1 |
♠94
♥K9752
♦A62
♣Q93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠7652
♥T
♦KT874
♣K76
|
♠JT
♥AQJ43
♦Q95
♣AJT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 1N N 1 5-Harry-Bemis vs 6-Rosen-Erickson
50 1.50 1.50 1N W -1 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 1-Bean-Bean
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 2-Krause-Sweeney vs 4-Wiegand-Smoluch
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -4 3-Gaffney-Sorenson vs 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey
|
2 |
♠T98543
♥KT65
♦Q
♣97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠762
♥4
♦AT94
♣KQJT6
|
♠AQJ
♥872
♦K63
♣A852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣1 ♦4 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S 3 2-Krause-Sweeney vs 4-Wiegand-Smoluch
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 1-Bean-Bean
150 1.00 2.00 4♣ E 5 5-Harry-Bemis vs 6-Rosen-Erickson
170 0.00 3.00 3♣ E 6 3-Gaffney-Sorenson vs 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey
|
3 |
♠T76
♥A4
♦AQJT9
♣A73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJ32
♥98
♦K84
♣T862
|
♠85
♥KJT5
♦752
♣KJ54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5/4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2N N 3 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 2-Krause-Sweeney
50 2.00 1.00 3N N -1 3-Gaffney-Sorenson vs 5-Harry-Bemis
100 1.00 2.00 2♣ S -2 6-Rosen-Erickson vs 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey
150 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -3 4-Wiegand-Smoluch vs 1-Bean-Bean
|
4 |
♠AQJ
♥Q987532
♦A93
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠92
♥J
♦QJ874
♣T8632
|
♠K64
♥AK64
♦K65
♣AQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ N 3 3-Gaffney-Sorenson vs 5-Harry-Bemis
100 1.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 6-Rosen-Erickson vs 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 4-Wiegand-Smoluch vs 1-Bean-Bean
750 0.00 3.00 3N* E 3 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 2-Krause-Sweeney
|
5 |
♠65
♥AQ5
♦AQ842
♣A96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ7
♥JT32
♦K6
♣J873
|
♠KJ9432
♥K64
♦JT9
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 4-Wiegand-Smoluch vs 6-Rosen-Erickson
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 5-Harry-Bemis vs 2-Krause-Sweeney
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey vs 1-Bean-Bean
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ E 3 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 3-Gaffney-Sorenson
|
6 |
♠KJT9
♥Q5
♦6
♣AT9543
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q2
♥986
♦KT72
♣K876
|
♠854
♥AKJ73
♦A83
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 5-Harry-Bemis vs 2-Krause-Sweeney
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 3 4-Wiegand-Smoluch vs 6-Rosen-Erickson
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ E 3 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey vs 1-Bean-Bean
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ E 3 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 3-Gaffney-Sorenson
|
7 |
♠75
♥AKQT5
♦86
♣A754
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K984
♥63
♦AQ73
♣K96
|
♠AQT62
♥98742
♦K
♣82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 1-Bean-Bean vs 2-Krause-Sweeney
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 5-Harry-Bemis vs 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ E 3 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 4-Wiegand-Smoluch
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ E 4 6-Rosen-Erickson vs 3-Gaffney-Sorenson
|
8 |
♠76
♥KT852
♦K97
♣K75
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ3
♥Q3
♦AJ63
♣A864
|
♠T82
♥94
♦QT842
♣Q32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣7/6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
250 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -5 1-Bean-Bean vs 2-Krause-Sweeney
110 2.00 1.00 1♠ S 2 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 4-Wiegand-Smoluch
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 5-Harry-Bemis vs 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey
50 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 6-Rosen-Erickson vs 3-Gaffney-Sorenson
|
9 |
♠654
♥AQ5
♦63
♣AKJT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AK98
♥T73
♦T852
♣95
|
♠QJT72
♥K42
♦K7
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 3♣ N 5 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 5-Harry-Bemis
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ N 4 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey vs 4-Wiegand-Smoluch
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ N 3 6-Rosen-Erickson vs 1-Bean-Bean
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ E 2 2-Krause-Sweeney vs 3-Gaffney-Sorenson
|
10 |
♠Q96
♥J7
♦Q532
♣KJ76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K8
♥AKQ6
♦J764
♣Q95
|
♠T75432
♥T843
♦A8
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥3/4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey vs 4-Wiegand-Smoluch
100 1.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 5-Harry-Bemis
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 6-Rosen-Erickson vs 1-Bean-Bean
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 4 2-Krause-Sweeney vs 3-Gaffney-Sorenson
|
11 |
♠84
♥J9873
♦J92
♣KT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KT3
♥2
♦K874
♣A8764
|
♠QJ2
♥AKT4
♦T653
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ ♣5/4 ♦4 ♥7/6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 3N E -3 1-Bean-Bean vs 5-Harry-Bemis
80 2.00 1.00 1♠ S 1 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey vs 2-Krause-Sweeney
50 0.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 3-Gaffney-Sorenson vs 4-Wiegand-Smoluch
50 0.50 2.50 3♦ W -1 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 6-Rosen-Erickson
|
12 |
♠KT6
♥42
♦J3
♣AKQ764
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J2
♥QJT5
♦Q87654
♣5
|
♠Q7543
♥987
♦AKT
♣JT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 4♦* W -2 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey vs 2-Krause-Sweeney
130 1.00 2.00 4♣ N 4 3-Gaffney-Sorenson vs 4-Wiegand-Smoluch
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ N 4 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 6-Rosen-Erickson
130 1.00 2.00 2♣ N 4 1-Bean-Bean vs 5-Harry-Bemis
|
13 |
♠J863
♥62
♦J7
♣JT976
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT74
♥AQJ43
♦43
♣82
|
♠A5
♥K87
♦K962
♣Q543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2/1NT ♣5 ♦6/5 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 2.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 4-Wiegand-Smoluch vs 5-Harry-Bemis
100 2.50 0.50 2♥ W -1 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey
110 1.00 2.00 1♥ W 2 1-Bean-Bean vs 3-Gaffney-Sorenson
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 2-Krause-Sweeney vs 6-Rosen-Erickson
|
14 |
♠JT97
♥AT965
♦J
♣Q83
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠Q652
♥Q72
♦Q95
♣KT5
|
♠4
♥843
♦T8732
♣AJ94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.00 0.00 3N S 4 1-Bean-Bean vs 3-Gaffney-Sorenson
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S 4 2-Krause-Sweeney vs 6-Rosen-Erickson
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ S 4 8-Boyd-Cunningham vs 7-Falls-Baker-Harvey
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ S 3 4-Wiegand-Smoluch vs 5-Harry-Bemis
|