1 |
♠4
♥AQT3
♦QJ875
♣T82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠653
♥9842
♦32
♣AJ97
|
♠KQ9872
♥KJ5
♦AKT6
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1/-♦ ♦7/6 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ E 4 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
590 0.00 3.00 4♠* E 4 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
|
2 |
♠AJ8
♥AQT
♦QJT96
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠543
♥K74
♦A83
♣T953
|
♠Q62
♥J8652
♦K
♣J874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 1.50 1.50 3N N 5 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
660 1.50 1.50 3N N 5 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
660 1.50 1.50 3N N 5 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
660 1.50 1.50 3N N 5 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
|
3 |
♠T4
♥6432
♦AQ98
♣AT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A952
♥97
♦KT53
♣Q63
|
♠Q873
♥KJT8
♦J742
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ N 3 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
130 1.50 1.50 2♣ S 4 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
130 1.50 1.50 2♣ S 4 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
120 0.00 3.00 1N N 2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
|
4 |
♠J76
♥QT74
♦K632
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠52
♥93
♦AQJT9
♣AJ87
|
♠K9843
♥KJ85
♦75
♣Q5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ W 2 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
100 2.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
120 1.00 2.00 2N W 2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
500 0.00 3.00 2♣* S -2 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
|
5 |
♠Q8643
♥K96
♦K83
♣A9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K952
♥T85
♦AQJ2
♣Q8
|
♠JT7
♥AJ74
♦4
♣KT642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
90 1.50 1.50 1N S 1 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
90 1.50 1.50 2♦ N 2 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
300 0.00 3.00 2♠ N -3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
|
6 |
♠AT95
♥AKT3
♦6
♣J872
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J4
♥J92
♦AJT3
♣Q543
|
♠Q3
♥Q854
♦KQ72
♣AT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 5 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 4 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
100 0.50 2.50 1N W -1 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
100 0.50 2.50 1N W -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
|
7 |
♠9864
♥5
♦Q7653
♣Q65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠7
♥KT43
♦KJ84
♣AJ83
|
♠QJ
♥AJ76
♦T92
♣T972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 2NT ♣4/5 ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ S 5 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
|
8 |
♠94
♥K52
♦K872
♣AT84
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ2
♥AJ9
♦AJT9
♣K63
|
♠AQT76
♥T643
♦4
♣QJ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ E 4 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
430 1.50 1.50 3N W 4 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
430 1.50 1.50 3N E 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 5 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
|
9 |
♠KT63
♥KJ8
♦K3
♣K763
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠52
♥AT54
♦T542
♣QJ2
|
♠AJ98
♥9732
♦J86
♣54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3/2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
430 2.50 0.50 3N N 4 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
430 2.50 0.50 3N N 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
400 0.50 2.50 3N S 3 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
400 0.50 2.50 3N S 3 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
|
10 |
♠QT9762
♥J
♦AT85
♣74
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠K
♥QT7543
♦7
♣KQ983
|
♠J8
♥AK982
♦KJ4
♣A62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.50 0.50 5♥ E 5 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
650 2.50 0.50 4♥ E 5 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
680 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 6 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
680 0.50 2.50 4♥ E 6 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
|
11 |
♠KJ752
♥8
♦Q7
♣AKQ52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠83
♥Q73
♦943
♣T8764
|
♠AQ64
♥AJT652
♦K
♣J9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5/4♦ 3♠ 5/4NT ♥5/4 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦1 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 5♦ S 6 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
300 2.00 1.00 4♥* E -2 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
50 1.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
100 0.00 3.00 5♦ S -2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
|
12 |
♠Q932
♥932
♦QJT97
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ84
♥864
♦63
♣AQT5
|
♠T765
♥JT7
♦AK842
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ ♦7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 3♣ S 3 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
200 1.50 1.50 1♥ S -2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
200 1.50 1.50 4♣ S -2 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
300 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -3 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
|
13 |
♠-
♥Q7
♦AKJT65
♣98743
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT962
♥9432
♦94
♣65
|
♠A8754
♥865
♦Q7
♣AJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 2.00 1.00 3N S 5 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
660 2.00 1.00 3N S 5 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
660 2.00 1.00 3N S 5 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
620 0.00 3.00 5♦ N 6 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
|
14 |
♠AKJT95
♥QJ5
♦9
♣832
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠6432
♥T9632
♦K5
♣KQ
|
♠8
♥K
♦AQJ8732
♣T976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 5♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 2.50 0.50 3♠ N 4 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
