Bridge Results

Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!

In Tempo Bridge Club
9:00 ♦ supervised
Thursday, November 17, 2022

Photo Gallery of Winners | ACBLmerge | ACBLscore | GIB | PBN | Hand Records | Legacy Display

Event: Supervised Bid And Play	Session: Thursday Morn	Movement: MITCHELL
Date: November 17, 2022	Rating: Club Masterpoint	Section: B
Club No: 269399	Club: In Tempo Bridge Club	Dir: Kandi Osborne
MP Limits: 200/50/10	Average: 16.5	Top: 3

Field strength: Mean: 253 MP
Geomean: 18 MP
(based on 9 players)

Both Directions Grouped - Pairs in strats: A=8 / B=7 / C=4

Split by Direction

Section

A

B

C

N-S

4

A

-

21.00

E-W

1

C

1

1

1

20.50

0.24

N-S

3

B

1

1

19.00

0.24

N-S

2

C

2

-

-

18.00

0.17

Christine Hawes

E-W

4

B

2

2

16.50

0.17

E-W

2

C

-

-

-

14.50

E-W

3

C

-

-

-

14.50

N-S

1

B

-

-

8.00

8 pairs - Pairs in strats: A=8 / B=7 / C=4
Click on a result to see the recap for this pair.

You can move from board to board by using the arrow keys on your keyboard.
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11

1

♠AQT754
♥5
♦A3
♣JT63

Dlr: North
Vul: None

♠J8
♥AQJ83
♦T5
♣Q542

♠K
♥K9764
♦Q982
♣AK8

♠9632
♥T2
♦KJ764
♣97

	11
10		15
	4

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	5	8	3	10	5
South	5	8	3	10	5
East	8	5	10	2	4
West	8	5	10	2	4

LoTT: 20 - 20 = 0
Par: 100 5H*-EW-1

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
420		3.00	0.00	4♠	N	4	♣A	-	3-McKennon-Breuer	3-Levinsky-Young
150		2.00	1.00	3N	E	-3	♥6	-2	1-Palmer-Fridley	1-Heitler-Reynolds
50		0.50	2.50	4♥	E	-1	♠2	+1	2-Hein-Klump	2-Conner-Hatch
50		0.50	2.50	5♥	E	-1	♠9	-	4-Niedner-Osborne	4-Cowie-Hawes

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

2

♠J73
♥AT2
♦K4
♣AJ852

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

♠AKQ8
♥Q984
♦QJT5
♣6

♠64
♥J765
♦A62
♣KT93

♠T952
♥K3
♦9873
♣Q74

	13
14		8
	5

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	6	4	3	4	5
South	6	4	3	4	5
East	7	9	10	9	8
West	7	9	10	8	8

LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -420 4H-EW

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
50		3.00	0.00	3♦	W	-1	♣A	+1	3-McKennon-Breuer	3-Levinsky-Young
	140	2.00	1.00	2♥	E	3	♣4	+1	4-Niedner-Osborne	4-Cowie-Hawes
	170	1.00	2.00	2♥	E	4	♠2	-	2-Hein-Klump	2-Conner-Hatch
	200	0.00	3.00	2♣	N	-2	♣2	-	1-Palmer-Fridley	1-Heitler-Reynolds

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

3

♠JT2
♥AQ542
♦74
♣QT3

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

♠K864
♥987
♦AQJ
♣AJ8

♠A9753
♥K
♦T863
♣642

♠Q
♥JT63
♦K952
♣K975

	9
15		7
	9

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	6	5	9	4	6
South	6	5	9	4	6
East	5	8	4	9	5
West	6	8	4	9	5

LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -100 4H*-NS-1

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
	50	3.00	0.00	3♥	N	-1	♦3	-1	4-Niedner-Osborne	4-Cowie-Hawes
	140	1.50	1.50	2♠	W	3	♣3	-	2-Hein-Klump	2-Conner-Hatch
	140	1.50	1.50	2♠	E	3	♥2	-	3-McKennon-Breuer	3-Levinsky-Young
	200	0.00	3.00	3♠	W	5	♣2	-2	1-Palmer-Fridley	1-Heitler-Reynolds

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

4

♠JT96
♥654
♦QT
♣KQ94

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

♠A72
♥Q9732
♦J4
♣875

♠53
♥A8
♦AK9872
♣T32

♠KQ84
♥KJT
♦653
♣AJ6

	8
7		11
	14

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	8	4	4	8	5
South	8	4	4	8	5
East	5	8	8	4	8
West	5	8	8	4	8

LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2N-EW

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
140		3.00	0.00	2♠	N	3	♥A	+1	4-Niedner-Osborne	3-Levinsky-Young
110		2.00	1.00	2♠	N	2	♦A	-	3-McKennon-Breuer	2-Conner-Hatch
	200	1.00	2.00	4♠	N	-2	♥A	-	1-Palmer-Fridley	4-Cowie-Hawes
	400	0.00	3.00	2N	S	-4	♥3	-1	2-Hein-Klump	1-Heitler-Reynolds

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

5

♠Q87
♥Q3
♦J987
♣QT87

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

♠T4
♥J542
♦AK
♣KJ632

♠A952
♥T876
♦T532
♣4

♠KJ63
♥AK9
♦Q64
♣A95

	7
12		4
	17

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	8	8	6	7	8
South	8	8	6	7	8
East	5	5	6	4	4
West	5	5	6	4	4

LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: 120 2N-NS

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
600		3.00	0.00	3N	S	3	♣3	+1	4-Niedner-Osborne	3-Levinsky-Young
120		2.00	1.00	2N	S	2	♣3	-	2-Hein-Klump	1-Heitler-Reynolds
50		1.00	2.00	2♣	W	-1	♣7	-2	3-McKennon-Breuer	2-Conner-Hatch
	100	0.00	3.00	1N	S	-1	♥2	-2	1-Palmer-Fridley	4-Cowie-Hawes

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

6

♠JT
♥Q7
♦K9652
♣AKJ9

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

♠A652
♥T962
♦A43
♣Q4

♠K43
♥A8543
♦QJT
♣52

♠Q987
♥KJ
♦87
♣T8763

	14
10		10
	6

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	9	8	5	6	6
South	9	8	5	6	6
East	4	5	8	7	6
West	4	5	8	7	6

LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: 110 3C-NS

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
110		2.50	0.50	3♣	N	3	♥3	-	2-Hein-Klump	1-Heitler-Reynolds
110		2.50	0.50	3♣	N	3	♥A	-	3-McKennon-Breuer	2-Conner-Hatch
	110	1.00	2.00	2♥	E	2	♦7	-	1-Palmer-Fridley	4-Cowie-Hawes
	140	0.00	3.00	2♥	E	3	♣6	-1	4-Niedner-Osborne	3-Levinsky-Young

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

7

♠A62
♥KJ843
♦QJ
♣A96

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

♠JT953
♥T7
♦AKT
♣JT7

♠74
♥A96
♦9532
♣K853

♠KQ8
♥Q52
♦8764
♣Q42

	15
9		7
	9

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	6	6	9	6	7
South	6	6	9	6	7
East	7	6	4	7	5
West	7	6	4	7	5

LoTT: 16 - 15 = 1
Par: 140 3H-NS

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
120		2.50	0.50	1N	N	2	♣3	+1	2-Hein-Klump	4-Cowie-Hawes
120		2.50	0.50	2N	N	2	♣3	+1	4-Niedner-Osborne	2-Conner-Hatch
	200	0.50	2.50	4♥	N	-2	♠7	-1	1-Palmer-Fridley	3-Levinsky-Young
	200	0.50	2.50	4♥	N	-2	♠4	-1	3-McKennon-Breuer	1-Heitler-Reynolds

