1 |
♠AKQJ9752
♥8
♦KT
♣85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠T43
♥QJ75
♦743
♣A96
|
♠86
♥KT2
♦Q862
♣QJ32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
8 |
8 |
8 |
11 |
11 |
South |
9 |
8 |
8 |
12 |
12 |
East |
4 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
West |
4 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
520 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3N |
S |
7 |
+1 |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
460 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
3N |
S |
5 |
-1 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
1-Hines-Jones |
450 |
|
1.00 |
2.00 |
4♠ |
N |
5 |
- |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
230 |
|
0.00 |
3.00 |
2♠ |
N |
6 |
+1 |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
2 |
♠T953
♥KJT4
♦KT
♣532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q74
♥872
♦A986
♣QJ7
|
♠J
♥AQ963
♦74
♣KT864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
4 |
8 |
4 |
9 |
6 |
South |
4 |
8 |
4 |
9 |
6 |
East |
9 |
4 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
West |
9 |
4 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
620 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
4♠ |
S |
4 |
+1 |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
140 |
|
1.50 |
1.50 |
3♠ |
S |
3 |
- |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
140 |
|
1.50 |
1.50 |
3♠ |
S |
3 |
- |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
|
100 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3♠ |
S |
-1 |
-1 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
1-Hines-Jones |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
3 |
♠Q3
♥A962
♦J65
♣AQ82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠A5
♥T83
♦742
♣KT975
|
♠KT9842
♥Q
♦AT9
♣J64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
6 |
9 |
10 |
6 |
8 |
South |
6 |
9 |
10 |
6 |
8 |
East |
6 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
West |
6 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
420 |
|
2.50 |
0.50 |
4♥ |
S |
4 |
- |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
420 |
|
2.50 |
0.50 |
4♥ |
S |
4 |
- |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
170 |
|
1.00 |
2.00 |
3♥ |
S |
4 |
- |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
|
150 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
4♥ |
S |
-3 |
-3 |
1-Hines-Jones |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
4 |
♠873
♥AT9
♦AKQ842
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KJ942
♥62
♦T53
♣Q82
|
♠T65
♥Q543
♦9
♣A6543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
7 |
11 |
11 |
7 |
11 |
South |
8 |
12 |
12 |
7 |
12 |
East |
5 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
West |
5 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
630 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3N |
S |
4 |
-2 |
1-Hines-Jones |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
210 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
2N |
S |
5 |
-1 |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
|
100 |
0.50 |
2.50 |
4♥ |
S |
-1 |
-3 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
|
100 |
0.50 |
2.50 |
4♥ |
S |
-1 |
-3 |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
5 |
♠KQ862
♥J
♦753
♣AT76
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠743
♥A942
♦A2
♣Q985
|
♠AT95
♥T865
♦KJ
♣K42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
6 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
South |
6 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
East |
6 |
4 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
West |
6 |
4 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
130 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
2♦ |
S |
4 |
+2 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
100 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
3♥ |
W |
-2 |
- |
1-Hines-Jones |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
50 |
|
1.00 |
2.00 |
2♠ |
E |
-1 |
- |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
|
100 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3♦ |
S |
-1 |
- |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
6 |
♠J4
♥KT983
♦54
♣AJ63
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠AK7653
♥Q2
♦AKJ8
♣7
|
♠QT2
♥J75
♦Q762
♣K84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
7 |
1 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
South |
7 |
1 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
East |
6 |
10 |
6 |
10 |
10 |
West |
6 |
10 |
6 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
|
170 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
3♠ |
W |
4 |
- |
1-Hines-Jones |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
|
650 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
4♠ |
W |
5 |
-1 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
|
650 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
4♠ |
W |
5 |
-1 |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
|
650 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
4♠ |
W |
5 |
-1 |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
7 |
♠AKT42
♥J
♦A2
♣QJT63
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠9653
♥A8643
♦JT
♣A4
|
♠QJ7
♥K5
♦Q943
♣9852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
South |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
East |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
West |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
150 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
2N |
S |
3 |
+1 |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
1-Hines-Jones |
140 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
2♠ |
N |
3 |
- |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
110 |
|
1.00 |
2.00 |
2♠ |
N |
2 |
-1 |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
|
200 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3N |
N |
-2 |
-1 |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
8 |
♠T762
