1 |
♠J95
♥73
♦AJ862
♣AK6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ7
♥Q98
♦K94
♣Q752
|
♠T4
♥6542
♦75
♣JT984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.88 0.13 3N N 5 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 3-Potts-Mowe
450 2.63 1.38 4♠ S 5 10-Whatley-Velling vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
420 0.75 3.25 4♠ S 4 6-Lee-Lewis vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
420 0.75 3.25 4♠ S 4 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
|
2 |
♠A532
♥6543
♦T
♣AKJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J74
♥T872
♦J2
♣9874
|
♠T96
♥K9
♦KQ876
♣652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 3.25 0.75 4♠ N 6 10-Whatley-Velling vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
680 3.25 0.75 4♥ N 6 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 3-Potts-Mowe
660 1.38 2.63 3N S 5 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
230 0.13 3.88 2♠ N 6 6-Lee-Lewis vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
|
3 |
♠AK85
♥T843
♦T932
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠973
♥K9652
♦74
♣QJ4
|
♠QJ6
♥QJ7
♦QJ
♣KT853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.25 0.75 3N S 4 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 3-Potts-Mowe
430 3.25 0.75 3N N 4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
400 1.38 2.63 3N S 3 6-Lee-Lewis vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
150 0.13 3.88 3♦ S 5 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
|
4 |
♠-
♥J865
♦A9
♣QJ98754
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ9642
♥T7
♦J42
♣A2
|
♠T85
♥KQ42
♦K65
♣T63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/1♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 3.88 0.13 3N S 5 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 4-Ries-Ries
600 2.63 1.38 3N S 3 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 6-Lee-Lewis
100 1.38 2.63 3♠ W -1 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
100 0.13 3.88 3♣ N -1 1-Carr-Bethel vs 3-Potts-Mowe
|
5 |
♠J765
♥KQ94
♦-
♣AKQT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ42
♥8
♦Q953
♣8765
|
♠T9
♥AJT632
♦T74
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/3♦ 2/1♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3/4 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.25 0.75 3N N 4 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
630 3.25 0.75 3N N 4 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 4-Ries-Ries
600 1.38 2.63 3N S 3 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 6-Lee-Lewis
100 0.13 3.88 3N S -1 1-Carr-Bethel vs 3-Potts-Mowe
|
6 |
♠74
♥JT952
♦AJ942
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQT85
♥76
♦KQT8
♣K3
|
♠A96
♥Q83
♦73
♣QT864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1/-NT ♦4 ♥4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.88 0.13 4♠ W -2 1-Carr-Bethel vs 3-Potts-Mowe
100 2.63 1.38 2♠ W -1 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 6-Lee-Lewis
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ W 2 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 4-Ries-Ries
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ W 3 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
|
7 |
♠A543
♥9
♦AJ963
♣AT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T72
♥QJT875
♦T2
♣64
|
♠KQ86
♥42
♦KQ87
♣QJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2/1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.88 0.13 3♥ W -3 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
200 2.63 1.38 2N E -2 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 4-Ries-Ries
100 0.75 3.25 3N S -1 10-Whatley-Velling vs 1-Carr-Bethel
100 0.75 3.25 3♣ S -1 6-Lee-Lewis vs 3-Potts-Mowe
|
8 |
♠K962
♥865
♦AKQT
♣T5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ3
♥J42
♦8654
♣976
|
♠QT875
♥KT3
♦J9
♣J32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 5♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
460 3.88 0.13 3N S 5 6-Lee-Lewis vs 3-Potts-Mowe
430 2.63 1.38 3N N 4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 1-Carr-Bethel
140 1.38 2.63 3♥ S 3 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 4-Ries-Ries
50 0.13 3.88 4♥ S -1 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
|
9 |
♠K54
♥K94
♦AQ3
♣QT64
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠973
♥QJT86
♦942
♣52
|
♠QJ8
♥A752
♦K7
♣K983
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4/3♠ 2/1NT ♥6/5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.88 0.13 3N N 3 10-Whatley-Velling vs 1-Carr-Bethel
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 4-Ries-Ries
50 2.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 6-Lee-Lewis vs 3-Potts-Mowe
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
|
10 |
♠9
♥A432
♦AQJ
♣AJT74
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQT8542
♥K75
♦874
♣-
|
♠KJ7
♥QT
♦T65
♣Q9653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/3♦ 3/4♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.88 0.13 4♠ W -1 10-Whatley-Velling vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ W 3 1-Carr-Bethel vs 6-Lee-Lewis
