1 |
♠KQ86
♥T95
♦K85
♣Q52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A32
♥AQ62
♦QJT9
♣K4
|
♠JT974
♥743
♦3
♣AJ63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 2♦ 2/3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 3-McCune-Walker vs 7-Binney-Hesson
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ W 3 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 6-Handley-Handley
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ W 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 1-Windus-Romeo
|
2 |
♠865
♥JT65
♦T86
♣J32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠732
♥7
♦AKQJ42
♣KT6
|
♠AT
♥AQ82
♦975
♣AQ85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥5 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 6♦ 2♥ 2♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 2.00 1.00 3N E 6 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
490 2.00 1.00 3N E 6 3-McCune-Walker vs 7-Binney-Hesson
490 2.00 1.00 3N E 6 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 6-Handley-Handley
990 0.00 3.00 6N E 6 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 1-Windus-Romeo
|
3 |
♠J853
♥QT72
♦Q86
♣73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K2
♥A6543
♦53
♣AQT2
|
♠QT9
♥9
♦JT974
♣K854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ S 2 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 3-McCune-Walker vs 7-Binney-Hesson
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 6-Handley-Handley
110 0.00 3.00 2♣ W 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 1-Windus-Romeo
|
4 |
♠A8
♥A764
♦T42
♣A863
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q943
♥KT82
♦AK96
♣K
|
♠752
♥J3
♦853
♣J9742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1/2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 3.00 0.00 2N S 2 3-McCune-Walker vs 7-Binney-Hesson
100 2.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 1-Windus-Romeo
70 1.00 2.00 1♦ W 1 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 6-Handley-Handley
100 0.00 3.00 2N S -1 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
|
5 |
♠AK8
♥J
♦K984
♣AKJT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J763
♥T
♦JT7
♣Q6432
|
♠9542
♥Q985
♦32
♣985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 7♦ 5♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦0 ♥2/1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
2140 3.00 0.00 7♦ N 7 3-McCune-Walker vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
1390 2.00 1.00 6♦ N 7 6-Handley-Handley vs 7-Binney-Hesson
100 0.50 2.50 6N N -1 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 1-Windus-Romeo
100 0.50 2.50 6♥ S -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
|
6 |
♠QJ532
♥5
♦5
♣AQ9832
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A94
♥T984
♦K8432
♣5
|
♠T6
♥J72
♦AQJT9
♣KJT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ N 3 3-McCune-Walker vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
130 2.00 1.00 2♣ N 4 6-Handley-Handley vs 7-Binney-Hesson
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
100 0.50 2.50 5♣ N -2 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 1-Windus-Romeo
|
7 |
♠62
♥T654
♦AQT
♣A982
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K7
♥AKQ2
♦KJ72
♣K73
|
♠AQJT85
♥98
♦63
♣QJT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 4/5♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ W 5 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 1-Windus-Romeo
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ E 5 3-McCune-Walker vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
660 1.00 2.00 3N W 5 6-Handley-Handley vs 7-Binney-Hesson
680 0.00 3.00 4♠ E 6 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
|
8 |
♠T72
♥9653
♦AT
♣AK96
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ9854
♥KJ7
♦53
♣J5
|
♠6
♥QT82
♦KQJ86
♣Q32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: -/1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 2♠* W -2 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
150 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -3 3-McCune-Walker vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
150 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -3 6-Handley-Handley vs 7-Binney-Hesson
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ W -2 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 1-Windus-Romeo
|
9 |
♠95
♥A8
♦K94
♣KQ8543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT87
♥KT65
♦AT8
♣T7
|
♠J4
♥Q7432
♦J762
♣J9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 3N N 3 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S 3 7-Binney-Hesson vs 1-Windus-Romeo
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 6-Handley-Handley
50 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 3-McCune-Walker
|
10 |
♠KJ98
♥Q964
♦J64
♣Q7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠32
♥K7
♦AK75
♣AKJT6
|
♠QT4
♥853
♦T982
♣954
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 3.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ W 3 7-Binney-Hesson vs 1-Windus-Romeo
