1 |
♠AJT
♥A64
♦AT632
♣Q8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠9
♥JT85
♦K85
♣A9732
|
♠K753
♥KQ972
♦J74
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N 4 ♣4 4-Ponds-Edington vs 1-Robertson-Favors
150 3.00 1.00 2N N 3 ♣4 9-Reiser-Mann vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ N 3 ♥K 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ N 3 ♣4 7-Fuller-Allen vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ E 4 ♣5 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
2 |
♠64
♥QJT96
♦984
♣854
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQJ753
♥543
♦75
♣63
|
♠T982
♥AK2
♦QJ
♣AQT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣6/5 ♦3 ♥5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 ♦A 4-Ponds-Edington vs 1-Robertson-Favors
100 3.00 1.00 5♦ S -1 ♣6 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 ♦A 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Randall-Randall
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 ♥Q 7-Fuller-Allen vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 3 ♦A 9-Reiser-Mann vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
|
3 |
♠QT743
♥63
♦JT653
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A965
♥J74
♦K4
♣8752
|
♠K2
♥AKQT95
♦Q7
♣AK4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♠J 7-Fuller-Allen vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♦A 10-Little-Wooden vs 8-Randall-Randall
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♣Q 4-Ponds-Edington vs 1-Robertson-Favors
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♣Q 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 ♣Q 9-Reiser-Mann vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
|
4 |
♠9
♥752
♦A76
♣KQ9754
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJT85
♥Q64
♦Q
♣A632
|
♠2
♥KJT983
♦K9543
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ E 3 ♠K 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Reiser-Mann
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ E 3 ♣J 1-Robertson-Favors vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E 4 ♠3 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 4 ♣J 8-Randall-Randall vs 4-Ponds-Edington
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 5 ♣8 7-Fuller-Allen vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
|
5 |
♠8754
♥83
♦QJ87643
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ
♥Q7
♦K5
♣KQJ7652
|
♠AQ92
♥AK2
♦A92
♣T94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1/2♦ 2/3♥ 5/6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N E 6 ♥4 7-Fuller-Allen vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
920 3.00 1.00 6♣ W 6 ♦Q 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
990 1.00 3.00 6N E 6 ♥J 1-Robertson-Favors vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
990 1.00 3.00 6N E 6 ♣A 8-Randall-Randall vs 4-Ponds-Edington
990 1.00 3.00 6N E 6 ♣A 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Reiser-Mann
|
6 |
♠J72
♥965
♦A3
♣KQT54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQT983
♥K2
♦K9852
♣-
|
♠64
♥AQT43
♦T76
♣AJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3/4 |
EW: 4♦ 2/3♥ 3/4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♣ N -2 ♠4 1-Robertson-Favors vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 ♦A 8-Randall-Randall vs 4-Ponds-Edington
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W 4 ♦A 10-Little-Wooden vs 9-Reiser-Mann
630 1.00 3.00 3N E 4 ♦4 7-Fuller-Allen vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
800 0.00 4.00 5♣* N -4 ♠6 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
|
7 |
♠A83
♥AT542
♦T93
♣A5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T765
♥K6
♦KQJ74
♣KQ
|
♠QJ94
♥QJ93
♦A652
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♦T 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Robertson-Favors
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♣A 9-Reiser-Mann vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ S -1 ♦K 8-Randall-Randall vs 7-Fuller-Allen
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 ♣A 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 4-Ponds-Edington
300 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♥3 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
|
8 |
♠K98
♥K7
♦A854
♣8642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ653
♥62
♦QT
♣J973
|
♠T74
♥JT98
♦K9632
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2/3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N 3 ♥J 8-Randall-Randall vs 7-Fuller-Allen
120 3.00 1.00 2N N 2 ♣A 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Robertson-Favors
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ S 3 ♠Q 9-Reiser-Mann vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
110 1.50 2.50 2♣ S 3 ♦Q 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
90 0.00 4.00 1N N 1 ♦3 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 4-Ponds-Edington
|
9 |
♠KQJ93
♥A7
♦72
♣T843
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T64
♥QJ642
♦QJ63
♣K
|
♠A7
♥KT983
♦A
♣AJ976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥1 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ W 5 ♠K 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ E 5 ♠8 8-Randall-Randall vs 7-Fuller-Allen
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ E 5 ♠5 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 4-Ponds-Edington
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 6 ♦4 9-Reiser-Mann vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 6 ♦4 10-Little-Wooden vs 1-Robertson-Favors
|
10 |
♠AT5
♥853
♦J32
♣J765
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠4
