1 |
♠AJ9732
♥8
♦KQ95
♣T2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T5
♥JT64
♦AJ632
♣86
|
♠KQ6
♥Q7532
♦8
♣AJ73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ N 3 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 2-McMillin-Falck
100 2.00 1.00 5♥ E -2 7-Denton-Forrester vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
50 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
50 0.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
|
2 |
♠Q2
♥K
♦QT7632
♣AQ93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJT84
♥AQ8
♦AJ
♣854
|
♠A95
♥96432
♦4
♣J762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 2-McMillin-Falck
50 2.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 7-Denton-Forrester vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
|
3 |
♠A
♥KQ654
♦K54
♣KJ93
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠943
♥AJ832
♦Q8
♣A76
|
♠KJT8765
♥T
♦AT2
♣85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ E 4 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 2-McMillin-Falck
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 4 7-Denton-Forrester vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
|
4 |
♠KQ82
♥6
♦J97643
♣84
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠63
♥T942
♦T
♣QJT932
|
♠T5
♥A85
♦AK85
♣A765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ S 3 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 2-McMillin-Falck
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S 3 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
5 |
♠Q432
♥A32
♦875
♣765
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A6
♥JT987
♦T62
♣K98
|
♠T975
♥-
♦A43
♣AQJT32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 5♣ E -2 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
50 1.50 1.50 3N W -1 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
50 1.50 1.50 5♣ E -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
130 0.00 3.00 4♣ E 4 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 2-McMillin-Falck
|
6 |
♠KT6
♥QJT954
♦K
♣942
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJ84
♥73
♦985
♣Q865
|
♠52
♥82
♦QT763
♣AKJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ S 5 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 2-McMillin-Falck
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ S 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
7 |
♠KJT9
♥K83
♦AJ98
♣96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠A762
♥Q4
♦Q74
♣KQJ5
|
♠53
♥J652
♦KT2
♣8743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 1♥ S 3 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 7-Denton-Forrester
100 1.50 1.50 1N E -1 2-McMillin-Falck vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
100 1.50 1.50 2♣ W -1 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
100 0.00 3.00 1♥ S -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
|
8 |
♠KQ52
♥AKQ3
♦T5
♣Q72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ9
♥8
♦QJ73
♣JT543
|
♠876
♥T9742
♦982
♣A6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.50 0.50 3N N 4 2-McMillin-Falck vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
430 2.50 0.50 3N N 4 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
400 0.50 2.50 3N N 3 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 7-Denton-Forrester
400 0.50 2.50 3N N 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
|
9 |
♠J987
♥J762
♦83
♣A52
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A6532
♥Q43
♦KJT2
♣Q
|
♠QT
♥KT85
♦AQ65
♣986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 2N E -2 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 7-Denton-Forrester
200 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -2 2-McMillin-Falck vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
100 1.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
110 0.00 3.00 2♦ E 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
|
10 |
♠AJ54
♥94
♦A9876
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K82
♥AKQ72
♦5
♣KQ75
|
♠-
♥T863
♦QT43
♣AT843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣1 ♦6 ♥1/0 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 6♥ ♦6 ♠2/3 NT4/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.00 0.00 4♥ W 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-McMillin-Falck
710 1.50 1.50 4♥ W 7 7-Denton-Forrester vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
710 1.50 1.50 4♥ E 7 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
1430 0.00 3.00 6♥ W 6 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
|
11 |
♠A
♥AJT85
♦K
♣J86542
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J932
♥Q43
♦9843
♣Q3
|
♠Q74
♥9762
♦JT75
♣A7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 2.00 1.00 3N S 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-McMillin-Falck
490 2.00 1.00 3N N 6 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
490 2.00 1.00 3N N 6 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
460 0.00 3.00 3N N 5 7-Denton-Forrester vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
|
12 |
♠9743
♥42
♦AK9
♣KQT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ2
♥T975
♦T76
♣A97
|
♠AK5
♥AKJ3
♦843
♣J43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ -/1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
80 3.00 0.00 1♠ N 1 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
50 1.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 7-Denton-Forrester vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 9-Shropshire-Shropshire vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-McMillin-Falck
|
13 |
♠AQJ
♥KJT43
♦K952
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠K65
♥A96
♦J873
♣532
|
♠973
♥75
♦QT4
♣KQ976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 6♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 2-McMillin-Falck vs 7-Denton-Forrester
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ N 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
|
14 |
♠JT54
♥2
♦86
♣QJ9842
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠3
♥KQ8765
♦KQ2
♣AK6
|
♠K87
♥AJ
♦AJT953
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦0 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ 6/2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
510 2.50 0.50 4♥ W 7 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
510 2.50 0.50 4♥ W 7 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
920 0.50 2.50 6♦ E 6 2-McMillin-Falck vs 7-Denton-Forrester
