1 |
♠AQ96
♥KQJ4
♦J
♣K843
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T543
♥762
♦Q8642
♣A
|
♠J
♥T98
♦KT973
♣QT92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 5.00 0.00 3N N 5 3-Randall-Randall vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
450 4.00 1.00 4♠ S 5 1-McMillin-Falck vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S 4 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 4-Lee-Poel
400 1.00 4.00 3N S 3 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
50 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 6-Metheny-Little vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
|
2 |
♠AKJ954
♥8
♦T864
♣Q3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T72
♥AQ2
♦KQ32
♣AT2
|
♠Q83
♥T7
♦J7
♣KJ9854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 3♥ S 3 1-McMillin-Falck vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
100 4.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 6-Metheny-Little vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
200 2.50 2.50 3♥ S -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
200 2.50 2.50 3♥ S -2 3-Randall-Randall vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
300 1.00 4.00 3♠ N -3 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 4-Lee-Poel
500 0.00 5.00 4♥* S -2 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
|
3 |
♠JT5
♥AK8732
♦63
♣82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K974
♥QT94
♦JT74
♣7
|
♠Q8
♥J5
♦Q952
♣AKT64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1/-NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 5.00 0.00 2♥ N 4 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 4-Lee-Poel
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ N 3 3-Randall-Randall vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ N 2 1-McMillin-Falck vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
90 2.00 3.00 1N S 1 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
50 1.00 4.00 2N S -1 6-Metheny-Little vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
100 0.00 5.00 2N S -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
|
4 |
♠QT642
♥Q5
♦T2
♣KQJ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ9
♥J93
♦KJ83
♣A74
|
♠K3
♥AT
♦AQ654
♣T983
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 4/5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.00 0.00 3♦ W 4 1-McMillin-Falck vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ W 5 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 4-Lee-Poel
600 3.00 2.00 3N E 3 6-Metheny-Little vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
630 1.50 3.50 3N W 4 3-Randall-Randall vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
630 1.50 3.50 3N E 4 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
660 0.00 5.00 3N W 5 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
|
5 |
♠AQ8
♥T985
♦KT6
♣852
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T4
♥72
♦J93
♣KT9764
|
♠976
♥KQ3
♦AQ8752
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4/3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ S 4 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
170 4.50 0.50 2♥ N 4 1-McMillin-Falck vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
140 2.50 2.50 2♠ S 3 3-Randall-Randall vs 4-Lee-Poel
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ N 3 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
100 1.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 6-Metheny-Little vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ E 3 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
|
6 |
♠Q82
♥A8754
♦QJ
♣QT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J96543
♥Q6
♦KT95
♣5
|
♠KT
♥J9
♦A8743
♣8732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦5/4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 3-Randall-Randall vs 4-Lee-Poel
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ N 6 6-Metheny-Little vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
450 1.00 4.00 4♥ S 5 1-McMillin-Falck vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
230 0.00 5.00 3♥ N 6 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
|
7 |
♠T98
♥AJ2
♦KT3
♣AJ62
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q7
♥KT953
♦AQJ87
♣K
|
♠KJ64
♥Q74
♦62
♣QT87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 1-McMillin-Falck vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
100 3.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
100 3.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ W 3 3-Randall-Randall vs 4-Lee-Poel
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ W 3 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
620 0.00 5.00 4♥ W 4 6-Metheny-Little vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
|
8 |
♠QT94
♥A63
♦A87
♣Q92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J52
♥KT82
♦Q94
♣K76
|
♠86
♥Q94
♦K632
♣J843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2/3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 5.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 1-McMillin-Falck vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 3-Randall-Randall vs 4-Lee-Poel
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ S -2 6-Metheny-Little vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
|
9 |
♠T9642
♥Q6
♦KT842
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠75
♥3
♦J65
♣AKQJ974
