1 |
♠AKQ4
♥J7542
♦K7
♣86
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠JT9
♥T
♦AJ6542
♣Q32
|
♠87652
♥A98
♦T3
♣AK5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.50 0.50 4♠* E -2 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
300 3.50 0.50 4♠* E -2 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 4 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 4 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
|
2 |
♠K72
♥K432
♦T65
♣964
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T964
♥JT8
♦AKQ2
♣T3
|
♠Q83
♥A95
♦3
♣AKQ852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ E 4 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
130 3.50 0.50 2♣ E 4 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
430 0.50 3.50 3N E 4 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
430 0.50 3.50 3N E 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
|
3 |
♠T6
♥AK843
♦KT63
♣98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A98
♥JT62
♦QJ94
♣T6
|
♠432
♥75
♦87
♣AQJ432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ S 5 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
180 2.00 2.00 2N N 4 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N 4 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
150 0.00 4.00 2N S 3 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
|
4 |
♠K974
♥AQ42
♦93
♣AK6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ632
♥KJ86
♦A72
♣J
|
♠A85
♥T
♦KJT5
♣98542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W 2 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
|
5 |
♠KT943
♥8
♦865
♣AJ52
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q876
♥6
♦972
♣KQ976
|
♠AJ5
♥J9742
♦KQJT
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -4 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
150 2.50 1.50 2♦ E -3 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
150 2.50 1.50 2♦ E -3 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ E -2 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
|
6 |
♠K985
♥K54
♦KJ8
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T632
♥J2
♦A532
♣AT2
|
♠Q74
♥AQT983
♦T6
♣84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.25 0.75 3♣ S -1 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
50 3.25 0.75 3♣ S -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
AVE AVE 2.00 2.00 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
100 1.38 2.63 1N N -2 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
140 0.13 3.88 2♥ E 3 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
|
7 |
♠J8642
♥632
♦A63
♣94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AK3
♥QT4
♦KQ9
♣KQ76
|
♠QT975
♥J95
♦JT54
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ E 3 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ E 3 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
150 1.00 3.00 2N W 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
300 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -3 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
|
8 |
♠972
♥AJ643
♦AQ974
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠6543
♥T2
♦-
♣AKQJT75
|
♠KT
♥KQ85
♦KT32
♣942
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥3/4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 4♦ S 5 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
50 2.50 1.50 5♣ W -1 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
50 2.50 1.50 4♣ W -1 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ N -1 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
|
9 |
♠A85
♥J42
♦K87
♣JT54
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJT3
♥Q83
♦AT5
♣983
|
♠42
♥K9765
♦QJ3
♣AQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
PASS 3.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ E 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ E 3 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E 5 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
|
10 |
♠T
♥QT9752
♦75
♣J952
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠53
♥AK843
♦AT3
♣AQT
|
♠AK876
♥-
♦Q9842
♣K86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2/1 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 4.00 0.00 5♠ E -3 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
200 3.00 1.00 6N W -2 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
630 1.50 2.50 3N W 4 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
630 1.50 2.50 3N W 4 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
660 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
|
11 |
♠T74
♥9743
♦76
♣AJ83
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ8
♥KJ65
♦AKJT
♣Q7
|
♠J632
♥AQ
♦85432
♣54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
150 3.00 1.00 1N W 3 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
400 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E 4 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
490 0.00 4.00 3N W 6 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
|
12 |
♠T63
♥87643
♦KJT
♣J8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠842
♥KJ92
♦72
♣K742
|
♠AQJ5
♥AQ
♦A96
♣AT63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
50 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
50 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
50 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
400 0.00 4.00 3N E 3 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
|
13 |
♠T
♥AKJ862
♦3
♣AJT52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠A86
♥Q97
♦J8762
♣Q6
|
♠QJ43
♥54
♦AKQT5
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ -/2NT ♣3 ♥3/4 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ N 4 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
100 2.50 1.50 4♦ W -1 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
|
14 |
♠AK63
♥Q65
♦T865
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠85
♥K984
♦Q32
♣Q872
|
♠QJT4
♥AJ72
♦9
♣KJT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
50 1.50 2.50 3♦ S -1 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 3 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
|
15 |
♠K8
♥KQT92
♦JT2
♣K32
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT932
♥J8
♦A84
♣AJ8
|
♠QJ6
♥A7654
♦K7
♣T97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W 2 10-Randall-Randall vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 3 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W 3 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
