1 |
♠653
♥T865
♦Q543
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K94
♥KJ43
♦J2
♣K754
|
♠AJ82
♥A7
♦A8
♣AQT92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3/2♦ 5♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 4.00 0.00 3N E 4 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
460 2.50 1.50 3N E 5 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 1-Poel-Hout
460 2.50 1.50 3N E 5 6-Ford-Elkin vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
490 0.50 3.50 3N W 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
490 0.50 3.50 3N E 6 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
|
2 |
♠K984
♥KQT6
♦A
♣AQJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A63
♥932
♦Q642
♣K54
|
♠T7
♥A75
♦J9873
♣983
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 1-Poel-Hout
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S 4 6-Ford-Elkin vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
210 0.50 3.50 1N N 5 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
210 0.50 3.50 1N N 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
|
3 |
♠T96
♥T632
♦82
♣AT75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQJ75
♥Q94
♦AK3
♣Q6
|
♠K3
♥87
♦JT74
♣KJ832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 6-Ford-Elkin vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
600 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 1-Poel-Hout
630 1.00 3.00 3N E 4 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
660 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
|
4 |
♠Q872
♥J64
♦8542
♣AQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠T65
♥AKT8
♦T7
♣KJT3
|
♠AKJ94
♥7532
♦AQJ
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5/4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 1-Poel-Hout vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 6-Ford-Elkin
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
630 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
5 |
♠AK73
♥J9632
♦Q7
♣J8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠852
♥K8
♦KJT8
♣Q764
|
♠QJ9
♥A54
♦A6432
♣A3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 2N E 2 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 6-Ford-Elkin
150 2.50 1.50 2N E 3 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
150 2.50 1.50 2N E 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
180 1.00 3.00 2♥ S 3 1-Poel-Hout vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
430 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
|
6 |
♠KT32
♥K9762
♦T54
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJ8
♥AQ83
♦A
♣QJ543
|
♠-
♥J54
♦KQ7632
♣AK96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥3/2 ♠6 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 4♥ 7NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 4.00 0.00 3N W 4 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 6-Ford-Elkin
640 3.00 1.00 5♣ W 7 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
720 1.50 2.50 3N W 7 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
720 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 6 1-Poel-Hout vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
1470 0.00 4.00 6N W 7 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
|
7 |
♠86
♥QJ6
♦A987
♣A974
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ754
♥T7
♦KJ65
♣QT
|
♠T93
♥K954
♦432
♣K82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S 4 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
600 3.00 1.00 3N S 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Poel-Hout
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ S 3 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
90 1.00 3.00 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ W 2 6-Ford-Elkin vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
|
8 |
♠KT92
♥2
♦K975
♣Q972
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠Q643
♥A974
♦Q63
♣A5
|
♠A8
♥KQJT8
♦-
♣KJT863
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣2 ♥1/0 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 6♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 6-Ford-Elkin vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
230 3.00 1.00 2♥ E 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Poel-Hout
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ E 6 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
480 1.50 2.50 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
510 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 7 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
|
9 |
♠J4
♥T
♦KQJT74
♣AK53
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T763
♥963
♦A9
♣9762
|
♠K
♥KJ8742
♦832
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 4.00 0.00 3N S 6 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
460 3.00 1.00 3N S 5 6-Ford-Elkin vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
450 2.00 2.00 5♠ S 5 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
420 1.00 3.00 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
400 0.00 4.00 5♦ N 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Poel-Hout
|
10 |
♠9542
♥T98
♦AQJ7
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK87
♥5
♦94
♣AQ8654
|
♠63
♥A763
♦KT853
♣K3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
130 2.50 1.50 2♣ W 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
130 2.50 1.50 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
400 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -4 1-Poel-Hout vs 6-Ford-Elkin
600 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
11 |
♠Q42
♥T5
♦A86
♣KQ962
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A873
♥K864
♦KJT2
♣J
|
♠KJ96
♥93
♦Q7543
♣73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 5♣ S 6 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ S 4 1-Poel-Hout vs 6-Ford-Elkin
170 2.50 1.50 3♣ S 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
50 0.50 3.50 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
|
12 |
♠A875
♥Q63
♦KT84
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K432
♥KJ5
♦976
♣A53
|
♠9
♥T982
♦AQJ32
♣KQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
50 2.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
50 2.50 1.50 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
150 1.00 3.00 1N E 3 1-Poel-Hout vs 6-Ford-Elkin
430 0.00 4.00 3N W 4 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
13 |
♠AQJ87
♥K764
♦Q8
♣43
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠5432
♥QT
♦T964
♣KQ6
|
♠KT96
♥J9852
♦J752
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5/4 ♠4/3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1440 4.00 0.00 6N S 6 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
210 3.00 1.00 2N S 5 1-Poel-Hout vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
100 1.00 3.00 6♣ S -1 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 6-Ford-Elkin
100 1.00 3.00 6♣ S -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
100 1.00 3.00 6♣ N -1 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
|
14 |
♠7
♥KJ763
♦KQ632
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠A642
♥T2
♦54
♣KJT42
|
♠QT
♥Q985
♦AJ9