170 2.50 0.50 3♠ N 4 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ N 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
|
15 |
♠AJT8753
♥JT2
♦97
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠-
♥KQ5
♦AQJ6532
♣Q83
|
♠9
♥A96
♦K84
♣JT6542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ N -1 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
200 2.00 1.00 5♠ N -2 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
400 1.00 2.00 5♦ W 5 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
500 0.00 3.00 6♠* N -2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
|
16 |
♠KQ5
♥J8653
♦T9
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T6
♥942
♦J862
♣Q874
|
♠J74
♥A
♦AKQ75
♣KT53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 5-Romeo-Hesson vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ N 4 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
|
17 |
♠AQJT63
♥T43
♦96
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠9852
♥KQ5
♦AK872
♣Q
|
♠K4
♥AJ962
♦T3
♣9853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♦ W -4 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ W -2 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
100 0.50 2.50 2♠ N -2 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
100 0.50 2.50 2♠ N -2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
|
18 |
♠J652
♥AK972
♦-
♣A632
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T983
♥T64
♦QT852
♣9
|
♠AK4
♥Q8
♦K743
♣KJ87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 3♥ 1/-♠ 1NT ♦5 ♠7/6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 3♦* W -2 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N 3 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
100 1.00 2.00 2♦ E -2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
50 0.00 3.00 1N E -1 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
|
19 |
♠92
♥AKJ62
♦T84
♣T74
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QT65
♥T97
♦AJ97
♣K9
|
♠AKJ873
♥Q4
♦K32
♣A3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ E 5 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 6 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 6 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ E 6 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
|
20 |
♠KQ
♥KQJT6
♦K87
♣A86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠9754
♥9
♦A63
♣95432
|
♠T632
♥42
♦952
♣KQT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
1430 2.50 0.50 6♥ N 6 6-Slemmons-Slemmons vs 1-Burbidge-Evanoff
1430 2.50 0.50 6♥ N 6 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
680 0.50 2.50 5♥ N 6 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
680 0.50 2.50 4♥ N 6 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
|
21 |
♠J6
♥KT876
♦A93
♣QT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQT9742
♥Q3
♦87
♣86
|
♠8
♥AJ
♦KJT6542
♣K42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
50 1.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ E 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
|
22 |
♠62
♥A743
♦A9
♣K6532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠95
♥Q652
♦7643
♣Q97
|
♠AJT8
♥T98
♦KJ5
♣AJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2/1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ S 2 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ S 2 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
50 0.00 3.00 1N N -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
|
23 |
♠AJ765
♥875
♦Q
♣KQ32
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠832
♥QJ
♦K973
♣AJT7
|
♠QT9
♥AK9
♦JT8654
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2/3NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 2.50 0.50 2♣ N 3 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
110 2.50 0.50 2♣ N 3 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ E 3 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
110 0.50 2.50 3♦ E 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
|
24 |
♠8
♥KQ64
♦AKT32
♣Q54
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠A542
♥J2
♦Q874
♣KT3
|
♠T93
♥T853
♦J5
♣A962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2N N 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
90 2.00 1.00 2♦ N 2 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 3-Finkelstein-Gousie vs 4-Limaye-Limaye
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 7-Breeze-Murdoch vs 2-Hooks-Snapinn
|
25 |
♠Q93
♥J9742
♦-
♣AKJT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠86542
♥8
♦AJ84
♣854
|
♠AJ
♥QT5
♦K763
♣Q962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 6♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥1 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N 5 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ N 4 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
|
26 |
♠4
♥AK
♦AQ65
♣QT9852
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ5
♥QJ94
♦742
♣K64
|
♠K98632
♥8653
♦8
♣A7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 3.00 0.00 4♣ N 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
100 2.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ E 4 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ E 4 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
|
27 |
♠KQ73
♥T9
♦T52
♣J752
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AT4
♥K7654
♦A
♣T843
|
♠J6
♥J32
♦KQJ873
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 1/-♥ ♣5 ♥7/6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 4 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ S 3 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W 3 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
|
28 |
♠AT43
♥T76
♦KQ9
♣J75
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K62
♥QJ2
♦J542
♣Q86
|
♠QJ5
♥AK983
♦A8
♣KT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 1N E 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 7-Breeze-Murdoch
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ E 4 4-Limaye-Limaye vs 5-Romeo-Hesson
400 1.00 2.00 3N E 3 1-Burbidge-Evanoff vs 3-Finkelstein-Gousie
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 2-Hooks-Snapinn vs 6-Slemmons-Slemmons
|