1 |
♠Q9
♥K98
♦KQJ9
♣J632
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 0.00 1N N -1 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
150 0.00 2.00 1N E +2 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
|
2 |
♠A864
♥AK62
♦A7
♣J73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 6♥ 3/4♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ S 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
100 0.50 1.50 6♥ S -1 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
100 0.50 1.50 6♥ S -1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
|
3 |
♠A952
♥J543
♦94
♣Q54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
500 2.00 0.00 5♣* E -2 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
200 0.50 1.50 3♥ N +2 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
200 0.50 1.50 5♣* E -1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
|
4 |
♠KT765
♥-
♦AQ52
♣AK93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♦6/7 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
990 2.00 0.00 4♠* S +1 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ N 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
|
5 |
♠942
♥T74
♦T52
♣AKJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ E 4-Ryder-Stacey vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
150 1.00 1.00 4♦ E +1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
|
6 |
♠876
♥K5
♦A53
♣AQ642
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.50 0.50 3♠ S +2 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
200 1.50 0.50 3♠ S +2 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 4-Ryder-Stacey vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
|
7 |
♠J73
♥A
♦952
♣KQ6542
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 4-Ryder-Stacey vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
|
8 |
♠QJT97
♥K53
♦43
♣J82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ W 4-Ryder-Stacey vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ E 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
|
9 |
♠KQT2
♥4
♦K843
♣A852
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 1.50 0.50 3N S 4-Ryder-Stacey vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
400 1.50 0.50 3N S 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
|
10 |
♠AT6
♥J95
♦AKQT83
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 1.50 0.50 3♦ N 4-Ryder-Stacey vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
110 1.50 0.50 2♦ N +1 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
|
11 |
♠J75
♥KJ9
♦K5
♣KQT74
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♠ 4/2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 1.50 0.50 3N S +2 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
460 1.50 0.50 3N N +2 4-Ryder-Stacey vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
|
12 |
♠9643
♥K62
♦AT643
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
90 1.00 1.00 1N W 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
300 0.00 2.00 2N S -3 4-Ryder-Stacey vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
|
13 |
♠AQJ4
♥J6
♦J85
♣J982
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
200 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
|
14 |
♠Q85
♥KT653
♦T5
♣J62
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ W 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
400 0.50 1.50 3N E 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
|
15 |
♠7
♥A92
♦KT64
♣J9842
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣4 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ E 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
450 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
|
16 |
♠Q7
♥-
♦AKJT853
♣Q642
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3/4♣ 1♥ 1/3♠ 3NT ♦4/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 1.50 0.50 4♦* N -1 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
100 1.50 0.50 4♦ N -2 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
150 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -3 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
|
17 |
♠KQ4
♥KT94
♦A
♣KQ972
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
200 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +3 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
200 0.00 2.00 5♠ S -4 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
|
18 |
♠6532
♥AK72
♦AKQ6
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.00 0.00 3♦ S +3 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
150 1.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ E -2 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
|
19 |
♠A87
♥752
♦KQ64
♣986
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♥ 2NT ♦5 ♥7/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 2.00 0.00 2N E 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
150 0.50 1.50 1N E +2 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
150 0.50 1.50 1N E +2 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
|
20 |
♠T7632
♥863
♦652
♣K5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♦ ♣6/7 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS vs 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON
100 0.00 2.00 2N E -1 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
|
21 |
♠AJT8
♥J
♦J86
♣A9863
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -4 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
100 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
|
22 |
♠KJ742
♥K62
♦KQ85
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ N 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
|
23 |
♠853
♥J63
♦K2
♣KQ763
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 2.00 0.00 1N W -2 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
90 1.00 1.00 1N N 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
300 0.00 2.00 3♣ S -3 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
|
24 |
♠AQ9752
♥A3
♦T6
♣QT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
110 1.00 1.00 3♣ E 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET vs 4-Ryder-Stacey
460 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH vs 2-HEYER-BYMERS
|
25 |
♠92
♥KQ76
♦T973
♣652
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 1.50 0.50 4♠ W +2 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
680 1.50 0.50 4♠ E +2 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
1430 0.00 2.00 6♠ W 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
|
26 |
♠A98
♥5
♦975
♣AK9654
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 1.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
200 1.50 0.50 2♥ E -2 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
|
27 |
♠T63
♥A752
♦K7
♣9763
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ E 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
|
28 |
♠T4
♥52
♦AQJ642
♣Q93
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♣7/6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 1-WIERZENSKI-ANDERSON vs 3-GREENBERG-BOUQUET
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 8-WITZ-WITZ vs 7-Mahoney-BERTSCH
90 0.00 2.00 1N E 2-HEYER-BYMERS vs 6-CAUCUTT-BURROWS
|