| 1 |
♠AK4
♥T73
♦K742
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
♠86
♥42
♦A863
♣AQ943
|
♠QT5
♥AJ9
♦JT95
♣T75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
6 |
6 |
9 |
9 |
7 |
South |
6 |
6 |
9 |
9 |
7 |
East |
7 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
West |
7 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
140 |
|
1.50 |
0.50 |
2♠ |
S |
3 |
♣2 |
- |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
140 |
|
1.50 |
0.50 |
2♠ |
S |
3 |
♣A |
- |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
100 |
|
0.00 |
2.00 |
4♣ |
W |
-2 |
♥10 |
-1 |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
3-Catt-Alford |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 2 |
♠9732
♥K62
♦QJ6
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
♠T64
♥AQJT874
♦T
♣82
|
♠KQ85
♥95
♦A7
♣AKT76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
3 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
South |
3 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
East |
10 |
5 |
11 |
9 |
6 |
West |
9 |
5 |
11 |
9 |
6 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
50 |
|
2.00 |
0.00 |
2N |
E |
-1 |
♦5 |
-1 |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
|
140 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
3♥ |
W |
3 |
♦6 |
+2 |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
3-Catt-Alford |
|
200 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
2♥ |
W |
5 |
♦Q |
- |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 3 |
♠J32
♥A
♦KQJ954
♣K76
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q54
♥J8432
♦AT7
♣JT
|
♠87
♥K97
♦82
♣Q95432
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
7 |
11 |
8 |
11 |
10 |
South |
7 |
11 |
8 |
11 |
10 |
East |
5 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
West |
5 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
480 |
|
2.00 |
0.00 |
4♠ |
S |
6 |
♠4 |
+1 |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
3-Catt-Alford |
420 |
|
1.00 |
1.00 |
4♠ |
S |
4 |
♥2 |
-1 |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
170 |
|
0.00 |
2.00 |
2♠ |
N |
4 |
♥3 |
-1 |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 4 |
♠8654
♥K2
♦K972
♣T43
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
♠AK
♥JT853
♦AQ85
♣86
|
♠93
♥Q9764
♦J4
♣AKJ9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
5 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
South |
5 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
East |
8 |
8 |
10 |
5 |
8 |
West |
8 |
8 |
10 |
5 |
8 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
|
170 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
2♥ |
W |
4 |
♠8 |
- |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
3-Catt-Alford |
|
620 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
4♥ |
W |
4 |
♦7 |
- |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
|
650 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
4♥ |
E |
5 |
♠6 |
-1 |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 5 |
♠A854
♥Q96
♦QJ9
♣A85
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
♠T63
♥JT
♦A7642
♣942
|
♠K9
♥832
♦KT53
♣QJ76
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
8 |
6 |
10 |
11 |
9 |
South |
8 |
6 |
10 |
11 |
9 |
East |
5 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
West |
5 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
650 |
|
2.00 |
0.00 |
4♠ |
N |
5 |
♣J |
- |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
3-Catt-Alford |
630 |
|
1.00 |
1.00 |
3N |
N |
4 |
♣6 |
+1 |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
620 |
|
0.00 |
2.00 |
4♠ |
N |
4 |
♦3 |
-1 |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 6 |
♠T7632
♥AJ63
♦J4
♣T7
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
♠J984
♥K8
♦AQ32
♣J53
|
♠AQ
♥Q97
♦76
♣AQ8642
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
3 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
South |
3 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
East |
10 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
9 |
West |
10 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
300 |
|
2.00 |
0.00 |
3N |
E |
-3 |
♦10 |
+3 |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
|
130 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
3♣ |
E |
4 |
♦8 |
- |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
|
630 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
3N |
E |
4 |
♠3 |
-1 |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
3-Catt-Alford |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 7 |
♠J8732
♥A53
♦9
♣AK64
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
♠Q654
♥964
♦Q32
♣Q85
|
♠T9
♥KJ
♦AJT864
♣T92
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
10 |
6 |
10 |
9 |
7 |
South |
10 |
6 |
10 |
9 |
7 |
East |
3 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
West |
3 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
620 |
|
2.00 |
0.00 |
4♥ |
N |
4 |
♠4 |
- |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
170 |
|
1.00 |
1.00 |
2♥ |
S |
4 |
♠6 |
- |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
3-Catt-Alford |
|
200 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
4♥ |
N |
-2 |
♦3 |
-2 |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 8 |
♠AT2
♥J43
♦8532
♣T72
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
♠J87
♥Q
♦Q96
♣AKJ983
|
♠543
♥AK652
♦JT4
♣64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
4 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
South |
4 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
East |
7 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
West |
7 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
50 |
|
1.50 |
0.50 |
2♣ |
E |
-1 |
♠2 |
- |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
3-Catt-Alford |
50 |
|
1.50 |
0.50 |
2♥ |
E |
-1 |
♠9 |
-1 |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
|
110 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
2♣ |
E |
3 |
♦2 |
-2 |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
| 10 |
♠5
♥JT9
♦7654
♣AQT94
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both |
|
♠QT863
♥A3
♦K8
♣KJ72
|
♠AK97
♥KQ86
♦QJT
♣63
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
|
♣ |
♦ |
♥ |
♠ |
NT |
North |
5 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
South |
5 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
East |
7 |
7 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
West |
8 |
7 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|
N-S |
E-W |
N-S |
E-W |
Contract |
Lead |
ETF |
N-S |
E-W |
|
100 |
2.00 |
0.00 |
4♠ |
S |
-1 |
♣6 |
+7 |
1-Lederman-Delugish |
2-Shimokubo-Lee |
|
170 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
2♠ |
E |
4 |
♦7 |
- |
2-Guttman-Guttman |
3-Catt-Alford |
|
600 |
0.00 |
2.00 |
3N |
E |
3 |
♦3 |
- |
3-Farnham-Laybourne |
1-Petrytus-Phaneuf |
ETF: Extra Trick Factor: Number of tricks that N-S achieved relative to the Double Dummy expectations.
|