920 0.50 2.50 6♦ E 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
|
15 |
♠K43
♥AQ987
♦T64
♣AQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠75
♥KT3
♦AJ82
♣J952
|
♠QT82
♥J642
♦K73
♣63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 1N N 3 2-McMillin-Falck vs 7-Denton-Forrester
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ N 2 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
16 |
♠AJ
♥T96
♦Q942
♣KT96
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q743
♥J874
♦73
♣Q87
|
♠T852
♥A32
♦AKJT8
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 2.50 0.50 2N N 4 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
180 2.50 0.50 1N N 4 2-McMillin-Falck vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ S 3 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 7-Denton-Forrester
110 0.50 2.50 2♣ N 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
|
17 |
♠AK653
♥KJT74
♦3
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠4
♥3
♦QT7652
♣AJT82
|
♠T9872
♥Q852
♦J9
♣K5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
400 2.00 1.00 3N S 3 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
50 0.50 2.50 3N S -1 2-McMillin-Falck vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
50 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 7-Denton-Forrester
|
18 |
♠T7
♥92
♦52
♣AQJ9542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ5
♥KJ
♦Q7643
♣K63
|
♠A643
♥T876
♦AJ9
♣T8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦4/5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ W 2 2-McMillin-Falck vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
100 2.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 7-Denton-Forrester
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ W 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
200 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -2 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
|
19 |
♠AJ
♥J74
♦KQJ432
♣A2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K62
♥A9865
♦86
♣QT3
|
♠Q43
♥KQ3
♦A7
♣K9865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ N 2 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
100 1.50 1.50 4♦ N -2 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 2-McMillin-Falck
100 1.50 1.50 4♦ N -2 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 7-Denton-Forrester
|
20 |
♠A74
♥J765
♦T
♣KQ984
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠J62
♥T942
♦K87
♣T65
|
♠Q93
♥AK8
♦AJ42
♣AJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 1N E -1 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 7-Denton-Forrester
100 2.50 0.50 1♦ E -1 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
120 0.50 2.50 2N E 2 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 2-McMillin-Falck
120 0.50 2.50 2N E 2 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
|
21 |
♠K763
♥J
♦AKQJ87
♣73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQT8
♥KQT94
♦4
♣AK6
|
♠J95
♥A8752
♦T9
♣T52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.50 0.50 3♥ W 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Carrell
200 2.50 0.50 3♥ E 5 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
450 1.00 2.00 4♥ E 5 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht vs 7-Denton-Forrester
500 0.00 3.00 5♦* N -2 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 2-McMillin-Falck
|
22 |
♠KJ64
♥AKT7
♦2
♣A975
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT852
♥9632
♦K84
♣2
|
♠Q73
♥Q5
♦AT95
♣KJ84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/-♦ 2/1♥ 2NT ♦7/6 ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 7-Denton-Forrester vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
100 1.50 1.50 2♦ E -1 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
90 0.00 3.00 2♣ S 2 2-McMillin-Falck vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
|
23 |
♠42
♥KJT4
♦J97
♣QJ96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠98
♥Q95
♦A832
♣8732
|
♠AJ5
♥A7632
♦Q5
♣KT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 3/2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♥7/6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 4 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ S 2 2-McMillin-Falck vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ S 2 7-Denton-Forrester vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
24 |
♠AQ7
♥943
♦J972
♣943
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KT98652
♥A5
♦T
♣T76
|
♠J43
♥QT7
♦K854
♣KQ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2/1♠ ♣4 ♦4/3 ♥4/3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 3♠* W -2 2-McMillin-Falck vs 8-Gioannini-Medd
100 2.00 1.00 3♠* W -1 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -1 4-Thomas-Unglaub vs 3-Edington-Van Ekeren
50 0.50 2.50 3♦ N -1 7-Denton-Forrester vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
25 |
♠-
♥AT874
♦QT
♣AJ9543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K5
♥KQ3
♦AKJ95
♣K76
|
♠QJ94
♥965
♦432
♣Q82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♠ 2NT ♣4/6 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 3♦ W -3 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
100 1.00 2.00 3♣ N -2 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
800 0.00 3.00 4♣* N -4 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Denton-Forrester
|
26 |
♠7653
♥KQJ3
♦T
♣AT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠4
♥T752
♦K963
♣K652
|
♠QT82
♥964
♦AQ8754
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♥ 5/4♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣0 ♥0 ♠2/1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 4 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
100 1.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Denton-Forrester
300 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -3 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
|
27 |
♠A752
♥52
♦Q32
♣9842
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J64
♥KT8764
♦A98
♣Q
|
♠T98
♥AQJ93
♦KT7
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 3NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 5-Spengler-Carrell vs 4-Thomas-Unglaub
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 8-Gioannini-Medd vs 1-Lerdal-Houseknecht
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ W 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Denton-Forrester
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 4 3-Edington-Van Ekeren vs 9-Shropshire-Shropshire
|