1 |
♠JT93
♥KQ6
♦KQ92
♣Q5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K754
♥T
♦86
♣KJ7632
|
♠AQ82
♥J754
♦A5
♣A98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.50 0.50 3♠ W 4 6-Morgan-Figler vs 1-Brantley-McBride
170 1.50 0.50 3♣ W 6 2-Nickerson-Swaim vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
400 0.00 2.00 5♣ E 5 3-Elkin-Ford vs 5-Moore-Moore
|
2 |
♠Q5
♥AQ987
♦K83
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A7643
♥53
♦96
♣J532
|
♠T2
♥T642
♦QJ542
♣A7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 5/4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 2.00 0.00 3N S 5 3-Elkin-Ford vs 5-Moore-Moore
600 1.00 1.00 3N N 3 2-Nickerson-Swaim vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
180 0.00 2.00 2N N 4 6-Morgan-Figler vs 1-Brantley-McBride
|
3 |
♠K5
♥QJ6
♦QJ6
♣JT976
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q9862
♥2
♦AT84
♣AK5
|
♠A3
♥T9875
♦2
♣Q8432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4/5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 3N W -4 6-Morgan-Figler vs 1-Brantley-McBride
100 1.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 2-Nickerson-Swaim vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
50 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 3-Elkin-Ford vs 5-Moore-Moore
|
4 |
♠AT2
♥K2
♦A765
♣AJ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q87654
♥A
♦92
♣K876
|
♠-
♥97654
♦QJ843
♣T53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/1♣ 1♦ 5/4♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -4 6-Morgan-Figler vs 1-Brantley-McBride
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 4 2-Nickerson-Swaim vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
200 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 3-Elkin-Ford vs 5-Moore-Moore
|
5 |
♠T5
♥Q86
♦K543
♣J964
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q72
♥AJ973
♦AQ2
♣82
|
♠J98643
♥T5
♦J
♣QT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 1N S 2 5-Moore-Moore vs 1-Brantley-McBride
100 0.50 1.50 2N S -1 6-Morgan-Figler vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
100 0.50 1.50 1N S -1 3-Elkin-Ford vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
|
6 |
♠2
♥KQT8
♦Q98
♣J7642
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK943
♥J542
♦642
♣9
|
♠T86
♥73
♦KT75
♣AK85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♦7/6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 5-Moore-Moore vs 1-Brantley-McBride
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ S 1 6-Morgan-Figler vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
150 0.00 2.00 2N S -3 3-Elkin-Ford vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
|
7 |
♠Q
♥AKT93
♦JT5
♣JT32
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ983
♥QJ7
♦Q87
♣Q9
|
♠K
♥642
♦K93
♣AK7654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♠ 1/2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 3-Elkin-Ford vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
200 1.00 1.00 3N W -2 5-Moore-Moore vs 1-Brantley-McBride
200 0.00 2.00 2♥ N -2 6-Morgan-Figler vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
|
8 |
♠9875
♥KJ
♦A643
♣872
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AKT
♥8
♦J9872
♣QJT4
|
♠Q432
♥QT73
♦KT
♣965
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 5-Moore-Moore vs 1-Brantley-McBride
50 1.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 6-Morgan-Figler vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
50 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 3-Elkin-Ford vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
|
9 |
♠JT
♥Q86
♦984
♣A9654
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q6
♥AT3
♦AKQJ2
♣QT8
|
♠AK975432
♥J52
♦65
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♦ 3♥ 7♠ 5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
710 1.50 0.50 5♠ E 7 4-Racine-Calhoon vs 5-Moore-Moore
710 1.50 0.50 4♠ E 7 1-Brantley-McBride vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
1460 0.00 2.00 6♠ E 7 6-Morgan-Figler vs 3-Elkin-Ford
|
10 |
♠K98
♥A9
♦AKJ
♣AK753
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q43
♥Q76432
♦Q82
♣T
|
♠AJT75
♥K8
♦T976
♣Q6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/2NT ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2N N 3 4-Racine-Calhoon vs 5-Moore-Moore