♥T764
♦AT976
♣943
|
♠Q9763
♥AK2
♦5
♣KQ82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♥ ♣7/6 ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 1.00 1N S 2 ♠4 9-Reiser-Mann vs 8-Randall-Randall
120 3.00 1.00 1N S 2 ♦7 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
120 3.00 1.00 1N S 2 ♦7 7-Fuller-Allen vs 4-Ponds-Edington
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ E 2 ♦K 1-Robertson-Favors vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
100 0.00 4.00 1N S -1 ♦6 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
|
11 |
♠JT986
♥KT6
♦Q82
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A42
♥432
♦AKT94
♣92
|
♠K
♥AJ9875
♦7
♣KT654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠Q 1-Robertson-Favors vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ E 4 ♣A 9-Reiser-Mann vs 8-Randall-Randall
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ E 4 ♣7 7-Fuller-Allen vs 4-Ponds-Edington
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 ♠3 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 ♣4 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
|
12 |
♠AK8654
♥75
♦Q87
♣98
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT73
♥KQT
♦T63
♣T65
|
♠9
♥A943
♦KJ942
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6/5 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣4 ♦7/6 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 6 ♦4 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N 3 ♥A 7-Fuller-Allen vs 4-Ponds-Edington
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♦9 9-Reiser-Mann vs 8-Randall-Randall
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -2 ♣T 10-Little-Wooden vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♥A 1-Robertson-Favors vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
|
13 |
♠KQJT42
♥AJ7
♦AQ9
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠6
♥Q852
♦K83
♣KQT32
|
♠3
♥K963
♦T7542
♣J86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 2.50 1.50 6♠ N 6 ♥3 1-Robertson-Favors vs 9-Reiser-Mann
1430 2.50 1.50 6♠ N 6 ♥3 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 7-Fuller-Allen
1430 2.50 1.50 6♠ N 6 ♦7 8-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
1430 2.50 1.50 6♠ N 6 ♣6 4-Ponds-Edington vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ N 6 ♥3 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
|
14 |
♠QT9742
♥KJ6
♦85
♣97
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠K6
♥Q84
♦QJ3
♣AT863
|
♠J5
♥5
♦A97642
♣KQ52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 ♠6 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 7-Fuller-Allen
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♥K 4-Ponds-Edington vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
50 2.00 2.00 5♣ W -1 ♥K 8-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♦Q 1-Robertson-Favors vs 9-Reiser-Mann
130 0.00 4.00 4♣ W 4 ♥K 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
|
15 |
♠AQJ96
♥A642
♦-
♣JT94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T7
♥QJ97
♦K83
♣AKQ6
|
♠542
♥53
♦QT742
♣752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1♦ 2/3♥ 3/4♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N 4 ♣7 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 7-Fuller-Allen
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ N 3 ♥5 8-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N 3 ♣2 4-Ponds-Edington vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♦2 1-Robertson-Favors vs 9-Reiser-Mann
100 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♦2 10-Little-Wooden vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
|
16 |
♠AT543
♥95
♦KQ42
♣JT
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJ87
♥KJT32
♦J8
♣63
|
♠62
♥AQ764
♦6
♣Q8752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦0 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 4♥* E -2 ♣A 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 1-Robertson-Favors
200 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -2 ♣A 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Ponds-Edington
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ E -2 ♣J 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 7-Fuller-Allen
170 0.50 3.50 4♦ S 6 ♥3 9-Reiser-Mann vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
170 0.50 3.50 3♦ S 6 ♥T 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
17 |
♠K9754
♥KT54
♦-
♣K864
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ83
♥J2
♦T986
♣T92
|
♠QT
♥AQ7
♦QJ432
♣A53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 ♦T 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 7-Fuller-Allen
50 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♦5 9-Reiser-Mann vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
50 2.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 ♠6 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 1-Robertson-Favors
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ E 2 ♣Q 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 8-Randall-Randall
150 0.00 4.00 1N E 3 ♦A 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Ponds-Edington
|
18 |
♠753
♥953
♦Q7
♣T9832
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT4
♥KJ4
♦JT6
♣Q764
|
♠K9
♥Q872
♦K85432
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S 2 ♣4 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 7-Fuller-Allen
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ E 3 ♠A 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 8-Randall-Randall
120 2.00 2.00 2N W 2 ♠7 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 1-Robertson-Favors
210 1.00 3.00 1N W 5 ♣3 10-Little-Wooden vs 4-Ponds-Edington