150 1.00 2.00 1♣ W 5 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 3-McCune-Walker
300 0.00 3.00 1N S -3 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 6-Handley-Handley
|
11 |
♠KQT53
♥AJ86
♦9
♣873
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J974
♥T742
♦6
♣AQ52
|
♠A6
♥K9
♦AKJ852
♣T96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦5/4 ♥6 ♠7/6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 3.00 0.00 2♦ E 3 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 6-Handley-Handley
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E 4 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
400 0.50 2.50 3N W 3 7-Binney-Hesson vs 1-Windus-Romeo
400 0.50 2.50 3N E 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 3-McCune-Walker
|
12 |
♠QT83
♥KJ95
♦AQJ95
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A65
♥87
♦83
♣AJ9643
|
♠7
♥AQT6432
♦2
♣KQT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ ♣0 ♥3/2 NT3 |
EW: 5/4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦1 ♠1/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
850 3.00 0.00 5♠* S 5 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 6-Handley-Handley
300 2.00 1.00 6♣* W -2 7-Binney-Hesson vs 1-Windus-Romeo
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ E 4 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ E 5 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 3-McCune-Walker
|
13 |
♠J97643
♥KT6
♦AK6
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKQT8
♥543
♦754
♣T9
|
♠2
♥AQJ72
♦T92
♣AKJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4/3 ♠5/4 NT5/3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -4 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 7-Binney-Hesson
300 2.00 1.00 4♥ E -3 6-Handley-Handley vs 3-McCune-Walker
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ E 4 1-Windus-Romeo vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
|
14 |
♠8
♥KJT6432
♦JT
♣T72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠QT64
♥A
♦AKQ96
♣AQ9
|
♠A9
♥985
♦853
♣KJ543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥6 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 7/6♣ 6♦ 1/-♥ 3♠ 6NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 3.00 0.00 5♣ E 6 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
490 1.50 1.50 3N W 6 1-Windus-Romeo vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
490 1.50 1.50 3N W 6 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 7-Binney-Hesson
920 0.00 3.00 6♣ E 6 6-Handley-Handley vs 3-McCune-Walker
|
15 |
♠AKQ4
♥T5
♦Q62
♣T764
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠8762
♥A984
♦K93
♣82
|
♠JT9
♥K72
♦T874
♣QJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
630 3.00 0.00 3N S 4 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 7-Binney-Hesson
600 2.00 1.00 3N S 3 1-Windus-Romeo vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
100 1.00 2.00 3N S -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 6-Handley-Handley vs 3-McCune-Walker
|
16 |
♠AJT764
♥7
♦T
♣QJ543
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K
♥A6542
♦Q72
♣AK97
|
♠853
♥KJ8
♦J8654
♣T2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4/5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 1-Windus-Romeo vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
420 2.50 0.50 4♠ N 4 6-Handley-Handley vs 3-McCune-Walker
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ N 5 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz vs 7-Binney-Hesson
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ N 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
|
17 |
♠AKJ8
♥QT2
♦K97
♣763
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T5
♥A94
♦J632
♣QJ52
|
♠Q7632
♥K53
♦Q8
♣K94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
180 3.00 0.00 1N N 4 6-Handley-Handley vs 1-Windus-Romeo
150 2.00 1.00 1N N 3 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 3-McCune-Walker
120 1.00 2.00 1N N 2 7-Binney-Hesson vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
160 0.00 3.00 1♠* E 1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
|
18 |
♠KJ72
♥Q3
♦QT5
♣K632
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T9843
♥A8765
♦AK
♣9
|
♠6
♥KJ4
♦9764
♣AQJ75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5/4 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 3.00 0.00 2N E 3 7-Binney-Hesson vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
400 2.00 1.00 3N E 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W 4 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 3-McCune-Walker
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ W 5 6-Handley-Handley vs 1-Windus-Romeo
|
19 |
♠K8653
♥A74
♦873
♣K7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T9
♥KQ986
♦KT9
♣Q95
|
♠72
♥T
♦AQ62
♣AJT843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
PASS 2.50 0.50 Pass Out 6-Handley-Handley vs 1-Windus-Romeo