|
♠KJ8
♥KJ82
♦A
♣86532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣2 NT4 |
EW: 5/4♣ 2NT ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
600 3.50 1.50 5♣ E 5 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
600 3.50 1.50 5♣ E 5 3-Randall-Randall vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
620 2.00 3.00 5♣ E 6 1-McMillin-Falck vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
630 1.00 4.00 3N E 4 6-Metheny-Little vs 4-Lee-Poel
660 0.00 5.00 3N E 5 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
|
10 |
♠Q9
♥K654
♦AJ976
♣32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K7643
♥T932
♦K
♣854
|
♠J
♥AQJ7
♦542
♣KJT97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3/2♠ 3/2NT ♣6/5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 5.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ N 4 3-Randall-Randall vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ N 4 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ N 4 6-Metheny-Little vs 4-Lee-Poel
100 1.00 4.00 2♥ W -1 1-McMillin-Falck vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ E 2 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
|
11 |
♠94
♥KT532
♦A4
♣AKT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠JT8
♥QJ984
♦J7
♣J94
|
♠AKQ532
♥76
♦QT53
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 5♣ N 5 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
130 3.50 1.50 4♣ S 4 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
130 3.50 1.50 3♣ N 4 1-McMillin-Falck vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
50 1.50 3.50 3♠ E -1 3-Randall-Randall vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
50 1.50 3.50 3♠ E -1 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
50 0.00 5.00 5♣ S -1 6-Metheny-Little vs 4-Lee-Poel
|
12 |
♠A4
♥Q987532
♦A7
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9532
♥AT6
♦Q82
♣Q32
|
♠QT8
♥KJ
♦JT963
♣AJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3/2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 4.50 0.50 3♥ N 3 6-Metheny-Little vs 4-Lee-Poel
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N 3 1-McMillin-Falck vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
110 2.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 3-Randall-Randall vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
110 2.50 2.50 2♥ N 2 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
100 1.00 4.00 4♦ E -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ N -1 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
|
13 |
♠J4
♥QJ2
♦K872
♣AK63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ972
♥T86
♦5
♣J874
|
♠K8
♥K93
♦AJT63
♣952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
200 4.50 0.50 1♦ E -2 6-Metheny-Little vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
150 3.00 2.00 1N N 3 1-McMillin-Falck vs 4-Lee-Poel
120 2.00 3.00 1N N 2 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
100 0.50 4.50 2♥ S -1 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
100 0.50 4.50 2♥ S -1 3-Randall-Randall vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
|
14 |
♠KQT
♥AKQJT6
♦43
♣J4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠72
♥95
♦KT98765
♣AQ
|
♠AJ864
♥872
♦A2
♣K52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 3-Randall-Randall vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
100 3.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 6-Metheny-Little vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
150 0.00 5.00 4♦ W 5 1-McMillin-Falck vs 4-Lee-Poel
|
15 |
♠Q3
♥74
♦AT52
♣Q9874
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJT2
♥JT
♦K8
♣AKJ65
|
♠976
♥K653
♦QJ964
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♥6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 6-Metheny-Little vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
100 4.50 0.50 2♣ W -2 1-McMillin-Falck vs 4-Lee-Poel
50 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
50 2.50 2.50 1♠ W -1 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
90 1.00 4.00 1N W 1 3-Randall-Randall vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
120 0.00 5.00 1N W 2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
|
16 |
♠K93
♥K84
♦AK
♣AQT73
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT82
♥J2
♦8754
♣K54
|
♠AJ74
♥AQ97653
♦96
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 4/2♦ ♥3 ♠3/2 NT3/2 |
EW: 4♥ 3/4♠ -/4NT ♣2 ♦3 NT3/10 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.50 0.50 4♣ N 4 1-McMillin-Falck vs 4-Lee-Poel
130 4.50 0.50 4♣ N 4 6-Metheny-Little vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
110 3.00 2.00 3♣ N 3 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
50 2.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ E 3 3-Randall-Randall vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
790 0.00 5.00 4♥* E 4 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
|
17 |
♠Q7
♥K74
♦AQJ9
♣AKJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠853
♥J9853
♦T4
♣T76
|
♠AT6
♥AT6
♦8763
♣Q93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 4.50 0.50 3N N 6 1-McMillin-Falck vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
490 4.50 0.50 3N N 6 6-Metheny-Little vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
460 3.00 2.00 3N N 5 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Lee-Poel