300 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -3 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
|
16 |
♠2
♥Q7
♦AKT42
♣KJ752
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKQJ86
♥KJ5
♦J9
♣AQ
|
♠9543
♥AT943
♦6
♣843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣4/5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 4♦ S -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
650 2.50 1.50 5♠ W 5 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
650 2.50 1.50 5♠ W 5 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
680 0.50 3.50 5♠ E 6 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 6 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
|
17 |
♠AKJ
♥AKQT
♦QT643
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠98762
♥J98
♦5
♣8762
|
♠43
♥43
♦KJ97
♣AKJT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
250 3.00 1.00 6♣ E -5 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N 4 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ N 4 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
300 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -2 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
|
18 |
♠KQ
♥AJ962
♦J952
♣Q9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT86
♥T84
♦AQ84
♣J4
|
♠A75432
♥3
♦T63
♣832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 3.88 0.13 3N N 5 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
650 2.63 1.38 4♥ N 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
AVE AVE 2.00 2.00 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
630 1.38 2.63 3N N 4 9-Escarpita-Poel vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
300 0.13 3.88 4♠* E -2 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
|
19 |
♠87
♥K
♦KQJ852
♣J532
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK964
♥J54
♦T94
♣T7
|
♠QT2
♥AQ73
♦73
♣Q864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -5 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ N 3 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ N 3 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
|
20 |
♠53
♥A85
♦T543
♣T954
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q982
♥QJ9
♦J9
♣A863
|
♠AT74
♥T32
♦Q82
♣QJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1/-NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 4.00 0.00 1N S 3 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
90 2.00 2.00 1N S 1 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
90 2.00 2.00 1N S 1 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
90 2.00 2.00 1N S 1 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
100 0.00 4.00 1N S -1 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
|
21 |
♠A97
♥98
♦AT42
♣AKJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K84
♥QT653
♦J97
♣QT
|
♠532
♥KJ42
♦K83
♣762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
210 4.00 0.00 2N N 5 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
180 3.00 1.00 2N N 4 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
170 2.00 2.00 3♣ N 6 10-Randall-Randall vs 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren
150 0.50 3.50 2N N 3 1-Zucconi-Shropshire vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
150 0.50 3.50 2N N 3 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
|
22 |
♠QT42
♥8654
♦AQJ7
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠6
♥AJT7
♦T6432
♣753
|
♠AJ85
♥KQ
♦K
♣KQJT94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
600 2.50 1.50 3N W 3 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
600 2.50 1.50 5♣ E 5 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
630 1.00 3.00 3N W 4 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
660 0.00 4.00 3N E 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
|
23 |
♠JT84
♥K432
♦Q3
♣KT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ532
♥AJ9
♦K2
♣Q53
|
♠K76
♥QT85
♦A8764
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.50 0.50 6♠ W -2 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
200 3.50 0.50 6♠ W -2 10-Randall-Randall vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
600 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
660 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
|
24 |
♠KQ9
♥QT
♦K862
♣KJT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T7654
♥K843
♦J943
♣-
|
♠32
♥AJ972
♦7
♣AQ642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 7-Gioannini-Schneider vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ N -2 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht vs 3-Rooney-Lowe
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ N -3 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W 4 10-Randall-Randall vs 6-O'Leary-Reiser
200 0.00 4.00 5♦ N -4 2-Unglaub-Falck vs 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren
|
25 |
♠KJ
♥Q6
♦AK853
♣AQJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠873
♥KT9872
♦76
♣62
|
♠T96
♥AJ54
♦QJ2
♣974
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 3.50 0.50 3N N 6 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
490 3.50 0.50 3N N 6 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
460 2.00 2.00 3N N 5 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
|
26 |
♠QJT
♥AT76
♦52
♣9764
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠A83
♥J3
♦AK8
♣AKQ82
|
♠962
♥KQ8
♦J63
♣JT53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1/-♠ 4NT ♥6 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -2 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
630 2.00 2.00 3N W 4 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
660 0.00 4.00 3N W 5 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
|
27 |
♠KJ62
♥Q98643
♦85
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠83
♥KJ75
♦KJT9
♣764
|
♠9754
♥T
♦A32
♣AKQ93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N 2 6-O'Leary-Reiser vs 2-Unglaub-Falck
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 10-Randall-Randall vs 7-Gioannini-Schneider
50 2.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 5-Spengler-Van Ekeren vs 4-Applebaum-Houseknecht
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 8-Ludeman-Van Ekeren vs 1-Zucconi-Shropshire
150 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -3 3-Rooney-Lowe vs 9-Escarpita-Poel
|