1 |
♠A92
♥AJT3
♦JT6
♣T93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ W 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 1-PEW-LONG
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
|
2 |
♠AT5
♥Q4
♦JT542
♣642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ E 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 1-PEW-LONG
|
3 |
♠AT83
♥Q7
♦Q86
♣AT97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 1♥* E -1 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 1-PEW-LONG
120 1.00 1.00 2N N 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
|
4 |
♠K9864
♥JT93
♦84
♣Q8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♦ 4/3♥ 1/-NT ♣6 ♠5/4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ E 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
800 0.00 2.00 4♠* N -3 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 1-PEW-LONG
|
5 |
♠QJ63
♥T98
♦T
♣J9832
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 1-PEW-LONG
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ E 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
|
6 |
♠85
♥AK842
♦JT4
♣762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
600 0.50 1.50 3N E 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 1-PEW-LONG
600 0.50 1.50 3N E 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
|
7 |
♠T32
♥K852
♦T74
♣K93
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 1-PEW-LONG
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
600 0.00 2.00 3N E 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
|
8 |
♠JT975
♥Q
♦AK73
♣954
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 1-PEW-LONG
PASS 0.00 2.00 Pass Out 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
|
9 |
♠A76532
♥T6
♦84
♣AQT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣3 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ N 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
100 1.00 1.00 4♦ W -1 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
130 0.00 2.00 4♦ W 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 1-PEW-LONG
|
10 |
♠Q962
♥T82
♦QT4
♣QJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ E +1 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ E +2 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
600 0.00 2.00 3N W 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 1-PEW-LONG
|
11 |
♠AQJ8
♥J94
♦K632
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠4/3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
50 1.00 1.00 3N E -1 1-PEW-LONG vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
800 0.00 2.00 1♦* N -4 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
|
12 |
♠QT
♥KQ763
♦T96
♣KT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
PASS 1.00 1.00 Pass Out 1-PEW-LONG vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
110 0.00 2.00 1♠ W +1 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
|
13 |
♠K8632
♥63
♦J9
♣Q742
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 1-PEW-LONG vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
|
14 |
♠J974
♥A8432
♦T3
♣84
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -4 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
100 1.00 1.00 3N W -2 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
430 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 1-PEW-LONG vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
|
15 |
♠Q965
♥T76
♦63
♣AJ72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 1-PEW-LONG vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
400 0.00 2.00 3N S -4 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
|
16 |
♠K7
♥KQT2
♦Q
♣AQT754
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 3♥ 6/5♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +2 1-PEW-LONG vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
480 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +2 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
400 0.00 2.00 5♣ N 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
|
17 |
♠-
♥AKJ7
♦986
♣JT9642
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 1♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
920 2.00 0.00 6♣ S 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
490 0.50 1.50 3N S +3 1-PEW-LONG vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
490 0.50 1.50 3N S +3 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
|
18 |
♠Q3
♥KJT654
♦QJT85
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣1 ♦6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 4NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 3♣ E +2 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
460 1.00 1.00 3N E +2 1-PEW-LONG vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
550 0.00 2.00 5♣* E 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
|
19 |
♠87
♥J86
♦J65
♣QJ732
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 1-PEW-LONG vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
|
20 |
♠QJ52
♥Q9532
♦7
♣T64
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 1-PEW-LONG vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
650 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 4-HARRIS-HODGSON
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ S 5-PRAKASH-Vinje vs 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney
|
21 |
♠Q
♥A7643
♦J8543
♣J7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 1-PEW-LONG
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ W 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
|
22 |
♠K97
♥73
♦Q9
♣986543
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 1-PEW-LONG
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
710 0.00 2.00 4♥ E +3 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
|
23 |
♠KT43
♥Q873
♦8
♣8642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠6/5 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 1-PEW-LONG
90 1.00 1.00 2♣ S 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
100 0.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
|
24 |
♠KQT754
♥AJ75
♦Q
♣52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 1.50 0.50 5♠ N 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ N 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 1-PEW-LONG
|
25 |
♠9
♥AT92
♦K54
♣J8532
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦3/2 ♥4/3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 4-HARRIS-HODGSON vs 1-PEW-LONG
630 0.50 1.50 3N W +1 6-EVANS-HEYER vs 5-PRAKASH-Vinje
630 0.50 1.50 3N E +1 2-CHAMBERLAIN-Mahoney vs 3-ATRUBIN-WITZ
|