Bridge Results

Return to calendar page

Register on BridgeResults.net to be notified when results are posted!

Spring Mt. Bridge Club
12:30 pm ♦ Open Pairs
Saturday, February 21, 2015

Photo Gallery of Winners | ACBLmerge | ACBLscore | Legacy Display

Event: Saturday Afternoon Pairs	Session: Saturday Aft	Movement: MITCHELL
Date: February 21, 2015	Rating: Club Masterpoint	Section: F
Club No: 244830	Club: SPRING MOUNTAIN BRIDGE CL	Dir: Barbara Vasilevs
MP Limits: None/1500/300	Average: 60	Top: 5

Field strength: Mean: 1301 MP
Geomean: 459 MP
(based on 21 players)

Section F North-South - Pairs in strats: A=6 / B=5 / C=3

Group the Results

Section

A

B

C

N-S

2

C

1

1

1

75.50

0.60

N-S

5

C

2

2

-

69.00

0.42

N-S

4

B

-

-

64.00

George Vasilevsky

N-S

3

A

-

63.00

N-S

6

C

-

-

-

44.50

Rosemary Hayden

N-S

1

B

-

-

44.00

Section F East-West - Pairs in strats: A=6 / B=4 / C=2

Group the Results

Section

A

B

C

Barbara Dunkley

E-W

6

A

1

72.00

0.60

Barbara Mikkelson

Justine Hancock

E-W

1

B

2

1

71.50

0.42

Ernest Ledbetter

E-W

4

A

-

66.00

Jacqueline Harrigan

Judith Ann Gillespie

E-W

2

B

-

2

56.50

0.22

E-W

5

C

-

-

1

51.50

0.16

Monique Achtman

E-W

3

C

-

-

-

42.50

12 pairs - Pairs in strats: A=12 / B=9 / C=5
Click on a result to see the recap for this pair.

You can move from board to board by using the arrow keys on your keyboard.
		257	258	259	260	261	262	263	264	265	266	267	268	269	270	271	272	273	274	275	276	277	278	279	280

257

Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	50	5.00	0.00	5-Geil-Baltz	3-Achtman-Achtman
	90	4.00	1.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	6-Dunkley-Graese
	100	2.50	2.50	6-Poh-Fisher	5-Burke-Williams
	100	2.50	2.50	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	110	0.50	4.50	1-Hayden-Marder	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	110	0.50	4.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	2-Harrigan-Gillespie

258

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
50		5.00	0.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	6-Dunkley-Graese
	100	3.50	1.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	100	3.50	1.50	5-Geil-Baltz	3-Achtman-Achtman
	120	2.00	3.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	200	1.00	4.00	6-Poh-Fisher	5-Burke-Williams
	800	0.00	5.00	1-Hayden-Marder	1-Mikkelson-Hancock

259

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
430		5.00	0.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
400		2.50	2.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
400		2.50	2.50	6-Poh-Fisher	5-Burke-Williams
400		2.50	2.50	5-Geil-Baltz	3-Achtman-Achtman
400		2.50	2.50	4-Schanz-Harrington	6-Dunkley-Graese
120		0.00	5.00	1-Hayden-Marder	1-Mikkelson-Hancock

260

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
200		5.00	0.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
120		3.00	2.00	1-Hayden-Marder	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
120		3.00	2.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
120		3.00	2.00	5-Geil-Baltz	3-Achtman-Achtman
100		1.00	4.00	6-Poh-Fisher	5-Burke-Williams
	100	0.00	5.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	6-Dunkley-Graese

261

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	430	4.00	1.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	3-Achtman-Achtman
	430	4.00	1.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	430	4.00	1.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	5-Burke-Williams
	490	1.50	3.50	1-Hayden-Marder	6-Dunkley-Graese
	490	1.50	3.50	6-Poh-Fisher	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	990	0.00	5.00	5-Geil-Baltz	2-Harrigan-Gillespie

262

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
200		5.00	0.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	5-Burke-Williams
100		3.50	1.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
100		3.50	1.50	5-Geil-Baltz	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	90	2.00	3.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	3-Achtman-Achtman
	110	0.50	4.50	1-Hayden-Marder	6-Dunkley-Graese
	110	0.50	4.50	6-Poh-Fisher	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

263

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
100		4.50	0.50	5-Geil-Baltz	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
100		4.50	0.50	4-Schanz-Harrington	5-Burke-Williams
	620	2.00	3.00	1-Hayden-Marder	6-Dunkley-Graese
	620	2.00	3.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	620	2.00	3.00	6-Poh-Fisher	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	660	0.00	5.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	3-Achtman-Achtman

264

Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	110	5.00	0.00	6-Poh-Fisher	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	120	3.50	1.50	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	3-Achtman-Achtman
	120	3.50	1.50	5-Geil-Baltz	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	130	2.00	3.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	5-Burke-Williams
	150	1.00	4.00	1-Hayden-Marder	6-Dunkley-Graese
	180	0.00	5.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	1-Mikkelson-Hancock

265

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
460		5.00	0.00	1-Hayden-Marder	5-Burke-Williams
430		3.50	1.50	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
430		3.50	1.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	6-Dunkley-Graese
400		1.50	3.50	6-Poh-Fisher	3-Achtman-Achtman
400		1.50	3.50	5-Geil-Baltz	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	50	0.00	5.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

266

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
660		5.00	0.00	6-Poh-Fisher	3-Achtman-Achtman
620		2.50	2.50	4-Schanz-Harrington	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
620		2.50	2.50	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
620		2.50	2.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	6-Dunkley-Graese
620		2.50	2.50	5-Geil-Baltz	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
170		0.00	5.00	1-Hayden-Marder	5-Burke-Williams

