Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!

Spring Mt. Bridge Club
6:30 pm ♦ Open Pairs
Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Photo Gallery of Winners | ACBLmerge | ACBLscore | Legacy Display

Event: Tues Eve Bridgers

Session: Tuesday Eve

Movement: MITCHELL

Date: September 15, 2015

Rating: Club Masterpoint

Section: P

Club No: 244830

Club: SPRING MOUNTAIN BRIDGE CL

Dir:

MP Limits: None/1500/300

Average: 60

Top: 5

Field strength: Mean: 1508 MP
Geomean: 832 MP
(based on 24 players)

Section P    North-South - Pairs in strats: A=6 / B=3

Group the Results

 

Section

 

 

Name

Name

Dir

No

Flt

A

B

C

Score

Result

Points

1

Jim Brier

Betty Tanenbaum

N-S

2

B

1

1

72.00

60.00

0.60

2

Barbara Mikkelson

Justine Hancock

N-S

6

A

2

65.00

54.17

0.42

3

Pat Updegraff

Phyllis Resnik

N-S

4

A

-

63.00

52.50

4

George vasilevsky

Sandra Gagnon

N-S

3

A

-

62.00

51.67

5

Rosemary Hayden

Sultan Murad

N-S

5

B

-

-

53.00

44.17

6

Charlene Mintz

Glen Hall

N-S

1

B

-

-

45.00

37.50

Section P    East-West - Pairs in strats: A=6 / B=4 / C=2

Group the Results

 

Section

 

 

Name

Name

Dir

No

Flt

A

B

C

Score

Result

Points

1

Evelyn Dahl

Rick Lepscier

E-W

5

A

1

76.50

63.75

0.60

2

Janet Fidelman

Mel Fineberg

E-W

3

B

2

1

70.50

58.75

0.42

3

Diana Cooper

Mark Suhany

E-W

2

C

-

2

-

60.00

50.00

0.22

4

Bob Lafleur

Barbara Wishnev

E-W

6

A

-

57.00

47.50

5

Nancy McCormick

Dianne Farkas

E-W

4

B

-

-

53.00

44.17

6

Barbara Geil

Robert Geil

E-W

1

C

-

-

-

43.00

35.83

12 pairs - Pairs in strats: A=12 / B=7 / C=2
Click on a result to see the recap for this pair.

You can move from board to board by using the arrow keys on your keyboard.

All Boards

Previous Board

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Next Board

1
Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

480

 

4.50

0.50

1-Mintz-Hall

1-Geil-Geil

480

 

4.50

0.50

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

450

 

1.50

3.50

5-Hayden-Murad

4-McCormick-Farkas

450

 

1.50

3.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

2-Cooper-Suhany

450

 

1.50

3.50

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

5-Dahl-Lepscier

450

 

1.50

3.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

3-Fidelman-Fineberg
2
Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

50

 

5.00

0.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

400

4.00

1.00

5-Hayden-Murad

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

450

1.50

3.50

1-Mintz-Hall

1-Geil-Geil

 

450

1.50

3.50

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

 

450

1.50

3.50

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

450

1.50

3.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

3-Fidelman-Fineberg
3
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

4.50

0.50

1-Mintz-Hall

1-Geil-Geil

200

 

4.50

0.50

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

140

 

2.50

2.50

5-Hayden-Murad

4-McCormick-Farkas

140

 

2.50

2.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

50

1.00

4.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

120

0.00

5.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

3-Fidelman-Fineberg
4
Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

600

 

5.00

0.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

170

 

4.00

1.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

130

 

3.00

2.00

1-Mintz-Hall

1-Geil-Geil

110

 

2.00

3.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

100

0.50

4.50

5-Hayden-Murad

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

100

0.50

4.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

2-Cooper-Suhany
5
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

130

 

5.00

0.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

4-McCormick-Farkas

110

 

4.00

1.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

5-Dahl-Lepscier

50

 

3.00

2.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

1-Geil-Geil

 

110

2.00

3.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

170

1.00

4.00

1-Mintz-Hall

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

 

200

0.00

5.00

5-Hayden-Murad

3-Fidelman-Fineberg
6
Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

490

 

3.50

1.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

2-Cooper-Suhany

490

 

3.50

1.50

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

5-Dahl-Lepscier

490

 

3.50

1.50

5-Hayden-Murad

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

490

 

3.50

1.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

1-Geil-Geil

420

 

1.00

4.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

4-McCormick-Farkas

400

 

0.00

5.00

1-Mintz-Hall

6-Lafleur-Wishnev
7
Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

620

 

5.00

0.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

1-Geil-Geil

170

 

3.00

2.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

2-Cooper-Suhany

170

 

3.00

2.00

5-Hayden-Murad

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

170

 

3.00

2.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

4-McCormick-Farkas

140

 

1.00

4.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

200

0.00

5.00

1-Mintz-Hall

6-Lafleur-Wishnev
8
Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

460

 

4.50

0.50

1-Mintz-Hall

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

460

 

4.50

0.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

1-Geil-Geil

430

 

2.50

2.50

5-Hayden-Murad

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

430

 

2.50

2.50

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

4-McCormick-Farkas

400

 

0.50

4.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

2-Cooper-Suhany

400

 

0.50

4.50

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

5-Dahl-Lepscier
9
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

460

 

5.00

0.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

1-Geil-Geil

430

 

3.50

1.50

5-Hayden-Murad

2-Cooper-Suhany

430

 

3.50

1.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

400

 

1.00

4.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

400

 