120 1.00 1.00 2N N 2 6-Morgan-Figler vs 3-Elkin-Ford
200 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 1-Brantley-McBride vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
|
11 |
♠2
♥KT93
♦AKJ432
♣T9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AQJ7
♥A84
♦86
♣KJ54
|
♠KT86543
♥Q62
♦97
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2/3♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 4-Racine-Calhoon vs 5-Moore-Moore
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 6-Morgan-Figler vs 3-Elkin-Ford
100 0.00 2.00 5♦* N -1 1-Brantley-McBride vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
|
12 |
♠KT9
♥KQ652
♦KT982
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J54
♥T9
♦63
♣QT5432
|
♠A862
♥AJ843
♦J7
♣J7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 2.00 0.00 3N S 4 4-Racine-Calhoon vs 5-Moore-Moore
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ N 5 6-Morgan-Figler vs 3-Elkin-Ford
100 0.00 2.00 6♦ N -1 1-Brantley-McBride vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
|
13 |
♠AT63
♥AT965
♦J2
♣A4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠9
♥KQJ32
♦T97
♣QJ98
|
♠K852
♥74
♦KQ86
♣K52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ N 3 5-Moore-Moore vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ S 3 1-Brantley-McBride vs 3-Elkin-Ford
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ S 2 6-Morgan-Figler vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
|
14 |
♠-
♥Q98642
♦KQ732
♣43
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠KQT86
♥5
♦A864
♣AQ5
|
♠AJ974
♥T3
♦T
♣K9872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠0 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 6♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
260 2.00 0.00 2♠ W 7 5-Moore-Moore vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ W 6 1-Brantley-McBride vs 3-Elkin-Ford
510 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 7 6-Morgan-Figler vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
|
15 |
♠9753
♥AJ9
♦AKJ
♣K32
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ42
♥T85
♦T62
♣JT4
|
♠K6
♥Q42
♦Q9743
♣A75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2/1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣5 ♦7/6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 2.00 0.00 2♦ E 2 6-Morgan-Figler vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
100 1.00 1.00 1N N -1 1-Brantley-McBride vs 3-Elkin-Ford
300 0.00 2.00 2N N -3 5-Moore-Moore vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
|
16 |
♠9832
♥9843
♦AKJ7
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKT65
♥T52
♦T8
♣KJ9
|
♠4
♥A
♦Q65432
♣AQT74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 5-Moore-Moore vs 2-Nickerson-Swaim
110 0.50 1.50 3♦ E 3 6-Morgan-Figler vs 4-Racine-Calhoon
110 0.50 1.50 3♣ E 3 1-Brantley-McBride vs 3-Elkin-Ford
|
17 |
♠64
♥J62
♦A865
♣QT75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KT93
♥AQ3
♦J9
♣J963
|
♠A72
♥87
♦KT7
♣AK842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ S 2 4-Racine-Calhoon vs 1-Brantley-McBride
100 0.50 1.50 3N E -2 2-Nickerson-Swaim vs 3-Elkin-Ford
100 0.50 1.50 3♠ W -2 6-Morgan-Figler vs 5-Moore-Moore
|
18 |
♠643
♥A7
♦AK52
♣AT32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ
♥Q6
♦JT843
♣J985
|
♠AK9752
♥JT4
♦7
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ N 3 2-Nickerson-Swaim vs 3-Elkin-Ford
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 4-Racine-Calhoon vs 1-Brantley-McBride
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ E 2 6-Morgan-Figler vs 5-Moore-Moore
|
19 |
♠Q
♥AT96
♦Q
♣A865432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A984
♥KJ5
♦K7632
♣Q
|
♠K7532
♥Q83
♦AJT4
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 4♣ N -1 6-Morgan-Figler vs 5-Moore-Moore
100 1.00 1.00 5♣ N -2 4-Racine-Calhoon vs 1-Brantley-McBride
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 4 2-Nickerson-Swaim vs 3-Elkin-Ford
|
20 |
♠854
♥A9
♦AJ853
♣852
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ73
♥KJT
♦Q974
♣KQ
|
♠JT962
♥62
♦K62
♣J76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 4-Racine-Calhoon vs 1-Brantley-McBride
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 6-Morgan-Figler vs 5-Moore-Moore
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ W 4 2-Nickerson-Swaim vs 3-Elkin-Ford
|