1 |
♠AT7
♥874
♦AQ9
♣AT72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ4
♥Q95
♦K542
♣Q98
|
♠962
♥AT63
♦J73
♣J43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 6.93 0.07 2♠ S 4 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
140 5.79 1.21 1♠ S 3 7-Holt-Dalton vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
120 4.07 2.93 1N N 2 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 9-Casson-Nickel
120 4.07 2.93 1N N 2 6-Munday-Munday vs 2-Ewan-Poole
100 2.36 4.64 2♥ E -2 3-Craig-Johnson vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
90 0.64 6.36 1N N 1 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
90 0.64 6.36 1N N 1 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
|
2 |
♠T92
♥A87
♦K965
♣JT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠3
♥QT2
♦AQ874
♣AK85
|
♠A8
♥KJ54
♦J32
♣Q432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4/5♥ ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
670 6.93 0.07 2♠* S 2 3-Craig-Johnson vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
50 4.64 2.36 4♥ E -1 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 9-Casson-Nickel
50 4.64 2.36 4♥ E -1 7-Holt-Dalton vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
50 4.64 2.36 5♦ W -1 6-Munday-Munday vs 2-Ewan-Poole
100 2.36 4.64 3♠ S -1 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
130 0.64 6.36 4♦ W 4 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
130 0.64 6.36 3♦ W 4 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
|
3 |
♠KQT2
♥QT8
♦74
♣Q643
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠94
♥AKJ3
♦KJ8
♣JT87
|
♠87653
♥964
♦AT3
♣95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 6.36 0.64 1N S 3 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
150 6.36 0.64 1N S 3 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 9-Casson-Nickel
120 4.64 2.36 2N N 2 3-Craig-Johnson vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
110 3.50 3.50 1♠ N 2 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
100 2.36 4.64 2♣ W -1 6-Munday-Munday vs 2-Ewan-Poole
90 1.21 5.79 1N S 1 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
100 0.07 6.93 3♠ N -2 7-Holt-Dalton vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
|
4 |
♠Q8
♥AK43
♦A9
♣AQJ65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K9654
♥T85
♦KJ6
♣92
|
♠T73
♥QJ72
♦8752
♣T7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2/3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2/3 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
660 6.93 0.07 4N S 5 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 9-Casson-Nickel
630 4.07 2.93 4N S 4 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 6-Gordon-Eger
630 4.07 2.93 3N S 4 6-Munday-Munday vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
630 4.07 2.93 3N S 4 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
630 4.07 2.93 3N N 4 7-Holt-Dalton vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
170 1.21 5.79 2♥ N 4 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
200 0.07 6.93 6N S -2 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 2-Ewan-Poole
|
5 |
♠AQ874
♥AJT3
♦962
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J63
♥Q5
♦KJ54
♣AK64
|
♠KT2
♥K942
♦A8
♣QJ53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2/3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.36 0.64 3N E -1 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
50 6.36 0.64 4♣ W -1 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 9-Casson-Nickel
90 4.07 2.93 2♣ W 2 7-Holt-Dalton vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
90 4.07 2.93 2♣ E 2 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
110 2.36 4.64 2♣ W 3 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 6-Gordon-Eger
400 0.64 6.36 3N W 3 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 2-Ewan-Poole
400 0.64 6.36 3N E 3 6-Munday-Munday vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
|
6 |
♠A8
♥T9743
♦85
♣KT86
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQT753
♥J
♦AT4
♣AJ5
|
♠4
♥A865
♦Q963
♣9742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ -/1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.36 0.64 3♠ W -2 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
200 6.36 0.64 2♠ W -2 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 9-Casson-Nickel
100 4.64 2.36 2♠ W -1 6-Munday-Munday vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
100 3.50 3.50 2N S -2 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 6-Gordon-Eger
110 1.79 5.21 2♠ W 2 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 2-Ewan-Poole
110 1.79 5.21 1♠ W 2 7-Holt-Dalton vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
140 0.07 6.93 2♠ W 3 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
|
7 |
♠K5
♥8632
♦AJT65
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ43
♥54
♦Q8
♣QT952
|
♠T9876
♥KQT
♦K97
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.36 0.64 4♠ E -2 7-Holt-Dalton vs 2-Ewan-Poole
200 6.36 0.64 3♥ N 5 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
140 4.64 2.36 3♥ N 3 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 6-Gordon-Eger
