1 |
♠K4
♥AQ62
♦A8
♣A8532
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 1.00 0.00 1N N +2 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
120 0.00 1.00 1N N +1 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
|
2 |
♠AK2
♥Q974
♦A542
♣74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 1.00 0.00 3N S +2 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
170 0.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
|
3 |
♠QJT3
♥974
♦QT7
♣932
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.00 0.00 4♠ W 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
690 0.00 1.00 3N W +3 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
|
4 |
♠KQT2
♥52
♦862
♣KQJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 2/1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
620 0.00 1.00 4♥ W 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
|
5 |
♠Q86
♥T74
♦QT9
♣QT76
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 1.00 0.00 3N W -1 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
120 0.00 1.00 2N W 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
|
6 |
♠87
♥J85
♦Q42
♣AKQ42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 0.50 0.50 3N S +1 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
430 0.50 0.50 3N N +1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
7 |
♠AQ742
♥Q85
♦76
♣752
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 1.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
650 0.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
8 |
♠Q98752
♥9
♦K32
♣T98
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♥ ♦1 ♥7/6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 0.50 0.50 4♠ N 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
420 0.50 0.50 4♠ N 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
9 |
♠Q6
♥Q765
♦A8765
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
620 0.00 1.00 4♥ W 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
10 |
♠JT9875
♥85
♦J93
♣AJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 3N E -1 3-MATAYA-RICE vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
660 0.00 1.00 3N E +2 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
11 |
♠T
♥T98
♦KJ8532
♣932
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
80 1.00 0.00 1♠ S 4-Copsey-Bloedorn vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
150 0.00 1.00 4♣ W +1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
|
12 |
♠K643
♥763
♦4
♣J7432
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦0 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 7♦ 5♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
190 1.00 0.00 3♦ W +4 4-Copsey-Bloedorn vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
1020 0.00 1.00 6N E +1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
|
13 |
♠94
♥K6
♦9873
♣AKJT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 1.00 0.00 2♣ N 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
PASS 0.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Copsey-Bloedorn vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
|
14 |
♠54
♥KT9
♦AKJ84
♣AK2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 1.00 0.00 3N N +1 4-Copsey-Bloedorn vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
50 0.00 1.00 3N N -1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
|
15 |
♠K72
♥T62
♦975
♣QJ43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦6/5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 1.00 0.00 4♠ S -3 4-Copsey-Bloedorn vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
420 0.00 1.00 4♥ W 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
|
16 |
♠QT8
♥94
♦J974
♣KQ76
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 0.50 0.50 2♥ W 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
110 0.50 0.50 1♥ W +1 5-HAUSER-Vinje vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
17 |
♠932
♥A976
♦AJ765
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 1.00 0.00 2♣ W 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
120 0.00 1.00 2N E 5-HAUSER-Vinje vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
18 |
♠JT962
♥9
♦J953
♣863
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 5-HAUSER-Vinje vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
50 0.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
|
19 |
♠A5
♥A9743
♦AKQ7
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.00 0.00 4♥ N 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
150 0.00 1.00 2♦ N +3 5-HAUSER-Vinje vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
20 |
♠75
♥AQ43
♦KQJ632
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 1.00 0.00 4♠ S 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 4-Copsey-Bloedorn
150 0.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 5-HAUSER-Vinje vs 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER
|
21 |
♠J6
♥A75
♦JT986
♣K94
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 0.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
50 0.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
|
22 |
♠KJT752
♥62
♦J96
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 1.00 0.00 4♥* W -3 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
200 0.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
|
23 |
♠A864
♥AJ6
♦AKJT
♣K8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ 5NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 0.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
650 0.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
|
24 |
♠9
♥QJ2
♦KJ6
♣QJT865
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 1.00 0.00 2N W +1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
400 0.00 1.00 3N W 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
|
25 |
♠Q965
♥QT862
♦95
♣K6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 1.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 2-CAUCUTT-ROEDIGER vs 3-MATAYA-RICE
120 0.00 1.00 1N S +1 6-CHAMBERLAIN-HOFFMAN vs 5-HAUSER-Vinje
|