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ S 5 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
430 1.00 4.00 3N N 4 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
130 0.00 5.00 3♣ N 4 3-Randall-Randall vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
|
18 |
♠AK54
♥KQJ9
♦82
♣KQ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ93
♥AT3
♦6
♣AT743
|
♠72
♥765
♦A754
♣J865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
600 5.00 0.00 3N N 3 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
120 4.00 1.00 1N N 2 1-McMillin-Falck vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
100 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
100 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 3-Randall-Randall vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
100 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Lee-Poel
100 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 6-Metheny-Little vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
|
19 |
♠KQJT9872
♥J75
♦-
♣A6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠3
♥AK
♦AQ64
♣QJ9543
|
♠4
♥T98642
♦K9875
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2/3♥ ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
690 3.50 1.50 4♠* N 5 1-McMillin-Falck vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
690 3.50 1.50 4♠* N 5 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
690 3.50 1.50 4♠* N 5 3-Randall-Randall vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
690 3.50 1.50 4♠* N 5 6-Metheny-Little vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
650 1.00 4.00 5♠* N 5 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
450 0.00 5.00 4♠ N 5 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Lee-Poel
|
20 |
♠AK73
♥QT
♦J75
♣J432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT98
♥K7542
♦T9
♣97
|
♠642
♥J86
♦KQ32
♣AQ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 5.00 0.00 3N S 4 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
200 4.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
120 3.00 2.00 2N S 2 6-Metheny-Little vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
100 1.50 3.50 1N E -1 1-McMillin-Falck vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
100 1.50 3.50 1♦ E -1 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 4-Lee-Poel
80 0.00 5.00 1♥ W 1 3-Randall-Randall vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
|
21 |
♠-
♥AK853
♦KQT
♣JT972
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJT7
♥QJ76
♦75
♣AQ8
|
♠AK862
♥94
♦J9642
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ ♦5/6 ♠3/4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣2 ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 6-Metheny-Little vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
110 4.00 1.00 3♣ N 3 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 4-Lee-Poel
100 2.50 2.50 4♠ W -2 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
100 2.50 2.50 3♠ E -2 1-McMillin-Falck vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
50 1.00 4.00 4♠ E -1 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ W 3 3-Randall-Randall vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
|
22 |
♠A96
♥A6542
♦94
♣J72
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q
♥QT9
♦JT86
♣K9654
|
♠J7432
♥J87
♦AQ2
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 5.00 0.00 1N W -4 1-McMillin-Falck vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
300 4.00 1.00 1N W -3 6-Metheny-Little vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
200 3.00 2.00 1N W -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 4-Lee-Poel
100 2.00 3.00 1♠ E -1 3-Randall-Randall vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
90 1.00 4.00 1N W 1 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
140 0.00 5.00 2♥ E 3 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
|
23 |
♠K653
♥KJ974
♦AT
♣98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T4
♥32
♦KQ98532
♣T6
|
♠AQJ2
♥T86
♦J64
♣732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/4♣ 6/4♥ 3♠ 6/4NT ♦5/4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥0 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
720 5.00 0.00 3N N 7 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
680 3.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 1-McMillin-Falck vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
680 3.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 4-Lee-Poel
680 3.00 2.00 4♥ N 6 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ N 5 6-Metheny-Little vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
620 0.00 5.00 5♣ S 6 3-Randall-Randall vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
|
24 |
♠Q7
♥J743
♦7532
♣J52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠A9653
♥K6
♦KQJ8
♣A4
|
♠JT8
♥QT852
♦AT4
♣96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 2-Houseknecht-Hawkins vs 4-Lee-Poel
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 1-McMillin-Falck vs 2-Zawacki-Escarpita
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 3-Randall-Randall vs 6-Van Ekeren-Ludeman
420 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 4-Nichols-Nichols vs 3-Rooney-Goodman
420 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 5-Gilbert-Shropshire vs 5-Carrell-Spengler
420 1.00 4.00 4♠ W 4 6-Metheny-Little vs 1-Palmer-Kimball
|