130 3.50 3.50 2♦ N 4 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
110 2.36 4.64 2♥ N 2 6-Munday-Munday vs 9-Casson-Nickel
100 1.21 5.79 2♥ N -1 3-Craig-Johnson vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
110 0.07 6.93 2♠ E 2 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
|
8 |
♠AQ43
♥98
♦85
♣J9642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J
♥K653
♦KQT9643
♣5
|
♠7652
♥T7
♦A7
♣AQT83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6/5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.93 0.07 4♦ W -1 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
50 5.21 1.79 3♥ S -1 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 6-Gordon-Eger
50 5.21 1.79 2♥ S -1 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
100 3.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
130 2.36 4.64 4♦ W 4 3-Craig-Johnson vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
150 0.64 6.36 4♦ W 5 7-Holt-Dalton vs 2-Ewan-Poole
150 0.64 6.36 3♦ W 5 6-Munday-Munday vs 9-Casson-Nickel
|
9 |
♠AKJ83
♥AKQ7
♦83
♣Q9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠652
♥T65
♦T954
♣763
|
♠74
♥J984
♦QJ
♣KJT85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 5♦ 6/5♥ 7/6♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
980 6.93 0.07 6♠ N 6 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
480 5.21 1.79 5♠ N 6 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
480 5.21 1.79 4♠ N 6 3-Craig-Johnson vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
450 2.93 4.07 4♠ N 5 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
450 2.93 4.07 4♠ N 5 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 6-Gordon-Eger
50 0.64 6.36 6♠ N -1 6-Munday-Munday vs 9-Casson-Nickel
50 0.64 6.36 6♠ N -1 7-Holt-Dalton vs 2-Ewan-Poole
|
10 |
♠K84
♥9873
♦AK76
♣Q8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT97
♥AJ
♦JT2
♣J764
|
♠Q62
♥KQ652
♦5
♣AT93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 5.79 1.21 4♦ N 4 3-Craig-Johnson vs 2-Ewan-Poole
130 5.79 1.21 3♦ N 4 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
130 5.79 1.21 2♦ N 4 6-Munday-Munday vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
110 2.93 4.07 3♦ S 3 7-Holt-Dalton vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
110 2.93 4.07 3♦ N 3 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 9-Casson-Nickel
110 1.21 5.79 2♥ E 2 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
140 0.07 6.93 2♥ E 3 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
|
11 |
♠T2
♥A9
♦QT5
♣AJT762
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQJ854
♥J
♦A9863
♣Q
|
♠A3
♥K87632
♦J
♣9854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
100 6.93 0.07 4♠ W -2 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
50 5.79 1.21 3♠ W -1 7-Holt-Dalton vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
140 4.64 2.36 2♠ W 3 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
170 3.50 3.50 3♠ W 4 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
200 1.79 5.21 2♠ W 5 3-Craig-Johnson vs 2-Ewan-Poole
200 1.79 5.21 2♠ W 5 6-Munday-Munday vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
420 0.07 6.93 4♠ W 4 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 9-Casson-Nickel
|
12 |
♠QJT64
♥82
♦A95
♣642
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠98
♥AQ954
♦QT6
♣A87
|
♠K75
♥JT6
♦J8432
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4/5♠ 1/2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4/2 ♠2 NT4/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.36 0.64 2♠ S 5 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
200 6.36 0.64 2♠ S 5 7-Holt-Dalton vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
150 4.64 2.36 3♣ S 5 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
130 3.50 3.50 3♣ S 4 3-Craig-Johnson vs 2-Ewan-Poole
50 2.36 4.64 3♥ W -1 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
100 1.21 5.79 3♠ N -1 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 9-Casson-Nickel
140 0.07 6.93 3♥ W 3 6-Munday-Munday vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
|
13 |
♠JT
♥653
♦AT73
♣Q653
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQ762
♥AJ2
♦64
♣A72
|
♠95
♥QT87
♦QJ82
♣T98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♦ -/1♠ 1NT ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠6/7 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
120 6.93 0.07 1N N 2 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
100 5.21 1.79 2♠ W -1 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
100 5.21 1.79 1♠ W -1 7-Holt-Dalton vs 9-Casson-Nickel
80 2.93 4.07 1♠ W 1 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 6-Gordon-Eger
80 2.93 4.07 1♠ W 1 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
200 0.64 6.36 1N N -2 3-Craig-Johnson vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
200 0.64 6.36 2♣ S -2 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
|
14 |
♠AK974
♥AQ9
♦KQJ54
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠J
♥KJ653
♦A32
♣AK76
|
♠T8532
♥2
♦86
♣QT854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣3 |
EW: 3♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.79 1.21 4♦ N 5 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