267

Dlr: South
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
170		5.00	0.00	6-Poh-Fisher	3-Achtman-Achtman
100		4.00	1.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	6-Dunkley-Graese
50		3.00	2.00	5-Geil-Baltz	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	50	2.00	3.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	100	1.00	4.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	130	0.00	5.00	1-Hayden-Marder	5-Burke-Williams

268

Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
100		5.00	0.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
50		4.00	1.00	5-Geil-Baltz	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	100	3.00	2.00	1-Hayden-Marder	5-Burke-Williams
	130	1.50	3.50	4-Schanz-Harrington	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	130	1.50	3.50	6-Poh-Fisher	3-Achtman-Achtman
	200	0.00	5.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	6-Dunkley-Graese

269

Dlr: North
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
200		5.00	0.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
140		4.00	1.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	5-Burke-Williams
100		3.00	2.00	6-Poh-Fisher	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	100	1.50	3.50	1-Hayden-Marder	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	100	1.50	3.50	5-Geil-Baltz	6-Dunkley-Graese
	110	0.00	5.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	3-Achtman-Achtman

270

Dlr: East
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
50		4.50	0.50	4-Schanz-Harrington	3-Achtman-Achtman
50		4.50	0.50	5-Geil-Baltz	6-Dunkley-Graese
	100	2.50	2.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	5-Burke-Williams
	100	2.50	2.50	6-Poh-Fisher	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	110	0.50	4.50	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	110	0.50	4.50	1-Hayden-Marder	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

271

Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
140		5.00	0.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	5-Burke-Williams
110		4.00	1.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	3-Achtman-Achtman
	100	2.00	3.00	1-Hayden-Marder	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	100	2.00	3.00	6-Poh-Fisher	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	100	2.00	3.00	5-Geil-Baltz	6-Dunkley-Graese
	300	0.00	5.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	1-Mikkelson-Hancock

272

Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
510		5.00	0.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
400		4.00	1.00	5-Geil-Baltz	6-Dunkley-Graese
200		3.00	2.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	5-Burke-Williams
100		2.00	3.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	3-Achtman-Achtman
	50	1.00	4.00	6-Poh-Fisher	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	110	0.00	5.00	1-Hayden-Marder	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

273

Dlr: North
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	520	4.00	1.00	5-Geil-Baltz	5-Burke-Williams
	520	4.00	1.00	1-Hayden-Marder	3-Achtman-Achtman
	520	4.00	1.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	1020	1.00	4.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	1020	1.00	4.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	6-Dunkley-Graese
	1020	1.00	4.00	6-Poh-Fisher	1-Mikkelson-Hancock

274

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
660		5.00	0.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	6-Dunkley-Graese
620		4.00	1.00	5-Geil-Baltz	5-Burke-Williams
600		2.00	3.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
600		2.00	3.00	1-Hayden-Marder	3-Achtman-Achtman
600		2.00	3.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
150		0.00	5.00	6-Poh-Fisher	1-Mikkelson-Hancock

275

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
400		4.50	0.50	4-Schanz-Harrington	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
400		4.50	0.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
100		3.00	2.00	1-Hayden-Marder	3-Achtman-Achtman
	50	2.00	3.00	6-Poh-Fisher	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	150	0.50	4.50	5-Geil-Baltz	5-Burke-Williams
	150	0.50	4.50	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	6-Dunkley-Graese

276

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	600	5.00	0.00	5-Geil-Baltz	5-Burke-Williams
	690	3.00	2.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	690	3.00	2.00	1-Hayden-Marder	3-Achtman-Achtman
	690	3.00	2.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	1370	1.00	4.00	6-Poh-Fisher	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	1430	0.00	5.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	6-Dunkley-Graese

277

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
50		4.50	0.50	5-Geil-Baltz	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
50		4.50	0.50	2-Chun-Sulerud	3-Achtman-Achtman
	110	3.00	2.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	5-Burke-Williams
	130	1.00	4.00	6-Poh-Fisher	6-Dunkley-Graese
	130	1.00	4.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	130	1.00	4.00	1-Hayden-Marder	2-Harrigan-Gillespie

278

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
	150	4.00	1.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	150	4.00	1.00	1-Hayden-Marder	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	150	4.00	1.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	3-Achtman-Achtman
	600	2.00	3.00	5-Geil-Baltz	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter
	630	0.50	4.50	6-Poh-Fisher	6-Dunkley-Graese
	630	0.50	4.50	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	5-Burke-Williams

279

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
200		5.00	0.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	3-Achtman-Achtman
100		3.50	1.50	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	5-Burke-Williams
100		3.50	1.50	1-Hayden-Marder	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	600	2.00	3.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
	630	1.00	4.00	6-Poh-Fisher	6-Dunkley-Graese
	660	0.00	5.00	5-Geil-Baltz	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter

280

Dlr: West
Vul: None

N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W	N-S	E-W
430		5.00	0.00	2-Chun-Sulerud	3-Achtman-Achtman
400		3.00	2.00	4-Schanz-Harrington	1-Mikkelson-Hancock
400		3.00	2.00	3-Caplan-Vasilevsky	5-Burke-Williams
400		3.00	2.00	1-Hayden-Marder	2-Harrigan-Gillespie
	50	0.50	4.50	6-Poh-Fisher	6-Dunkley-Graese
	50	0.50	4.50	5-Geil-Baltz	4-Fineberg-Ledbetter