300 0.00 4.00 2N S -3 ♦J 9-Reiser-Mann vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
|
19 |
♠J8
♥KJ97
♦Q862
♣865
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠642
♥T2
♦AJ974
♣AKJ
|
♠AKQ97
♥8654
♦K
♣Q43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ E 4 ♠3 4-Ponds-Edington vs 9-Reiser-Mann
630 3.00 1.00 3N E 4 ♣2 1-Robertson-Favors vs 7-Fuller-Allen
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E 5 ♣2 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 8-Randall-Randall
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 ♣2 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
710 0.00 4.00 4♠ E 7 ♦3 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
|
20 |
♠T765
♥T42
♦754
♣T42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ3
♥AJ53
♦K9
♣AQ65
|
♠AJ8
♥87
♦AJ82
♣K987
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N W 4 ♠5 4-Ponds-Edington vs 9-Reiser-Mann
630 3.50 0.50 3N N 4 ♥6 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
660 2.00 2.00 3N W 5 ♠5 1-Robertson-Favors vs 7-Fuller-Allen
1440 0.50 3.50 6N E 6 ♦3 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 8-Randall-Randall
1440 0.50 3.50 6N E 6 ♦3 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
|
21 |
♠AK9854
♥54
♦J4
♣874
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J7
♥AT6
♦8652
♣T965
|
♠2
♥QJ9872
♦T7
♣KJ32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 5/6♦ 5/6♠ 1/6NT ♣6/7 ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 2.00 5♠ N 5 ♥Q 10-Little-Wooden vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♥Q 1-Robertson-Favors vs 7-Fuller-Allen
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♥Q 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♥Q 4-Ponds-Edington vs 9-Reiser-Mann
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 5 ♥Q 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
22 |
♠J87
♥KJ6
♦AJ7
♣AQ62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K65
♥A752
♦K6543
♣5
|
♠QT92
♥4
♦QT
♣KJT743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5/4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2N N 4 ♣7 4-Ponds-Edington vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 2 ♣K 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Robertson-Favors
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 2 ♣T 7-Fuller-Allen vs 9-Reiser-Mann
50 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 ♣T 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 8-Randall-Randall
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E 2 ♦8 10-Little-Wooden vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
|
23 |
♠JT874
♥Q754
♦9
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠652
♥A93
♦KJ543
♣72
|
♠Q9
♥J8
♦Q762
♣AKJ93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 ♣7 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 8-Randall-Randall
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 ♣7 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Robertson-Favors
100 2.00 2.00 2♣ E -1 ♠A 7-Fuller-Allen vs 9-Reiser-Mann
100 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♦4 4-Ponds-Edington vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♣7 10-Little-Wooden vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
|
24 |
♠Q763
♥Q8
♦KQJ76
♣A5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AK9
♥AJ962
♦A9
♣J84
|
♠J842
♥T543
♦85
♣K73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♦K 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Robertson-Favors
50 2.50 1.50 1N W -1 ♦K 7-Fuller-Allen vs 9-Reiser-Mann
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 ♦K 4-Ponds-Edington vs 3-Schatz-Schatz
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W 3 ♦K 10-Little-Wooden vs 6-Gilbert-Allen
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W 3 ♦K 2-Thomas-Lindeman vs 8-Randall-Randall
|
25 |
♠J
♥JT876
♦J964
♣JT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT53
♥A3
♦AQ2
♣K964
|
♠942
♥-
♦KT53
♣AQ8753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6/5♦ 3♠ 6NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♥* S -1 ♣A 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Ponds-Edington
100 3.50 0.50 4♥* S -1 ♣4 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 9-Reiser-Mann
300 2.00 2.00 5♥* S -2 ♣4 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
620 1.00 3.00 5♣ E 6 ♦7 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Fuller-Allen
1370 0.00 4.00 6♣ E 6 ♥K 8-Randall-Randall vs 1-Robertson-Favors
|
26 |
♠962
♥AQ6
♦AK5
♣K732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K543
♥KJ872
♦Q62
♣T
|
♠AQ87
♥9
♦J843
♣A865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♦A 8-Randall-Randall vs 1-Robertson-Favors
120 3.00 1.00 1N N 2 ♠7 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Fuller-Allen
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♦A 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 9-Reiser-Mann
90 1.00 3.00 1N N 1 ♥9 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Ponds-Edington
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E 4 ♦A 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
|
27 |
♠A3
♥Q7642
♦K
♣J7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠QT42
♥K8
♦AQ963
♣KQ
|
♠K9
♥AJT5
♦J8542
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♣4 8-Randall-Randall vs 1-Robertson-Favors
130 2.50 1.50 4♦ W 4 ♠A 3-Schatz-Schatz vs 9-Reiser-Mann
130 2.50 1.50 2♦ W 4 ♠A 10-Little-Wooden vs 7-Fuller-Allen
300 1.00 3.00 4♣* N -2 ♠K 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Ponds-Edington
500 0.00 4.00 5♣* N -3 ♠K 6-Gilbert-Allen vs 2-Thomas-Lindeman
|