150 5.79 1.21 3♦ N 5 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 6-Gordon-Eger
150 5.79 1.21 3♦ N 5 7-Holt-Dalton vs 9-Casson-Nickel
100 3.50 3.50 4♣ W -2 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
80 2.36 4.64 1♠ N 1 3-Craig-Johnson vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
100 1.21 5.79 2♠ N -2 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
150 0.07 6.93 4♠ N -3 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
|
15 |
♠A7
♥JT532
♦752
♣942
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T32
♥K6
♦AQT83
♣AJ6
|
♠K965
♥AQ87
♦KJ4
♣73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 6.93 0.07 2♦ W 6 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
400 5.79 1.21 3N W 3 3-Craig-Johnson vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
430 4.07 2.93 3N W 4 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
430 4.07 2.93 3N W 4 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
460 1.21 5.79 3N W 5 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 6-Gordon-Eger
460 1.21 5.79 3N W 5 7-Holt-Dalton vs 9-Casson-Nickel
460 1.21 5.79 3N E 5 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
|
16 |
♠J6
♥QT9
♦AK7
♣AKJ75
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQT8742
♥532
♦Q
♣42
|
♠A3
♥KJ76
♦J9842
♣98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ ♥7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
130 6.36 0.64 4♣ S 4 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
130 6.36 0.64 3♣ N 4 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
50 4.64 2.36 5♣ S -1 6-Munday-Munday vs 6-Gordon-Eger
100 3.50 3.50 5♣ N -2 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 2-Ewan-Poole
140 2.36 4.64 3♠ W 3 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
170 1.21 5.79 3♠ E 4 3-Craig-Johnson vs 9-Casson-Nickel
730 0.07 6.93 3♠* W 3 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
|
17 |
♠4
♥KT764
♦KJ4
♣9653
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AT73
♥983
♦T9
♣AKQ8
|
♠852
♥AJ52
♦AQ6
♣J72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 5.79 1.21 4♥ E -1 6-Munday-Munday vs 6-Gordon-Eger
50 5.79 1.21 2♦ E -1 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
50 5.79 1.21 3♣ W -1 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
130 3.50 3.50 3♣ E 4 3-Craig-Johnson vs 9-Casson-Nickel
140 2.36 4.64 2♥ E 3 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 2-Ewan-Poole
150 1.21 5.79 1N E 3 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
400 0.07 6.93 3N E 3 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
|
18 |
♠JT4
♥A963
♦T8
♣9643
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ987
♥KJ2
♦AJ4
♣75
|
♠K652
♥T74
♦Q752
♣A8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3/4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
50 6.93 0.07 4♠ W -1 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
170 4.64 2.36 3♠ W 4 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
170 4.64 2.36 3♠ E 4 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
170 4.64 2.36 2♠ W 4 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 2-Ewan-Poole
200 2.36 4.64 2♠ W 5 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
420 1.21 5.79 4♠ W 4 3-Craig-Johnson vs 9-Casson-Nickel
480 0.07 6.93 4♠ W 6 6-Munday-Munday vs 6-Gordon-Eger
|
19 |
♠97543
♥KT
♦3
♣KJ532
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKT
♥J853
♦852
♣QT4
|
♠62
♥A76
♦Q976
♣A876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1/2♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
110 6.50 0.50 2♠ S 2 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
110 6.50 0.50 2♠ N 2 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 2-Ewan-Poole
90 4.50 2.50 1N S 1 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
90 4.50 2.50 1N S 1 6-Munday-Munday vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
50 3.00 4.00 2♦ S -1 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 6-Gordon-Eger
100 1.00 6.00 3N S -2 7-Holt-Dalton vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
100 1.00 6.00 2♠ N -2 3-Craig-Johnson vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
100 1.00 6.00 2♠ N -2 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
|
20 |
♠AQ4
♥8
♦KQT5
♣96532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠T963
♥QJ95
♦9843
♣T
|
♠5
♥KT7643
♦J
♣AKJ84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥3 |
EW: 4♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
620 6.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
620 6.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 6-Munday-Munday vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
620 6.00 1.00 4♠ S 4 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 2-Ewan-Poole
200 3.00 4.00 3♠ S 5 3-Craig-Johnson vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
200 3.00 4.00 5♥* E -1 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 6-Gordon-Eger
200 3.00 4.00 5♥* E -1 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
170 1.00 6.00 3♠ S 4 7-Holt-Dalton vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
140 0.00 7.00 3♥ E 3 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
