1 |
♠AQ876
♥T9432
♦Q6
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥2 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 3♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
170 2.00 1.00 3♣ W +3 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
400 1.00 2.00 5♣ W 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
460 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
|
2 |
♠2
♥A873
♦KQT8652
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ E 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
450 1.00 2.00 5♠ W 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
|
3 |
♠J9542
♥AKQ2
♦A86
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
450 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ N 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ N 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
|
4 |
♠Q4
♥4
♦AJT982
♣JT52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.83 0.17 3♠ W -2 8-Blume-Ekhoff vs 4-Cook-Bulau
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ W 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
200 0.17 2.83 3♥ S -2 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
|
5 |
♠T8764
♥K4
♦8765
♣Q6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣5 ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7/6♦ 7♠ 7NT ♣5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 2.17 0.83 3♠ W +3 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
230 2.17 0.83 3♠ W +3 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
420 0.17 2.83 4♠ W 8-Blume-Ekhoff vs 4-Cook-Bulau
|
6 |
♠J952
♥2
♦KT6
♣JT754
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.83 0.17 2♠ E 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
120 1.50 1.50 1N E +1 8-Blume-Ekhoff vs 4-Cook-Bulau
630 0.17 2.83 3N E +1 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
|
7 |
♠AJT6
♥A987
♦96
♣KJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.17 0.83 4♥ S +1 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 4-Cook-Bulau
650 2.17 0.83 4♥ S +1 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
200 0.17 2.83 3♥ S +2 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
|
8 |
♠AKQ7
♥J96
♦32
♣AK87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
520 2.83 0.17 3N N +4 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
420 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 4-Cook-Bulau
400 0.17 2.83 3N N 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
|
9 |
♠J95
♥AJT32
♦J
♣AQ63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.83 0.17 4♠ S 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
50 0.17 2.83 4♠ S -1 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 4-Cook-Bulau
|
10 |
♠K
♥AT7532
♦AKQ
♣Q32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.83 0.17 1♥ N +2 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
110 1.50 1.50 1♥ N +1 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 4-Cook-Bulau
140 0.17 2.83 3♠ E 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
|
11 |
♠QT974
♥JT
♦A7
♣QT83
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.83 0.17 3♥ W -1 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
PASS 0.83 2.17 Pass Out 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 4-Cook-Bulau
PASS 0.83 2.17 Pass Out 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
|
12 |
♠J5
♥JT7
♦KJ2
♣96543
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥0 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 6♥ 6♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
230 2.17 0.83 3♠ W +3 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 4-Cook-Bulau
230 2.17 0.83 2♠ W +4 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
480 0.17 2.83 4♠ W +2 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
|
13 |
♠T863
♥J2
♦AQ97
♣T72
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 3N W -1 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
100 2.50 0.50 2♦ E -1 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 4-Cook-Bulau vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
600 0.00 3.00 3N W 8-Blume-Ekhoff vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
|
14 |
♠A
♥A94
♦QJT62
♣AJ72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 4-Cook-Bulau vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ S 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -2 8-Blume-Ekhoff vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
|
15 |
♠AKJ76
♥T9764
♦J6
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣4 ♦5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ S 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4-Cook-Bulau vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 8-Blume-Ekhoff vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
|
16 |
♠AT654
♥6
♦964
♣KQJ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4/5 ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ N +2 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 4-Cook-Bulau
90 1.00 2.00 1N S 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
110 0.00 3.00 2♦ W +1 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
|
17 |
♠76
♥942
♦KT76
♣K742
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4/5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 3N N 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
150 2.00 1.00 1N S +2 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
120 1.00 2.00 1N S +1 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 4-Cook-Bulau
|
18 |
♠K9842
♥K74
♦8
♣QT97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1/2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
50 2.00 1.00 2N E -1 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 4-Cook-Bulau
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ E 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ W 9-Foss-ANDERSON vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
|
19 |
♠A32
♥A532
♦AKJ8
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 4-Cook-Bulau vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ E 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
130 0.00 3.00 3♣ W +1 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
|
20 |
♠T986
♥T5
♦AK5
♣9743
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
100 2.00 1.00 1♠ W -1 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
90 1.00 2.00 2♣ E 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ E 4-Cook-Bulau vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
|
21 |
♠AT6
♥AJT
♦Q654
♣T43
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -4 4-Cook-Bulau vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 2-Grigoleit-Joyce
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ E -2 6-KELLY-KELLY vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 5-Nelson-McConnell
|
22 |
♠KQJ98
♥AQ83
♦Q2
♣A7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 4-Cook-Bulau vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
|
23 |
♠J86
♥AJ52
♦KJT7
♣J6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +3 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 4-Cook-Bulau vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ W 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
|
24 |
♠KQJT64
♥J8
♦Q6
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3/4♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ N 7-Mataitis-Marquart vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 4-Cook-Bulau vs 3-Jacobus-Bartels
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ N +1 2-Grigoleit-Joyce vs 8-Blume-Ekhoff
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ N +1 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 6-KELLY-KELLY
|
25 |
♠AQ984
♥T
♦K984
♣Q42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.83 0.17 3N N -2 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 4-Cook-Bulau
110 0.83 2.17 2♥ W 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
110 0.83 2.17 2♣ W +1 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
|
26 |
♠K762
♥Q72
♦K873
♣T3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.83 0.17 3N W -2 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
70 1.50 1.50 1♦ E 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
120 0.17 2.83 2N W 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 4-Cook-Bulau
|
27 |
♠AT763
♥-
♦T743
♣9875
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.83 0.17 4♥ E -1 5-Nelson-McConnell vs 4-Cook-Bulau
430 1.50 1.50 3N E +1 3-Jacobus-Bartels vs 9-Foss-ANDERSON
590 0.17 2.83 4♥* E 10-Schwinghammer-Schwinghammer vs 7-Mataitis-Marquart
|