PASS 2.50 0.50 Pass Out 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 7-Binney-Hesson vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
500 0.00 3.00 4♠* N -3 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 3-McCune-Walker
|
20 |
♠KJ6
♥AQT32
♦K5
♣875
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠A2
♥5
♦AQJT762
♣T93
|
♠QT98743
♥8
♦43
♣642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 5NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
800 3.00 0.00 5♦* W -3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
650 1.00 2.00 5♥ N 5 6-Handley-Handley vs 1-Windus-Romeo
650 1.00 2.00 5♥ N 5 7-Binney-Hesson vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
650 1.00 2.00 4♥ N 5 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 3-McCune-Walker
|
21 |
♠AQ942
♥K54
♦8742
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠86
♥JT983
♦KJ9
♣T92
|
♠T5
♥Q72
♦Q
♣KQJ8643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
650 1.50 1.50 5♠ N 5 3-McCune-Walker vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
650 1.50 1.50 5♠ N 5 7-Binney-Hesson vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 1-Windus-Romeo vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ N 5 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 6-Handley-Handley
|
22 |
♠K
♥Q
♦QJ98763
♣QT73
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A76542
♥J2
♦4
♣K642
|
♠QT8
♥KT73
♦KT5
♣A95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 4♦ N -1 1-Windus-Romeo vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ W 3 3-McCune-Walker vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ W 3 7-Binney-Hesson vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
1100 0.00 3.00 5♥* S -5 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 6-Handley-Handley
|
23 |
♠AJ
♥J9842
♦A954
♣K4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠K4
♥KQ7
♦K8632
♣AJ2
|
♠972
♥6
♦JT7
♣Q87653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ -/1NT ♣5 ♦6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
300 3.00 0.00 3♣ W -3 1-Windus-Romeo vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ N 5 7-Binney-Hesson vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ W 3 3-McCune-Walker vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
780 0.00 3.00 1N* W 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 6-Handley-Handley
|
24 |
♠T2
♥8753
♦T87
♣AJ74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AQJ943
♥A2
♦QJ654
♣-
|
♠-
♥KQJT6
♦A92
♣K8532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2/1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 1-Windus-Romeo vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
400 2.00 1.00 5♦ W 5 7-Binney-Hesson vs 2-Chinn-Lewis
430 1.00 2.00 3N E 4 3-McCune-Walker vs 4-Emmerson-Vazeux
920 0.00 3.00 6♦ W 6 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 6-Handley-Handley
|
25 |
♠A52
♥Q94
♦A982
♣Q52
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ986
♥T6532
♦54
♣T
|
♠T7
♥J87
♦JT73
♣K963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2/1 ♦2/1 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT2/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
490 3.00 0.00 4N N 6 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 6-Handley-Handley
400 2.00 1.00 3N N 3 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 7-Binney-Hesson
50 1.00 2.00 6N N -1 1-Windus-Romeo vs 3-McCune-Walker
100 0.00 3.00 6N N -2 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
|
26 |
♠KT62
♥863
♦A8
♣K987
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ9
♥AT5
♦KT54
♣QJ6
|
♠54
♥QJ9742
♦Q962
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ W 3 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 1-Windus-Romeo vs 3-McCune-Walker
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 6-Handley-Handley
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ W 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 7-Binney-Hesson
|
27 |
♠5
♥T632
♦K75
♣A9763
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠QT986
♥A95
♦J3
♣K42
|
♠AK
♥QJ84
♦T986
♣JT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2/1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 2.50 0.50 2♦ S -1 1-Windus-Romeo vs 3-McCune-Walker
50 2.50 0.50 2♦ S -1 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 7-Binney-Hesson
100 0.50 2.50 2♦ S -2 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 6-Handley-Handley
100 0.50 2.50 2♦ S -2 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
|
28 |
♠QJ2
♥Q43
♦952
♣7543
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KT9643
♥KJT
♦63
♣62
|
♠A
♥A8
♦AJT874
♣AKJT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT2/1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
400 3.00 0.00 3N E 3 1-Windus-Romeo vs 3-McCune-Walker
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ W 4 8-Custer-Sawyer vs 7-Binney-Hesson
460 1.00 2.00 3N E 5 2-Chinn-Lewis vs 6-Handley-Handley
480 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 6 4-Emmerson-Vazeux vs 5-Miller-Kasperkiewicz
|