|
21 |
♠J32
♥Q843
♦A7
♣QJ43
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT9764
♥T97
♦3
♣KT5
|
♠-
♥AKJ65
♦KQT852
♣A6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3/2 ♥1 ♠6/5 NT5/4 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 7.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
100 5.50 1.50 4♥ E -2 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 2-Ewan-Poole
100 5.50 1.50 3♥ E -2 6-Munday-Munday vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
50 4.00 3.00 3N E -1 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
110 3.00 4.00 1♥ E 2 3-Craig-Johnson vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
170 2.00 5.00 2♥ E 4 7-Holt-Dalton vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
420 0.50 6.50 4♥ E 4 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
420 0.50 6.50 4♥ E 4 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 6-Gordon-Eger
|
22 |
♠T
♥A864
♦K73
♣AQT52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠754
♥KQJ
♦A985
♣743
|
♠AJ962
♥T753
♦J4
♣J9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
150 5.79 1.21 2N S 3 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 9-Casson-Nickel
150 5.79 1.21 1N N 3 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 2-Ewan-Poole
150 5.79 1.21 3♣ N 5 7-Holt-Dalton vs 6-Gordon-Eger
130 3.50 3.50 2♣ N 4 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
120 2.36 4.64 1N N 2 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
110 1.21 5.79 2♣ N 3 3-Craig-Johnson vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
100 0.07 6.93 2♠ E -1 6-Munday-Munday vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
|
23 |
♠AKT6
♥J865
♦K63
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q9
♥K9
♦AT54
♣KQJ86
|
♠75
♥QT2
♦QJ98
♣AT75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.93 0.07 3N E -2 6-Munday-Munday vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
140 5.79 1.21 3♠ S 3 7-Holt-Dalton vs 6-Gordon-Eger
100 4.64 2.36 3♠ N -1 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
110 2.36 4.64 3♣ W 3 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
110 2.36 4.64 3♣ W 3 3-Craig-Johnson vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
110 2.36 4.64 3♣ W 3 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 2-Ewan-Poole
120 0.07 6.93 2N W 2 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 9-Casson-Nickel
|
24 |
♠AJ954
♥QT9742
♦8
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K32
♥A6
♦J954
♣AK73
|
♠QT76
♥K3
♦Q732
♣JT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
450 6.93 0.07 4♥ N 5 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 2-Ewan-Poole
200 5.79 1.21 2♥ N 5 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 9-Casson-Nickel
150 4.64 2.36 3♠ E -3 7-Holt-Dalton vs 6-Gordon-Eger
140 3.50 3.50 2♥ S 3 1-Sadler-Holmgren vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
90 2.36 4.64 2♦ W 2 6-Munday-Munday vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
120 1.21 5.79 2N W 2 3-Craig-Johnson vs 7-Hartin-Donohue
400 0.07 6.93 3N W 3 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
|
25 |
♠76
♥J9832
♦62
♣A973
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKJT54
♥T7
♦A
♣K642
|
♠Q92
♥654
♦KJT7
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
200 6.36 0.64 2♠ W 5 6-Munday-Munday vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
200 6.36 0.64 2♠ W 5 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 9-Casson-Nickel
230 4.64 2.36 2♠ W 6 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
620 2.36 4.64 4♠ W 4 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
620 2.36 4.64 4♠ W 4 3-Craig-Johnson vs 6-Gordon-Eger
620 2.36 4.64 4♠ W 4 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
650 0.07 6.93 4♠ W 5 7-Holt-Dalton vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
|
26 |
♠8732
♥J873
♦AT43
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠54
♥QT52
♦J7
♣AJ875
|
♠T96
♥94
♦Q65
♣KQ964
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
680 6.93 0.07 4♠ S 6 3-Craig-Johnson vs 6-Gordon-Eger
650 5.79 1.21 4♠ S 5 6-Munday-Munday vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
620 4.64 2.36 4♠ S 4 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
120 2.93 4.07 2N S 2 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
120 2.93 4.07 2N S 2 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
100 0.64 6.36 3N S -1 7-Holt-Dalton vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
100 0.64 6.36 3N S -1 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 9-Casson-Nickel
|
27 |
♠T73
♥QT7
♦86
♣J8762
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A64
♥K96
♦KQ943
♣T4
|
♠QJ9
♥A853
♦AJ752
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract
170 6.36 0.64 3♦ W 6 4-Heckler-Bocan vs 8-Bailey-Gupta
170 6.36 0.64 3♦ W 6 7-Holt-Dalton vs 5-Kruse-Kruse
400 4.64 2.36 3N W 3 6-Munday-Munday vs 3-Thompson-Thompson
430 3.50 3.50 3N W 4 3-Craig-Johnson vs 6-Gordon-Eger
920 1.21 5.79 6♦ W 6 2-Fitzgerald-Edwards vs 4-Gastelum-Wies
920 1.21 5.79 6♦ W 6 9-Lanigan-Lanigan vs 9-Casson-Nickel
920 1.21 5.79 6♦ E 6 5-Edwards-Edwards vs 1-Cargill-Joseph
|