♣Q763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥6/5 ♠4/3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ S 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ N -2 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 6-Ford-Elkin
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ S -2 1-Poel-Hout vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
150 1.00 3.00 2N N -3 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
250 0.00 4.00 3N N -5 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
|
15 |
♠QT965
♥J3
♦QT64
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ3
♥AK64
♦873
♣AK2
|
♠K8
♥T972
♦J95
♣QJ74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 1-Poel-Hout vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 6-Ford-Elkin
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
|
16 |
♠J753
♥QT765
♦AKT9
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A92
♥K8432
♦Q652
♣J
|
♠Q64
♥9
♦84
♣AKQ9542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1100 4.00 0.00 5♣* E -4 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
300 3.00 1.00 4♣ E -3 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 6-Ford-Elkin
100 2.00 2.00 3N W -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
110 0.50 3.50 3♣ E 3 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 1-Poel-Hout
110 0.50 3.50 3♣ E 3 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
|
17 |
♠J7
♥Q75
♦QJ842
♣976
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ6
♥A84
♦A9763
♣JT
|
♠T832
♥JT62
♦KT5
♣Q3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -4 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 6-Ford-Elkin
170 3.00 1.00 2♣ S 6 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -3 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 1-Poel-Hout
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ W -2 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
18 |
♠QJ98
♥A42
♦AQT72
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K6
♥973
♦K83
♣AQT98
|
♠A753
♥K5
♦J64
♣7632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♣ 2NT ♦5/6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 9-Gose-Ludeman vs 6-Ford-Elkin
90 1.50 2.50 1N W 1 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
90 1.50 2.50 2♣ W 2 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 1-Poel-Hout
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
|
19 |
♠K32
♥KQ94
♦52
♣AQ65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J4
♥T63
♦K8643
♣943
|
♠Q9876
♥J85
♦AJT7
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
520 4.00 0.00 3N N 7 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ N 4 1-Poel-Hout vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
420 2.50 1.50 5♣ S 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
400 1.00 3.00 3N S 3 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ S 5 6-Ford-Elkin vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
|
20 |
♠AT86
♥JT87
♦K64
♣J3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q973
♥KQ42
♦Q85
♣75
|
♠KJ542
♥A5
♦AJ7
♣KT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 4 1-Poel-Hout vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 4 6-Ford-Elkin vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
|
21 |
♠A73
♥A7632
♦T87
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJT86
♥QT5
♦K2
♣AQ3
|
♠542
♥KJ98
♦QJ3
♣JT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.50 0.50 2N W -1 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
110 2.00 2.00 1♠ W 2 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Nichols-Nichols
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 3 1-Poel-Hout vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
180 0.00 4.00 1N E 4 6-Ford-Elkin vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
|
22 |
♠J63
♥98754
♦J982
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKQ72
♥AT
♦A76
♣T64
|
♠T5
♥Q3
♦QT53
♣AJ983
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5/4♠ 5/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 2N E 3 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
600 3.00 1.00 3N W 3 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Poel-Hout
690 1.00 3.00 3N W 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 6-Ford-Elkin
690 1.00 3.00 3N E 6 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
690 1.00 3.00 3N E 6 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
|
23 |
♠AJ876
♥AT32
♦KT4
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠9543
♥KQ86
♦A
♣Q962
|
♠T2
♥954
♦QJ753
♣843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 4.00 0.00 2♥* W -3 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 6-Ford-Elkin
600 1.50 2.50 3N S 3 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
600 1.50 2.50 3N S 3 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
170 0.00 4.00 1♠ N 4 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Poel-Hout
|
24 |
♠Q
♥T95
♦K95
♣AKJ642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AK3
♥QJ2
♦QT87
♣Q83
|
♠987642
♥A874
♦2
♣97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ -/1♥ 3NT ♥6/7 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♣ N 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 6-Ford-Elkin
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 2-Holmes-Bingham vs 8-Gilbert-Falck
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ N 2 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Poel-Hout
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 7-Colson-Houseknecht vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E 3 4-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 3-Unglaub-McMillin
|
25 |
♠842
♥A7
♦AJ3
♣AKQT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJT975
♥3
♦QT964
♣7
|
♠A3
♥KT96542
♦75
♣62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.50 0.50 3N N 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
400 3.50 0.50 5♣ N 5 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 6-Ford-Elkin vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ N 5 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
50 0.00 4.00 6♣ N -1 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 1-Poel-Hout
|
26 |
♠AKJ3
♥-
♦AQJ8
♣KT962
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠-
♥A65
♦T96542
♣AJ43
|
♠Q98642
♥8432
♦7
♣Q7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥2/5 ♠3/4 NT2/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 3.50 0.50 3N N 5 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
660 3.50 0.50 3N N 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
600 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 1-Poel-Hout
400 1.00 3.00 2♠ E -4 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 6-Ford-Elkin vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
|
27 |
♠7
♥AKJ876
♦QT
♣K953
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AQT9
♥T94
♦AK632
♣2
|
♠KJ65
♥532
♦975
♣A86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Colson-Houseknecht
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ N 3 8-Gilbert-Falck vs 1-Poel-Hout
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 3-Unglaub-McMillin vs 9-Gose-Ludeman
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 3 5-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Shropshire-Shropshire
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W 3 6-Ford-Elkin vs 2-Holmes-Bingham
|