Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!


In Tempo Bridge Club
9:30-11:30 ♦ Barometer Supervised Play 0-20 MP
Friday, November 7, 2014

Photo Gallery of Winners | ACBLmerge | ACBLscore | GIB | PBN | Hand Records | New Display

Event: Supervised Bid And Play

Session: Friday Morn

Movement: MITCHELL

Date: November 7, 2014

Rating: Club Masterpoint

Top: 1

Club No: 269399

Club: In Tempo Bridge Club

Dir: Kandi Osborne

 

Name

Name

Dir

No

Flt

A

Result

Points

1

Sue Holt

Dan Rothman

N-S

1

1

83.33

0.15

2

Shirley Burns

Virgina Doyle

E-W

1

2

66.67

0.13

3

Tony Demarco

J Craig Farnham

E-W

2

2

66.67

0.13

4

Melissa Withers

Jane Butterly

N-S

2

4

16.67

5

Kim Kovach

Freya Winsberg

E-W

3

5

0.00

5 pairs


All Boards

Previous Board

1

2

3

4

5

6

Next Board

1 A975
AK9
43
QT74

Dlr: North
Vul: None

T82
732
AJ85
AK8
K643
Q65
Q2
J952
QJ
JT84
KT976
63
13
128
7

Double Dummy Makes

 

NT

North

5

6

7

6

6

South

5

6

7

5

6

East

7

6

6

7

7

West

8

6

6

7

7

LoTT: 15 - 14 = 1
Par: 1N-EW

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

ETF

N-S

E-W

120

 

1.00

0.00

1N

N

2

3

+2

1-Holt-Rothman

1-Burns-Doyle

 

50

0.00

1.00

4

N

-1

T

+2

2-Withers-Butterly

2-DeMarco-Farnham

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

2 QT63
9863
AQ
J85

Dlr: East 
Vul: N-S

A97
K75
J8653
A4
J
QT4
K9742
KQ92
K8542
AJ2
T
T763
9
1211
8

Double Dummy Makes

 

NT

North

5

2

6

7

5

South

5

2

6

7

4

East

8

11

7

6

7

West

8

11

7

6

7

LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: 5D-EW

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

ETF

N-S

E-W

100

 

1.00

0.00

2N

W

-2

6

+1

1-Holt-Rothman

1-Burns-Doyle

 

150

0.00

1.00

3

E

5

6

-

2-Withers-Butterly

2-DeMarco-Farnham

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

3 A932
Q53
842
Q43

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

J
K764
JT65
AK52
K8
AT2
AK97
T986
QT7654
J98
Q3
J7
8
1214
6

Double Dummy Makes

 

NT

North

3

3

3

6

3

South

3

3

3

6

3

East

10

10

10

7

9

West

10

10

10

7

9

LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: 4H-EW

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

ETF

N-S

E-W

200

 

1.00

0.00

4

E

-2

9

+2

2-Withers-Butterly

2-DeMarco-Farnham

100

 

0.00

1.00

2N

E

-1

6

+2

1-Holt-Rothman

1-Burns-Doyle

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

4 Q54
QT653
T2
J53

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

AK62
K87
J86
QT2
J73
J9
AKQ743
K7
T98
A42
95
A9864
5
1314
8

Double Dummy Makes

 

NT

North

6

2

6

3

3

South

6

2

6

3

3

East

7

10

7

10

10

West

7

11

7

10

10

LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: 4N-EW

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

ETF

N-S

E-W

 

130

1.00

0.00

3

E

4

6

-

1-Holt-Rothman

3-Kovach-Winsberg

 

150

0.00

1.00

4

E

5

5

-1

2-Withers-Butterly

1-Burns-Doyle

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

5 Q853
3
J987
Q874

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

T97
Q7
AKQ2
AT95
AK6
KJ92
T654
32
J42
AT8654
3
KJ6
5
1511
9

Double Dummy Makes

 

NT

North

5

3

6

5

4

South

5

3

6

6

4

East

7

10

7

7

9

West

7

9

7

7

8

LoTT: 16 - 15 = 1
Par: 3N-W

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

ETF

N-S

E-W

50

 

1.00

0.00

3N

W

-1

8

-

1-Holt-Rothman

3-Kovach-Winsberg

 

430

0.00

1.00

3N

W

4

3

-2

2-Withers-Butterly

1-Burns-Doyle

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.

6 73
976
QJT95
A52

Dlr: East 
Vul: E-W

KJ4
Q54
76
JT764
T5
A32
AK8432
Q3
AQ9862
KJT8
-
K98
7
713
13

Double Dummy Makes

 

NT

North

6

7

8

8

5

South

6

7

8

8

5

East

7

6

5

5

6

West

7

6

5

5

6

LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: 2S-NS/2H-NS

N-S

E-W

N-S

E-W

Contract

Lead

ETF

N-S

E-W

200

 

1.00

0.00

3

E

-2

8

-1

1-Holt-Rothman

3-Kovach-Winsberg

140

 

0.00

1.00

3

S

3

6

+1

2-Withers-Butterly

1-Burns-Doyle

ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.