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ W 3 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 4-Ries-Ries
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ W 3 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
|
11 |
♠QJ53
♥4
♦K63
♣AJT76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T87
♥JT2
♦AQ52
♣K42
|
♠4
♥KQ85
♦JT94
♣Q953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
480 3.88 0.13 4♠ S 6 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 4-Ries-Ries
420 2.63 1.38 4♠ S 4 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
170 1.38 2.63 1♠ S 4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
50 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -1 1-Carr-Bethel vs 6-Lee-Lewis
|
12 |
♠JT976
♥J
♦A6542
♣53
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠84
♥K432
♦KT987
♣86
|
♠Q52
♥QT6
♦QJ
♣AKQJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1/-NT ♣5 ♠4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.88 0.13 2♠ N 3 10-Whatley-Velling vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
100 2.63 1.38 3♠ N -1 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
120 1.38 2.63 1N E 2 1-Carr-Bethel vs 6-Lee-Lewis
150 0.13 3.88 1N E 3 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 4-Ries-Ries
|
13 |
♠J5
♥K652
♦KJ5
♣8642
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ9762
♥7
♦T876
♣53
|
♠T8
♥AQJT843
♦A
♣AK7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦6 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -4 1-Carr-Bethel vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ E 5 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
200 2.50 1.50 1♥ E 5 4-Ries-Ries vs 6-Lee-Lewis
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ E 4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 3-Potts-Mowe
|
14 |
♠J87
♥QJ54
♦962
♣Q72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠T432
♥A9
♦QT85
♣KT9
|
♠KQ96
♥873
♦KJ3
♣865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 4.00 0.00 1N S 2 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
90 3.00 1.00 1N S 1 4-Ries-Ries vs 6-Lee-Lewis
50 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 1-Carr-Bethel vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
50 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 10-Whatley-Velling vs 3-Potts-Mowe
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
|
15 |
♠A987
♥AJT3
♦976
♣63
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJT5
♥9
♦KT
♣AJT987
|
♠K64
♥K52
♦J854
♣Q42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 4.00 0.00 1N E -1 4-Ries-Ries vs 6-Lee-Lewis
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 1-Carr-Bethel vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ W 3 10-Whatley-Velling vs 3-Potts-Mowe
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W 4 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
|
16 |
♠987
♥Q9432
♦J752
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQT6
♥J865
♦Q43
♣AK
|
♠KJ2
♥AT
♦AT98
♣J754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 4.00 0.00 6N W -4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 4-Ries-Ries
300 3.00 1.00 6N W -3 3-Potts-Mowe vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
600 2.00 2.00 3N W 3 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 1-Carr-Bethel
660 0.50 3.50 5N E 5 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
660 0.50 3.50 3N W 5 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 6-Lee-Lewis
|
17 |
♠8754
♥AT94
♦K65
♣98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KQT9
♥KJ3
♦T42
♣AT6
|
♠62
♥Q762
♦AQ7
♣5432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 4.00 0.00 1N S 1 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
50 2.00 2.00 2N S -1 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 6-Lee-Lewis
50 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 10-Whatley-Velling vs 4-Ries-Ries
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ S -1 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 1-Carr-Bethel
100 0.00 4.00 1♥ N -2 3-Potts-Mowe vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
|
18 |
♠QJ983
♥T9
♦765
♣J52
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠75
♥A8652
♦84
♣KQ87
|
♠KT2
♥KQ4
♦KQ32
♣A43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ E 4 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 6-Lee-Lewis
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ E 4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 4-Ries-Ries
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 1-Carr-Bethel
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 3-Potts-Mowe vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
|
19 |
♠J52
♥T
♦AKQ3
♣A9653
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT76
♥AK
♦J97
♣KQ74
|
♠9
♥Q98643
♦T854
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2/4♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠3 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.50 0.50 3N W -3 1-Carr-Bethel vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
