Bridge Results

Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!

Spring Mt. Bridge Club
6:30 pm ♦ Open Pairs
Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Photo Gallery of Winners | ACBLmerge | ACBLscore | Legacy Display

Event: Tues Eve Bridgers	Session: Tuesday Eve	Movement: MITCHELL
Date: September 15, 2015	Rating: Club Masterpoint	Section: P
Club No: 244830	Club: SPRING MOUNTAIN BRIDGE CL	Dir:
MP Limits: None/1500/300	Average: 60	Top: 5

Field strength: Mean: 1508 MP
Geomean: 832 MP
(based on 24 players)

Section P North-South - Pairs in strats: A=6 / B=3

Group the Results

Section

A

B

C

Betty Tanenbaum

N-S

2

B

1

1

-

72.00

60.00

0.60

Barbara Mikkelson

Justine Hancock

N-S

6

A

2

-

-

65.00

54.17

0.42

N-S

4

A

-

-

-

63.00

52.50

George vasilevsky

N-S

3

A

-

-

-

62.00

51.67

Rosemary Hayden

N-S

5

B

-

-

-

53.00

44.17

N-S

1

B

-

-

-

45.00

37.50

Section P East-West - Pairs in strats: A=6 / B=4 / C=2

Group the Results

Section

A

B

C

E-W

5

A

1

-

-

76.50

63.75

0.60

E-W

3

B

2

1

-

70.50

58.75

0.42

E-W

2

C

-

2

-

60.00

50.00

0.22

Barbara Wishnev

E-W

6

A

-

-

-

57.00

47.50

Nancy McCormick

E-W

4

B

-

-

-

53.00

44.17

E-W

1

C

-

-

-

43.00

35.83

12 pairs - Pairs in strats: A=12 / B=7 / C=2

1

Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
480		4.50	0.50	1-Mintz-Hall	1-Geil-Geil
480		4.50	0.50	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
450		1.50	3.50	5-Hayden-Murad	4-McCormick-Farkas
450		1.50	3.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	2-Cooper-Suhany
450		1.50	3.50	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	5-Dahl-Lepscier
450		1.50	3.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	3-Fidelman-Fineberg

2

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
50		5.00	0.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	2-Cooper-Suhany
	400	4.00	1.00	5-Hayden-Murad	4-McCormick-Farkas
	450	1.50	3.50	1-Mintz-Hall	1-Geil-Geil
	450	1.50	3.50	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
	450	1.50	3.50	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	450	1.50	3.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	3-Fidelman-Fineberg

3

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
200		4.50	0.50	1-Mintz-Hall	1-Geil-Geil
200		4.50	0.50	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
140		2.50	2.50	5-Hayden-Murad	4-McCormick-Farkas
140		2.50	2.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	2-Cooper-Suhany
	50	1.00	4.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	120	0.00	5.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	3-Fidelman-Fineberg

4

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
600		5.00	0.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
170		4.00	1.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
130		3.00	2.00	1-Mintz-Hall	1-Geil-Geil
110		2.00	3.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	100	0.50	4.50	5-Hayden-Murad	4-McCormick-Farkas
	100	0.50	4.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	2-Cooper-Suhany

5

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
130		5.00	0.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	4-McCormick-Farkas
110		4.00	1.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	5-Dahl-Lepscier
50		3.00	2.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	1-Geil-Geil
	110	2.00	3.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	2-Cooper-Suhany
	170	1.00	4.00	1-Mintz-Hall	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
	200	0.00	5.00	5-Hayden-Murad	3-Fidelman-Fineberg

6

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
490		3.50	1.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	2-Cooper-Suhany
490		3.50	1.50	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	5-Dahl-Lepscier
490		3.50	1.50	5-Hayden-Murad	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
490		3.50	1.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	1-Geil-Geil
420		1.00	4.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	4-McCormick-Farkas
400		0.00	5.00	1-Mintz-Hall	6-Lafleur-Wishnev

7

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
620		5.00	0.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	1-Geil-Geil
170		3.00	2.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	2-Cooper-Suhany
170		3.00	2.00	5-Hayden-Murad	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
170		3.00	2.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	4-McCormick-Farkas
140		1.00	4.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	200	0.00	5.00	1-Mintz-Hall	6-Lafleur-Wishnev

8

Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
460		4.50	0.50	1-Mintz-Hall	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
460		4.50	0.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	1-Geil-Geil
430		2.50	2.50	5-Hayden-Murad	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
430		2.50	2.50	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	4-McCormick-Farkas
400		0.50	4.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	2-Cooper-Suhany
400		0.50	4.50	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	5-Dahl-Lepscier

9

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
460		5.00	0.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	1-Geil-Geil
430		3.50	1.50	5-Hayden-Murad	2-Cooper-Suhany
430		3.50	1.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
400		1.00	4.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
400		1.00	4.00	1-Mintz-Hall	5-Dahl-Lepscier
400		1.00	4.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	4-McCormick-Farkas

10

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
300		5.00	0.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	1-Geil-Geil
200		4.00	1.00	1-Mintz-Hall	5-Dahl-Lepscier
100		3.00	2.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
	120	2.00	3.00	5-Hayden-Murad	2-Cooper-Suhany
	150	1.00	4.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
	600	0.00	5.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	4-McCormick-Farkas