1.00

4.00

1-Mintz-Hall

5-Dahl-Lepscier

400

 

1.00

4.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

4-McCormick-Farkas
10
Dlr: East 
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

300

 

5.00

0.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

1-Geil-Geil

200

 

4.00

1.00

1-Mintz-Hall

5-Dahl-Lepscier

100

 

3.00

2.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

 

120

2.00

3.00

5-Hayden-Murad

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

150

1.00

4.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

 

600

0.00

5.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

4-McCormick-Farkas
11
Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

100

 

4.50

0.50

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

100

 

4.50

0.50

5-Hayden-Murad

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

140

3.00

2.00

1-Mintz-Hall

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

150

2.00

3.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

170

1.00

4.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

1-Geil-Geil

 

240

0.00

5.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

6-Lafleur-Wishnev
12
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

690

 

5.00

0.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

1-Geil-Geil

630

 

3.50

1.50

5-Hayden-Murad

2-Cooper-Suhany

630

 

3.50

1.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

620

 

2.00

3.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

4-McCormick-Farkas

500

 

1.00

4.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

 

200

0.00

5.00

1-Mintz-Hall

5-Dahl-Lepscier
13
Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

140

3.50

1.50

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

140

3.50

1.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

 

140

3.50

1.50

1-Mintz-Hall

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

140

3.50

1.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

730

1.00

4.00

5-Hayden-Murad

1-Geil-Geil

 

870

0.00

5.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

3-Fidelman-Fineberg
14
Dlr: East 
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

690

 

5.00

0.00

5-Hayden-Murad

1-Geil-Geil

450

 

3.00

2.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

450

 

3.00

2.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

450

 

3.00

2.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

5-Dahl-Lepscier

200

 

1.00

4.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

2-Cooper-Suhany

170

 

0.00

5.00

1-Mintz-Hall

4-McCormick-Farkas
15
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

650

 

5.00

0.00

1-Mintz-Hall

4-McCormick-Farkas

230

 

4.00

1.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

 

480

1.50

3.50

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

480

1.50

3.50

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

 

480

1.50

3.50

5-Hayden-Murad

1-Geil-Geil

 

480

1.50

3.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

5-Dahl-Lepscier
16
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

4.50

0.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

200

 

4.50

0.50

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

100

 

3.00

2.00

1-Mintz-Hall

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

110

1.00

4.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

110

1.00

4.00

5-Hayden-Murad

1-Geil-Geil

 

110

1.00

4.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

5-Dahl-Lepscier
17
Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

120

 

5.00

0.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

2-Cooper-Suhany

90

 

4.00

1.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

50

2.50

2.50

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

1-Geil-Geil

 

50

2.50

2.50

5-Hayden-Murad

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

 

100

0.50

4.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

100

0.50

4.50

1-Mintz-Hall

3-Fidelman-Fineberg
18
Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

 

420

4.00

1.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

1-Geil-Geil

 

420

4.00

1.00

1-Mintz-Hall

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

 

420

4.00

1.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

460

1.00

4.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

460

1.00

4.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

460

1.00

4.00

5-Hayden-Murad

6-Lafleur-Wishnev
19
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

500

 

5.00

0.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

2-Cooper-Suhany

450

 

4.00

1.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

1-Geil-Geil

420

 

3.00

2.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

4-McCormick-Farkas

140

 

1.50

3.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

5-Dahl-Lepscier

140

 

1.50

3.50

5-Hayden-Murad

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

 

100

0.00

5.00

1-Mintz-Hall

3-Fidelman-Fineberg
20
Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

200

 

5.00

0.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

2-Cooper-Suhany

100

 

4.00

1.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

1-Geil-Geil

 

600

3.00

2.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

660

1.50

3.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

660

1.50

3.50

5-Hayden-Murad

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

 

690

0.00

5.00

1-Mintz-Hall

3-Fidelman-Fineberg
21
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

690

 

5.00

0.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

4-McCormick-Farkas

650

 

4.00

1.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

630

 

2.00

3.00

5-Hayden-Murad

5-Dahl-Lepscier

630

 

2.00

3.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

630

 

2.00

3.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

1-Geil-Geil

620

 

0.00

5.00

1-Mintz-Hall

2-Cooper-Suhany
22
Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

300

 

5.00

0.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

4-McCormick-Farkas

200

 

4.00

1.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

170

 

3.00

2.00

5-Hayden-Murad

5-Dahl-Lepscier

150

 

2.00

3.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

1-Geil-Geil

140

 

1.00

4.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

100

 

0.00

5.00

1-Mintz-Hall

2-Cooper-Suhany
23
Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

690

 

5.00

0.00

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

4-McCormick-Farkas

650

 

3.50

1.50

4-Updegraff-Resnik

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

650

 

3.50

1.50

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

1-Geil-Geil

630

 

1.00

4.00

5-Hayden-Murad

5-Dahl-Lepscier

630

 

1.00

4.00

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

630

 

1.00

4.00

1-Mintz-Hall

2-Cooper-Suhany
24
Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

50

 

4.50

0.50

3-vasilevsky-Gagnon

6-Lafleur-Wishnev

50

 

4.50

0.50

2-Brier-Tanenbaum

4-McCormick-Farkas

 

400

3.00

2.00

4-Updegraff-Resnik

3-Fidelman-Fineberg

 

430

1.00

4.00

5-Hayden-Murad

5-Dahl-Lepscier

 

430

1.00

4.00

1-Mintz-Hall

2-Cooper-Suhany

 

430

1.00

4.00

6-Mikkelson-Hancock

1-Geil-Geil