300 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -3 6-Lee-Lewis vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ S 5 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 4-Ries-Ries
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 10-Whatley-Velling vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W 2 3-Potts-Mowe vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
|
20 |
♠J
♥T864
♦J4
♣AT9643
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q2
♥A
♦AQT975
♣J875
|
♠K986
♥KQ52
♦62
♣KQ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ ♣4/5 ♦3 ♥4/7 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2/1♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.50 0.50 3♠ E -3 1-Carr-Bethel vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
300 3.50 0.50 4♦ W -3 10-Whatley-Velling vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
180 2.00 2.00 2N E 4 6-Lee-Lewis vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
600 1.00 3.00 3N W 3 3-Potts-Mowe vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
630 0.00 4.00 3N E 4 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 4-Ries-Ries
|
21 |
♠Q83
♥KJ532
♦7
♣KT85
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT942
♥7
♦AK532
♣J9
|
♠K765
♥Q84
♦98
♣Q763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N 4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge
500 3.00 1.00 4♠* W -3 9-Holcomb-Hunt vs 4-Ries-Ries
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 3-Potts-Mowe vs 2-Aberg-Fiorini
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 3 1-Carr-Bethel vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
200 0.00 4.00 5♥ N -2 6-Lee-Lewis vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
|
22 |
♠KQJ93
♥-
♦KT632
♣A74
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠4
♥KT96432
♦75
♣Q86
|
♠52
♥AQJ75
♦AJ94
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 6♠ ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 4.00 0.00 5♠* S 5 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ S 6 4-Ries-Ries vs 3-Potts-Mowe
450 2.00 2.00 5♠ S 5 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ S 4 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 1-Carr-Bethel
50 0.00 4.00 6♠ S -1 10-Whatley-Velling vs 6-Lee-Lewis
|
23 |
♠53
♥97542
♦Q94
♣JT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ2
♥Q6
♦AJ762
♣A95
|
♠KJT84
♥-
♦K83
♣K8642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 4-Ries-Ries vs 3-Potts-Mowe
130 3.00 1.00 4♦ W 4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 6-Lee-Lewis
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ W 5 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 5 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ E 5 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 1-Carr-Bethel
|
24 |
♠QJ98
♥K843
♦K5
♣875
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KT6532
♥AQ975
♦Q
♣K
|
♠A4
♥JT
♦T762
♣AQJ43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -4 10-Whatley-Velling vs 6-Lee-Lewis
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 2-Aberg-Fiorini vs 8-Eriksen-Eshelman
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 4-Ries-Ries vs 3-Potts-Mowe
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 1-Carr-Bethel
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W 4 7-Silk-Dunnam vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
|
25 |
♠A7
♥5
♦Q9763
♣AK653
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠54
♥KQJ2
♦JT52
♣T94
|
♠KJT963
♥64
♦84
♣Q82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4/3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 3.88 0.13 3N N 4 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 4-Ries-Ries
400 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 3-Potts-Mowe vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
400 2.00 2.00 3N N 3 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 1-Carr-Bethel
50 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 10-Whatley-Velling vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
|
26 |
♠962
♥T
♦Q65
♣QJ9632
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT84
♥KQJ762
♦72
♣T
|
♠KJ
♥A85
♦KJT8
♣K874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4/3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.88 0.13 3♥ E 3 3-Potts-Mowe vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 4-Ries-Ries
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 1-Carr-Bethel
650 0.13 3.88 4♥ E 5 10-Whatley-Velling vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
|
27 |
♠J8532
♥Q5
♦AT52
♣76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠T7
♥86
♦KJ84
♣KQJ93
|
♠KQ9
♥JT432
♦Q63
♣85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.25 0.75 3♠ N 3 3-Potts-Mowe vs 9-Holcomb-Hunt
140 3.25 0.75 2♠ S 3 5-Van Dam-MacGeorge vs 4-Ries-Ries
50 1.38 2.63 3♠ N -1 8-Eriksen-Eshelman vs 1-Carr-Bethel
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 10-Whatley-Velling vs 7-Silk-Dunnam
|