11

Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
100		4.50	0.50	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
100		4.50	0.50	5-Hayden-Murad	2-Cooper-Suhany
	140	3.00	2.00	1-Mintz-Hall	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	150	2.00	3.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	4-McCormick-Farkas
	170	1.00	4.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	1-Geil-Geil
	240	0.00	5.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	6-Lafleur-Wishnev

12

Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
690		5.00	0.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	1-Geil-Geil
630		3.50	1.50	5-Hayden-Murad	2-Cooper-Suhany
630		3.50	1.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
620		2.00	3.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	4-McCormick-Farkas
500		1.00	4.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
	200	0.00	5.00	1-Mintz-Hall	5-Dahl-Lepscier

13

Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	140	3.50	1.50	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	2-Cooper-Suhany
	140	3.50	1.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
	140	3.50	1.50	1-Mintz-Hall	4-McCormick-Farkas
	140	3.50	1.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	730	1.00	4.00	5-Hayden-Murad	1-Geil-Geil
	870	0.00	5.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	3-Fidelman-Fineberg

14

Dlr: East
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
690		5.00	0.00	5-Hayden-Murad	1-Geil-Geil
450		3.00	2.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
450		3.00	2.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
450		3.00	2.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	5-Dahl-Lepscier
200		1.00	4.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	2-Cooper-Suhany
170		0.00	5.00	1-Mintz-Hall	4-McCormick-Farkas

15

Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
650		5.00	0.00	1-Mintz-Hall	4-McCormick-Farkas
230		4.00	1.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
	480	1.50	3.50	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	2-Cooper-Suhany
	480	1.50	3.50	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
	480	1.50	3.50	5-Hayden-Murad	1-Geil-Geil
	480	1.50	3.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	5-Dahl-Lepscier

16

Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
200		4.50	0.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
200		4.50	0.50	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
100		3.00	2.00	1-Mintz-Hall	4-McCormick-Farkas
	110	1.00	4.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	2-Cooper-Suhany
	110	1.00	4.00	5-Hayden-Murad	1-Geil-Geil
	110	1.00	4.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	5-Dahl-Lepscier

17

Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
120		5.00	0.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	2-Cooper-Suhany
90		4.00	1.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	4-McCormick-Farkas
	50	2.50	2.50	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	1-Geil-Geil
	50	2.50	2.50	5-Hayden-Murad	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
	100	0.50	4.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	100	0.50	4.50	1-Mintz-Hall	3-Fidelman-Fineberg

18

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	420	4.00	1.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	1-Geil-Geil
	420	4.00	1.00	1-Mintz-Hall	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
	420	4.00	1.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	2-Cooper-Suhany
	460	1.00	4.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	4-McCormick-Farkas
	460	1.00	4.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	460	1.00	4.00	5-Hayden-Murad	6-Lafleur-Wishnev

19

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
500		5.00	0.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	2-Cooper-Suhany
450		4.00	1.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	1-Geil-Geil
420		3.00	2.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	4-McCormick-Farkas
140		1.50	3.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	5-Dahl-Lepscier
140		1.50	3.50	5-Hayden-Murad	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
	100	0.00	5.00	1-Mintz-Hall	3-Fidelman-Fineberg

20

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
200		5.00	0.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	2-Cooper-Suhany
100		4.00	1.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	1-Geil-Geil
	600	3.00	2.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	4-McCormick-Farkas
	660	1.50	3.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	660	1.50	3.50	5-Hayden-Murad	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
	690	0.00	5.00	1-Mintz-Hall	3-Fidelman-Fineberg

21

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
690		5.00	0.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	4-McCormick-Farkas
650		4.00	1.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
630		2.00	3.00	5-Hayden-Murad	5-Dahl-Lepscier
630		2.00	3.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
630		2.00	3.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	1-Geil-Geil
620		0.00	5.00	1-Mintz-Hall	2-Cooper-Suhany

22

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
300		5.00	0.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	4-McCormick-Farkas
200		4.00	1.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
170		3.00	2.00	5-Hayden-Murad	5-Dahl-Lepscier
150		2.00	3.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	1-Geil-Geil
140		1.00	4.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
100		0.00	5.00	1-Mintz-Hall	2-Cooper-Suhany

23

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
690		5.00	0.00	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	4-McCormick-Farkas
650		3.50	1.50	4-Updegraff-Resnik	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
650		3.50	1.50	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	1-Geil-Geil
630		1.00	4.00	5-Hayden-Murad	5-Dahl-Lepscier
630		1.00	4.00	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
630		1.00	4.00	1-Mintz-Hall	2-Cooper-Suhany

24

Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
50		4.50	0.50	3-vasilevsky-Gagnon	6-Lafleur-Wishnev
50		4.50	0.50	2-Brier-Tanenbaum	4-McCormick-Farkas
	400	3.00	2.00	4-Updegraff-Resnik	3-Fidelman-Fineberg
	430	1.00	4.00	5-Hayden-Murad	5-Dahl-Lepscier
	430	1.00	4.00	1-Mintz-Hall	2-Cooper-Suhany
	430	1.00	4.00	6-Mikkelson-Hancock	1-Geil-Geil