♥A74
♦864
♣QT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠Q985
♥KT85
♦72
♣A83
|
♠AKJ3
♥93
♦KT3
♣K654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
5 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
South |
5 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
East |
7 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
West |
7 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
100 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
4♠ |
E |
-2 |
- |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
50 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
2♠ |
E |
-1 |
+1 |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
|
120 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
1N |
E |
2 |
-2 |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
|
170 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
2♠ |
E |
4 |
-2 |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
1-Hines-Jones |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
9 |
♠T764
♥A9
♦QJ53
♣J84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠A85
♥QT753
♦T9
♣QT7
|
♠QJ9
♥-
♦AK642
♣K6532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
2 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
South |
2 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
East |
11 |
10 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
West |
11 |
10 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
|
100 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
2♥ |
S |
-2 |
- |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
|
110 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
3♣ |
E |
3 |
+2 |
1-Hines-Jones |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
|
150 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
3♥ |
S |
-3 |
- |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
|
170 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
2♣ |
E |
6 |
-1 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
10 |
♠AQJ98
♥953
♦9853
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠3
♥6
♦AKQJ7
♣AKJT98
|
♠T54
♥AQJ872
♦6
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
South |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
East |
12 |
12 |
10 |
6 |
8 |
West |
12 |
12 |
10 |
6 |
8 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
100 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3N |
E |
-1 |
- |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
|
170 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
3♣ |
W |
6 |
- |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
|
620 |
0.50 |
2.50 |
5♣ |
W |
6 |
- |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
|
620 |
0.50 |
2.50 |
5♣ |
W |
6 |
- |
1-Hines-Jones |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
11 |
♠T87
♥AQ
♦AT8
♣AKT73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠93
♥KJT854
♦K92
♣42
|
♠AKQ2
♥96
♦743
♣J986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
8 |
10 |
6 |
9 |
9 |
South |
8 |
10 |
6 |
9 |
9 |
East |
4 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
West |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
250 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3♠ |
E |
-5 |
-1 |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
|
50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
1N |
N |
-1 |
-3 |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
1-Hines-Jones |
|
50 |
1.50 |
1.50 |
2♠ |
N |
-1 |
-2 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
|
100 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
3♣ |
N |
-2 |
-1 |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
12 |
♠K762
♥AKJ86
♦J7
♣T5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠J85
♥T43
♦AQ854
♣Q2
|
♠Q3
♥2
♦K962
♣AKJ943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
2 |
1 |
8 |
8 |
2 |
South |
2 |
1 |
8 |
8 |
2 |
East |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
West |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
|
100 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
3♥ |
N |
-1 |
- |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
|
130 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
3♦ |
W |
4 |
- |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
|
150 |
0.50 |
2.50 |
3♣ |
E |
5 |
-1 |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
1-Hines-Jones |
|
150 |
0.50 |
2.50 |
4♦ |
W |
5 |
-1 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
13 |
♠Q9
♥AJT982
♦962
♣Q2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠AT54
♥Q7
♦KQ84
♣JT7
|
♠76
♥43
♦JT73
♣98653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
7 |
7 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
South |
7 |
7 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
East |
5 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
West |
6 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
680 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
4♥ |
N |
6 |
+1 |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
660 |
|
2.00 |
1.00 |
3N |
S |
5 |
+1 |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
650 |
|
0.50 |
2.50 |
4♥ |
N |
5 |
- |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
1-Hines-Jones |
650 |
|
0.50 |
2.50 |
4♥ |
N |
5 |
- |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
14 |
♠A872
♥AT4
♦QJ2
♣AT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠3
♥KJ852
♦AK764
♣J8
|
♠QT4
♥976
♦853
♣Q942
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
8 |
6 |
6 |
10 |
9 |
South |
9 |
6 |
6 |
10 |
10 |
East |
4 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
West |
4 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
140 |
|
3.00 |
0.00 |
3♠ |
N |
3 |
-1 |
6-Mehan-Boetjer |
2-Ruppel-Ruppel |
|
50 |
2.00 |
1.00 |
3♠ |
N |
-1 |
-2 |
8-Fitzgibbons-Stephens |
7-Cahn-Cahn |
|
100 |
1.00 |
2.00 |
3♠ |
S |
-2 |
-3 |
3-Freyer-Amirani |
1-Hines-Jones |
|
150 |
0.00 |
3.00 |
2N |
N |
-3 |
-4 |
5-Barkovsky-Johnson |
4-Johnson-Johnson |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|