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

8

♠Q87643
♥94
♦T82
♣65

Dlr: West
Vul: None

♠AT9
♥KJ2
♦9543
♣987

♠K5
♥AQ765
♦AKJ7
♣J4

♠J2
♥T83
♦Q6
♣AKQT32

	2
8		18
	12

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	6	1	2	6	2
South	6	1	2	6	2
East	7	11	11	7	7
West	7	11	11	7	7

LoTT: 17 - 16 = 1
Par: -450 5H-EW

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
	200	3.00	0.00	3♥	E	5	♦6	-	2-Hein-Klump	4-Cowie-Hawes
	420	2.00	1.00	4♥	E	4	♣A	+1	4-Niedner-Osborne	2-Conner-Hatch
	450	0.50	2.50	4♥	E	5	♣A	-	1-Palmer-Fridley	3-Levinsky-Young
	450	0.50	2.50	4♥	E	5	♣A	-	3-McKennon-Breuer	1-Heitler-Reynolds

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

9

♠AKT982
♥KT
♦KT86
♣Q

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

♠QJ6
♥Q863
♦J42
♣J84

♠53
♥A9742
♦3
♣96532

♠74
♥J5
♦AQ975
♣AKT7

	15
7		4
	14

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	9	12	7	12	12
South	9	12	7	12	12
East	2	0	5	0	0
West	2	0	5	0	0

LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: 990 6N-NS

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
450		2.50	0.50	4♠	N	5	♦3	-1	3-McKennon-Breuer	1-Heitler-Reynolds
450		2.50	0.50	4♠	N	5	♥A	-1	4-Niedner-Osborne	2-Conner-Hatch
170		1.00	2.00	4♦	N	6	♣2	-	2-Hein-Klump	4-Cowie-Hawes
	50	0.00	3.00	4♠	N	-1	♦3	-3	1-Palmer-Fridley	3-Levinsky-Young

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

10

♠2
♥K76
♦T6
♣AKJ9862

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

♠KJT975
♥AQJ9
♦87
♣T

♠AQ843
♥T8
♦K54
♣Q73

♠6
♥5432
♦AQJ932
♣54

	11
11		11
	7

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	10	9	7	4	6
South	10	9	7	4	6
East	3	2	5	9	5
West	3	2	5	9	5

LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: 130 4C-NS

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
100		2.00	1.00	4♠	E	-1	♣4	-	2-Hein-Klump	3-Levinsky-Young
100		2.00	1.00	4♠	W	-1	♣A	-	3-McKennon-Breuer	4-Cowie-Hawes
100		2.00	1.00	5♣	N	-1	♠3	-	4-Niedner-Osborne	1-Heitler-Reynolds
	140	0.00	3.00	3♠	E	3	♦10	-	1-Palmer-Fridley	2-Conner-Hatch

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

11

♠Q74
♥AJ73
♦852
♣T93

Dlr: South
Vul: None

♠JT52
♥QT54
♦QT
♣A76

♠K9863
♥K
♦A9764
♣KQ

♠A
♥9862
♦KJ3
♣J8542

	7
9		15
	9

Double Dummy Makes

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
North	7	4	7	3	4
South	7	4	7	3	4
East	6	9	6	10	8
West	6	9	6	10	8

LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -420 4S-EW

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	Contract			Lead	ETF	N-S	E-W
50		3.00	0.00	4♠	W	-1	♥2	+1	1-Palmer-Fridley	2-Conner-Hatch
	140	2.00	1.00	3♠	E	3	♥2	+1	2-Hein-Klump	3-Levinsky-Young
	420	0.50	2.50	4♠	E	4	♥2	-	3-McKennon-Breuer	4-Cowie-Hawes
	420	0.50	2.50	4♠	E	4	♥2	-	4-Niedner-Osborne	1-Heitler-Reynolds

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.