 1♥ N 1 ♠8 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
50 3.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♣6 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 7-Randall-Randall
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ W 2 ♦K 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 9-Oates-Saekow
100 1.00 3.00 1N N -2 ♠2 8-Falck-Schneider vs 1-Robertson-Favors
150 0.00 4.00 1N N -3 ♦2 5-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Reiser-Mann
|
26 |
♠T7
♥KJ985
♦KQJ
♣A75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ
♥732
♦T9654
♣QJ3
|
♠8642
♥AQ4
♦A82
♣K62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♦ E -2 ♠A 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 9-Oates-Saekow
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 ♦K 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♦K 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 7-Randall-Randall
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ N 2 ♦K 5-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Reiser-Mann
100 0.00 4.00 2N W -1 ♠K 8-Falck-Schneider vs 1-Robertson-Favors
|
27 |
♠KQ7432
♥QJ83
♦32
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T86
♥T
♦AJ98
♣JT753
|
♠J9
♥K9742
♦KQ76
♣AQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S 5 ♦2 3-Gioannini-Medd vs 9-Oates-Saekow
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 ♠K 10-Peters-Van Ekeren vs 7-Randall-Randall
180 2.00 2.00 2N S 4 ♣3 8-Falck-Schneider vs 1-Robertson-Favors
150 1.00 3.00 2N S 3 ♣3 6-Rooney-Lindeman vs 2-Cauthorne-Hawkins
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♠K 5-Stein-Michelson vs 4-Reiser-Mann
|